Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T01:15:08.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Life-Cycle of Heterodera schachtii.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Marjorie J. Triffitt
Marjorie J. Triffitt
Affiliation:
Field Officer, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early accounts of the morphology and life-cycle of Heterodera schachtii, were, like much of the subsequent work on this subject, the result of observations carried out on the strain of H. schachtii parasitic on sugar-beet in Germany.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1930 , pp. 185 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chatin, J., 1887.—“Sur les Kystes bruns de l'anguillule de la betterave,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. CV, pp. 130–132. (W.L. 6628).Google Scholar
Chatin, J., 1888.—“Sur la structure des téguments de l'Heterodera schachtii et sur les modifications qu'ils présentent chez les femelles fécondées,” C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, vol. CVII, pp. 139–141. (W.L. 6628).Google Scholar
Duffield, C. A. W., 1927.—“The beet eelworm (Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt)): Its life history when found on hops in this country,” J. Southeast Agric. Coll. Wye, Kent, No. 24, pp. 56–58.Google Scholar
Fuchs, O., 1911.—“Beiträg zur Biologie der Rubennematoden Heterodera schachtii,” Z. landw. Vchsw. Ost., Jahrg. 14, pp. 923–949. (W.L. 23488).Google Scholar
Miles, H. W., 1930.—“Field Studies on Heterodera schachtii Schmidt in relation to the pathological condition known as “potato sickness,” J. Helm., vol. VIII, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rensch, B., 1924.—“Eine neue Methode zur Bekämpfung der Rübennematoden,” Mitt. deuts. Landw. Ges., Bd. 39, pp. 412–414. (W.L. 13900).Google Scholar
Sengbusch, R. v., 1927.—“Beiträg zur Biologie des Rubennematoden Heterodera schachtii,” Z. PflKrank., vol. XXXVII, pp. 86–102. (W.L. 23540a).Google Scholar
Strubell, A., 1888.—“Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklung des Rubennematoden ‘Heterodera schachtii, Schmidt,’” Bibl. zool. (Cassel), Heft. 2, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1929.—“Further observations on the morphology of Heterodera schachtii, with remarks on the bionomics of a strain attacking mangolds in Britain,” J. Helm., vol. VII., pp. 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1930.—“On the bionomics of Heterodera schachtii on Potatoes, with special reference to the influence of mustard on the escape of the larvæ from the cysts,” J. Helm., vol. VIII, pp. 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar