Edson, M., Wit (New York: Faber and Faber, 1999): At 11.Google Scholar

“New York Hospitals,” New York Times, Dec. 31, 1900, at 12; quoted in Rosner, D., A Once Charitable Enterprise: Hospitals and Health Care in Brooklyn and New York, 1885–1915 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982): At 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuckerman, C., End of Life Care and Hospital Legal Counsel: Current Involvement and Opportunities for the Future. (New York: Milbank Memorial Fund and United Hospital Fund, 1999): At 8.Google Scholar

Galanti, G., Caring for Patients from Different Cultures: Case Studies from American Hospitals, 2nd Edition. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997): At 55.Google Scholar

Wright, L.M. Leahy, M., “Maximizing Time, Minimizing Suffering,” Journal of Family Nursing (August 1999): 259–74.Google Scholar

Veatch, R.M., “Medical Codes and Oaths: History,” Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol. 3 (995): At 1426.Google Scholar

See, for example, such major court cases addressing end of life care as Cruzan v. Director, 497 U.S. 261, 110 S.Ct. 2841 (1990); In re Conroy, 98 N.J., 486 A.2d 1209 (1985); and In re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647 (1976); for seminal cases addressing informed consent, see, for example, Canterbury v. Spence 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972) and Cobbs v. Grant, 104 Cal. Rptr. 505, 502 P.2d 1 (1972); for major treatises addressing patient autonomy in health care decision making see, for example, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Making Health Care Decisions. (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982); Meisel, A., The Right To Die (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1989 and subsequent cumulative supplements); for a major federal legislative initiative to support patient autonomy, see The Patient Self-Determination Act (OBRA 1990): The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, § 4206,4751 (OBRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395 cc(f) & 42 U.S.C. § 1396 a (a) (Supp. 1991).Google Scholar

Ruddick, W., “Family Wishes and Patient Autonomy,” Hastings Center Report, 10, no. 5, (1980): 21–22. Ruddick's later works take a much more family-centered approach. See, for example, “Transforming Homes and Hospitals,” in Bringing the Hospital Home: Ethical and Social Implications of High-Tech Home Care, Arras J.D., ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995): 166–79.Google Scholar

The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Making Health Care Decisions (Washington, DC, 1983): 127.Google Scholar

Id. at 128.Google Scholar

Nelson, H.L. Nelson, J.L., The Patient in the Family: An Ethics of Medicine and Families (New York: Routledge, 1995); Brock, D., “What Is the Moral Authority of Family Members to Act as Surrogates for Incompetent Patients?” The Milbank Quarterly, 74 (1996): 599–618; Hardwig, J., “Is There a Duty to Die?” Hastings Center Report, 27, no. 2 (1997): 34–42; Hardwig, J., “What About the Family?” Hastings Center Report, 20, no.2 (1990): 5–10; Blustein, J., “The Family in Medical Decisionmaking,” Hastings Center Report, 23, no. 3 (1993):. 6–13; Jecker, N.S., “Being a Burden on Others,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4, no. 1 (1993): 16–20.Google Scholar

Emanuel, E.J., The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991): At 56–57, 89. Despite his critique of the family as a social institution, Emanuel dedicated his book to his parents, “a contribution toward fulfilling the Fifth Commandment.” He is also principal investigator of a recent study of terminal illness that documents the essential role of family. See note 21.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, supra note 3.Google Scholar

Levine, C., “AIDS and Changing Definitions of Family,” in Nelkin, D. Willis, D.P. Parris, S.V., A Disease of Society: Cultural & Institutional Responses to AIDS (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991): At 48.Google Scholar

Waltman, R.E., “Turn Patients' Next-of-Kin into Partners, Not Adversaries,” Medical Economics, August 11, 1997: 81–92.Google Scholar

Marvel, M.K. Morphew, P.K., “Levels of Family Involvement by Resident and Attending Physicians,” Family Medicine, 25, no. 1 (1993): 26–30.Google Scholar

Rolland, J., Families, Illness, and Disability: An Integrative Treatment Model (New York: Basic Books, 1994); Levitt, J.M., “The Conceptualization and Assessment of Family Dynamics in Terminal Care,” The Hospice Journal, 2, no. 4 (1986): 1–18.Google Scholar

See, for example, Hickson, G.B., “Obstetricians' Prior Malpractice Experience and Patients' Satisfaction with Care,” JAMA, 272, no. 20 (1994): 1583–1587; Beckman, H.B., “The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice: Lessons from Plaintiff Depositions,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 154 (1994): 1365–70.Google Scholar

Hoffman, C. Rice, D. Sung, H., “Persons with Chronic Conditions: Their Prevalence and Costs,” JAMA, 276, no. 18 (1996): 1473–79.Google Scholar

Arno, P. Levine, C. Memmott, M.M., “The Economic Value of Informal Caregiving,” Health Affairs 18, no.2 (1999): 182–88.Google Scholar

Emanuel, E., “Assistance from Family Members, Friends, Paid Care Givers, and Volunteers in the Care of Terminally Ill Patients,” N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (1999): 956–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, U., “Sending More through Cost Control: Our Obsessive Quest to Gut the Hospital,” Health Affairs, no. 15 (1996): 146–54; American Hospital Association, Hospital Statistics, 1999 Edition (Chicago, 1999), Table 1, p. 3.Google Scholar

Arno, P. Bonuck, K. Padgug, R., “The Economic Impact of High-Tech Home Care,” in Arras, , ed., Bringing the Hospital Home, supra note 8, at 222.Google Scholar

Gordon, S., “The Impact of Managed Care on Female Caregivers in the Hospital and Home,” Journal of the American Medical Womens' Association, 52, no.2 (1997): 76.Google Scholar

Quoted in Anders, G., “Who Pays Cost of Cut-Rate Heart Care?” Wall Street Journal, October 15, 1996: At B10.Google Scholar

“More HMOs Order Outpatient Mastectomies,” Wall Street Journal, Marketplace feature, November 6, 1996, at B1.Google Scholar

FitzPatrick, M., letter in series, “Cruel Medical Care is Good for Business,” Wall Street Journal, November 27, 1996, at A11.Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine, Nursing Staff in Hospitals and Nursing Homes: Is It Adequate? Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1996, as cited in Gordon, S., Life Support: Three Nurses on the Front Lines (New York: Little Brown, 1997): At 265.Google Scholar

Lagnado, L., “Patients Give Hospitals Poor Score Card,” Wall Street Journal, January 28, 1997, at B1.Google Scholar

Doty, P., “Informal Caregiving,” in Evashwick, C., ed., The Continuum of Long-Term Care: An Integrated Systems Approach (Albany, NY: Delman Publishers, 1995): 125–41.Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation, August 1997; Marks, N., “Caregiving Across the Lifespan: National Prevalence and Predictions,” Family Relations, no. 45 (1996): 27–36; National Alliance for Caregiving, Family Caregiving in the U.S.: Findings from a National Survey, June 1997; National Long-Term Care Surveys 1982, 1984, and 1989, as cited in Manton, K.G. Corder, L.S. Stallard, E., “Estimates of Change in Chronic Disability and Institutional Incidence and Prevalence Rates in the U.S. Elderly Population from the 1982, 1984, and 1989 National Long-Term Care Survey,” The Journals of Gerontology, 48, no. 4, (1993): S153–S166.Google Scholar

Stone, R. Cafferata, G.L. Stangl, J., “Caregivers of the Frail Elderly: A National Profile,” The Gerontologist, 27, no.5 (1987): 616–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, supra note 32.Google Scholar

Hoffman, supra note 19.Google Scholar

Haupt, B.J. Jones, A., “The National Home and Hospice Care Survey: 1996 Summary,” National Center for Health Statistics, Series 13, no. 141 (1999): 22.Google Scholar

Astudillo, W., “How Can Relations Be Improved Between the Family and the Support Team During the Care of Terminally Ill Patients?” Support Care for Cancer, 3 (1995): At 72.Google Scholar

Higginson, I. Wade, A. McCarthy, M., “Palliative Care: Views of Patients and Their Families,” British Medical Journal, 30 (1990): At 277.Google Scholar

Kristjanson, L.J., “Family Members' Perceptions of Palliative Cancer Care: Predictors of Family Functioning and Family Members' Health,” Journal of Palliative Care, 12, no. 4 (1996): At 20.Google Scholar

In another context R. Macklin objects: “There is something vaguely disturbing about the idea of ‘treating the family.’ The notion of ‘treatment’ is ambiguous. It can mean ‘the performance of therapy,’ but it also has a nonmedical sense, meaning ‘dealing with’ or ‘behaving toward.’ [In a case involving a critically ill infant who was unlikely to survive the surgery the mother wanted] she criticized the medical team because ‘“treating the family’ had assumed as much importance as treating the patient.” Macklin, R, Mortal Choices: Ethical Dilemmas in Modern Medicine (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987): At 132.Google Scholar

Charlton, R. Dolman, E., “Bereavement: A Protocol for Primary Care,” British Journal of General Practice, 45, no. 397 (1995): 427–30; Prigerson, H.G. Bierhals, A.J. Kasl, S.V., “Traumatic Grief as a Risk Factor for Mental and Physical Morbidity,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, no. 5 (1997): 616–23.Google Scholar

Cohen-Almagor, R., “Patients' Right to Die in Dignity and the Role of their Beloved People,” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Band 4, 1996, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Cohen-Almagor considers three U.S. court cases. In the Spring case, involving a family's request to discontinue dialysis for Earl Spring, who in the court's words was “heavily sedated to restrain his hostile impulses, uncooperative toward his arduous maintenance program, insensible of his family and his situation,” Cohen-Almagor concludes that “we should be cautious of incidents in which the best interests of the patient's beloved people come at the expense of the best interests of the patient.” Acknowledging that the Spring family (wife and son) was close-knit and loved Earl Spring and appealed to the court “to keep their own sanity, their own lives,” Cohen-Almagor, like several other commentators on this case, concluded that the patient's interest in a longer life was strong enough to outweigh any other interests.Google Scholar

Goffman, E., Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1961): At 76.Google Scholar

Carr, J. M. Fogarty, J. P., “Families at the Bedside: An Ethnographic Study of Vigilance,” Journal of Family Practice, 48 no.6 (1999): 433–38.Google Scholar

Bonnel, W.B., “Not Gone and Not Forgotten: A Spouse's Experience of Late-Stage Alzheimer's Disease,” Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 34, no. 8 (1996): 24–27.Google Scholar

Foner, N., “Relatives as Trouble,” in The Culture of Long-Term Care, by Henderson, H.N. Vesperi, M.D. (Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey, 1995): At 172.Google Scholar

Charon, R., “Let Me Give a Listen to Your Heart,” in Gordon, S. Benner, P. Noddings, N., eds., Caregiving: Readings in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics, and Politics (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996): At 294.Google Scholar

Id. at 288–89.Google Scholar

Glaser, B.G. Strauss, A.L., Time for Dying (Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company, 1968): At 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichhorn, D.J. Meyers, T.A. Mitchell, T.G. Guzzetta, C. E., “Opening the Doors: Family Presence during Resuscitation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 10, no. 4 (1996): 59–70.Google Scholar

Dubler, N.N., “The Doctor-Proxy Relationship: The Neglected Connection,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5, no. 4 (1995): 289–306.Google Scholar

Pearlman, R.A. Uhlmann, R.F. Jecker, N.S., “Spousal Understanding of Patient Quality of Life: Implications for Surrogate Decisions,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3, no. 2 (1992): 114–21; Seckler, A.B. Meier, D.E. Mulvihill, M. Cammer-Paris, B.E., “Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions?” Annals of Internal Medicine, 115 (1991): 289–94; Tomlinson, T. Howe, K. Norman, M. Rossmiller, D., “An Empirical Study of Proxy Consent for Elderly Persons,” The Gerontologist, 30 (1990): 54–61; Uhlmann, R.F. Pearlman, R. A. Cain, K.C., “Physicians and Spouses' Predictions of Elderly Patients' Treatment Preferences,” Journal of Gerontology, 43 (1988): 115–21; Zweibel, N.R. Cassel, C. K., “Treatment Choices at the End of Life: A Comparison of Decisions by Older Patients and their Physician-Selected Proxies,” The Gerontologist, 29 (1989): 615–21.Google Scholar

Sulmasy, D.P. Terry, P.B. Weisman, C.S., “The Accuracy of Substituted Judgment in Patients with Terminal Diagnoses,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, no.8 (1998): 621–29.Google Scholar

Post, L.F. Blustein, J. Dubler, N.N., “Introduction: The Doctor-Proxy Relationship: An Untapped Resource,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 27 (1998): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capron, A.M., “Foreword,” in Zucker, M.B. Zucker, H.D., eds., Medical Futility and the Evaluation of Life-Sustaining Interventions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997): ix–xii.Google Scholar

Prip, W. Moretti, A., “Medical Futility: A Legal Perspective,” in Zucker, Zucker, , eds. supra note 54: 136–54.Google Scholar

Meisel, A., The Right to Die, 2nd ed., vol. 2 (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995).Google Scholar

Hines, S.C. Gover, J.J. Holley, J.L., “Dialysis Patients' Preferences for Family-Based Advance Care Planning,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 130 (1999): 825–28.Google Scholar

Brock, supra note 11: 599–618.Google Scholar

Id. at 612.Google Scholar

Brophy, P., “Death with Dignity?” in Zucker, Zucker, supra, note 54: 15–23.Google Scholar

See, for example, Groopman, J., “The Last Deal,” The New Yorker, September 8, 1997: 62–74. In his account of treating a cancer patient after an aggressive experimental regimen has ended in a relapse, and the patient is clearly dying, Groopman orders emergency CAT scans to see if the cancer is encroaching on the spinal cord. He says that it would be terrible for the patient to die “paralyzed and incontinent.” While this may be a common view, many people with spinal cord injuries live long and productive lives even though paralyzed and incontinent.Google Scholar

Singer, P.A. Martin, D.K. Kelner, M., “Quality End-of-Life Care: Patients' Perspectives,” JAMA, 281 (1999): 163–68.Google Scholar

Covinsky, K.E., “Is Economic Hardship on the Families of the Seriously Ill Associated with Patient and Surrogate Care Preferences?” Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, no. 15 (1996): 1737–41.Google Scholar

Collopy, B. Dubler, N.N. Zuckerman, C., “Toward an Ethic of Accommodation,” Hastings Center Report, 20, no. 2, (1990); Dill, A.E. P., “The Ethics of Discharge Planning for Older Adults: An Ethnographic Analysis,” Social Science and Medicine, 41, no. 9 (1995): 1289–99.Google Scholar

Levine, C., Rough Crossings: Family Caregivers' Odysseys through the Health Care System (New York: United Hospital Fund, 1998).Google Scholar

Jacobson, J. A. Francis, L.P. Battin, M.P., “Dialogue to Action: Lessons Learned from Some Family Members of Deceased Patients at an Interactive Program in Seven Utah Hospitals,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 8, no. 4 (1997): 359–71.Google Scholar

Carillo, J.E. Green, A.R. Betancourt, J.R., “Cross-Cultural Primary Care: Patient-Based Approach,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 130 (1999): 829–34.Google Scholar

Duffy, F.D., “Dialogue: The Core Clinical Skill.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, no. 2: 139–41.Google Scholar

Tilden, V.P. Tolle, S.W. Garland, M.J. Nelson, C.A., “Decisions about Life-Sustaining Treatment: Impact of Physicians' Behavior on the Family,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 155, no.6 (1995): 633–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubler, N.N. Marcus, L.J., Mediating Bioethical Disputes: A Practical Guide (New York: United Hospital Fund, April 1994); Alpers A. Lo B., “Avoiding Family Feuds: Responding to Surrogate Demands for Life-Sustaining Interventions,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 27, no. 1 (1999): 74–80.Google Scholar