Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:15:29.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temporalis fascia grafts shrink

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. J. England*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
D. R. Strachan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
J. G. Buckley
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: R. J. A. England, F.R.C.S., Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. James' University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF.

Abstract

Temporalis fascia, placed as an underlay graft, is commonly used to repair tympanic membrane perforations. Graft failure, however, is a well recognized complication. Grafts are often allowed to dry out during the procedure and, therefore, are often positioned in a dry or partially dehydrated state and only become fully rehydrated after placement. This study looked at how the size of the temporalis fascia alters with its state of hydration. The size of 20 temporalis fascia grafts was measured when fresh, after flattening and allowing them to dry, and finally after rehydrating the grafts with 0.9 per cent saline solution. Significant shrinkage was demonstrated. It is therefore proposed that a cause of increased failure rates, particularly in anterior myringoplasties, is loss of underlay due to graft rehydration and shrinkage. Thus graft shrinkage should be considered when positioning the graft.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, J. H., Hickey, S. A., Wormald, P. J. (1995) An analysis of the results of myringoplasty in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 31: 95100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisch, U. (1994) Tympanoplasty, Mastoidectomy and Stapes Surgery. G. Thieme Verlag, Germany, pp 1043.Google Scholar
Gersdorff, F. F., Garin, P., Decat, M., Juantegui, M. (1995) Myringoplasty: long-term results in adults and children. American Journal of Otology 16(4): 532553.Google ScholarPubMed
Palva, T. (1987) Surgical treatment of chronic middle ear disease. 1. Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 104: 279284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palva, T., Ramsay, H. (1995) Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty – results related to training and experience. Clinical Otolaryngology 20: 329335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Brown, P. M., Cameron, J. M., Fowler, S. M., Grant, H. R., Topham, J. H. (1993) Royal College of Surgeons comparative ENT audit 1990. Clinical Otolaryngology 18: 541546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tos, M. (1980) Stability of myringoplasty based on late results. ORL; Journal of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties 42(3): 171181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, E., Nuutinen, J. (1993) Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. American Journal of Otology 14(3): 301305.Google ScholarPubMed
Wormald, P. J., Alun-Jones, T. (1991) Anatomy of the temporalis fascia. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105 522524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed