Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:22:11.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novel word learning at 21 months predicts receptive vocabulary outcomes in later childhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2019

Vinaya RAJAN ,
Haruka KONISHI ,
Katherine RIDGE ,
Derek M. HOUSTON ,
Roberta Michnick GOLINKOFF ,
Kathy HIRSH-PASEK ,
Nancy EASTMAN  and
Richard G. SCHWARTZ
Vinaya RAJAN*
Affiliation:
University of the Sciences
Haruka KONISHI
Affiliation:
Missouri Western State University
Katherine RIDGE
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Derek M. HOUSTON
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Nationwide Children's Hospital
Roberta Michnick GOLINKOFF
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Kathy HIRSH-PASEK
Affiliation:
Temple University
Nancy EASTMAN
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Nationwide Children's Hospital
Richard G. SCHWARTZ
Affiliation:
City University of New York
*
*Correspondence author: University of the Sciences, 600 S. 43rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: v.rajan@usciences.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several aspects of early language skills, including parent-report measures of vocabulary, phoneme discrimination, speech segmentation, and speed of lexical access predict later childhood language outcomes. To date, no studies have examined the long-term predictive validity of novel word learning. We examined whether individual differences in novel word learning at 21 months predict later childhood receptive vocabulary outcomes rather than generalized cognitive abilities. Twenty-eight 21-month-olds were taught novel words using a modified version of the Intermodal Preferential Looking Paradigm. Seventeen children (range 7–10 years) returned to participate in a longitudinal follow-up. Novel word learning in infancy uniquely accounted for 22% of the variance in childhood receptive vocabulary but did not predict later childhood visuospatial ability or non-verbal IQ. These results suggest that the ability to associate novel sound patterns to novel objects, an index of the process of word learning, may be especially important for long-term language mastery.

Keywords

novel word learninglanguage developmentinfancy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 617 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altepeter, T. S. (1989). The PPVT-R as a measure of psycholinguistic functioning: a caution. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 935–41.Google Scholar
Axelsson, E. L., & Horst, J. S. (2013). Testing a word is not a test of word learning. Acta Psychologica, 144, 264–8.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benasich, A. A., & Tallal, P. (2002). Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predict later language impairment. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 31–49.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. M., Kemp, N., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Early word–object associations and later language development. First Language, 27, 315–28.Google Scholar
Bion, R. A., Borovsky, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Fast mapping, slow learning: disambiguation of novel word–object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months. Cognition, 126(1), 39–53.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., & Hayes, O. M. (1998). Vocabulary competence in early childhood: measurement, latent construct, and predictive validity. Child Development, 69(3), 654–71.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). TONI-3: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Can, D. D., Ginsburg-Block, M., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2013). A long-term predictive validity study: Can the CDI Short Form be used to predict language and early literacy skills four years later? Journal of Child Language, 40(4), 821–35.Google Scholar
Childers, J. S., & Durham, T. W. (1994). Relation of performance on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised among preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(3), 1195–9.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., Dale, P. S., Campbell, T. F., Colborn, D. K., Kurs-Lasky, M., Rockette, H. E., & Paradise, J. L. (2005). Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years. Child Development, 76(4), 856–68.Google Scholar
Fennell, C. T., & Werker, J. F. (2003). Early word learners’ ability to access phonetic detail in well-known words. Language and Speech, 46(2/3), 245–64.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (Serial No. 242).Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Harters, J. P., … & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98–116.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1) 3–55.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., de Villiers, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Iglesias, A., & Wilson, M. S. (2017). User's manual for the Quick Interactive Language Screener™ (QUILS™): a measure of vocabulary, syntax, and language acquisition skills in young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2008). How toddlers begin to learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 397–403.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 99–108.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Ma, W., Song, L., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2013). Twenty-five years using the intermodal preferential looking paradigm to study language acquisition: What have we learned? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 316–39.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday parenting and intellectual development in young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A. … Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children's language success. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1071–83.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The preferential looking paradigm reveals emerging language comprehension. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Cairns, H. (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 105–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hodapp, A. F., & Gerken, K. C. (1999). Correlations between scores for Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–III and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–III. Psychological Reports, 84, 1139–42.Google Scholar
Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128–57.Google Scholar
Houston, D. M., Stewart, J., Moberly, A., Hollich, G., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2012). Word learning in deaf children with cochlear implants: effects of early auditory experience. Developmental Science, 15(3), 448–61.Google Scholar
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Houston, D., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Word learning in infant- and adult-directed speech. Language Learning and Development, 7, 209–25.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.Google Scholar
Mather, E., & Plunkett, K. (2009). Learning words over time: the role of stimulus repetition in mutual exclusivity. Infancy, 14(1), 60–76.Google Scholar
Mather, E., & Plunkett, K. (2010). Novel labels support 10-month-olds’ attention to novel objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 232–42.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.Google Scholar
Newman, R., Ratner, N. B., Jusczyk, A. M., Jusczyk, P. W., & Dow, K. A. (2006). Infants’ early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: a retrospective analysis. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 643–55.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–74.Google Scholar
Schafer, G., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development, 69(2), 309–20.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Reznick, J. S., & Xuehua, L. (2012). Infant word segmentation and childhood vocabulary development: a longitudinal analysis. Developmental Science, 15(4) 482–95.Google Scholar
Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381–2.Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13(5), 480–4.Google Scholar
Thal, D., O'Hanlon, L., Clemmons, M., & Fralin, L. (1999). Validity of parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax for preschool children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 482–96.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Mervis, C. B. (1999). The instrument is great, but measuring comprehension is still a problem. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 174–9.Google Scholar
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 75(4), 1067–84.Google Scholar
Wecshler, D. (2003). Wecshler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word–object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1289–309.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 197–234.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Wojcik, E. H. (2013). Remembering new words: integrating early memory development into word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 151. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00151Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L., Markman, E. M., & Fitzsimmons, C. M. (1994). Rapid word learning in 13- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 553–66.Google Scholar