Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T22:08:26.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terminal Loyalties in a Mexican Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stan Wilk
Stan Wilk*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Lycoming College, Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The psychological development of most human beings leads to the emergence of feelings of “belongingness” vis-à-vis certain social groupings. I shall denote such feelings by the term “loyalties.” With the emergence of the state, and increasingly on into the contemporary era, an attempt has been made by these maximal-sized, territorial-based political units, to develop a state-focused civic sense within their respective societies. According to Geertz (1963: 156), the civic sense involves “a definite concept of the public as a separate and distinct body and an attendant notion of a genuine public interest, which though not necessarily superior to, is independent of and at times even in conflict with both private and other sorts of collective interest.” However, within the confines of already existing states may be smaller territorial units who view themselves as political communities with their own publics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , November 1974 , pp. 482 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. [ed.] (1957) Political Changes in Guatemalan Indian Communities. New Orleans.Google Scholar
Bailey, F. G. (1968) “Parapolitical systems,” pp. 281–294 in Swartz, M. (ed.) Local-Level Politics. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Erasmus, C. J. (1967) “Upper limits of peasantry and agrarian reform: Bolivia, Venezuela, and Mexico compared.” Ethnology 6: 349–380.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1963) “The Integrative Revolution: primordial sentiments and civil politics in the new states,” pp. 105–157 in Geertz, C. (ed.) Old Societies and New States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gillin, J. (1951) The Culture of Security in San Carlos. New Orleans.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1968) The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Kunkel, J. H. (1965) “Economic autonomy and social changes in a Mexican village,” pp. 438–453 in Heath, D. and Adams, R. (eds.) Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nicholas, R. W. (1966) “Segmentary factional political systems,” pp. 49–60 in Swartz, M. et al. (eds.) Political Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Pospisil, L. (1971) Anthropology of Law. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Pospisil, L. (1958) Kapauku Papuans and Their Law. New Haven, Conn.: Human Relations Area File Press.Google Scholar
Schermerhorn, R. A. (1961) Society and Power. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tax, S. (1941) “World view and social relations in Guatemala.” Amer. Anthropologist 43: 27–42.Google Scholar
Wilk, S. (1970)“Salvador del Monte: a study of political peasantry.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1971) “Peasant rebellion and revolution, pp. 48–67 in Miller, N. and Aya, R. (eds.) National Liberation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1969) Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar