Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-tr9hg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T17:51:15.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RURAL, SUBURBAN AND URBAN DIFFERENCES IN THE SELF-DIAGNOSIS OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN THE UNITED STATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

ANTWAN JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, OH, USA
FRANKLIN GOZA
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, OH, USA

Summary

This study explores rural, suburban and urban differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) using the 2005 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey conducted in the United States. Although areal context is not often considered in morbidity studies, this study evaluates the importance of place of residence given that areas offer differential access to health infrastructures and different contextual factors that could affect health. Also examined is the role of geographic heterogeneity on the recent racial divergence in CHD in the United States. Results indicate that area of residence is associated with CHD diagnosis, net of health and demographic variables. The area-stratified analysis documents that rural residents are most impacted by exercise and smoking, while being male or above age 50 are most detrimental for suburban residents. In addition, the racial divergence in CHD is driven by differences in rural locales. These findings indicate a disparate impact of geography on CHD and highlight the need for health research to take into account areal context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)