Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • John Witte (a1)

“CLS” was an acronym with two very different meanings when I was a fledgling law student some thirty-five years ago. For most, it meant “critical legal studies,” a burgeoning new movement of sundry neo-Marxist jurists and philosophers collectively bent on exposing the fallacies and false equalities of modern law. Many of my first-year law professors were the high priests of this CLS movement. They were making serious waves at the time with their denunciation of much that was considered sound and settled in the law. The best CLS professors taught black letter doctrine—and then shredded it with rhetorical and analytical power. That instruction appealed to my native ethic of semper reformanda—always reforming and working to improve our traditions. Other professors simply taught their pet critical topics, sending us students scrambling to the bookstore in search of study guides that would acquaint us with the legal basics. After a year of such CLS instruction, I could not wait to take the upper-level electives that would no doubt unveil the new and better legal system CLS had in mind. Little was on offer. The “crits,” I soon learned, were better at deconstruction than reconstruction of the law. Not surprisingly, this movement has now faded and fractured into sundry special interest groups.

Hide All

The events that generated the essays for this roundtable discussion were supported by a grant from the McDonald Agape Foundation. My Center for the Study of Law and Religion colleagues join me in expressing our deep appreciation to Ambassador Alonzo L. McDonald and his foundation colleagues for their stalwart and generous support for this and several other projects. We also express our appreciation to Amy Wheeler for her administrative work in support of twin roundtable conferences at Emory and Berlin in 2015, where drafts of these and other papers were mooted. More expansive discussions of these themes are included in a new Cambridge Studies in Law and Christianity series, one of several new book series that Cambridge University Press is establishing for the study of law and each of the world religions. Portions of this foreword are drawn from my foreword to Robert F. Cochran and David VanDrunen, eds., Law and the Bible: Justice, Mercy, and Legal Institutions (Downer Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2013), a volume with several valuable chapters on this same subject.

Hide All
Robert Cover , “Foreword: Nomos and Narrative—The Supreme Court 1982 Term,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 568

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Law and Religion
  • ISSN: 0748-0814
  • EISSN: 2163-3088
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 138 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th March 2017 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.