Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:36:23.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host age, sex and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

J. M. Behnke ,
J. W. Lewis ,
S. N. Mohd Zain  and
F. S. Gilbert
J. M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
J. W. Lewis
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
S. N. Mohd Zain
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
F. S. Gilbert
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
*
*Fax: 0115 951 3252, E-mail: jerzy.behnke@nottingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Helminth parasites were studied in the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, in southern England in September of each of four successive years (1994–1997). Nine species of helminths were recorded: five nematodes (Heligmosomoides polygyrus, Syphacia stroma, Pelodera strongyloides, Trichuris muris, Capillaria murissylvatici), two cestodes (Microsomacanthus crenata, Taenia taeniaeformis) and two trematodes (Corrigia vitta, Brachylaemus recurvum). In total, 134 mice were examined and 91.8% carried at least one species of helminth. The majority of mice carried two to three species (60.5%) and the highest combination was six of the nine species recorded in the study. The patterns of between-year variations in the prevalence and abundance of infection were different for each of the six species for which sufficient quantitative data were available to enable statistical analysis. For H. polygyrus, the most important source of variation arose from between-year differences, host age and the interaction of these factors: abundance increased with host age but in 1995 the age pattern was markedly different from that in the remaining years. The abundance of C. vitta also varied significantly between years but additionally there was a strong independent age effect. For M. crenata, the year × age interaction was significant, indicating that abundance among different age cohorts varied from year to year but there was also a weak significant main effect of age arising from the youngest age cohort carrying no parasites and the oldest age cohort the heaviest infections. For P. strongyloides the only significant factor was between-year variation with 1995 being a year of exceptionally low prevalence and abundance of infection. No significant between-year variation was detected for S. stroma but there was a strong sex effect (males carrying heavier infections) and an age effect (older mice of both sexes carrying heavier infections). The abundance of Trichuris muris varied only in relation to host age, worm burdens growing in intensity with increasing age, but there was also a significant interaction between year and host sex with respect to prevalence. For the remaining three species, the prevalence of infections was too low (< 8.2%) to enable any meaningful interpretation. This analysis emphasizes the need for carefully controlled statistical procedures in aiding the interpretation and the prioritization of the factors affecting worm burdens in wild rodents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 31 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Madi, M.A., Behnke, J.M. Lewis, J.W. & Gilbert, F.S. (1998) Descriptive epidemiology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England.Journal of Helminthology 72, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneberg, P., Skorping, A., Grenfell, B. & Read, A.F. (1998) Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 265, 1283–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bancroft, A.J., Else, K.J. & Grencis, R.K. (1994) Low-level infection with Trichuris muris significantly affects the polarization of the CD4 response.European Journal of Immunology 24, 3113–3118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M. & Wakelin, D. (1973) The survival of Trichuris muris in wild populations of its natural hosts. Parasitology 67, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M.,Ali, N.M.H. & Jenkins, S.N. (1984) Survival to patency of low level infections with Trichuris muris in mice concurrently infected with Nematospiroides dubius . Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 78, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M., Pritchard, D.I., Wakelin, D., Park, J.R., McNicholas, A.M. & Gilbert, F.S. (1994) Effect of ivermectin on infection with gastro-intestinal nematodes in Sierra Leone.Journal of Helminthology 68, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbet, G.B. & Harris, S. (1991) The handbook of British mammals. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Press.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.T. (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.M. (1977) Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria, UK.Google Scholar
Elton, C., Ford, E.B., Baker, J.R. & Gardiner, A.D. (1931) The health and parasites of a wild mouse population. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931, 657–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R.D. (1992) On the interpretation of host-parasite ecology: Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in wild wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) populations.Journal of Zoology 226, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R.D., Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1992) Population biology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in the wood mouse.Journal of Animal Ecology 61, 749–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V. (1986) Frequency distributions of helminths in microtine rodents in Finnish LaplandAnnales Zoologici Fennici 23, 141–150.Google Scholar
Haukisalmi, V. & Henttonen, H. (1993) Coexistence in helminths of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. I. Patterns of co-occurrence.Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V., Henttonen, H. & Tenora, F. (1988) Population dynamics of common and rare helminths in cyclic vole populations.Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hominick, W.M. & Aston, A.J. (1981) Association between Pelodera strongyloides (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) and wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus.Parasitology 83, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, A.E. & Dobson, A.P. (1987) The ecology of helminths in populations of small mammals.Mammal Review 17, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, L.F., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (1994) Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. Wallingford, CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisielewska, K. (1970) Ecological oraganization of intestinal helminth groupings in Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreb.) (Rodentia). 1. Structure and seasonal dynamics of helminth groupings in a host population in the Białowieża National ParkActa Parasitologica Polonica 18, 121–147.Google Scholar
Kisielewska, K. (1971) Intestinal helminths as indicators of the age structure of Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778 population.Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences. Serie des Sciences Biologiques Cl.II, 19, 275–282.Google Scholar
Kisielewska, K., Fraczak, K., Krasowska, I. & Zubczewska, Z. (1973) Structure of the intestinal helminthocoenosis in the population of Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778, and the mechanisms of its variability.Acta Parasitologica Polonica 21, 71–83.Google Scholar
Langley, R. & Fairley, J.S. (1982) Seasonal variations in infestations of parasites in a wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus population in the west of Ireland.Journal of Zoology 198, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.W. (1968) Studies on the helminth parasites of the long-tailed field mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus sylvaticus from Wales Journal of Zoology 154, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.W. (1987) Helminth parasites of British rodents and insectivores.Mammal Review 17, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Holmes, J.C., Kuris, A.M. & Schad, G.A. (1982) The use of ecological terms in parasitology (Report of an ad hoc Committee of the American Society of Parasitologists).Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1988) Cyclic and non-cyclic dynamics in populations of the helminth parasites of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus.Journal of Helminthology 62, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1989) Spatial and temporal variation in the infracommunity structure of helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia: Muridae)Parasitology 98, 145–150.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1990) Structure, stability and species interactions in helminth communities of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticusInternational. Journal for Parasitology 20, 225–242.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, H.M., Small, C.M. & Fairley, J.S. (1984) A study of parasitic infestations in populations of small rodents (Apodemus sylvaticus and Clethrionomys glareolus) on Ross Island, Killarney.Journal of Life Sciences, Royal Dublin Society 5, 29–42.Google Scholar
Prokopic, J. (1967) Hymenolepis muris-sylvatici (Rudolphi, 1819) = Variolepis crenata (Goeze, 1782)Folia Parasitologica 14, 365–369.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C.A. (1819) Entozoorum Synopsis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sharpe, G.I. (1964) The helminth parasites of some small mammal communities. I. The parasites and their hosts.Parasitology 54, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenora, F. (1967) Ecological study on helminths of small rodents of the Rohacska Dolina valley.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemoslovacae 1, 163–207.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. & Stanek, M. (1995) Changes of the helminthofauna in several Muridae and Arvicolidae at Lednice in Moravia. II. Ecology.Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 43, 57–65.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. & Grenfell, B.T. (1997) Generalized linear modelling for parasitologists.Parasitology Today 13, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar