See Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See id.; Kundu, R. V. and Patterson, S., “Dermatologic Conditions in Skin of Color: Part II. Disorders Occurring Predominantly in Skin of Color,” American Family Physician 87 (2013).Google Scholar

Bey, 999 F.3d at 161.Google Scholar

See id. at 161–62.Google Scholar

See id. at 162.Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2000e-17. (1964); see CM-619 Grooming Standards, U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Commissionn, available at <https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/cm-619-grooming-standards> (last visited Sept. 28, 2022); see, e.g., Fagan v. Nat’l Cash Reg. Co., 481 F.2d 1115, 1125–26 (D.C. Cir. 1973) (holding that requiring a male employee to cut his hair to an acceptable length was not sex discrimination); Rogers v. Am. Airlines Inc., 527 F. Supp. 229, 231–32 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) (upholding an employer policy against women wearing braids or cornrows).+(last+visited+Sept.+28,+2022);+see,+e.g.,+Fagan+v.+Nat’l+Cash+Reg.+Co.,+481+F.2d+1115,+1125–26+(D.C.+Cir.+1973)+(holding+that+requiring+a+male+employee+to+cut+his+hair+to+an+acceptable+length+was+not+sex+discrimination);+Rogers+v.+Am.+Airlines+Inc.,+527+F.+Supp.+229,+231–32+(S.D.N.Y.+1981)+(upholding+an+employer+policy+against+women+wearing+braids+or+cornrows).>Google Scholar

See CM-619 Grooming Standards, supra note 8.Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See infra Part I.C.i.Google Scholar

See generally Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See infra Part III.B.Google Scholar

See infra Part III.A.Google Scholar

See infra Part III.B.Google Scholar

See infra Part III.C.Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 232 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id; 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(i); see also Sutton v. United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 480 (1999) (holding that caring for oneself is a major life activity).Google Scholar

See Robinson, D. E. and Robinson, T., “Between a Loc and a Hard Place: A Socio-Historical, Legal, and Intersectional Analysis of Hair Discrimination and Title VII,” University of Maryland Law Jourrnal of Race, Religion, Gender 20, no. 2 (2020).Google Scholar

Legal Enforcement Guidance on Race Discrimination on the Basis of Hair, N.Y.C. Commission on Human Rights. (Feb. 2019), available at <https://www.nyc.gov/assets/cchr/downloads/pdf/Hair-Guidance.pdf> (last visited March 6, 2023).+(last+visited+March+6,+2023).>Google Scholar

Greene, D. Wendy, “Splitting Hairs: The Eleventh Circuit’s Take on Workplace Bans Against Black Women’s Natural Hair in EEOC v . Catastrophe Management Solutions,” University of Miami Law Review 71 (2017).Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See Legal Enforcement Guidance on Race Discrimination on the Basis of Hair, supra note 22.Google Scholar

527 F. Supp. 229, 232–33 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) (holding that prohibiting female Black employees to wear braids or cornrows was not racial discrimination).Google Scholar

852 F.3d 1018, 1021 (11^th Cir. 2016) (holding that asking plaintiff, a Black woman, to cut her dreadlocks was not racial discrimination).Google Scholar

See Greene, supra note 23, at 998.Google Scholar

Id. at 1015.Google Scholar

Id. At 998 (federal protections only extend to adverse treatment based on an employee’s “traits with which one is born, are fixed, difficult to change, and/or displayed by individuals who share the same racial identity”).Google Scholar

Id. at 1029.Google Scholar

See Robinson and Robinson, supra note 21, at 287.Google Scholar

140 S. Ct. 1731, 1746 (2020).Google Scholar

See Robinson and Robinson, supra note 21, at 285.Google Scholar

See “About,” Official Campaign of The CROWN Act, available at <https://www.thecrownact.com/about> (last visited Sept. 26, 2022).+(last+visited+Sept.+26,+2022).>Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See Greene, supra note 23, at 1003.Google Scholar

Tshudy, M.T. and Cho, S., “Pseudofolliculitis Barbae in the U.S. Military, a Review,” Military Medicine 186 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255487, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020) (denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the employee’s disability discrimination claim).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 227 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

Tshudy and Cho, supra note 38, at e56.Google Scholar

Letter to the Editor, Pseudofolliculitis Barbae in the Military and the Need for Social Awareness, Military Medicine (2021).Google Scholar

2 F.3d 1112 (11th Cir 1993).Google Scholar

7 F.3d 795 (8th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79188 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2009).Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. §§ 12111(5)(A), 12112(a). Plaintiffs can also bring claims under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits disability discrimination from employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any federal department or agency. 29 U.S.C. § 794(a); see also Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta, 2 F.3d 1112, 1125 (11th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

See 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973); Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 165 (2d Cir. 2021); see also S. F. Sperino, The Law of Employment Discrimination (West Academic Publishing 2019) (“Many lower courts assume that a disparate impact case under the ADA works similarly to a Title VII disparate impact case.”).Google Scholar

Bey, 999 F.3d at 165.Google Scholar

McMillan v. City of N.Y., 711 F.3d 120, 128 (2d Cir. 2013).Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. § 12111(10)(A).Google Scholar

Rambacher v. Bemus Point Cent. Sch. Dist., 307 F. App’x 541, 543 (2d Cir. 2009).Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (2008).Google Scholar

See Kennedy v. Gray, 83 F. Supp. 3d 385, 390 (D.D.C. 2015) (citing Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184, 195–98 (2002)).Google Scholar

42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(A).Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 231 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021) (“Plaintiffs are [d]isabled within the [m]eaning of the ADA[.]”); Dehonney v. G4S Secure Sols., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162217, at *6 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 28, 2017) (“[I]t is plausible that Plaintiff’s pseudofolliculitis barbae condition is a disability.”).Google Scholar

See, e.g., Lewis v. Univ. of Pa., 779 F. App’x 920, 926 (3d Cir. 2019) (holding that whether PFB qualified as a disability under the ADA definition was a fact in dispute that should be decided by a jury).Google Scholar

See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a)(2).Google Scholar

See generally CM-619 Grooming Standards, supra note 8.Google Scholar

See, e.g., Forkin v. UPS, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255487, at *21 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020) (citations omitted) (holding that UPS’s clean shave policy that affects only men did not discriminate on the basis of sex).Google Scholar

See Black Muslims Account for a Fifth of All U.S. Muslims, and About Half Are Converts to Islam, Pew Research Center, Jan. 17, 2019, available at <https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/black-muslims-account-for-a-fifth-of-all-u-s-muslims-and-about-half-are-converts-to-islam/> (last visited March 6, 2023).+(last+visited+March+6,+2023).>Google Scholar

See Bhatia v. Chevron U.S.A., 734 F.2d 1382, 1383 (9th Cir. 1984); Hamilton v. City of New York, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185855, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2021); Sughrim v. New York, 503 F. Supp. 3d 68, 83 (S.D.N.Y. 2020).Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 162 (2d Cir. 2021); Green v. Safeway Stores, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19910, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 1998).Google Scholar

See Gordon, W., “The Evolution of the Disparate Impact Theory of Title VII: A Hypothetical Case Study,” Harvard Journal of Legislation 44 (2007).Google Scholar

See id. at 530.Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973); Sperino, supra note 48.Google Scholar

401 U.S. 424, 431 (1971).Google Scholar

490 U.S. 642, 659 (1989); see Gordon, supra note 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Gordon, supra note 65, at 540–41.Google Scholar

See id Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

29 C.F.R. § 1910.134 (2022); Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See Bey, 999 F.3d at 161.Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 229 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See id. at 226.Google Scholar

See id. at 234–36.Google Scholar

See id. at 237.Google Scholar

See id. at 238.Google Scholar

See Bey, 999 F.3d at 162–63.Google Scholar

See id. at 162.Google Scholar

Id. at 167–68.Google Scholar

Id. at 170.Google Scholar

See Order Denying Petition for Rehearing, id. (No. 20-456).Google Scholar

See Respiratory Protection, Occupational Safety & Health Admin., available at <https://www.osha.gov/respiratory-protection> (last visited Aug. 7, 2022).+(last+visited+Aug.+7,+2022).>Google Scholar

Bey, 999 F.3d at 166.Google Scholar

Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 235 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See Bey, 437 F. Supp. 3d at 228–29 (“A Fit Test is a standard test designed by OSHA to ensure[] that the face piece of the SCBA gets the proper seal…”).Google Scholar

843 F.3d 529, 532 (D.C. Cir. 2016).Google Scholar

2 F.3d 1112, 1121 (11th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

See Sughrim v. New York, 503 F. Supp. 3d 68, 77 (S.D.N.Y. 2020).Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See Appellees–Cross-Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing en Banc at 11–12, Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 2021) (No. 20-456).Google Scholar

Bey, 999 F.3d at 168, 170.Google Scholar

See id. at 168.Google Scholar

536 U.S. 73, 84–85 (2002).Google Scholar

See Gordon, supra note 65, at 542.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta, 2 F.3d 1112, 1121 (11th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

Id. at 1119; see also Stewart v. City of Houston, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79188, at *8–9, 34–35 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2009), aff’d, 372 Fed. App’x 475 (5th Cir. 2010); Gordon, supra note 65, at 543–44.Google Scholar

See Gordon, supra note 65, at 531.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, 2 F.3d at 1119 n.6.Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 168, 170 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id. at 168.Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 228–29 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See Bey, 999 F.3d at 166.Google Scholar

About OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Admin., available at <https://www.osha.gov/aboutosha> (last visited Apr. 4, 2022).+(last+visited+Apr.+4,+2022).>Google Scholar

See N.Y. Lab. Law § 27-a(4)(a) (Consol. 2022); Bey, 999 F.3d at 161.Google Scholar

See Use of Respirators in the Workplace, U.S. Bureau Lab. Stats. (Mar. 21, 2002), available at <https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2002/mar/wk3/art04.htm> (last visited March 10, 2023); “Who Uses Respirators — and Why?” Indus. Safety & Hygiene News, Apr. 19, 2002, available at <https://www.ishn.com/articles/85737-who-uses-respirators-and-why> (last visited March 10, 2023).+(last+visited+March+10,+2023);+“Who+Uses+Respirators+—+and+Why?”+Indus.+Safety+&+Hygiene+News,+Apr.+19,+2002,+available+at++(last+visited+March+10,+2023).>Google Scholar

See id. Google Scholar

See Respiratory Protection, supra note 88. Although the government’s labor statistics might need some time to catch up, additional COVID-19 guidance issued by OSHA indicates significantly increased importance of respiratory protection in the workplace. See id. Google Scholar

See COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, 86 Fed. Reg. 61402 (Nov. 5, 2021).Google Scholar

See M. Schnell, “OSHA Suspends Enforcement of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Businesses,” Hill, Nov. 17, 2021, available at <https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/582022-osha-suspends-enforcement-of-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-for-businesses> (last visited March 10, 2023).+(last+visited+March+10,+2023).>Google Scholar

See NYS Hero Act, N.Y. Dep’t Lab., available at <https://dol.ny.gov/ny-hero-act> (last visited Apr. 4, 2022).+(last+visited+Apr.+4,+2022).>Google Scholar

See 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185855, at *1–2 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2021).Google Scholar

See id. at *3.Google Scholar

Id. at *16.Google Scholar

Id. at *17 (citing Kalsi v. N. Transit Auth., 62 F. Supp. 2d 745, 757 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) (“[I]n stark contrast to the ADA’s reasonable accommodation requirement, which has been interpreted broadly, the obligation under Title VII is very slight.”)).Google Scholar

See Sughrim v. New York, 503 F. Supp. 3d 68, 96–97 (S.D.N.Y. 2020).Google Scholar

The matter is stayed until April 14, 2023. See Scheduling Order, Sughrim, 503 F. Supp. 3d 68 (Dkt. 311).Google Scholar

See N.Y. Lab. Law § 27-a(4)(a) (Consol. 2022). For some religions, shaving is prohibited altogether, so even the previous reading of the OSHA RPS (allowing cropped facial hair) might not suffice for the employees. See Bhatia v. Chevron U.S.A., 734 F.2d 1382, 1383 (9th Cir. 1984) (“[T]he Sikh religion proscribes the cutting or shaving of any body hair.”). But a meaningful analogy could still be drawn between disability and religious challenges to Clean Shave Policies, and as discussed below, some of the claims could be intersectional. See infra Part III.B.Google Scholar

See Kundu and Patterson, supra note 3, at 860.Google Scholar

See A. W. Herndon and A.Watkins, “How a Racist Scandal at the F.D.N.Y. Led to Its Biggest Suspensions Ever,” New York Times, Oct. 5, 2021, available at <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/nyregion/fdny-racism-scandal.html> (last visited March 10, 2023); G. Adams Otis, “Why So Few of New York’s Bravest Are Black,” Atlantic, June 6, 2015, available at <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/black-firefighters-matter/394946/> (last visited March 10, 2023); The Council of the City of N.Y., Rep. of the Fin. Div. on the Fiscal 2021 Preliminary Plan and the Fiscal 2020 Preliminary Mayor’s Mgmt. Rep. for the Fire Dep’t of N.Y. 5 (2020), available at <https://council.nyc.gov/budget/wp-content/uploads/sites/54/2020/02/057-FDNY.pdf> (last visited March 2023).+(last+visited+March+10,+2023);+G.+Adams+Otis,+“Why+So+Few+of+New+York’s+Bravest+Are+Black,”+Atlantic,+June+6,+2015,+available+at++(last+visited+March+10,+2023);+The+Council+of+the+City+of+N.Y.,+Rep.+of+the+Fin.+Div.+on+the+Fiscal+2021+Preliminary+Plan+and+the+Fiscal+2020+Preliminary+Mayor’s+Mgmt.+Rep.+for+the+Fire+Dep’t+of+N.Y.+5+(2020),+available+at++(last+visited+March+2023).>Google Scholar

See Herndon and Watkins, supra note 126.Google Scholar

See A. Farinacci, “FDNY Reports Progress in Diversity Recruitment Efforts,” Spectrum News NY1, June 28, 2018, available at <https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2018/06/29/fdny-reports-progress-in-diversity-recruitment-efforts-> (last visited March 10, 2023).+(last+visited+March+10,+2023).>Google Scholar

See Adams Otis, supra note 126.Google Scholar

See Herndon and Watkins, supra note 126; Adams Otis, supra note 126.Google Scholar

See The Council of the City of New York, supra note 126, at 5.Google Scholar

See Farinacci, supra note 128.Google Scholar

Adams Otis, supra note 126.Google Scholar

See Bey v. City of New York, 999 F.3d 157, 166, 170 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See id. at 168–70.Google Scholar

See supra notes 112–114 and accompanying text.Google Scholar

See Kundu and Patterson, supra note 3, at 860.Google Scholar

The Second Circuit did not have to issue an interpretation on the OSHA RPS to decide this case, but it chose to, unlike the district court. See Bey, 999 F.3d at 166.Google Scholar

See id. at 169.Google Scholar

See id. at 169–70 (“[T]he FDNY’s defensive strategy was likely influenced by the Firefighters’ approach.”).Google Scholar

See supra Part I.C.Google Scholar

See Bey, 999 F.3d at 169 (“[T]he Firefighters retain the ability to present their evidence to OSHA if they continue to believe that the respiratory-protection standard is unduly restrictive; but it is OSHA to which such a challenge should be directed, not the FDNY, and not the courts.”).Google Scholar

See Gordon, supra note 65, at 529.Google Scholar

ADA Amendments Act of 2008 Frequently Asked Questions, U.S. Dep’t Lab., available at <https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ofccp/faqs/americans-with-disabilities-act-amendments#Q1> (last updated Jan. 1, 2009).+(last+updated+Jan.+1,+2009).>Google Scholar

See Job Requiring Respiratory Protection, Occupational Safety & Health Admin. (Apr. 16, 1996), available at <https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1996-04-16> (last visited March 10, 2023).+(last+visited+March+10,+2023).>Google Scholar

See Stewart v. City of Houston, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79188, at *8–9 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2009).Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Id. at *9.Google Scholar

See Dewberry, T. M., Note, “Title VII and African American Hair: A Clash of Cultures,” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 54 (2017).Google Scholar

See Cohen, S., “The Truth within Our Roots: Exploring Hair Discrimination and Professional Grooming Policies in the Context of Equality Law,” York Law Review 2 (2021).Google Scholar

See id.; Halo Collective, available at <https://halocollective.co.uk/> (last visited Sept. 25, 2022).+(last+visited+Sept.+25,+2022).>Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See Hair Discrimination in Workplace, Halo Collective, available at <https://halocollective.co.uk/halo-code-workplace/> (last visited Nov. 29, 2021).+(last+visited+Nov.+29,+2021).>Google Scholar

Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 237 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

Greene, D. Wendy, “Title VII: What’s Hair (and Other Race-Based Characteristics) Got to Do with It?” University of Colorado Law Review 92 (2021).Google Scholar

See Crenshaw, K., “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics,” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, no. 1 (1989): 139–167.Google Scholar

U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm’n, EEOC-CVG-2006-1, Section 15 Race and Color Discrimination (2006), available at <https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-15-race-and-color-discrimination#IVC> (last visited Sept. 25, 2022).+(last+visited+Sept.+25,+2022).>Google Scholar

Robinson and Robinson, supra note 21, at 282 (“Hair discrimination, and race discrimination generally of course, affects a person’s access to money, capital, and generational wealth.”).Google Scholar

See supra Part I.C.i.; Bey v. City of New York, 437 F. Supp. 3d 222, 231 (E.D.N.Y 2020), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 999 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2021).Google Scholar

See Kimble v. Wis. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 690 F. Supp. 2d 765, 770 (E.D. Wis. 2010).Google Scholar

See S. Callaham, “Women Plaintiffs ‘Sex-Plus-Age’ Discrimination Claim Stands,” Forbes, July 26, 2020, available at <https://www.forbes.com/sites/sheilacallaham/2020/07/26/women-plaintiffs-sex-plus-age-discrimination-claim-stands> (last visited March 13, 2023).+(last+visited+March+13,+2023).>Google Scholar

Greene, D. Wendy, “A Multidimensional Analysis of What Not to Wear in the Workplace: Hijabs and Natural Hair,” 8 Florida International University Law Review 8, no. 2 (2013).Google Scholar

See supra Part I.A.Google Scholar

See Off. CROWN Act, supra note 35.Google Scholar

See V. Stracqualursi, “US House Passes CROWN Act That Would Ban Race-Based Hair Discrimination,” CNN, March 18, 2022, available at <https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/18/politics/house-vote-crown-act/index.html> (last visited March 13, 2023).+(last+visited+March+13,+2023).>Google Scholar

See Off. CROWN Act, supra note 35.Google Scholar

Legislative Bill 451, available at <https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/107/PDF/Slip/LB451.pdf> (last visited March 13, 2023).+(last+visited+March+13,+2023).>Google Scholar

See The CROWN Act Resources, Off. CROWN Act, available at <https://www.thecrownact.com/research-studies> (last visited April 18, 2023) (examining Hair Discrimination experienced by Black women and girls in “2021 Dove CROWN Research Study for Girls” and “2019 Dove CROWN Research Study”).+(last+visited+April+18,+2023)+(examining+Hair+Discrimination+experienced+by+Black+women+and+girls+in+“2021+Dove+CROWN+Research+Study+for+Girls”+and+“2019+Dove+CROWN+Research+Study”).>Google Scholar

See S.B. 188, 2019 S., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019) (“This bill would provide that the definition of race … also include traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles …); Introduce the CROWN Act to Your State, Off. CROWN Act, available at <https://www.thecrownact.com/email-your-federal-legislator> (last visited April 18, 2023) (providing state legislators with legislative templates).+(last+visited+April+18,+2023)+(providing+state+legislators+with+legislative+templates).>Google Scholar

See J. Diaz, “The House Passes the CROWN Act, a Bill Banning Discrimination on Race-Based Hairdos,” NPR, March 18, 2022, available at <https://www.npr.org/2022/03/18/1087661765/house-votes-crown-act-discrimination-hair-style> (last visited March 13, 2023) (quoting the floor statement of Rep. Ayanna Pressley: “For too long, Black girls have been discriminated against and criminalized for the hair that grows on our heads”); The CROWN Act, NAACP Legal Def. Fund, available at <https://www.naacpldf.org/crown-act/> (last visited Sept. 25, 2022) (“Black women are 1.5x more likely to be sent home from their workplace because of their hair. Black women were also 80% more likely to change their hair from its natural state to fit into the office setting.”).+(last+visited+March+13,+2023)+(quoting+the+floor+statement+of+Rep.+Ayanna+Pressley:+“For+too+long,+Black+girls+have+been+discriminated+against+and+criminalized+for+the+hair+that+grows+on+our+heads”);+The+CROWN+Act,+NAACP+Legal+Def.+Fund,+available+at++(last+visited+Sept.+25,+2022)+(“Black+women+are+1.5x+more+likely+to+be+sent+home+from+their+workplace+because+of+their+hair.+Black+women+were+also+80%+more+likely+to+change+their+hair+from+its+natural+state+to+fit+into+the+office+setting.”).>Google Scholar