Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T22:17:50.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtual clinic for hearing loss and non-pulsatile tinnitus: initial experience of 210 cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2023

T Baron Open the ORCID record for T Baron [Opens in a new window] ,
D Whinney  and
V Reddy
T Baron
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
D Whinney
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
V Reddy*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
*
Corresponding author: Venkat Reddy; Email: venkat.reddy1@nhs.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Patients with hearing loss and tinnitus face lengthy waits to be seen in the ENT clinic. SHOEBOX Audiometry is an iPad-based, audiometric screening tool. A virtual hearing loss and non-pulsatile tinnitus clinic involving an ENT specialist virtually assessing cases based on the SHOEBOX audiogram, a patient symptom questionnaire and the primary care referral letter were implemented. This service evaluation explored the outcomes of the virtual clinic in reducing the need for a face-to-face ENT appointment.

Method

This was a retrospective service evaluation of the first six months of the virtual hearing loss and non-pulsatile tinnitus clinic.

Results

A total of 210 patients were included: 34.8 per cent (73) were discharged without requiring audiologist assessment or an ENT appointment, 51.9 per cent (109) required formal audiological assessment, 36.7 per cent (77) required imaging and only 13.8 per cent (29) required a face-to-face ENT appointment.

Conclusion

A virtual hearing loss and non-pulsatile tinnitus clinic minimised the number of patients requiring a traditional face-to-face clinic appointment within ENT.

Keywords

Tinnitusaudiologyhealth services researchscreeningsensorineural hearing loss
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 138 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 38 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Venkat Reddy takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented at European Association of Otology and Neurotology 2021, 6 September 2021, online.

References

Tinnitus UK. Tinnitus guidance for GPs. In: https://tinnitus.org.uk/what-we-do/our-vision/ [19 August 2023]Google Scholar
Action on Hearing Loss. Hearing matters report. In: https://rnid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Hearing-Matters-Report.pdf [7 December 2022]Google Scholar
Park, HM, Jung, J, Kim, JK, Lee, YJ. Tinnitus and its association with mental health and health-related quality of life in an older population: a nationwide cross-sectional study. J Appl Gerontol 2020;41:181–610.1177/0733464820966512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, PR, Feeny, D, Tomlinson, G, Cushing, S, Chen, JM, Krahn, MD. Health-related quality of life changes associated with hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;146:630–810.1001/jamaoto.2020.0674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Government. Research and analysis, Saleem: profoundly deaf user. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-disabilities-and-impairments-user-profiles/saleem-profoundly-deaf-user#statistics-about-hearing-loss [7 December 2022]Google Scholar
Slade, K, Plack, CJ, Nuttall, HE. The effects of age-related hearing loss on the brain and cognitive function. Trends Neurosci 2020;43:810–2110.1016/j.tins.2020.07.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, DR, Zobay, O, Ferguson, MA. Minimal and mild hearing loss in children: association with auditory perception, cognition, and communication problems. Ear Hear 2020;41:720–3210.1097/AUD.0000000000000802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shukla, A, Harper, M, Pedersen, E, Goman, A, Suen, JJ, Price, C, et al. Hearing loss, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;162:622–3310.1177/0194599820910377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, GH, Roughley, A. Audiology in the time of COVID-19: practices and opinions of audiologists in the UK. Int J Audiol 2021;60:255–6210.1080/14992027.2020.1814432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popelka, MM, Cruickshanks, KJ, Wiley, TL, Tweed, TS, Klein, BE, Klein, R. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:1075–810.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06643.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHOEBOX Audiometry Pro. In: https://www.shoebox.md/products/clinical-audiometer/ [7 December 2022]Google Scholar
Yeung, J, Javidnia, H, Heley, S, Beauregard, Y, Champagne, S, Bromwich, M. The new age of play audiometry: prospective validation testing of an iPad-based play audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42:2110.1186/1916-0216-42-21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, JC, Heley, S, Beauregard, Y, Champagne, S, Bromwich, MA. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1248–5210.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saliba, J, Al-Reefi, M, Carriere, JS, Verma, N, Provencal, C, Rappaport, JM. Accuracy of mobile-based audiometry in the evaluation of hearing loss in quiet and noisy environments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 2017;156:706–1110.1177/0194599816683663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rourke, R, Kong, DC, Bromwich, M. Tablet Audiometry in Canada's North: a portable and efficient method for hearing screening. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:473–810.1177/0194599816644407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, CH, Lin, HH, Wang, MC, Chu, YC, Chang, CY, Huang, CY et al. Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based audiometry for hearing loss detection: meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9:e2837810.2196/28378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastianelli, M, Mark, AE, McAfee, A, Schramm, D, Lefrancois, R, Bromwich, M. Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;48:5910.1186/s40463-019-0385-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, GP, Sladen, DP, Borst, BJ, Still, OL. Accuracy of a tablet audiometer for measuring behavioral hearing thresholds in a clinical population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;153:838–4210.1177/0194599815593737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, T, Pallawela, D. Validated smartphone-based apps for ear and hearing assessments: a review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2016;3:e1310.2196/rehab.6074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louw, C, Swanepoel, W, Eikelboom, RH. Self-reported hearing loss and pure tone audiometry for screening in primary health care clinics. J Prim Care Community Health 2018;9:1–810.1177/2150132718803156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbari, A, Mayhew, A, Al-Alawi, MA, Grimshaw, J, Winkens, R, Glidewell, E et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD00547110.1002/14651858.CD005471.pub2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanser, F, Gijsbertsen, B, Herbst, K. Modelling and understanding primary health care accessibility and utilization in rural South Africa: an exploration using a geographical information system. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:691–70510.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. Global estimates on prevalence of hearing loss. In: https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/WHO_GE_HL.pdf [7 December 2022]Google Scholar
Sankey, Diagram. In: https://developers.google.com/chart/interactive/docs/gallery/sankey [7 December 2022]Google Scholar