Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:45:19.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Convergence of Efficiency and Equity via Neoclassical Prescriptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

William Ascher
William Ascher*
Affiliation:
Center for International Development Research at Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The most exciting prospect in Latin American political economy and public policy is the possibility of pursuing the objectives of equity and efficiency through the same neoclassical policy instruments. In light of conventional views, this convergence is remarkable, perhaps even shocking. We often juxtapose efficiency and equity, along with the ideological positions associated with each. It is common to link Leftist political approaches both to statism and to progressive income distribution, thereby linking statism to progress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 31 , Issue 1-2: Special Issue: Latin America at the Crossroads: Major Public Policy Issues , Spring/Summer 1989 , pp. 49 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, W. (1989) “Risk, Politics, and Tax Reform: Lessons from Some Latin American Experiences,” in Malcolm Gillis (ed.) Lessons from Fundamental Tax Reform in Developing Countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cline, W. (1983) “Economic Stabilization in Developing Countries,” pp. 175-208 in John Williamson (ed.) IMF Stabilization. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
Cline, W. and Weintraub, S. (1981) Economic Stabilization in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Foxley, A. (1983) Latin American Experiments in Neo-Conservative Economics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, M. (ed.) (1989) Lessons from Fundamental Tax Reform in Developing Countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Harberger, A. (1984) “Economic Policy and Economic Growth,” pp. 427-466 in Harberger (ed.) World Economic Growth. San Francisco, CA: Ics Press.Google Scholar
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) (1975) Agricultural Credit: Sector Policy Paper (May). Washington, DC: IBRD.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. and Salop, J. (1980) “Distributional Aspects of Stabilization Programs in Developing Countries.” Imf Staff Papers 27, 1 (March): pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Lal, D. (1985) The Poverty of Development Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. (1971) A Pre-View of the Policy Sciences. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Little, I. (1982) Economic Development: Theory, Policy, and International Relations, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mamalakis, M. (1969) “The Theory of Sectoral Clashes.” Latin American Research Review 4, 3: pp. 9–46.Google Scholar
Mikesell, R. (1983) “Appraising IMF Conditionality: Too Loose, Too Tight, or Just Right?” pp. 47-62 in John Williamson (ed.) IMF Stabilization. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1977) Government Policy and the Distribution of Income in Peru. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1975) “Government Policy and the Distribution of Income in Peru, 1963-1973,” pp. 79-127 in Abraham Lowenthal (ed.) The Peruvian Experiment: Continuity and Change Under Military Rule. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar