Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T14:25:07.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence-based review of aetiopathogenic theories of congenital and acquired cholesteatoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2007

R Persaud*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
D Hajioff
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
A Trinidade
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
S Khemani
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
M N Bhattacharyya
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK
N Papadimitriou
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
A Kalan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
A K Bhattacharyya
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Ricardo Persaud, Specialist Registrar in Otolaryngology, North Thames London, Department of Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK. Fax: +44 208 8869 2964 E-mail: ricardopersaud@yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

Cholesteatoma is a non-neoplastic, keratinising lesion which has two forms: congenital and acquired. Congenital cholesteatoma develops behind a normal, intact tympanic membrane, whilst acquired cholesteatoma is associated with a defect in the tympanic membrane. The pathological substrate of cholesteatoma is keratinising stratified squamous epithelium, but the origin of this epidermal tissue in the middle ear is controversial. Here, we review the most relevant and recent evidence for the principal aetiopathogenic theories of both forms of cholesteatoma, in the light of recent otopathological findings.

Congenital cholesteatoma is most plausibly explained by the persistence of fetal epidermoid formation. Conclusive ‘proof’ awaits the unambiguous demonstration of the metamorphosis of an epidermoid nidus into a lesion in vivo.

Acquired cholesteatoma may develop by various mechanisms: immigration, basal hyperplasia, retraction pocket and/or trauma (iatrogenic or non-iatrogenic). However, squamous metaplasia of the normal cuboidal epithelium of the middle ear is a highly unlikely explanation. Chronic inflammation seems to play a fundamental role in multiple aetiopathogenic mechanisms of acquired cholesteatoma. Therefore early treatment of inflammatory conditions might reduce their sequelae, perhaps by preventing the development of hyperplastic papillary protrusions.

Continued otopathological, cellular and molecular research would enhance our limited understanding of cholesteatoma and may lead to new therapeutic strategies for this erosive disease, which often defies surgical treatment.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Olszewska, E, Wagner, M, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M, Ebmeyer, J, Dazert, S, Hildmann, H et al. Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Persaud, R, Singh, A, Georgalas, C, Kirsch, C, Wareing, M. A new case of synchronous primary external ear canal cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:1055–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Persaud, R, Hajioff, D, Thevasagayam, M, Wareing, M, Wright, A. Keratosis obturans and external ear canal cholesteatoma: how and why we should distinguish between these conditions. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:577–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Tos, M. Incidence, etiology and pathogenesis of cholesteatoma in children. Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;40:110–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Mills, RP, Padgham, ND. Management of childhood cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:343–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Levenson, MJ, Parisier, SC, Chute, P, Wenig, S, Juarbe, C. A review of twenty congenital cholesteatomas of the middle ear in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:560–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Parisier, SC, Levenson, MJ, Edelstein, DR, Bindra, GS, Han, JC, Dolitsky, JN. Management of congenital pediatric cholesteatomas. Am J Otol 1989;10:121–3Google ScholarPubMed
8Potsic, WP, Korman, SB, Samadi, DS, Wetmore, RF. Congenital cholesteatoma: 20 years' experience at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:409–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Aimi, K. Role of the tympanic ring in the pathogenesis of congenital cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 1983;93:1140–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Northrop, C, Piza, J, Eavey, RD. Histological observations of amniotic fluid cellular content in the ear of neonates and infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1986;11:113–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Eavey, RD. Abnormalities of the neonatal ear: otoscopic observations, histologic observations, and a model for contamination of the middle ear by cellular contents of amniotic fluid. Laryngoscope 1993;10:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Michaels, L. Origin of congenital cholesteatoma from a normally occurring epidermoid rest in the developing middle ear. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1988;15:5165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Tos, M. A new pathogenesis of mesotympanic (congenital) cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1890–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Sudhoff, H, Linthicum, F. Cholesteatoma behind an intact tympanic membrane: histopathologic evidence for a tympanic origin. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:444–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Teed, RW. Cholesteatoma verum tympani: its relationship to the first epibranchial placode. Arch Otolaryngol 1936;24:455–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Michaels, L. An epidermoid formation in the developing middle ear: possible source of cholesteatoma. J Otolaryngol 1986;15:169–74Google ScholarPubMed
17Mueller, DT, Schwetschenau, EL, Isaacson, G. Occult contralateral congenital cholesteatoma: is the epidermoid formation theory enough? Am J Otol 2004;25:285–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Liang, J, Michaels, L, Wright, A. Immunohistochemical characterization of the epidermoid formation in the middle ear. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1007–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Karmody, CS, Byahatti, SV, Blevins, N, Valtonen, H, Northrop, C. The origin of congenital cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 1998;19:292–7Google ScholarPubMed
20Levine, JL, Wright, CG, Pawlowski, KS, Meyerhoff, WL. Postnatal persistence of epidermoid rests in the human middle ear. Laryngoscope 1998;108:70–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Sadé, J, Babiacki, A, Pinkus, G. The metaplastic and congenital origin of cholesteatoma. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;96:119–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Palva, T, Palva, A, Darmmert, K. Middle ear mucosa and chronic ear disease. Arch Otolaryngol 1968;87:21–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Wells, MD, Michaels, L. Mode of growth of acquired cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:261–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Imamura, S, Nozawa, I, Imamura, M, Murakami, Y. Pathogenesis of experimental aural cholesteatoma in the chinchilla. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999;61:8491CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Boxall, JD, Proops, DW, Michaels, L. The specific locomotive activity of tympanic membrane and cholesteatoma epithelium in tissue culture. J Otolaryngol 1988;17:140144Google ScholarPubMed
26Broekaert, D, Coucke, P, Leperque, S, Ramaekers, F, Van Muijen, G, Boedts, D et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of the cytokeratin expression in middle ear cholesteatoma and related epithelial tissues. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:931–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Lee, RJ, Mackenzie, IC, Hall, BK, Gantz, BJ. The nature of the epithelium in acquired cholesteatoma. Clin Otolaryngol 1991;16:168–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Youngs, RP, Rowles, PM. The spatial organisation of keratinocytes in acquired middle ear cholesteatoma resembles that of external auditory canal skin and pars flaccida. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990;110:115–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Bezold, F. Perforation of Shrapnell's membrane and occlusion of the tubes: an aetiological study. Arch Otolaryngol 1890;19:232–54Google Scholar
30Freidmann, I. The comparative pathology of otitis media – experimental and human. II. The histolopathology of experimental otitis of the guinea pig, with particular reference to experimental cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 1955;69:588601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Masaki, M, Wright, CG, Lee, DH. Epidermal growth through tympanic membrane following middle ear application of propylene glycol. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1989;108:113–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Wright, CG, Meyerhoff, WL, Burns, DK. Middle ear cholesteatoma: an animal model. Am J Otolaryngol 1985;6:327–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Ruedi, L. Pathogenesis and surgical treatment of the middle ear cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1978;361:145Google Scholar
34Sudhoff, H, Bujia, J, Borkowski, G, Hildmann, H, Koc, C, Holly, A et al. Basement membrane in middle ear cholesteatoma. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural observations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:804–10Google ScholarPubMed
35Michaels, L, Persaud, R, Liang, J, Soucek, S, Wright, A. Epidermal hyperplasia on the tympanic membrane and deep external canal: I. Histopathological changes. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 2005:486Google Scholar
36Persaud, R, Michaels, L, Liang, J, Soucek, S, Wright, A. Epidermal hyperplasia on the tympanic membrane and deep external canal: II. Clinical types and pathological correlates. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 2005:487Google Scholar
37Wullstein, HL, Wullstein, SR. Cholesteatoma: etiology, nosology and tympanoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1980;42:313–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Plester, D, Pusalkar, A. The anterior tympanomeatal angle: the aetiology, surgery and avoidance of blunting and annular cholesteatoma. Clin Otolaryngol 1981;6:323–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39McKennan, KX, Chole, RA. Post-traumatic cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 1989;99:779–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Portman, M. The invagination theory for the pathogenesis of cholesteatoma. In: Sadé, J, ed. Cholesteatoma and Mastoid Surgery. Amsterdam: Kugler, 1982;265–6Google Scholar
41Youngs, R. Chronic suppurative otits media – cholesteatoma. In: Ludman, H, Wright, T, eds. Diseases of the Ear, 6th edn.London: Arnold, 1998;386–97Google Scholar
42Dominguez, S, Harker, LA. Incidence of cholesteatoma with cleft palate. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;97:659–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Goldman, JL, Martinez, SA, Ganzel, TM. Eustachian tube dysfunction and its sequelae in patients with cleft palate. South Med J 1993;86:1236–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Wolfman, DE, Chole, RA. Experimental retraction pocket cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986;95:639–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Wells, M, Michael, L. Role of retraction pockets in cholesteatoma formation. Clin Otolaryngol 1983;8:3945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Akyildiz, N, Akbay, C, Ozgirgin, ON, Bayramoglu, I, Sayin, N. The role of retraction pockets in cholesteatoma development: an ultrastructural study. ENT J 1993;72:210–12Google ScholarPubMed