Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T03:44:09.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political and Moral Threat to Religious Liberty*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Extract

I count it a privilege to be asked to address you today. I have never been more consciously grateful for the priceless heritage of freedom, and particularly of religious freedom, that we enjoy. I am deeply aware of the occasion and the setting of this bicentennial celebration, and of the untiring work of many of you on behalf of religious liberty.

I have just arrived from the Soviet Union where it was my privilege to participate in the 1000 year celebration of Christianity in Russia. I was a guest of the Orthodox Church, and had the privilege of speaking a number of times not only in the celebrations, but preaching in Orthodox Cathedrals and Baptist Churches.

Just before going to the Soviet Union, my wife and I and several colleagues toured parts of China. I had the privilege of speaking at several universities, several of the newly opened churches, and was the second foreign visitor that Premier Li Peng received after his election as premier. We had many discussions with scholars, political leaders, and religious leaders in which we discussed the very points, to some extent, that concern us here today. Both countries are in the process of forming new laws governing religion; let us hope that they grant much more freedom to religion.

Type
II. The First Liberty Summit
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Keynote Address delivered by Dr. Graham at the First Liberty Summit, June 25, 1988.

References

1. Editor's note: On October 1, 1990, the Supreme Soviet adopted a statute on freedom of conscience and on religious organizations. A translation of this statute is provided in the documentation section of this issue of the Journal, 385 below.