Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T15:21:49.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Four Stages of Youth Sports TBI Policymaking: Engagement, Enactment, Research, and Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Hosea H. Harvey ,
Dionne L. Koller  and
Kerri M. Lowrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article advances, for the first time, a framework for situating public health law interventions as occurring in a predictable four-stage process. Whether the intervention is related to mandatory seat-belt laws, HIV prevention through needle-exchanges, or distracted-driving laws, these public health law interventions have generally been characterized by the following four stages. First, a series of publicized incidents, observances, or outcomes generate significant media attention, and are framed as public health harms. Then, a few select states evaluate such harms and proactively seek testimony or evidence designed to support a law-based intervention. After this initial public engagement, states enact legal frameworks designed to minimize or reduce the harm, often in the absence of full information about the scope of harm or potential effectiveness of the intervention. In contrast, scholars have proposed that at these early stages, lawmaking should be evidence-based and “developed through a continuous process that uses the best available quantitative and qualitative evidence.”5 Our experience evaluating youth sports traumatic brain injury (TBI) lawmaking suggests that, like other public health issues with sudden and intense media (and, therefore, constituent) attention, an evidence-based approach was lacking during these early stages.

Type
JLME Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 43 , Issue S1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 87 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Our work is influenced by Brownson, R. et al., “Understanding Evidence-Based Public Health Policy,” American Journal of Public Health 99, no. 9 (2009): 1576–1583.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Harper, S. et al., “The Effect of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Seat Belt Use by Socioeconomic Position,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 33, no. 10.1002 (2014): 1141–161.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Davis, C. et al., “Effects of an Intensive Street-Level Police Intervention on Syringe Exchange Program Use in Philadelphia, PA,” American Journal of Public Health 95, no. 2 (2005): 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Ibrahim, J. K. et al., “State Laws Restricting Driver Use of Mobile Communications Devices: Distracted-Driving Provisions, 1992–2010,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 40, no. 6 (2011): 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See generally Brownson, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Protecting Student Athletes from Concussions Act of 2013, S. 1546, 113th Cong. (2013).Google Scholar
See, e.g., In re: National Football League Players' Concussion Injury Litigation, MDL No. 2323 (E.D.Pa. 2012); In re: NCAA Student-Athlete Concussion Injury Litigation MDL No. 2492 (N.D.Ill. 2013).Google Scholar
See, Burlette Carter, W., “Introduction: What Makes a “Field” a Field?” Virginia Journal of Sports & Law 1, no. 1 (1999): 235–245 at 235, 244–245; Davis, T., “What Is Sports Law,” Marquette Sports Law Review 11, no. 2 (2001): 211–244, at 211, 212–13, 234–235.Google Scholar
Langlois, J. A. et al., “The Epidemiology and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Brief Overview,” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21, no. 5 (2006): 375–378, at 375, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Federation of State High School Associations, “2012–13 High School Athletics Participation Survey,” in NFHS Handbook 2013–2014 (2013), available at <http://www.nfhs.org/media/885654/2013–14-nfhs-handbook.pdf> (last visited January 23, 2015).+(last+visited+January+23,+2015).>Google Scholar
Harvey, H. H., “Reducing Traumatic Brain Injuries in Youth Sports: Youth Sports Traumatic Brain Injury State Laws, January 2009-December 2012,” American Journal of Public Health 103, no. 7 (2013): 1249–1254.Google Scholar
Chrisman, S. P. et al., “Implementation Of Concussion Legislation and Extent of Concussion Education for Athletes, Parents, and Coaches in Washington State,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 42, no. 5 (2014): 1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. H., “Refereeing the Public Health,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 14, no. 1 (2014): 66–121.Google Scholar
Lowrey, K. M. Morain, S. R., “State Experiences Implementing Youth Sports Concussion Laws: Challenges, Successes, and Lessons for Evaluating Impact,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42, no. 3 (2014): 290–296.Google Scholar
See the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, “Concussions and Sports,” 42, no. 3 (2014).Google Scholar
Cantu, R. Hyman, R., Concussions and Our Kids (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012).Google Scholar
See, e.g., <http://www.nflevolution.com/concussion-protocol> (NFL's protocol) and <http://www.popwarner.com/safety/concussionpolicy.htm> (Pop Warner's youth football protocol) (both last visited January 23, 2015). (Pop Warner's youth football protocol) (both last visited January 23, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=See,+e.g.,++(NFL's+protocol)+and++(Pop+Warner's+youth+football+protocol)+(both+last+visited+January+23,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Lowrey, K. M., “State Laws Addressing Youth SportsRelated Traumatic Brain Injury and the Future of Concussion Law and Policy,” Journal of Business & Technology Law 10, no. 1 (2014): 61–72.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
These changes included changing definitions of qualified health providers (Alaska), gathering more outcome data (Connecticut, Vermont), and “return to learn” programs (Nebraska, Virginia).Google Scholar
Massachusetts was a leader in this effort, but other states soon followed. Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 111, § 222. For example, California, Connecticut, and Vermont have amended their laws to add similar primary prevention strategies.Google Scholar
N.J. Stat. Ann. § 18A:40–41.2 (focused on cheerleading TBIs).Google Scholar
See Rivara, F. P., “The Effect of Coach Education on Reporting of Concussions among High School Athletes After Passage of a Concussion Law,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 1187, no. 5 (2014): 1197–1203, at 1197, 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Williams, J. et al., “Does Liberalizing Cannabis Laws Increase Cannabis Use?” Journal of Health Economics 36 (2014): 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar