Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:40:24.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonological variation and change in the regional French of Alsace: Supralocalization, age, gender and the urban–rural dichotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2020

Zoë Boughton*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Katharine Pipe
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
*
*Corresponding author. Email: z.c.boughton@exeter.ac.uk

Abstract

This article examines patterns of variation and change in the phonology of the regional French of Alsace, within an overarching framework of regional dialect levelling (Kerswill, 2003) in the French of France. Data are drawn from an original corpus gathered in Strasbourg and a small village in a rural area of the Bas-Rhin. We analyse two well-known regional features in spontaneous speech: (h), the variable realisation of initial [h], and (ʒ), the non-assimilatory devoicing of /ʒ/. We focus on the effect on the variation observed of the major extra-linguistic variables of age, gender and social class as well as urban or rural community. While the results for class and location follow expected patterns, whereby working-class and rural speakers show higher rates of traditional non-standard variants, the principal observation is the decline and, in the case of (ʒ), apparent loss of such features. We thus provide new evidence in support of supralocalization, not only in the urban context but also in the rural location. The results for gender are however less clear-cut: there is an interaction with age, class and location, and disruption of the usual pattern of female-led adoption of supralocal norms.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We acknowledge with gratitude the financial support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council which facilitated aspects of the research reported here. Thanks are also due to Aidan Coveney and to the anonymous JFLS reviewers for their constructive remarks. Any remaining shortcomings are, of course, solely our responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, N. (2001). Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, N. (2002). Nivellement et standardisation en anglais et en français. Langage et Société, 102: 532.10.3917/ls.102.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, N., Bauvois, C., Beeching, K., (eds), with Bruyninckx, M. (2001). La langue française au féminin: le sexe et le genre affectent-ils la variation linguistique? Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Low, J. (2008). C’est encœur plus jeuli, le Mareuc: Some evidence for the spread of /ɔ/-fronting in French. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(3): 432455.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00206.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Mackenzie, I. (2018). Speaker variables in Romance: when demography and ideology collide. In: Ayres-Bennett, W. and Carruthers, J. (eds), Manual of Romance Sociolinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 173196.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Pooley, T. (2010). Social and Linguistic Change in European French. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230281714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Pooley, T. (2013). Levelling, resistance and divergence in the pronunciation of English and French. Language Sciences, 39: 141150.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, N. and Unsworth, S. (1999). Sociolinguistic variation in southern French schwa. Linguistics, 37(1): 127156.10.1515/ling.1999.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauvois, C. (2002). Ni d’Ève ni d’Adam: étude sociolinguistique de douze variables du français. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. A. (1988). On reading and re-reading Grevisse: ‘h aspiré’. French Studies Bulletin, 27: 12.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. and Matzen, R. (1969). Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de l’Alsace, Volume I. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Bickel-Kauffmann, M.-M. (1983). Les consonnes du parler d’Andolsheim: étude expérimentale en milieu bilingue. PhD thesis, Université des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg. (Cited in Gardner-Chloros, 1991.)Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2007). Some listener-oriented accounts of h aspiré in French. Lingua, 117: 19892054.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnot, J.-F. P., Bothorel-Witz, A. and Huck, D. (1993). Les variétés de français parlées en Alsace: Approches méthodologiques et analyse des premiers résultats. In: Lüdi, G. (ed.), Approches linguistiques de l’interaction. Bulletin CILA, 57: 2544.Google Scholar
Bothorel-Witz, A., Philipp, M. and Spindler, S. (1984). Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de l’Alsace, Volume II. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Boughton, Z. (2003). Phonological variation in contemporary standard French: A tale of two cities. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Boughton, Z. (2005). Accent levelling and accent localisation in northern French: Comparing Nancy and Rennes. Journal of French Language Studies, 15: 235256.10.1017/S0959269505002140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughton, Z. (2013). Locating variation in French: Geolinguistic patterns, levelling and the ‘French exception’. In: Jones, M. C. and Hornsby, D. (eds), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. London: Legenda, pp. 119132.Google Scholar
Boula de Mareüil, P., Adda-Decker, M., Woehrling, C., Bardiaux, A. and Simon, A. C. (2012). Une étude par traitement automatique de la prosodie du français à la frontière des domaines roman et germanique. In: Simon, A. C. (ed.), La variation prosodique régionale en français. Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot, pp. 119136.Google Scholar
Britain, D. and Cheshire, J. (2003). Introduction. In: Britain, D. and Cheshire, J. (eds), Social Dialectology: In honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 18.10.1075/impact.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, F., Rossi, M., Autesserre, D. and Léon, P. (1983). Les accents des Français. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2009). Sociolinguistic Theory, rev. edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, A. (2001). The Sounds of Contemporary French: Articulation and diversity. Exeter: Elm Bank.Google Scholar
Coveney, A. and Dekhissi, L. (2017). Parallel innovations in conflictual rhetorical questions in the multicultural vernaculars of London English and Parisian French. In: Tyne, H., Bilger, M., Cappeau, P. and Guerin, E. (eds), La variation en question(s). Bruxelles: Peter Lang, pp. 181208.Google Scholar
De Dietrich, A. (1917). Alsaciens, corrigeons notre accent. Paris: Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
D’Hauteville, J. (1852). Le français alsacien. Fautes de prononciation et germanismes. Strasbourg: Dérivaux.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. and Foulkes, P. (1999). Derby and Newcastle: instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In: Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (eds), Urban Voices. London: Arnold, pp. 4771.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Eychenne, J. and Lyche, C. (2013). On levelling and counter-levelling in French: A phonological perspective. In: Jones, M. C. and Hornsby, D. (eds), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. London: Legenda, pp. 5868.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (2002). La Phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. In: Pusch, C. and Raible, W. (eds), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik/Romance Corpus Linguistics. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 93106.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. (2002). We all speak the same round here: Dialect levelling in a Scottish–English community. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(1): 99116.10.1111/1467-9481.00179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, R. (1990). The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. (1957). Traité de prononciation française. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (eds) (1999a). Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (1999b). Urban Voices — overview. In: Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (eds), Urban Voices. London: Arnold, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. and Meisenburg, T. (2009). Silent onsets? An optimality-theoretic approach to French ‘h aspiré’ words. In: Kügler, F., Féry, C. and van de Vijver, R. (eds), Variation and Gradience in Phonetics and Phonology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163184.Google Scholar
Gadet, F. (1996). Variabilité, variation, variété: le français d’Europe. Journal of French Language Studies, 6: 7598.10.1017/S0959269500004981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1991). Language Selection and Switching in Strasbourg. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. N. and Hintze, M.-A. (2004). Le h aspiré en français contemporain: stabilité, variation ou déclin? In: Coveney, A., Hintze, M.-A. and Sanders, C. (eds), Variation et francophonie. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 217280.Google Scholar
Guézennec, N. (2003). Variations phonétiques: entre identité et interactions sociales. Cas de l’île de Sein (Finistère-Sud). Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 33: 151158.Google Scholar
Hall, D. (2019). (e) in Normandy: The sociolinguistics, phonology and phonetics of the ‘loi de position’. Journal of French Language Studies, 29: 133.10.1017/S0959269518000157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. and Hornsby, D. (2015). Top-down or bottom-up? Understanding diffusion of supralocal norms in France. In: Davies, W. V. and Ziegler, E. (eds), Language Planning and Microlinguistics: From Policy to Interaction and Vice Versa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105127.10.1057/9781137361240_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambye, P. (2005). La prononciation du français contemporain en Belgique: Variation, normes et identités. PhD thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Hambye, P. (2009). The sociolinguistic relevance of regional categories: Some evidence from word-final consonant devoicing in French spoken in Belgium. In: Beeching, K., Armstrong, N. and Gadet, F. (eds), Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 2542.10.1075/impact.26.04hamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E. (2013). ‘Instruments de travail’ and the travails of instruments: Reflections on the cross-national measurement of social class. In: Jones, M. C. and Hornsby, D. (eds), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. London: Legenda, pp. 1021.Google Scholar
Hornsby, D. (2002). Dialect contact and koinéization: the case of northern France. In: Jones, M. C. and Esch, E. (eds), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1928.Google Scholar
Hornsby, D. (2006). Redefining Regional French: Koinéization and Dialect Levelling in Northern France. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
Hornsby, D. (2007). Regional dialect levelling in urban France and Britain. Nottingham French Studies, 46.2: 6481.10.3366/nfs.2007-2.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howiller, A. (2008). Où va l’Alsace? Illkirch: Le Verger Editeur.Google Scholar
Jadin, N. (1985). Modalisateurs dans le français contemporain en Alsace. In: Salmon, G.-L. (ed.), Le français en Alsace. Paris: Champion/Genève: Slatkine, pp. 113130.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. (2003). Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In: Britain, D. and Cheshire, J. (eds), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223243.10.1075/impact.16.16kerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). Stages in the acquisition of standard English. In: Hungerford, H., Robinson, J. and Sledd, J. (eds), English linguistics. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, pp. 274303.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In: Baugh, J. and Sherzer, J. (eds), Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 2866.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2: 205254.10.1017/S0954394500000338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1983). Dynamique des changements phonétiques dans le français de France et du Canada. La Linguistique, 19(1): 1328.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1993). Précis de phonostylistique: Parole et expressivité. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Marchessou, A. (2018). Strasbourg, another setting for sociolinguistic variation in contemporary French. Journal of French Language Studies, 28: 265289.10.1017/S095926951800008XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1945). La prononciation du français contemporain. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Matzen, R. (1973). Le français alsacien d’aujourd’hui. Ethnologie Française, 3(3/4): 367376.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. and Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470758359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, D. (2016). Southern Regional French: A Linguistic Analysis of Language and Dialect Contact. Cambridge: Legenda.10.2307/j.ctv16kkzx0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, M. (1965). Le système phonologique du parler de Blaesheim: Etude synchronique et diachronique. Nancy: Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de l’Université de Nancy. Google Scholar
Philipp, M. (1967). La prononciation du français en Alsace. La Linguistique, 3(1): 6374.Google Scholar
Philipp, M. (1985). L’accent alsacien. In: Salmon, G.-L. (ed.), Le français en Alsace. Paris: Champion/Genève: Slatkine, pp. 1926.Google Scholar
Philipp, M. and Bothorel-Witz, A. (1990). Low Alemannic. In: Russ, C. (ed.), The Dialects of Modern German: A Linguistic Survey. London: Routledge, pp. 313336.Google Scholar
Pipe, K. (2010). Phonological variation and change in Alsatian French. MRes dissertation, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Pipe, K. (2014). Accent levelling in the regional French of Alsace. PhD thesis, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Pooley, T. (1994). Word-final consonant devoicing in a variety of working-class French: A case of dialect contact? Journal of French Language Studies, 4: 215233.10.1017/S0959269500002234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, T. (2001). Les variantes sociolinguistiques féminines: essai de synthèse. In: Armstrong, N., Bauvois, C. and Beeching, K. (eds), with Bruyninckx, M., La langue française au féminin: le sexe et le genre affectent-ils la variation linguistique? Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 5373.Google Scholar
Pooley, T. (2002). The depicardization of the vernaculars of the Lille conurbation. In: Jones, M. C. and Esch, E. (eds), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 2962.Google Scholar
Pooley, T. (2006). On the geographical spread of Oïl French in France. Journal of French Language Studies, 16: 357390.10.1017/S0959269506002560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, T. (2007). Dialect Levelling in Southern France. Nottingham French Studies, 46(2): 4063.10.3366/nfs.2007-2.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, T. (2013). Studying variation in urban France: The state of play and prospects for the future. In: Jones, M. C. and Hornsby, D. (eds), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. London: Legenda, pp. 190209.Google Scholar
Potte, J.-C. (1977). Le français de Glaine-Montaigut (Puy-de-Dôme): Connaissance du milieu et approche phonétique. In: Taverdet, G. et Straka, G. (eds), Les français régionaux. Paris: Klincksieck, pp. 191198.Google Scholar
Pottier, B. (1968). La situation linguistique en France. In: Martinet, A. (ed.), Le Langage. Paris: Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, pp. 11441161.Google Scholar
Sobotta, E. (2003). Les Aveyronnais d’Aveyron et les Aveyronnais de Paris. Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 33: 135142.Google Scholar
Southworth, M.-J. (1970). French words in H-. The French Review, 44(1): 6371.Google Scholar
Suiter, I.-P. (1920). Petite méthode de prononciation composée spécialement pour les Alsaciens. Strasbourg: F.-X. Leroux.Google Scholar
Tarrier, J. M. (2010). La variation socio-phonologique illustrée. In: Detey, S., Durand, J., Laks, B. and Lyche, C. (eds), Les variétés du français parlé dans l’espace francophone. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Temple, R. A. M. (2001). The interaction between speaker sex and changes in regional patterns of voicing in metropolitan French: A case of over-levelling? In: Hintze, M.-A., Pooley, T. and Judge, A. (eds), French Accents: Phonological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. London: AFLS/CILT, pp. 148164.Google Scholar
Tifrit, A. (2003). Le point d’enquête PFC à Dijon. Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 33: 180186.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vajta, K. (2004). ‘Nous n’avons plus de langue pour nos fêtes de famille’: Le changement de langue dans une famille alsacienne. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Vassberg, L. (1993). Alsatian Acts of Identity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Walter, H. (1982). Enquête phonologique et variétés régionales du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Watt, D. and Milroy, L. (1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: is this dialect levelling? In: Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (eds), Urban Voices. London: Arnold, pp. 2546.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. J. N. (2004). L’alsacien de poche. Chennevières-sur-Marne: Assimil.Google Scholar
Williams, A. and Kerswill, P. (1999). Dialect levelling: change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In: Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (eds), Urban Voices. London: Arnold, pp. 141162.Google Scholar
Winter, L. (2000). Ciel! Mon mari est muté en Alsace! Strasbourg: La Nuée Bleue.Google Scholar