Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty for reconstruction of Austin–Kartush type B ossicular defects

  • U Düzenli (a1) and A F Kıroğlu (a1)

Abstract

Objective

Manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty functional outcomes were compared to those of other methods for reconstructing Austin–Kartush type B ossicular defects.

Methods

Forty-two patients underwent Austin–Kartush type B ossicular defect reconstruction using: manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty (13 patients), an autologous incus (19 patients) or a titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis (10 patients). For manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty reconstruction, the malleus head was removed, the manubrium was relocated posteriorly and the incus short process was placed on the mobile footplate. The manubrium was placed on the incus body groove and bone cement was applied to stabilise the manubrium–incus junction. Pre- and post-operative hearing thresholds were assessed.

Results

The air–bone gap decreased from 25.9 ± 6.0 dB to 12.3 ± 5.0 dB (p < 0.05) in the manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty group. The hearing gain was 13.6 ± 5.2 dB for manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty, 3.4 ± 14.2 dB with the autologous incus, and 3.3 ± 11.07 dB with the titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis. Hearing improvement was greater for manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty compared to the other reconstruction methods (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Manubrio-incudo-stapedioplasty resulted in satisfactory hearing outcomes in patients with Austin–Kartush type B ossicular defects. This technique can be considered a stable, inexpensive and effective method to reconstruct Austin–Kartush type B ossicular defects.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Dr Ufuk Düzenli, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Bardakçı Village, Van, Turkey E-mail: drufukd35@hotmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Dr U Düzenli takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1Gardner, EK, Jackson, CG, Kaylie, DM. Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses. Laryngoscope 2004;114:6570
2Babu, S, Seidman, MD. Ossicular reconstruction using bone cement. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:98101
3O'Reilly, RC, Cass, SP, Hirsch, BE, Kamerer, DB, Bernat, RA, Poznanovic, SP. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:853–8
4Luers, JC, Huttenbrink, KB, Mickenhagen, A, Beutner, D. A modified prosthesis head for middle ear titanium implants—experimental and first clinical results. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:624–9
5Austin, DF. Ossicular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 1971;94:525–35
6Kartush, JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:689715
7Gerard, JM, De Bie, G, Franceschi, D, Deggouj, N, Gersdorff, M. Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1629–35
8De Vos, C, Gersdorff, M, Gerard, JM. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:61–7
9House, JW, Teufert, KB. Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:135–41
10Ashraf, B, Ghonim, MR, Eladl, HM, Elsisi, H. Role of malleus relocation in cholesteatoma surgery: our experience in 145 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:738–43
11Zakzouk, A, Bonmardion, N, Bouchetemble, P, Lerosey, Y, Marie, JP. Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:2653–7
12Emir, H, Kizilkaya Kaptan, Z, Gocmen, H, Uzunkulaoglu, H, Tuzuner, A, Bayiz, U et al. Ossiculoplasty with intact stapes: analysis of hearing results according to the middle ear risk index. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:1088–94
13Vassbotn, FS, Moller, P, Silvola, J. Short-term results using Kurz titanium ossicular implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:21–5
14Smyth, GD. TORPs—how have they fared after five years? J Laryngol Otol 1983;97:991–3
15Beutner, D, Luers, JC, Huttenbrink, KB. Cartilage ‘shoe’: a new technique for stabilisation of titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis at centre of stapes footplate. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:682–6
16Mantei, T, Chatzimichalis, M, Sim, JH, Schrepfer, T, Vorburger, M, Huber, AM. Ossiculoplasty with total ossicular replacement prosthesis and Omega Connector: early clinical results and functional measurements. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1102–7
17Berenholz, L, Burkey, J, Lippy, W. Total ossiculoplasty: advantages of two-point stabilization technique. Int J Otolaryngol 2012;2012:346260
18Vincent, R, Rovers, M, Mistry, N, Oates, J, Sperling, N, Grolman, W. Ossiculoplasty in intact stapes and malleus patients: a comparison of PORPs versus TORPs with malleus relocation and Silastic banding techniques. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:616–25
19Murugasu, E, Puria, S, Roberson, JB Jr. Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:572–82
20Stankovic, MD. Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short- and long-term follow-up of influential factors. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:933–40
21Dornhoffer, JL, Gardner, E. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:299304
22Redaelli de Zinis, LO. Titanium vs hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:1283–7
23Vincent, R, Oates, J, Sperling, NM, Annamalai, S. Malleus relocation in ossicular reconstruction: managing the anteriorly positioned malleus: results in a series of 268 cases. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:223–30
24Vlaming, MS, Feenstra, L. Studies on the mechanics of the reconstructed human middle ear. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1986;11:411–22
25Asai, M, Roberson, JB Jr, Goode, RL. Acoustic effect of malleus head removal and tensor tympani muscle section on middle ear reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1217–22
26Sennaroglu, L, Gungor, V, Atay, G, Ozer, S. Manubrio-stapedioplasty: new surgical technique for malleus and incus fixation due to tympanosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:587–90
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed