Introduction
The geographical position of Nicaragua in Lower Central America, along with Costa Rica and Panama, places the region in a pivotal biogeographical position bridging North and South America. The uplift of the Isthmus of Panama created a land bridge, which allowed the dispersal of freshwater fauna through the biogeographical event known as the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI) (see Bacon et al., Reference Bacon, Molnar, Antonelli, Crawford, Montes and Vallejo-Pareja2016 and references therein). Irrespective of the date of the closure of the seaway, freshwater fishes dispersed northwards throughout different routes, and experienced diversification events (Perdices et al., Reference Perdices, Bermingham, Montilla and Doadrio2002; Hulsey et al., Reference Hulsey, García De León, Johnson, Hendrickson and Near2004; Ornelas-García et al., Reference Ornelas-García, Domínguez-Domínguez and Doadrio2008; Říčan et al., Reference Říčan, Piálek, Dragová and Novák2016). Nicaragua lies on one of the most active volcanic areas on the planet, the Central American volcanic arc. Over this arch, on the Pacific coast, lie the great Nicaraguan lakes, Managua and Nicaragua. These lakes were formed in the early Pleistocene, and were originally connected, separating later when the lakes opened towards the Atlantic Ocean via the San Juan River (Villa, Reference Villa and Thorson1976). In the surrounding of the great lakes lies a chain of active volcanoes dating back to the Holocene (Kutterolf et al., Reference Kutterolf, Freundt, Pérez, Wehrmann and Schmincke2007). The calderas of the volcanoes collapsed and filled with water from precipitation and/or underground seeps, creating lakes of different ages and isolated environments without interconnections with other waterbodies. Each lake has a different origin and time of formation – Lake Apoyo is the oldest and Lake Masaya was formed 1800 years ago (Kutterolf et al., Reference Kutterolf, Freundt, Pérez, Wehrmann and Schmincke2007). Besides the lakes, Nicaragua has dozens of rivers, several draining from the Central Highlands towards the Atlantic Lowlands.
The heterogenous landscape of this region has shaped the evolution of its biodiversity, with 114 species of fish, of which 104 are native, belonging to 28 families (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021). The most diverse freshwater fish group is the family Cichlidae (28 species), followed by Poeciliidae (ten species) and Characidae (seven species) (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021). Within cichlids, the Midas cichlid, Amphilophus spp., forms the largest biomass in the lakes, and experienced adaptive radiations in several crater lakes (Barluenga et al., Reference Barluenga, Stölting, Salzburger, Muschick and Meyer2006; Kautt et al., Reference Kautt, Kratochwil and Nater2020). These three fish families have South American origin, and expanded northwards in their dispersal routes (Ornelas-García et al., Reference Ornelas-García, Domínguez-Domínguez and Doadrio2008; Říčan et al., Reference Říčan, Zardoya and Doadrio2008, Reference Říčan, Piálek, Zardoya, Doadrio and Zrzavý2013, Reference Říčan, Piálek, Dragová and Novák2016; Reznick et al., Reference Reznick, Furness, Meredith and Springer2017; García-Andrade et al., Reference García-Andrade, Carvajal-Quintero, Tedesco and Villalobos2021).
Knowledge on the parasite diversity of freshwater fishes in this region is still scarce, representing a gap in the parasitological knowledge of the parasite fauna between South and North America, where a larger number of studies have been conducted. In addition, some fragmentary information has also been published regarding the parasite fauna of Costa Rica and Panama (e.g. Sandlund et al., Reference Sandlund, Daverdin, Choudhury, Brooks and Diserud2010; Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, García-Varela and Pérez-Ponce de León2017). These three countries comprise the geographic region known as Lower Central America, where eight biogeographic provinces are recognized – namely, the Nicaraguan depression, the Sandino fore arc, the Nicaraguan volcanic front, the Chorotega volcanic front, the Chorotega fore arc, the Chorotega back arc, the Panama Canal Zone lowlands and the Darién isthmus (Bagley & Johnson, Reference Bagley and Johnson2014). Furthermore, Bagley & Johnson (Reference Bagley and Johnson2014) pointed out that Lower Central America represents a geologically complex area and a richly biodiverse model for studying the current composition and the diversification history of the Neotropical biota. A more detailed inventory of the parasite fauna of the region will be fundamental in explaining the history diversification of the biota across the Panama isthmus, providing further data to explain the biotic exchange between North and South America as discussed by Choudhury et al. (Reference Choudhury, García-Varela and Pérez-Ponce de León2017)
Particularly in Nicaragua, the first study was performed by Watson (Reference Watson and Thorson1976), where several species of digeneans from Lake Nicaragua were reported. After that, a few studies were conducted across Nicaragua, representing isolated records of parasites in some fish species in scattered sampling areas in Nicaragua (Aguirre-Macedo et al., Reference Aguirre-Macedo, Scholz and González-Solís2001a, Reference Aguirre-Macedo, Scholz and Gonźalez-Solísb; Vidal-Martínez et al., Reference Vidal-Martínez, Scholz and Aguirre-Macedo2001b; Mendoza-Franco et al., Reference Mendoza-Franco, Posel and Dumailo2003; González-Solís & Moravec, Reference González-Solís and Moravec2004; Scholz et al., Reference Scholz, Aguirre-Macedo and Choudhury2004; Andrade-Gómez et al., Reference Andrade-Gómez, Pinacho-Pinacho and García-Varela2017; López-Jiménez et al., Reference López-Jiménez, Pérez-Ponce de León and García-Varela2018; González-García et al., Reference González-García, Andrade-Gómez, Pinacho-Pinacho, Sereno-Uribe and García-Varela2021). Particularly for the crater lakes, McCrary et al. (Reference McCrary, van den Berghe, McKaye and López Pérez2001) referred to an outbreak of blindness among native cichlids in crater Lake Apoyo caused by a trematode infection. Also, some nematodes were reported from crater lakes Xiloá and Apoyo (González-Solís & Jiménez-García, Reference González-Solís and Jiménez-García2006). Recently, intensive survey work aimed at describing the metazoan parasite fauna of cichlids, with an emphasis on the Midas cichlid species complex, yielded the description of an additional set of species (Santacruz et al., Reference Santacruz, Morales-Serna, Leal-Cardín, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2020, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2021, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2022).
The main objective of this study was, first, to characterize the parasites infecting non-cichlid fishes in the two great Nicaraguan lakes and four crater lakes based on field surveys; second, to provide an overview of all the records published of parasites infecting fishes dwelling in the Nicaraguan freshwater systems; and, third, to briefly discuss their historical biogeography in a wider context related with the information we provide in two supplementary files regarding the checklists of parasites of freshwater fishes of Costa Rica and Panama to consider Lower Central America as a whole.
Materials and methods
Sampling and fish dissection
Fish were sampled in three consecutive years (2017–2019), at the end of the rainy season (November and December), in the two great lakes Nicaragua and Managua and in four crater lakes (Asososca León, Xiloá, Masaya and Apoyo). The procedures to sample, maintain and euthanize the fish specimens followed those described in Santacruz et al. (Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2022), and followed procedures approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for Euthanasia of Animals, 2020 edition (available at https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Guidelines-on-Euthanasia-2020.pdf). All parasites recovered were counted, and representative samples of each morphotype were fixed for morphological or molecular study in hot formalin or molecular-grade ethanol, respectively.
Parasite processing and identification
All parasites collected were analysed morphologically to achieve the highest taxonomic resolution following Santacruz et al. (Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2022). Morphological vouchers of some species, and in some cases hologenophores (sensu Pleijel et al., Reference Pleijel, Jondelius, Norlinder, Nygren, Oxelman, Schander, Sundberg and Thollesson2008), were deposited at the Colección Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, with the accession numbers 11,482, 11,491, 11,492, 11,497, 11,499, 11,500 and 11,503. In some cases, parasite specimens representing a particular morphotype were sequenced for identification, particularly those whose morphological characteristics or developmental stage impeded reaching an identification to the lowest taxonomic level. The molecular markers used were the mitochondrial cox1, cox2 and the nuclear 28S genes, depending on the genetic library available for each parasite group. The description of the methods for sequencing and primers used can be seen in Santacruz et al. (Reference Santacruz, Morales-Serna, Leal-Cardín, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2020, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2021, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2022). Sequence data were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: Genarchella astyanactis, 28S (OM502567); Saccocoelioides cf. lamothei, cox1 (OM509699–700); Saccocoelioides orosiensis, cox1(OM509696–98); Dactylogyridae gen. sp., 28S (OM502566) and cox1 (OM509707–08); Characithecium costaricensis, cox1 (OM509703–06); and Contracaecum sp., cox2 (OM524389).
All existing records of parasites from freshwater fishes were retrieved from the literature, considering all published accounts for the period 1976–2021. Host names follow those currently recognized in FishBase (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021). The checklist of the freshwater fishes of Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama was retrieved from the same source. The checklists of the parasite fauna of freshwater fishes of Costa Rica and Panamá were built from the existent records of specimens deposited in the CNHE, Biology Institute, National Autonomous University of México, and by gathering the data from various bibliographical sources. To conduct a comprehensive bibliographic search, we retrieved all of the records from the ISI Web of Knowledge database using the following terms: and ‘freshwater fish’ and parasit*, or helminth, or monogen*, or digen* or acanthoceph*, or nematod*, or hirudinea*, or copepod*. We used those terms in combination with the name of the country, as Panama or ‘Costa Rica’.
Results
We analysed 136 fishes from seven species (see table 1) during the three sampling seasons. The analysis yielded 17 parasite taxa, including trematodes, cestodes, monogeneans, nematodes, copepods and oribatid mites (table 1). Specimens of Poecilia spp. were collected in all lakes. Overall, poeciliids were infected by six parasite taxa, including trematodes, cestodes, copepods and oribatid mites. In the crater lakes Asososca León and Xiloá, two congeneric species of trematodes – namely, Saccocoelioides. cf. lamothei Aguirre-Macedo & Violante-Gonzalez, 2008 and S. orosiensis Curran, Pulis, Andres & Overstreet, 2018 – were found in mixed infections in individual poeciliids. The eleotrid Gobiomorus sp. was collected from Lake Nicaragua and three crater lakes. No Gobiomorus sp. was infected by parasites, but sample size was very low. Astyanax spp. were sampled from the great Nicaraguan lakes (they are absent in the crater lakes) and harboured seven parasite taxa. The sister characiform Bramocharax sp. was parasitized by four parasite taxa, all of them shared parasite species with Astyanax spp. Individuals of Bramocharax sp. harboured mixed infections of the monogeneans C. costaricensis (Price & Bussing, 1967) and an unidentified species of Dactylogyridae. One individual of the haemulid Pomadasys croco (Cuvier) was sampled in Lake Nicaragua and was infected with the cryptogonomid trematode Neochasmus ackerti (Watson, 1976), now considered a synonym of Siphoderina Manter, 1934.
Table 1. Fish species analysed for metazoan parasites in the two great lakes and four crater lakes of Nicaragua, and parasite records within lakes presented in alphabetical order per host species, with some ecological parameter data on the infection.
S, stage; A, adult; L, larvae; Si, site of infection; SD, standard deviation; Ac, acari; C, cestode; Cr, crustacean; M, monogenean; N, nematode; T, trematode.
We sequenced the 28S gene for two species of monogeneans: C. costaricensis and Dactylogyridae gen. sp., both from characids. The cox1 gene was also sequenced for the Dactylogyridae gen. sp. Additionally, sequences of the cox1 gene allowed the identification of two species of Saccocoeiliodes Szidat, 1954, which caused mixed infections in poecilids. A fragment of the 28S gene of G. astyanactis (Watson, 1976) from the type locality matched with available sequences of the species sampled in Astyanax aeneus from Mexico (GenBank number MK648277), and their sister species, Genarchella isabellae (Lamothe-Argumedo, 1977) from a cichlid also from Mexico. Sequences of the 18S rRNA gene were obtained for crustaceans. Finally, sequences of cox2 recovered from larval stages of Contracaecum (Railliet & Henry, 1912) did not allow species identification, as they did not match with available sequences in the GenBank database.
Our literature revision yielded records of 96 parasite taxa in Nicaraguan freshwaters. With the records generated in the present study, there are a total of 101 parasite taxa described in Nicaraguan fish (supplementary table S1). Parasite diversity includes species of trematodes, cestodes, monogeneans, acanthocephalans, nematodes, hirudineans, copepods, branchiurans and oribatid mites. Most species correspond to trematodes, with 42 taxa included in 16 families. Sixteen of them are reported as metacercaria. Monogeneans and nematodes are represented by 24 and 20 taxa, respectively. The oribatid mites, hirudineans and branchiurans are considered as rare records since they exhibit low prevalence values in their respective hosts. They are represented by a single taxon and reported only from one or two host species. In addition, three of the 101 parasite taxa are invasive species – namely, the anchor worm Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 in the characids Astyanax sp. and Bramocharax sp., the Asian fish tapeworm Schizochotyle acheilognathi (Yamaguti, 1934) in the cichlids Amphilophus citrinellus and Parachromis sp., and the larval trematode Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, 1924) in Astyanax sp.
The area with the greatest diversity was Lake Nicaragua with 37 parasite taxa, followed by the Black Water River (in the Atlantic slope of Nicaragua) with 36 parasite taxa. Sampling was asymmetrical among localities for both fish host species and number of individuals analysed, resulting in asymmetric patterns of distribution of parasite diversity among waterbodies (fig. 1). Most studies have focused thus far on the lowlands of either the Pacific or the Atlantic slopes, but there is, to date, no study in the Cordillera Central. Considering the Nicaraguan crater lakes, Lake Xiloá exhibited the greatest diversity, with 20 parasite taxa.
Fig. 1. Map of Nicaragua showing the sites where parasites have been from freshwater systems in Nicaragua. Parenthetical values next to site names indicate the number of parasite taxa reported for each site. Abbreviations: Cl, crater lake; L, lake; C, creek; R, river.
The 101 parasite taxa reported for Nicaragua were found in 51 fish species belonging to 11 families (figs 2, 3 and supplementary table S2). Therefore, parasite records are still lacking for 55.2% of the freshwater fish species diversity of Nicaragua. Cichlids are the best studied fish group in terms of their parasite fauna, with records from 30 fish species (fig. 2). Three parasite groups are only reported from cichlid hosts: acanthocephalans, hirudineans and branchiurans. Among cichlids, the Midas cichlid harbours the most species-rich fauna of all studied hosts, with 21 parasite taxa. Four species of poeciliids have been studied and 17 parasite taxa were recorded. For characids, including the genera Astyanax Baird & Girard, 1854, Bramocharax Gill, 1877 and Roeboides Günther, 1864 sampled in the great lakes and streams of the Atlantic slope, the parasite fauna includes 26 parasite taxa. In four species of catfishes (Heptapteridae), ten parasite taxa have been reported. The remaining fish families exhibited a poor parasite diversity, although we acknowledge that the sampling size for these fish is small: Bryconidae (one taxa), Carcharhinidae (three taxa), Eleotridae (three taxa), Haemulidae (one taxa), Lepisosteidae (two taxa), Megalopidae (one taxa) and Pristidae (two taxa) (supplementary table S2).
Fig. 2. Parasites in freshwater fishes of Nicaragua. Total number of parasite taxa per parasitic group (top graph) and number of fish host species per host family in colour (bottom graph) reported.
Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of representative parasites in freshwater fishes from the Nicaraguan lakes. Trematodes (a) Criptogonomidae gen. sp., (b) Oligogonotylus manteri, (c) Saccocoeilioides sp., (d) Genarchella astynactys, (e) Crassicutis cichlasomae, (f) Trematoda gen. sp., (g) Strigeidae gen. sp., (h) Austrodiplostomum sp., (i) Posthodiplostomum sp. 2, (j) Posthodiplostomum sp. 1, (k) Heterophyidae gen. sp., (l) cestode Cichlidocestus janikae, (m) monogenan Sciadicleithrum mexicanum, (n) nematode Goezia sp., (o) hirudinean Myzobdella.
Complementarily, the parasite fauna of freshwater fishes of Costa Rica and Panama were compiled in two checklists. The parasite–host list of freshwater fish parasites of Costa Rica comprises around 21 bibliographical references accounting for 59 parasite taxa reported from 44 fish species (supplementary table S3); cichlids have been the most studied hosts, with 26% of the species analysed. In contrast, the parasite–host list of freshwater fishes of Panama is based on solely eight references, on which 63 parasite taxa were reported from 25 fish species (supplementary tables S4). In this case, characiforms are the most intensively studied hosts, with 32% of the total number of species analysed.
Discussion
Nicaragua has a natural setting that favours diversification, with large freshwater bodies combined with smaller isolated crater lakes, which collectively are sources of biological endemism. In the last few years, we increased our sampling effort in the great Nicaraguan lakes and several crater lakes occurring on the Pacific coast of Nicaragua, where cichlids experienced evolutionary success and recent adaptive radiations, similar, albeit to a smaller extent, to the well-known adaptive radiations of cichlids in the East African Great Lakes (Barluenga et al., Reference Barluenga, Stölting, Salzburger, Muschick and Meyer2006; Salzburger et al., Reference Salzburger, Van Bocxlaer and Cohen2014; Kautt et al., Reference Kautt, Kratochwil and Nater2020). The freshwater fish fauna of Nicaragua comprises around 104 native species (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021), of which four siluriforms and nine characiforms are primary fish restricted to freshwater environments, but the rest are secondary freshwater fishes tolerant to different degrees of salinity. The most abundant fish in the Nicaraguan freshwaters are cichlids and poeciliids, which together account for almost 50% of the fish fauna.
The present study represents an additional step to an ongoing effort to characterize the metazoan parasites of Nicaraguan fish (see Santacruz et al., Reference Santacruz, Morales-Serna, Leal-Cardín, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2020, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2021, Reference Santacruz, Barluenga and Pérez-Ponce de León2022). Here, we report new data on the parasite fauna of non-cichlid fish hosts. We recorded 17 parasite taxa from seven fish species. The poecilids, widely distributed across all lakes (Astorqui, Reference Astorqui1971; Waid et al., Reference Waid, Raesly, Mckaye and McCrary1999), harboured the most parasite species-rich fauna, with six taxa, whereas, in characids, we found adult stages typical of their biogeographical core parasite fauna (sensu Pérez-Ponce de León & Choudhury, Reference Pérez-Ponce de León and Choudhury2005), including the trematode G. astyanactis and the monogenean C. costaricensis. Interestingly, the eleotrid Gobiomorus sp. (introduced in crater Lake Apoyo; Waid et al., Reference Waid, Raesly, Mckaye and McCrary1999) harboured a poor parasite fauna; host invasive species usually loss parasites when they colonize a new environment (Roche et al., Reference Roche, Leung, Mendoza Franco and Torchin2010).
In Nicaragua, considering all existing parasite records, the Midas cichlid species complex Amphilophus spp. possess the highest parasite species richness, with 26 taxa. The large parasite species diversity of these cichlids agrees with the observed diversity in Middle American cichlids of the tribe Heroini (Razo-Mendivil et al., Reference Razo-Mendivil, Rosas-Valdez and Pérez-Ponce de León2009, Reference Razo-Mendivil, Vázquez-Domínguez, Rosas-Valdez, Pérez-Ponce de León and Nadler2010, Reference Razo-Mendivil, Rosas-Valdez, Rubio-Godoy and Pérez-Ponce de León2015). This high parasite species richness in cichlids may be a response to their remarkable dominance in Middle American freshwaters, and the great number of endemisms in the lacustrine systems. However, the differences may also account for a sampling bias given the large interest these fishes raise. Overall, Middle American cichlids are parasitized by a large diversity of taxa, particularly helminth parasites (see Vidal-Martínez et al., Reference Vidal-Martínez, Aguirre-Macedo, Sholz, González-Solís and Mendoza-Franco2001a).
The parasite fauna of Nicaraguan freshwater fishes is mainly of Neotropical origin, and only a few records have been reported for Nearctic fish hosts, such as gars, which extend their southernmost distribution range to the San Juan River, which joins Lake Nicaragua with the Atlantic slope. Trematodes represent the dominant component of the parasite fauna, with the list including taxa from 16 families, reported in 39 fish species, both as adults and as metacercariae. Most of the trematode fauna of Nicaragua is shared with that of Mexican freshwaters, where Neotropical fishes reach their northernmost distributional range (see Pérez-Ponce de León & Choudhury, Reference Pérez-Ponce de León and Choudhury2005).
The freshwater fish parasite fauna of Lower Central America
The data gathered on the metazoan parasites of freshwater fishes of Nicaragua reveal a species-rich fauna, with a total of 101 parasite taxa belonging to eight parasitic groups, and these parasites infect 51 host species (less than 50% of the fish fauna). This makes Nicaragua the most thoroughly studied region of Central America. In contrast, for other areas in Lower Central America with higher fish richness – for example, Costa Rica and Panama – parasite surveys reported lower parasite species richness (see supplementary tables S3 and S4). To the best of our knowledge, in Costa Rica at least 44 of the 178 freshwater fish species (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021) have been studied for parasites to a certain extent, and 59 parasite taxa have been reported (Chandler et al., Reference Chandler, Chapman and Chapman1995; Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Daverdin and Brooks2002, Reference Choudhury, Pérez Ponce de León, Brooks and Daverdin2006; López-Caballero et al., Reference López-Caballero, Osorio-Sarabia and Garcia-Prieto2009; Arguedas Cortés et al., Reference Arguedas Cortés, Dolz, Zúñiga, Rocha and Alán2010; Sandlund et al., Reference Sandlund, Daverdin, Choudhury, Brooks and Diserud2010; Pinacho-Pinacho et al., Reference Pinacho-Pinacho, Sereno-Uribe, Pérez Ponce de León and García-Varela2015, Reference Pinacho-Pinacho, Sereno-Uribe, García-Varela and Pérez-Ponce de León2020, Reference Pinacho-Pinacho, Sereno-Uribe, Hernández-Orts, García-Varela and Pérez–Ponce de León2021; Tkach & Curran, Reference Tkach and Curran2015; Andrade-Gómez et al., Reference Andrade-Gómez, Pinacho-Pinacho and García-Varela2017, Reference Andrade-Gómez, Sereno-Uribe and García-Varela2019; De Chambrier et al., Reference De Chambrier, Pinacho-Pinacho, Hernández-Orts and Scholz2017; Curran et al., Reference Curran, Pulis, Andres and Overstreet2018; López-Jiménez et al., Reference López-Jiménez, Pérez-Ponce de León and García-Varela2018; Briosio-Aguilar et al., Reference Briosio-Aguilar, García-Varela, Hernández-Mena, Rubio-Godoy and Pérez-Ponce de León2019; Sereno-Uribe et al., Reference Sereno-Uribe, Gómez, Núñez, Pérez Ponce de León and García-Varela2019; González-García et al., Reference González-García, Andrade-Gómez, Pinacho-Pinacho, Sereno-Uribe and García-Varela2021; supplementary table S3). In Panama, 25 of the 213 freshwater fish species (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021) have been studied for parasites, and 63 parasite taxa have been reported (Sogandares-Bernal, Reference Sogandares-Bernal1955; Mendoza-Franco et al., Reference Mendoza-Franco, Aguirre-Macedo and Vidal-Martínez2007, Reference Mendoza-Franco, Roche and Torchin2008, Reference Mendoza-Franco, Reina and Torchin2009a, Reference Mendoza-Franco, Violante-González and Rocheb; Mendoza-Franco & Reina, Reference Mendoza-Franco and Reina2008; Kritsky et al., Reference Kritsky, Mendoza-Franco, Bullard and Vidal-Martínez2009; Roche et al., Reference Roche, Leung, Mendoza Franco and Torchin2010; Choudhury et al., Reference Choudhury, Zheng, Pérez-Ponce de León, Martínez-Aquino, Brosseau and Gale2013, Reference Choudhury, García-Varela and Pérez-Ponce de León2017; supplementary table S4). Nicaragua, along with Costa Rica and Panama, comprise a geographical region known as Lower Central America. Overall, the freshwater fish fauna of Lower Central America is composed of at least 176 parasite taxa, although the proportion of fish species analysed thus far is still relatively low. This clearly indicates that the inventory of the freshwater fish parasite fauna is far from complete. However, some interesting biogeographical patterns emerged, particularly when adult stages are considered, since larval forms might obscure patterns as they can be dispersed with their definitive hosts – usually fish-eating birds. An initial interesting pattern refers to the fact that the parasite fauna of Lower Central America is mainly composed of adult parasites, with 127 taxa out of the 173 reported (73%). Ecologically, this may indicate that the analysed host species play a minor role in the transmission dynamic of some parasites in the freshwaters of Lower Central America. Still, 46 larval stages of parasites complete their life cycle in another vertebrate. Most of the larval forms are found in fish-eating birds (32 of the 42 taxa), while the other use either larger fish, mammals or reptiles as definitive hosts. Current data show that only five adult taxa – that is, the trematodes Acanthostomum minimum Stunkard, 1938, Oligogonotylus manteri Watson, 1976, Prosthenhystera obesa (Diesing, 1850), Saccocoelioides cichlidorum (Aguirre-Macedo & Scholz, 2005) and the nematode Rhabdochona sp. – are shared across all of Lower Central America. However, this might be a sampling artifact, and the result of incomplete sampling of hosts or inaccurate species identifications. The parasite fauna shared across Lower Central America is the result of the influence of the regional fauna, as well as the biogeographical patterns of their hosts. All the species are also distributed in Middle America; they have been reported in freshwater fishes of Mexico, particularly in the Neotropical part of the country, where the same groups of hosts are distributed (Pérez-Ponce de León & Choudhury, Reference Pérez-Ponce de León and Choudhury2005). Interestingly, at least 29 parasite taxa are endemic in freshwater fishes in river basins across Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama, accounting for 16.7% of endemism.
In summary, the results of our study highlight the diversity of parasites in freshwater systems of Nicaragua, and show the spatial distribution of the sampling effort, mainly in the lowlands of the west and east of the Cordillera Central. Our data add information to the inventory of the parasite fauna of freshwater fishes in this important region. The biogeographical event referred to as the GABI requires the use of different taxa to better explain the major patterns of distribution derived from the formation of the land bridge. We acknowledge that the inventory of the freshwater fish parasite fauna of Nicaragua is still far from complete, but the current information is very useful for better understanding the role of GABI in the diversification of both hosts and parasites. In addition, we concur with Poulin et al. (Reference Poulin, Presswell and Jorge2020) in that the research programs on fish parasite discovery require an improvement in their efficiency to achieve a better understanding of parasite diversity patterns, which is central to comprehending the evolutionary-based classification of living forms on the planet. In our study, we targeted a geographical hotspot of fish biodiversity, and we used molecular tools to study parasite genetic diversity in cases where morphology was not enough to establish proper species identifications. For the descriptions of new taxa, we followed an integrative taxonomy approach that considered traits such as morphology, DNA, host association and geographical distribution; this sets a standard quality criterion for new species descriptions. Poulin et al. (Reference Poulin, Presswell and Jorge2020) clearly stated that since taxonomy and systematics underpin all other research in ecology and evolution, and applied science related, for example, with fisheries and aquaculture, it is necessary first to discover parasite species and then to characterize host–parasite associations. In addition, our study on the parasite fauna of Nicaraguan freshwater fishes is part of a larger project aimed at understanding the potential role of parasites in the diversification of the Midas cichlid species complex, which mirrors the case of adaptive radiations of cichlids in African lakes. Information on the parasite fauna of these fish sheds light on the factors that determine cases of sympatric speciation.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X2200013X
Acknowledgements
Our thanks to Mariana Leal and Carlos Lozano for their help during fieldwork, and to Brenda Solórzano, Yanet Velázquez and Jhonatan Cabañas for their help with the fish dissection. Thanks to the Nicaraguan Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA) and Universidad Centroamericana (UCA) in Nicaragua for support in the field, and to Luis García and Ricardo Paredes for their help with the identification of some parasites. We also thank Luis García for the loan of parasites to the CNHE.
Financial support
This work was supported by a pre-doctoral scholarship from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) (A.S.) CVU 630729; the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (M.B., grant number CGL2017-82986-C2-1-P); and CONACYT (G.P.-P.L., grant number A1-S-21694).
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical standards
The authors assert that hosts were studied following all applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. Fish were euthanized and killed following procedures of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Hosts were collected under a collection permit (number 001-012015) issued by MARENA.
Open access
