Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:18:18.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S. Influence in the Organization of American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

George Meek
George Meek*
Affiliation:
Organization of American States
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Literature on U.S. influence in the Organization of American States reveals a marked diversity of views. Some authors consider that U.S. influence is absolute or very nearly so; others hold that it is relative; still others think it is minimal.

In the nearly-absolute school, former Guatemalan President Arévalo (1961: 126) says that the United States “always wins” in the OAS. The Ecuadorian writer Benjamín Cardón (1965: 29) says that the OAS “receives orders and complies with them, with the appearance of discussion, and the appearance of votes that satisfy pro-forma the hypocritical quakerism of the masters.” This view might be summed up by a comment attributed to a Latin American delegate to one Inter-American Conference: “If the United States wanted to badly enough, it could have a resolution passed declaring two and two are five ” (New York Times, March 8, 1954).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 1975 , pp. 311 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, H. R. and Russett, B. M. (1965) World Politics in the General Assembly. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Arevalo, J. J. (1961) The Shark and the Sardines (trans, by Cobb, J. and Osegueda, R.). New York: Lyle Stuart.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. A. (1967) Latin America in World Politics. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
Ball, M. M. (1969) The OAS in Transition. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carrion, B. (1965) “Oración Fúnerbre por la OEA.” Cuadernos Americanos 141 (July-August): 19-35.Google Scholar
Connell-Smith, G. (1966) The Inter-American System. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Corominas, E. (1965) Mexico–Cuba y la Organización de los Estados Americanos. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Política, Economía y Finanzas.Google Scholar
Drier, J. C. (1962) The Organization of American States and the Hemisphere Crisis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Etzioni, M. M. (1970) The Majority of One: Towards a Theory of Regional Compatibility. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Gerassi, J. (1963) The Great Fear: The Reconquest of Latin America by Latin Americans. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Haas, E. B. (1970) The Web of Interdependence: the United States and International Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. S. (1965) Latin American Mission: An Adventure in Hemisphere Diplomacy (ed. by Frank, G.). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Riggs, R. E. (1958) Politics in the United Nations: A Study of United States Influence in the General Assembly. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ronning, C. N. (1970) Intervention in Latin America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rowe, E. T. (1969) “Changing patterns in the voting success of member states in the United Nations General Assembly.” International Organization 23 (Spring): 231–253.Google Scholar
Slater, J. (1967) The OAS and United States Foreign Policy. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. H. (1970) United States Policy Toward Latin America: A Study in Domestic and International Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar