Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:59:46.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Third British Empire: Transplanting the English Shire to Wales, Scotland, Ireland, and America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Myron C. Noonkester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During their hegemony in world affairs, the English exported persons, commodities, and texts to regions that they absorbed into a widening pale of influence. Discussion of these ventures has consumed a vast literature. What once seemed to be a simple matter of transporting Protestantism (or convicts) into an overseas wilderness or making distant lands safe for English farming and trade now seems a matter too complex to be captured in a metaphor or an alliterative catchphrase. Yet it remains a matter of historical fascination that a relatively small archipelago off the coast of Europe not only could become the first “modern” nation-state but could then transform itself into a vast global empire, ultimately making it seem as if the affairs of this proverbial workshop encompassed world history itself. For many years, such success seemed too evident for investigation, and scholarly attention turned toward explaining how this achievement unraveled or declined. The result has been a quest for detailed precision and microhistorical reconstruction on the part of those who have adopted an “empirical,” geopolitical approach to imperialism and an outpouring of criticism from those who, on the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, have penned polemical classics whose evocative, if not evidentiary, power envisioned revolution as historical destiny and a means of filling the intellectual and political void left by imperial evacuation. Their disagreements notwithstanding, however, both categories of imperial commentary display relative innocence of the paradox that imperial power represented: that, despite voluble criticism, it enjoyed eclipsing success for a time and produced effects whose mysteries continue to survive postcolonial deconstruction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 251 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fieldhouse, D. K., The Colonial Empires: A Comparative Survey from the Eighteenth Century (1966; reprint, New York, 1971)Google Scholar, Economics and Empire, 1830–1914 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1973)Google Scholar; Robinson, Ronald, Gallaher, John, and Denny, Alice, Africa and the Victorians: The Climax of Imperialism (New York, 1961)Google Scholar.

2 Hobson, J. A., Imperialism: A Study (London, 1902)Google Scholar; Lenin, V. I., Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (New York, 1939)Google Scholar.

3 Allen, David Grayson, In English Ways (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1981)Google Scholar; Cressy, David, Coming Over: Migration and Communication between England and New England in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar; Kishlansky, Mark A., “Community and Continuity: A Review of Selected Works on English Local History,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 37 (1980): 139–46Google Scholar; Murrin, John, “Anglicizing an American Colony: The Transformation of Provincial Massachusetts” (Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1966)Google Scholar, and “The Great Inversion, or Court versus Country: A Comparison of the Revolution Settlements in England (1688–1721) and America (1776–1816),” in Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776, ed. Pocock, J. G. A. (Princeton, N.J., 1980), pp. 368–453Google Scholar; Liss, Peggy K., Atlantic Empires: The Network of Trade and Revolution, 1713–1826 (Baltimore, 1983)Google Scholar; Steele, Ian K., The English Atlantic, 1675–1740 (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Greene, Jack P., Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities of the British Empire and the United States, 1607–1788 (Athens, Ga., 1986)Google Scholar; Fischer, David Hackett, Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (New York, 1989)Google Scholar; Hoffer, Peter Charles, Law and People in Colonial America (Baltimore, 1992)Google Scholar; Clark, J. C. D., The Language of Liberty, 1660–1832: Political Discourse and Social Dynamics in the Anglo-American World (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar; Lawson, Phillip, ed., Parliament and the Atlantic Empire (Edinburgh, 1994)Google Scholar; Horn, James, Adapting to a New World: English Settlement in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1994)Google Scholar; Canny, Nicholas, ed., Europeans on the Move: Studies on European Migration, 1500–1800 (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar; Bremer, Francis J., Congregational Communion: Clerical Friendship in the Anglo-American Puritan Community, 1610–1692 (Boston, 1994)Google Scholar; Thompson, Roger, Mobility and Migration: East Anglian Founders of New England, 1629–1640 (Amherst, Mass., 1994)Google Scholar.

4 See Pocock, J. G. A., “British History: A Plea for a New Subject,” Journal of Modern History 47 (1975): 601–21Google Scholar, and “The Limits and Divisions of British History: In Search of the Unknown Subject,” American Historical Review 87 (1982): 311–36Google Scholar; Russell, Conrad, “The British Problem and the English Civil War,” History 72 (1987): 395–415Google Scholar; Levack, Brian P., The Formation of the British State: England, Scotland and Union, 1603–1707 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar; Davies, R. R., The British Isles, 1100–1500: Comparisons, Contrasts and Connections (Edinburgh, 1988)Google Scholar; Kearney, Hugh, The British Isles (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar; Clark, J. C. D., “English History's Forgotten Context: Scotland, Ireland, Wales,” Historical Journal 32 (1989): 211–28Google Scholar; Sher, Richard B. and Smitten, Jeffrey R., eds., Scotland and America in the Age of the Enlightenment (Princeton, N.J., 1990)Google Scholar; Williamson, Arthur H., “From the Invention of Great Britain to the Creation of British History: A New Historiography,” Journal of British Studies 29 (1990): 267–76Google Scholar; Colley, Linda, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, Conn., 1992)Google Scholar; Canny, Nicholas P., The Elizabethan Conquest of Ireland: A Pattern Established, 1565–1576 (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Crawford, Jon G., Anglicizing the Government of Ireland: The Irish Privy Council and the Expansion of Tudor Rule, 1556–1578 (Dublin, 1993)Google Scholar; Lennon, Colm, Sixteenth Century Ireland: The Incomplete Conquest (New York, 1994)Google Scholar.

5 For variously nuanced approaches, see Hechter, Michael, Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536–1966 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1975)Google Scholar; Wormald, Jenny, “The Creation of Britain: Multiple Kingdoms or Core and Colonies?” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 62 (1992): 175–94Google Scholar; Ellis, Steven, Tudor Frontiers and Noble Power: The Making of the British State (Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar; Ellis, Steven G. and Barber, Sarah, eds., Conquest and Union: Fashioning a British State, 1485–1725 (London, 1995)Google Scholar; Bradshaw, Brendan and Morrill, John, eds., The British Problem, c. 1534–1707: State Formation in the Atlantic Archipelago (New York, 1996)Google Scholar.

6 For more traditional but still valuable approaches, see Andrews, Charles M., The Colonial Background of the American Revolution (New Haven, Conn., 1931)Google Scholar, The Colonial Period of American History (New Haven, Conn., 1934)Google Scholar; Labaree, L. W., Royal Government in America: A Study of the British Colonial System before 1783 (New York, 1958)Google Scholar; Labaree, L. W. and Christie, Ian R., Empire or Independence, 1760–1776 (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Tucker, Robert W. and Hendrickson, David D., The Fall of the First British Empire: Origins of the War of American Independence (Baltimore, 1982)Google Scholar; Baxter, Stephen B., ed., England's Rise to Greatness, 1660–1763 (Berkeley, 1983)Google Scholar.

7 See, e.g., Maitland, F. W., The Constitutional History of England (London, 1931), p. 233Google Scholar; Barnes, T. G., Somerset, 1625–1640: A County's Government during the Personal Rule (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), pp. 124 ff.Google Scholar; Russell, Conrad, The Crisis of Parliaments, 1509–1660 (Oxford, 1971), pp. 48–49Google Scholar; Williams, Penry, The Tudor Regime (Oxford, 1979), p. 407Google Scholar; Hirst, Derek, Authority and Conflict: England, 1603–1658 (Cambridge, Mass., 1986), p. 43Google Scholar.

8 See, e.g., Morgan, Edmund S., American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia (New York, 1975)Google Scholar.

9 Nevertheless, this is precisely the logic employed, quite differently, of course, by historians such as John Morrill working on the “British Problem” and J. C. D. Clark working on Anglo-American governing culture.

10 Loyn, H. R., The Governance of Anglo-Saxon England, 500–1087 (Stanford, Calif., 1987), pp. 138–40, 194–96Google Scholar; Harmer, F. E., Anglo-Saxon Writs (Manchester, 1952), pp. 48–50, 206Google Scholar.

11 Kapelle, William E., The Norman Conquest of the North: The Region and Its Transformation, 1100–1135 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1979), pp. 76–83Google Scholar.

12 On twinned shrievalties, see Palmer, Robert, The County Courts of Medieval England, 1150–1350 (Princeton, N.J., 1981), p. 29Google Scholar; Journal of the House of Commons (CJ), 1:74–80, 88–92, 93Google Scholar; Journal of the House of Lords (LJ), 1:464, 658, 660, 684, 694Google Scholar; D'Ewes, Simonds, A Compleat Journal, etc. (London, 1693), pp. 50, 129Google Scholar; Historical Manuscripts Commission (HMC), London, Salisbury MSS, 1:164; Hartley, T. E., ed., Proceedings in the Parliaments of Elizabeth I, 1559–1581 (Leicester, 1981), pp. 251, 252, 386, 390, 399, 402, 409, 410Google Scholar; British Library (BL), London, Harleian MS 165, fols. 263r–v, December 30, 1643.

13 Public Record Office (PRO), London, Privy Council (PC) 2/45, p. 294, December 20, 1635; Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1635, p. 487, November 18, 1635; PRO, State Papers (SP) 16/327/2; PC 2/45, p. 69; PC 2/46, p. 456, November 28, 1636; PC 2/51, p. 109, December 1, 1639.

14 On ship money, see Gill, A. A. M., “Ship Money during the Personal Rule of Charles I: Politics, Ideology and the Law, 1634 to 1640” (Ph.D. diss., Sheffield University, 1990)Google Scholar. On Peterloo, see the quotation in Parry, Jonathan, The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in England (New Haven, Conn., 1993), p. 81Google Scholar.

15 See Redlich, Josef, The Procedure of the House of Commons: A Study of Its History and Its Present Form, 3 vols. (London, 1908), 2:53Google Scholar; Speck, W. A., A Concise History of Britain, 1707–1975 (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 4–6Google Scholar.

16 Evidence of the sentimental connection of sheriffs with due process in the empire may be found in nn. 27, 42, and 43 below and in England in “Proposals from … Sir Thomas Fairfax and the Counsell of his Army,” October 1647, BL, E. 411 (5), pp. 3–5; “Proposals from the Parliament to the King for Peace,” May 1647, BL, E. 390 (4), pp. 7–8; SirHale, Matthew, History of the Common Law, ed. Gray, Charles M. (Chicago, 1971), pp. 76, 96, 114, 115, 160Google Scholar; Emerson, Ralph Waldo, English Traits (Boston, 1903), p. 36Google Scholar: Macaulay, T. B., History of England from the Accession of James II, 8 vols. (London, 1876), 1:78, 274, 297Google Scholar. The lowering of shrieval accounting thresholds, which, in turn, affected the establishment of a routine shrieval due process, may best be seen in the records themselves. See PRO, SP 1/102, fol. 5; SP 18/72/31, I and II; Exchequer (E) 126/5, fols. 218–19; E 368/305, 675; BL, Additional Charter 18498, Cotton MS Titus B.IV., fols. 269–72.

17 Note, e.g., the usual specifications that J.P.s and sheriffs had no authority outside their counties, e.g., in the case of J.P.s in Dalton, Michael, The Countrey Justice (1619; reprint, London, 1973), p. 21Google Scholar.

18 Lambarde, William, Archeion (London, 1635), p. 266Google Scholar.

19 Bowen, Catherine Drinker, “Historians Courageous,” in William Lambarde, Elizabethan Jurist, 1536–1601, ed. Dunkel, William (New Brunswick, N.J., 1965), p. xivGoogle Scholar. On a recent controversy over Lambarde's conformist or radical attitudes, see Alsop, J. D. and Stevens, W. M., “William Lambarde and the Elizabethan Polity,” Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History 8 (1987): 235–53Google Scholar; and Prest, Wilfrid, “William Lambarde, Elizabethan Law Reform and Early Stuart Politics,” Journal of British Studies 34 (1995): 464–80Google Scholar. The eventual effect of documentation on magisterial practice may be seen in Rosenheim, James M., “Documenting Authority: Texts and Magistracy in Restoration Society,” Albion 25 (1993): 591–604Google Scholar. The metaphor of the shire was often employed in a genre-extending way. See, e.g., Bernard, Richard, The Isle of Man or, the Legall Proceeding in Man-shire against Sinne (London, 1630)Google Scholar.

20 Lambarde, William, Eirenarcha (1581; reprint, London: Abingdon, 1980), pp. 510–11Google Scholar.

21 See Smith, A. Hassell, County and Court (Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar; BL, Lansdowne MS 167, fols. 16, 18, 90, 92, 113; PRO, Signet Office 3/4, July 1609; Index (IND) 6744, July 1607; SP 14/121/48, 49, 125; SP 14/94/128; CJ 1:679, 695, 731, 771, 773, 781.

22 Elburne, Richard, A Plain Pathway to Plantation (London, 1624)Google Scholar, cited in Hill, Christopher, The English Bible and the Seventeenth Century Revolution (New York, 1994), p. 27Google Scholar.

23 Richardson, H. G. and Sayles, G. O., The Irish Parliament in the Middle Ages (Philadelphia, 1952), p. 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Ellis, Steven G., “Tudor Policy and the Kildare Ascendancy in the Lordship of Ireland, 1496–1534,” Irish Historical Studies 20 (1977): 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Otway-Ruthven, A. J., “Anglo-Irish Shire Government in the Thirteenth Century,” Irish Historical Studies 5 (1946–1947): 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Quinn, D. B., “Anglo-Irish Government, 1485–1534,” Irish Historical Studies 1 (1938): 354–81Google Scholar; Canny, , Elizabethan Conquest (n. 4 above), pp. 17–18Google Scholar; SirDavies, John, Historical Relations, or A Discovery of the True Causes Why Ireland Was Never Entirely Subdued Nor Brought Under Obedience to the Crown of England Until the Beginning of the Reign of King James of Happy Memory (Dublin, 1664), pp. 223, 228, 235, 238Google Scholar; Calendar of State Papers, Ireland (CSPI), vol. 3, 1586–88 (London, 1877), p. 122Google Scholar.

27 Hale (n. 16 above), pp. 114–15.

28 J. Davies, pp. 13, 89, 107, 113. See also Pawlisch, Hans, “Sir John Davies, the Ancient Constitution and the Civil Law,” Historical Journal 23 (1980): 689–702Google Scholar, “Sir John Davies' Law Reports and the Case of Proxies,” Irish Jurist 17 (1982): 368–83Google Scholar, and Sir John Davies and the Conquest of Ireland: A Study in Legal Imperialism (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar.

29 PRO, SP 63/6/37, Anonymous to the Queen, June 1562, cited in Canny, , Elizabethan Conquest, p. 50Google Scholar.

30 PRO, SP 62/2/63 (CSPI, 1509–73 [London, 1860], p. 148Google Scholar), August [?], 1558.

31 J. Davies, pp. 126–27. I owe the point about Irish manorial courts to a reader for the Journal of British Studies.

32 PRO, SP 63/60/25 (CSPI, 1574–85 [London, 1867], p. 130Google Scholar), President Drury to the Council, March 24, 1578. See also Canny, , Elizabethan Conquest (n. 4 above), p. 67Google Scholar.

33 PRO, SP 63/112/261 (CSPI, 1574–85, p. 531).

34 For seneschals and the troubles of the Elizabethans in imposing their ways on Ireland, see Brady, Ciaran, The Chief Governors: The Rise and Fall of Reform Government in Tudor Ireland, 1536–1588 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 29, 95, 271 ff.Google Scholar, 273, 276–77, 281, 287. See also PRO, SP 63/96/171 (CSPI, 1574–85, p. 405), Thomas Norreys to the Lords Justices, October 11, 1582; Lee, Thomas, “A Brief Declaration of the Government of Ireland,” in Desiderata Curiosa Hibernica, vol. 1, ed. Lodge, J. (Dublin, 1772), p. 95Google Scholar; Canny, , Elizabethan Conquest, pp. 113, 118Google Scholar. See also PRO, SP 63/83/31 (CSPI, 1574–85, p. 305), Lord Deputy to Sheriffs, May 22, 1581; ibid, pp. 308, 344.

35 See comment to de Tocqueville, Alexis, “The Sheriffs are Protestants,” in Journeys to England and Ireland, ed. Mayer, J. P., trans. Lawrence, G. and Mayer, K.P. (New Haven, Conn., 1958), p. 151Google Scholar.

36 Ibid., p. 145, information from the Bishop of Kilkenny, July 24, 1835.

37 Ibid., p. 177.

38 Auchmuty, James Johnston, Lecky: A Biographical and Critical Essay (Dublin, 1945), pp. 23–24Google Scholar.

39 “For Certain Ordinances in the King's Majesty's Dominions and Principality of Wales,” 1543, Statutes of the Realm, 11 vols. (London, 1810–1828), 3:930–31Google Scholar, 34 & 35 Hen. VIII, c. 26. See also J. Davies (n. 26 above), pp. 117–18.

40 SirBlackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books (Chicago, 1899), 1:95Google Scholar.

41 Webb, Stephen Saunders, The Governors-General: The English Army and the Definition of the Empire, 1569–1681 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1979)Google Scholar. On the West Indies, see ibid. For Virginia, see Hening, W., ed., The Statutes at Large, 13 vols. (Richmond, Va., 1819–1823), 1:224Google Scholar. For Massachusetts, see Warden, G. B., Boston, 1689–1776 (Boston, 1970), p. 43Google Scholar.

42 Boyd, Julian P., “The Sheriff in Colonial North Carolina,” North Carolina Historical Review 5 (1928): 152Google Scholar; Saunders, William, ed., Colonial Records of North Carolina (Raleigh, N.C., 1886–1890), 4:175, October 15, 1736Google Scholar.

43 Brown, Richard M., The South Carolina Regulators (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), pp. 64, 69–71Google Scholar.

44 Ibid., pp. 70–71. See also Cooper, Thomas and McCord, David J., eds., Statutes of South Carolina, 10 vols. (Columbia, S.C., 1836–1841), 4:298–302Google Scholar.

45 Russell, Conrad, The Causes of the English Civil War (Oxford, 1990), pp. 40–41Google Scholar.

46 Malcolm, C. A., “The Office of Sheriff in Scotland: Its Origin and Early Development,” Scottish Historical Review 20 (1923): 129, 131–32, 290Google Scholar. See also MacQueen, Hector L., Common Law and Feudal Society in Medieval Scotland (Edinburgh, 1993), pp. 34–35, 54–55, 138–39, 188–89Google Scholar.

47 Malcolm, pp. 296–98.

48 Brown, P. Hume, History of Scotland, 3 vols. (1900; reprint, New York, 1971), 2:55Google Scholar. Sir Hew Campbell, one of the negotiators, was sheriff of Ayr. See also Wormald, Jenny, “An Early Modern Postscript: The Sandlaw Dispute, 1546,” in The Settlement of Disputes in Early Medieval Europe, ed. Davies, Wendy and Fouracre, Paul (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 194, 198Google Scholar.

49 Malcolm (n. 46 above), pp. 304–7.

50 “An Act for an Union of the Two Kingdoms of England and Scotland,” 1707, Statutes of the Realm (n. 39 above), 8:566–77Google Scholar, 6 Anne, c. 11.

51 Whetstone, Ann E., Scottish County Government in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries (Edinburgh, 1981), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

52 Ibid., p. 3. The jurisdiction of Scottish sheriffs was vast but vaguely defined. It included original jurisdiction in civil cases and responsibility for adjudicating alleged petty crimes.

53 “An Act for Discharging the Attendance of Noblemen, etc.,” 1709, Statutes of the Realm, 9:244–46Google Scholar, 8 Anne, c. 16; Agnew, Andrew, A History of the Hereditary Sheriffs of Galloway (Edinburgh 1864), p. 493Google Scholar; PRO, SP 57/13/188–92, Memorandum on Landholding and Heritable Jurisdictions, [1717?], cited in Whetstone, p. 3.

54 Malcolm (n. 46 above), p. 310; PRO, SP 54/32/18, June 13 and 17, 1746; SP 54/34/7b, October 13, 1746; SP 54/37/32, November 25, 1747.

55 Whetstone, p. 4.

56 Ibid., p. 5.

57 Lockhart, J. G., Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, 7 vols. (Edinburgh and London, 1837–1838), 1:404Google Scholar, cited in Gill, Stephen, William Wordsworth: A Life (Oxford, 1989), pp. 216–17Google Scholar. See also Clark, Robert, A View of the Office of Sheriff in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1824)Google Scholar; and, for later duties of Scottish sheriffs, see Prest, John, Liberty and Locality: Parliament, Permissive Legislation and Ratepayers' Democracies in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1990), p. 188Google Scholar.

58 PRO, SP 63/127/4 (CSPI, 1586–88, p. 212), Archbishop Loftus to Lord Burghley, December 4, 1586.

59 PRO, Chancery 3, Elizabeth I, bundle 113, no. 85.

60 Calendar of Wynn of Gwydir Papers (Aberystwyth, 1926), no. 135, December 16, 1592Google Scholar.

61 PRO, SP 12/39/87. I owe the point about Hoby's literary achievement to Professor Melvin Tucker.

62 PRO, SP 12/235/18.

63 PRO, SP 14/111/16, November 13, 1619.

64 Calendar of Wynn of Gwydir Papers, nos. 357, September 10, 1605; 365, November 25, 1605; 368; 392, February 5, 1606; and 548, November 8, 1610. See also HMC, Bath Longleat MSS, 5:201.

65 BL, Harleian MSS 3992, fols. 64 and 65; 6994, fol. 40; 6997, fol. 75; HMC, Salisbury MSS, 8:452, 454; 14: 3, 81; Williams, Penry, The Council in the Marches of Wales (Cardiff, 1958), pp. 25, 82, 120–22, 196Google Scholar; Henry E. Huntington Library, San Marino, Calif., Ellesmere MS 7091, Bridgewater to Edward Vaughn, sheriff of Cardiganshire, November 7, 1631.

66 Huntington Library, Ellesmere MS 7199, Owen Edwards to Thomas Cartwright, October 9, 1635.

67 Huntington Library, Ellesmere MS 7424, Lord Keeper Coventry to the earl of Bridgewater, August 29, 1637.

68 Huntington Library, Ellesmere MS 7308 (draft), Bridgewater to Lord Keeper Finch, November 4, 1640.

69 Labaree, L. W., ed., Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, 2 vols. (New York, 1967)Google Scholar, vol. 1, no. 98. Number 274 reveals that sheriffs in Bermuda who did not account were to be suspended from office.

70 Hening (n. 41 above), 3:246–50.

71 Northhampton County Records 1651–54, pp. 66, 632, cited in Karraker, Cyrus, The Seventeenth Century Sheriff: A Comparative Study of the Sheriff in England and in the Chesapeake Colonies, 1607–1689 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1930), p. 74Google Scholar.

72 Karraker, p. 73; Hening, 1:392. On English selection, see PRO, SP 9/6.

73 Brown, R., Regulators (n. 43 above), pp. 81, 82, 109Google ScholarPubMed.

74 Brogan, Hugh, The Penguin History of the United States of America (New York, 1990), p. 166Google Scholar.

75 Soule, Allen, ed., Laws of Vermont (Montpelier, Vt., 1964), pp. 113 ffGoogle Scholar. See also ibid., pp. 117 ff.

76 Calendar of State Papers, Colonial, 1689–92, pp. 117–18, 205–6, cited in Barnes, Viola F., The Dominion of New England: A Study in British Colonial Policy (New York, 1960), p. 255Google Scholar, n. 56.

77 Keith, Charles, Chronicles of Pennsylvania, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1917), 2:561–62Google Scholar.

78 Hazard, Samuel, ed., Pennsylvania Archives, 1st ser. (Philadelphia, 1854), 10:285Google Scholar; Reed, George F., ed., Pennsylvania Archives, 4th ser. (Harrisburg, Pa., 1900), 1:34–35Google Scholar; James, E. W., ed., Lower Norfolk County Virginia Antiquary, 5 vols. (Richmond, Va., and Baltimore, 1895–1906), l:47n.Google Scholar, cited in Karraker, p. 71. See also Karraker, pp. 77–79; and Rankin, Hugh F., Criminal Trial Proceedings in the General Court of Virginia (Charlottesville, Va., 1965), p. 60Google Scholar.

79 Bailyn, Bernard, “Politics and Social Structure in Virginia,” in Colonial America: Essays in Politics and Social Development, ed. Katz, Stanley (Boston, 1976), p. 133Google Scholar; Bailyn, Bernard, “On Bacon's Rebellion in Virginia,” in The Annals of America (Chicago, 1968), p. 256Google Scholar; Webb, Stephen Saunders, 1676: The End of American Independence (Cambridge, Mass., 1985), p. 39Google Scholar; Browne, William H.et al., eds., Archives of Maryland, 72 vols. (Baltimore, 1883–1972), 7:68–69Google Scholar.

80 Barrow, Thomas C., “A Project for Imperial Reform: ‘Hints Respecting the Settlement for our American Provinces’, 1763,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d ser., 24 (1967): 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Saunders (n. 42 above), 8:266.

82 Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 8, no. 2 (October 1900): 197Google Scholar; Karraker (n. 71 above), pp. 68–70, 79; Robinson, Morgan P., Virginia Counties: Those Resulting from Legislation (Richmond, Va., 1916), p. 83Google Scholar; Osgood, Herbert L., The American Colonies in the Seventeenth Century (Gloucester, Mass., 1957), 2:288Google Scholar; Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 3, no. 2 (October 1895): 154Google Scholar.

83 Hening (n. 41 above), 2:21.

84 Browne, 1:450, 451; 3:61, 96, 97, 117; 7:39, 68–70; 41:87, cited in Semmes, Raphael, Crime and Punishment in Early Maryland (Baltimore, 1938), pp. 12–13Google Scholar; Boyd (n. 42 above), p. 162; Starke, Richard, The Office and Authority of a Justice of the Peace, Expanded and Digested under Proper Titles (Williamsburg, Va., 1774), p. 323Google Scholar; Acts and Laws of His Majesty's English Colony of Connecticut (New London, Conn., 1750), p. 221Google Scholar; Karraker, pp. 93–94. Samuel Sewall recorded in his diary the swearing in of a sheriff's deputy as well as gossip about shrieval selection in a manner befitting similar English speculations. See Thomas, M. Halsey, ed., The Diary of Samuel Sewall, 1674–1729, 2 vols. (New York, 1973), 1:137, 172, 428Google Scholar.

85 Saunders, 6:771, 7:91.

86 Browne, 6:238, 9:64, cited in Greene, E. B., The Provincial Governor in the English Colonies of North America (Gloucester, Mass., 1966), p. 114n.Google Scholar; Keith, 2:560.

87 PRO, SP 54/38/75, Newcastle to the Lord Justice Clerk, February 18, 1747/8, cited in Whetstone (n. 51 above), p. 5.

88 Hutchison, I. G. C., A Political History of Scotland, 1832–1924: Parties, Elections and Issues (Edinburgh, 1986), pp. 34, 93–95Google Scholar.

89 Gardiner, S. R., ed., Reports in Star Chamber, Camden Society ser., no. 39 (London, 1886), p. 7Google Scholar.

90 Ibid., pp. 1–37, esp. pp. 34–35.

91 See Kearney, Hugh F., Strafford in Ireland, 1633–1641 (Manchester, 1959)Google Scholar; LordEssex, Lieutenant, Compliance Having Been made at the Board, etc. (Dublin, 1677)Google Scholar; LordOrmonde, Lieutenant, Whereas the Processes of His Majesties Court of Exchequer, etc. (Dublin, 1678)Google Scholar; LordOrmonde, Lieutenant, Whereas We Are Informed by the Earl of Ranelagh, etc. (Dublin, 1680)Google Scholar.

92 Jefferson, Thomas, Reports of Cases Determined in the General Court of Virginia (Charlottesville, Va., 1829), pp. 14–18Google Scholar, Morris v. Chamberlayne, April 1735. See also ibid., p. 59, Webb v. Elligood, April 1739.

93 The conclusions of Boyd, in “The Sheriff in Colonial North Carolina,” have been successfully challenged by Watson, Alan D., in “The Appointment of Sheriffs in Colonial North Carolina: A Reexamination,” North Carolina Historical Review 53 (1976): 385–98Google Scholar.

94 Beverly, Robert, The History and Present State of Virginia, ed. Wright, Louis B. (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1947), pp. 257–58Google Scholar; Rankin (n. 78 above), pp. 61–62, 90–91; Karraker (n. 71 above), pp. 97–98.

95 Acts and Laws of New Hampshire (Boston, 1699), p. 66Google ScholarPubMed. For English efforts, see Lancashire Record Office, Direct Deposit Kenyon, Kenyon MS 3/28, November 21, 1606; Bodleian Library, Tanner MS 241, fols. 4–5; BL, Additional MS 36767, fols. 137, 139; Harleian MS 703, fol. 143; LJ 1:107; LJ 2:81; CJ 1:129, 261; PRO, SP 12/177/53.

96 Lovejoy, David, The Glorious Revolution in America (New York, 1972), p. 188Google Scholar.

97 Brown, Richard, Revolutionary Politics in Massachusetts: The Boston Committee of Correspondence and the Towns, 1772–1774 (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), p. 190Google Scholar. For earlier practice, see Viola Barnes (n. 76 above), p. 109.

98 Acts and Laws of His Majesty's English Colony of Connecticut (n. 84 above), pp. 270, 328 (see also p. 82 for jails and jailers); Laws of New York from 1691 to 1773 (New York, 1774), p. 760Google Scholar; Archives of Maryland, vol. 2, Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, April 1666–June 1676, ed. Browne, W. H. (Baltimore, 1884), pp. 322, 520, 532Google Scholar; Osgood (n. 82 above), 2:304–5.

99 Richardson and Sayles (n. 23 above), p. 142 and n. In early Irish history, sheriffs could be fined for failure to answer a writ of summons for a parliament or a great council (ibid., p. 143 and n.). For writs of summons, see ibid., pp. 302–5.

100 J. Davies (n. 26 above), p. 241.

101 Vaughan, John, Reports and Arguments (London, 1677), pp. 395 ff.Google Scholar

102 Karraker, pp. 80–81.

103 10 Car. I, c. 13, 16, 19 (Ireland), cited in Barnard, Toby, Cromwellian Ireland: English Government and Reform in Ireland, 1649–1660 (Oxford, 1975), pp. 253–54Google Scholar.

104 Ibid., p. 278.

105 James, , Stair, Viscount, The Institutions of the Laws of Scotland (1693), ed. Walker, David M. (Edinburgh, 1981), p. 951Google Scholar; Mitchison, R., “North and South: The Development of the Gulf in Poor Law Practice,” in Scottish Society 1500–1800, ed. Houston, R. A. and Whyte, I. D. (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 202, 210, 212, 222Google Scholar.

106 All Persons Indebted to His Majesty for Quit-Rents of Land, etc. (New York, 1752)Google Scholar; Osgood, 2:43, 350. In the Pennsylvania Archives (see Reed [n. 78 above], 1:106), it states that Pennsylvania sheriffs were to be charged with receipt of fines “as they do in England.”

107 Richardson and Sayles, p. 90. Irish parliaments could check the accounts of sheriffs (ibid., p. 75n.).

108 Beverly (n. 94 above), p. 248.

109 Saunders (n. 42 above), 6:990–91, Mr. Reed to the Secretary, June 26, 1763.

110 Hening (n. 41 above), 1:498, cited in Rankin (n. 78 above), pp. 10–11.

111 Boyd (n. 42 above), p. 166; Saunders, 7:497, Governor Tryon to the earl of Shelburne; and 8:93–94. See also Boyd, pp. 170–72; and Karraker, pp. 130–46.

112 J. Davies (n. 26 above), p. 251. See also PRO, SP 63/89/20 (CSPI, 1574–85, p. 349), G. Beverly to Lord Burghley, February 6, 1582; SP 63/89/38 (CSPI, 1574–85, p. 350), Auditor Jenyson to Lord Burghley, February 20, 1582; SP 63/125/33 (CSPI, 1586–88, p. 115), July 1586; SP 63/124/821 (CSPI, 1586–88, p. 81), opinion of Thomas Jenyson, Her Majesty's Auditor of Ireland, 1586.

113 Richardson and Sayles (n. 23 above), p. 216.

114 PRO, SP 63/126/531 (CSPI, 1586–88, p. 172).

115 Hazard (n. 78 above), 7:252, V. P. Bryan to James Claypoole, sheriff, March 17, 1779. For postrevolutionary reforms, see Nelson, William E., Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760–1830 (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 92–93Google Scholar. But ibid., p. 209, n. 63, demonstrates that sheriffs continued to monopolize process. See also Labaree, L. W., ed., The Public Records of the State of Connecticut, May 1789 to October 1792 (Hartford, Conn., 1948), pp. 14, 18, 60, 89–90, 148, 159, 163, 280, 298, 317, 351, 545, 552Google Scholar.

116 Browne, , Archives of Maryland (n. 79 above), 1:158, 159, 286, 350Google Scholar, and 3:117, cited in Semmes (n. 84 above), p. 9.

117 See Browne, , Archives of Maryland, 2:246 ff.Google Scholar; Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society, vol. 11, The Law Papers: Correspondence and Documents during Jonathan Law's Governorship in the Colony of Connecticut, 1741–1750 (Hartford, Conn., 1907), pp. 80–81Google Scholar, Thomas Hill to Jonathan Law, April 25, 1743.

118 Browne, , Archives of Maryland, 4:395, 396Google Scholar, cited in Semmes, p. 10.

119 Ibid., 41:315, 316, 333, cited in Semmes, p. 410.

120 Ibid., 4:401, 402, 434–37, cited in Semmes, p. 11.

121 Ibid., 41:602, 603, cited in Semmes, p. 11.

122 Ibid., 17:42, 57, 58, 60–63, 96, cited in Semmes, p. 13. Usually sheriffs were fined only for obstinance and even then it is hard to determine whether the fines were levied. See cases regarding the escape of a hog killer and a tobacco debtor in ibid., 49:137–38, 477–78, cited in Semmes, pp. 13–14.

123 Rankin (n. 78 above), p. 116.

124 PRO, Treasury 1/446, Greenleaf's deposition, cited in Maier, Pauline, “Popular Uprisings and Civil Authority in Eighteenth-Century America,” in Katz, (n. 79 above), p. 438Google Scholar.

125 Hazard (n. 78 above), 10:63, Secretary Armstrong to the sheriffs, July 30, 1783; 3:105, Gov. Denny to the sheriff of Cumberland County, 1757.

126 Herbert, Trevor and Jones, Gareth Elwyn, eds., The Remaking of Wales in the Eighteenth Century (Cardiff, 1988), p. 9Google Scholar.

127 See, e. g., CSPI, 1586–88 (n. 26 above), p. 20.

128 Belfast Newsletter (August 1–12, 1768), cited in Johnston, Edith M., Great Britain and Ireland, 1760–1800: A Study in Political Administration (Edinburgh, 1963; reprint, Westport, Conn., 1978), pp. 139–40Google Scholar.

129 Brogan (n. 74 above), p. 106n.; Journal of the Votes and Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Colony of New York (New York, 1764), p. 227Google Scholar; Boyd (n. 42 above), pp. 174–80; Karraker (n. 71 above), pp. 117–21; Lovejoy (n. 96 above), p. 115.

130 Sirmans, M. Eugene, Colonial South Carolina: A Political History, 1663–1763 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1966), p. 70Google Scholar. In the same election the house itself chose among two men who had “tied for the last place in the Berkeley County delegation” (ibid., p. 70). See also Browne, , Archives of Maryland, 7:19, November 1678Google Scholar.

131 Miles, Lion G., “The Red Man Dispossessed: The Williams Family and the Alienation of Indian Land, 1736–1818,” New England Quarterly 67 (1994): 46–76Google Scholar, esp. p. 70. Van Wyck Brooks wrote of Concord residents who hid fugitive slaves in an effort to “foil the inquisitive sheriff” in New England Indian Summer, 1865–1915 (Boston, 1940), p. 56Google Scholar.

132 This point may be further appreciated after consideration of the number of nineteenth-century American cases regarding sheriffs that depended on the construction of English statutes from the fourteenth to sixteenth centuries. See Brown, Elizabeth G., British Statutes in American Law, 1776–1836 (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1964), pp. 329–31Google Scholar. Subjects of controversy included such supposedly archaic matters as the order of indictments in a sheriff's tourn. With a few exceptions, sheriffs' manuals also came relatively late to America and were then often reprints or recapitulations of English manuals. This may be seen alternatively as an indication of the unsophisticated nature of peripheral legal discourse or the prescriptive nature of the imperial model. See, e.g., Conductor Generalis: or the Office, Duty and Authority of Justices of the Peace, High-Sheriffs, Under-Sheriffs, etc (New York, 1788)Google Scholar; Haywood, John, The Duty and Office of Justices of the Peace and of Sheriffs, Coroners, etc. (Halifax, N.C., 1800)Google Scholar; Martin, Francis Xavier, The Office and Authority of a Justice of the Peace and of Sheriffs, Coroners, etc. (Newbern, N.C., 1804)Google Scholar; Martin, Francis Xavier, A Treatise on the Powers and Duties of a Sheriff (Newbern, N.C., 1806)Google Scholar; The Civil Officer, or the Whole Duty of Sheriffs, Constables and Collectors of Taxes (Boston, 1814)Google Scholar; Brewster, Francis E., The Secret “Customs” and Revenue of the Sheriffs Office (Philadelphia, 1819)Google Scholar.

133 The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Bergh, Albert E., 20 vols. (Washington, D.C., 1903–1904), 15:34–35, 39Google Scholar, Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, July 12, 1816. For another comparative perspective, see Sumner, C. P., A Discourse on Some Points of Difference between the Sheriff's Office in Massachusetts and in England (Boston: Freeman & Bolles, 1829)Google Scholar. The latter had appeared in the American Jurist in 1829.

134 For background, see Chu, Jonathan M., “Debt Litigation and Shays's Rebellion.” in In Debt to Shays: The Bicentennial of an Agrarian Rebellion, ed. Gross, Robert A. (Charlottesville, Va., 1993), pp. 81–99Google Scholar.

135 Law Report (Ireland, [1879–1993]), 32:243Google Scholar, cited in Osborough, W. N., “Executive Failure to Enforce Judicial Decrees: A Neglected Chapter in Nineteenth Century Constitutional History,” in The Common Law Tradition: Essays in Irish Legal History, ed. McEldowney, J. F. and O'Higgins, Paul (Dublin, 1990), pp. 101–2Google Scholar.

136 For movement in this direction, see my “Charles I and Shrieval Selection, 1625–6,” Historical Research 64 (1991): 305–11Google Scholar, “Dissolution of the Monasteries and the Decline of the Sheriff,” Sixteenth Century Journal 23 (1992): 677–98Google Scholar, and “Due Process: The Early-Modern Shrievalty and Propertied Rule in the English-Speaking World” (manuscript in preparation).

137 Proceedings in Parliament, 1628, 6 vols., Commons Debates, vols. 1–4 (New Haven, Conn., 1977–1978), 2:463Google Scholar, cited in Christianson, Paul, “Arguments on Billeting and Martial Law in the Parliament of 1628,” Historical Journal 37 (1994): 552Google Scholar.

138 The Speeches of William Huskisson with a Biographic Memoir, 3 vols. (London, 1831), 3:287–88Google Scholar, cited in Parry (n. 14 above), pp. 42, 345, n. 55.

139 For an example of the Webbs' continued influence, see Parry, pp. 120, 352, n. 2, 373. For county community historiography, see Holmes, Clive, “The County Community in Stuart Historiography,” Journal of British Studies 19, no. 2 (1980): 54–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.