Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:00:45.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Oxyurid Parasites of Reptiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Gobind Singh Thapar
Gobind Singh Thapar
Affiliation:
From the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Oxyurid parasites of Reptiles form a group of very interesting forms and have been a subject of study by several distinguished helminthologists from early times. The earliest account, in a connected form, to which the writer has been able to refer is that given by Rudolphi (1819). This author, though recognising the genus Oxyuris, restricts to it the forms found in mammals and more particularly Oxyuris vermicttlaris from the large intestine of man and Oxyuris curvula from the caxum of horse; the Oxyurids of all other animals he refers to the genus Ascaris.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 3 , Issue 3-4 , August 1925 , pp. 83 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A., and Daubney, R., 1922.—“Report on the parasitic Nematodes in the Collection of the Zoological Survey of India.” Mem. Ind. Mus., Calcutta, vol. VII., No. 4, 303.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1923.—“Report on a collection of parasitic Nematodes, mainly from Egypt. Part II., Oxyuridæ.” Parasit, vol. XV., No. 1, pp. 14–24. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, E. A., 1924.—“Nematode Parasites of Brazilian land-tortoise (Testudo denticulata.” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. Washington, vol. LXV., Art. 13, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, K. M., 1857.—“Sechzehn arten von Nematoideen.” Denkschr. d. k. Akad. d. Wissensch. Math.-Nalurw. CL, vol. XIII., I abt., pp. 6–21.Google Scholar
Drasche, R. von, 1883.—“Nematoden aus Testudo græca.” Verhandl. d. k. Zool. bot. geo., Bd. XXXIII., pp. 325–330..Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire Naturelle des Helminthes ou vers Intestineaux.” Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fracker, S. B., 1914.—“Variations in Oxyurias: Its bearing on the value of a Nematode Formula.” Journ. of Parasit., vol. I., No. 1, pp. 22–30..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraipont, J., 1882.—“Nouveaux vers Parasites de l'Uromastix acanthinurus.” Bull, de I'Acad. Roy. de Belgique, vol. LI., No. 2, pp. 104–5.Google Scholar
Galeb, O. B., 1889.—“Note sur I'Organisation et le development d'une nouvellc espece d'entozoaire.” Mém, de l'Inst. Egypt., Le Caire, vol. II., pp. 425–431.Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1916.—“Notes sur la Faune Parasitaire du Congo Beige.” Rev. Zool. Africaine, vol. V., part 1, pp. 27–33 and 76–77.Google Scholar
Hetherington, D. C., 1923.—“Comparative Studies on certain features of Nematodes and their Significance.” Ill. Biol. Monogr., vol. VIII., No. 2, pp. 111–166.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1910.—“The Entozoa of the Hippopotamus.” Proc. Zool. Soc., London, pp. 233–251..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1911.—“Some new Parasitic Nematodes from Tropical Africa.” Proc. Zool. Soc., London, pp. 549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1883.—“Nematoden, Trematoden, u Acanthocephalen, gesammelt von Prof. Fedtschenko in Turkestan.” Archiv. für Naturg., XLIX., I., pp. 274–314.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1893.—“Oxyuris paronai n. sp. u Cheiracanthus hispidus.” Archiv. für Naturg. LIX., I., pp. 201–208.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1897.—“Nemathelminthen Grösstentheils in Madagascar gcsammelt.” Ibid., J., Bd. ixm., Heft. 1, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1899.—“Nematoden aus dcr Berlinger Zoologischen Sammlung.” Mitt, aus der Zoologisch. des Mus. für Naturk. in Berlin, Bd. I., Heft. 2, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1902.—“Atractis cruciata und Oxyuris monhystera, Zwei neue Nematoden aus Metopoceros cornutus.” Centralbl. für Bakt. Parasit. und Infektionskunde, Bd. XXXI., pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1904.—“Nematodes in the Collection of Colombo Museum.” Spolia Zeylanica, vol. I., Part 4, pp. 100–102.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1904.—“Beobachtungen an Nematoden und Cestoden.” Archiv. für Naturg., Bd. I., Heft. 3, pp. 297–309.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1906.—“Nematoden des Zoologischen Museum Königsberg.” Archiv. für Naturg., vol. III., Heft. 11, pp. 249–258.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1907.—“Helminthcs von Herrn Edward Jacobson in Java, Gesammelt.” Notes from Leyden Museum, vol. XXIX., No. 10, pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von, 1909.—“Susswasserfauna Deutschlands, Heft. 15, pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
Macalister, A., 1866.—“On the Anatomy of Ascaris (Atractis) dactyluris.” Journ. Micros. Sci., vol. VI., pp. 79–86. London.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., and Henry, A., 1912.—“Quelques Nematodes Parasites des Reptiles.” Bull. Soc. de Path. Exot., Tome V., No. 4, pp. 251–259.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., and Henry, A., 1916a.—“Sur les Oxyuridés.” C.R. Soc. de Biol., Tome LXXIX,, pp. 113–115. Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., and Henry, A., 1916b.—“Nouvelles Remarques sur les Oxyuridés.” C.R. Soc. de Biol., pp. 247–250.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—“Entozoorum Synopsis.”Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1866.—“Monographic der Nematoden.” Berlin, pp. 107–108 and 114–126.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1912.—“Oxyures de I'Uromastix acanthurus.” C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris. Tome LXXIII., pp. 223–226.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1913.—“Sur un cas des Pœcilogonie chez un Oxyurc.” C.R. Soc. Biol., Tome LXXIV., pp. 1089–1092.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1914.—“Sur un cas d'endotokie Matricide chez un Oxyure.” C.R. Soc. Biol., Tome LXXVI., pp. 850–853.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1914.—“Sur un Nouvel Oxyure des Reptiles.” C.R. Soc. Biol., Tome LXXVII. pp. 96–98.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1917.—“Sur les Oxyures des Sauriens du Nord Africain.” Archiv. de Zool. Exper. et Gen., Tome LVI., Fasc. 9, pp. 401–444.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1918.—“Contribution à l'étude de la Faune Parasitaire de la Tunisie.” Archiv. de l'Inst. Past, de Tunis, Tome X., Fasc. 4, pp. 244–260.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1918.—“Sur les Conditions de la Ponte chez les Nématodes.” C.R. Soc. Biol., vol. LXXXI., pp. 279–281. Paris.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1918.—“Dimorphisme Sexuel chez les Nématodes.” C.R. Soc. Biol., pp. 1099–1101.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G., 1918.—“Sur la Variation chez les Nématodcs.” C.R. Soc. Biol., pp. 1101–1104.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. H., 1914.—“Studies on Indian Helminthology.” No. I., Rec. Ind. Mus., Calcutta, vol. X., part 3, pp. 165–193.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. S., 1916.—“Parasitic Trematodes and Nematodes, collected by the Expedition of Prof. V. Dogiel and I. Sokolov in British East Africa. (Translation, pp. 99–157).Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1920.—“Esboco du uma chave geral dos Nematödes Parasitôs.” Revist. vet. et Zootech., Rio de Janeiro, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar