Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:43:53.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Invasion of Helminth Eggs by Chytridiacean Fungi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. J. C. Buckley
Affiliation:
Research ScholarNational University of IrelandFrom the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Phyllis A. Clapham
Affiliation:
Field Officer, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Extract

The material forming the basis of this paper consists of the two fungi, Catenaria anguillulæ Sorokin and Rhizophidium carpophilum Zopf, which were found parasitic on the eggs of Dibothriocephalus latus in the Helminthology Department in March, 1927. The stool containing the eggs had been washed in laboratory tap water and this was evidently the vehicle of the fungus infection. A sediment obtained from one of the water tanks from which the laboratory is supplied was found to contain infusoria, rotifers and other forms likely to act as hosts for the fungi, and that this was the source of the original infection was proved on more than one occasion by placing some of the sediment in a petri dish along with some uninfected eggs of D. latus, when a new infection of both the fungi appeared in the eggs.

In the following paper the fungi are described and an account is given of some experimental work that was carried out with a view to determining the possibility of employing such parasites as a control measure in helminthiasis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, C. H., 1925.—“The Life Cycle of the Human Intestinal Fluke, Fasciolopsis buski(Lankester),” Amer. J. Hyg. (July, 1925).Google Scholar
Butler, E. J., 1928.—“Morphology of the Chytridiacean Fungus, Catenaria anguillulæ, in Liver Fuke Eggs,” Ann. Bot., Vol. XLII, No. 168.Google Scholar
Butler, J. B. and Buckley, J. J. C., 1927.— “Catenaria anguillulæ as a parasite of the ova of Fasciola hepatica,” Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. (N.S.), No. 45.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P. A., 1886.—“Recherches sur les Organismes Inférieures,” Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 7, IV.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1920.—“Histoire Naturelle des Nématodes de la Bérbérie,” Tran. Lab. Zool. Gen., Univ., Alger., p. 189.Google Scholar
Sorokin, N., 1876.—“Les Végétaux Parasites des Anguillules,” Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 6, IV.Google Scholar
Zopf, W., 1884.—“Zur Kenntnis der Phycomyceten. I. Zur Morphologie und Biologie der Ancylisteen und Chytridiaceen”. Nova Ada. Leop. Carol. Bd. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar