Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T13:42:43.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teaching Health Law: A Service Learning Project: Disability, Access, and Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Last summer, I was thinking about a public service project for my disability discrimination law course. I teach the course in fall, and try to incorporate a project each year. Integrating a public service project into a traditional doctrinal course fits within the trend toward expanding teaching techniques beyond the case method in order to better prepare students for the practice of law. It was also inspired in part by the Carnegie Foundation's 2007 report, “Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law,” as a way to foster “civic professionalism,” and to “[link] the interests of legal educators with the needs of legal practitioners and with the public the profession is pledged to serve.” That link is especially important to disability discrimination law, as issues critical to the lives of people with disabilities often go unnoticed and unaddressed by people without disabilities.

Type
JLME Column
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Charity Scott, J.D., is a Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Law, Health & Society at the Georgia State University College of Law. (charity@gsu.edu)

References

For example, Harvard Law School now offers a course on “complex problem solving” in the first year, see Kagan, E., “HLS Faculty Unanimously Approves First-Year Curricular Reform” (October 2, 2006), available at <http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2006/10/06_curriculum.php> (last visited January 27, 2009), and Washington and Lee has devoted its entire third year to professional development through simulated and actual practice experiences, see “The New Third Year: A Message from the Dean (October 2, 2006), available at <http://law.wlu.edu/thirdyear/> (last visited January 27, 2009).+(last+visited+January+27,+2009),+and+Washington+and+Lee+has+devoted+its+entire+third+year+to+professional+development+through+simulated+and+actual+practice+experiences,+see+“The+New+Third+Year:+A+Message+from+the+Dean+(October+2,+2006),+available+at++(last+visited+January+27,+2009).>Google Scholar
Sullivan, W. M. et al., Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law (2007) (“Carnegie Report”): At 4, available at <http://www.carnegie-foundation.org/publications/educating-lawyers-preparation-profession-law> (last visited February 12, 2009).Google Scholar
See Saint Louis University School of Law, The Mission, available at <http://law.slu.edu/admissions/apply/over-view.html> (last visited December 12, 2009).+(last+visited+December+12,+2009).>Google Scholar
See Pendo, E., “Disability, Equipment Barriers and Women's Health: Using the ADA to Provide Meaningful Access,” Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy 2, no. 1 (2008): 1556.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 1210112213, Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act, S. 3406 (effective January 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Carnegie Report, supra note 2, at 8.Google Scholar
If you are interested in reading more about this project from the public right-of-way perspective, see Pendo, E., “Taking it to the Streets: A Public Service Project for Disability Discrimination Law,” Saint Louis University Law Review (2010): Forthcoming.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§ 1213112134.Google Scholar
28 C.F.R. § 35.150(a) (2008). This obligation is met where the “opportunity to participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service… [is] equal to that afforded others.” 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b) (1)(ii) (2008).Google Scholar
28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7) (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The classic cases are Barden v. City of Sacramento, 292 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2002), and Kinney v. Yerusalim, 9 F.3d 1067 (3rd Cir.1993). I also assigned a newer case, Frame v. City of Arlington, 575 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 2009).Google Scholar
Once adopted by the Department of Justice, the ADAAG became the standards for accessible design under Title III. See 28 C.F.R. pt. 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities, Final Rule (Title III regulation; subpart C contains requirements for existing facilities, subpart D covers new construction and alterations, incorporating ADAAG as Appendix A); 28 C.F.R. pt. 35 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services, Final Rule (Title II regulation, subpart D contains requirements for existing facilities and new construction and alterations). The ADAAG was updated in 2004, but that version has not yet been adopted. For the full text of the 2004 ADAAG, see U.S. Architectural & Transportational Barriers Compliance Board, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities, available at <http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/ADAAG.pdf> (last visited December 15, 2009).+(last+visited+December+15,+2009).>Google Scholar
Colker, R., The Law of Disability Discrimination, 7th ed. (Newark: LexisNexis, 2009): at 482501.Google Scholar
Draft PROWAG (November 23, 2005), available at <http://www.access-board/gov/prowac/draft.htm> (last visited January 29, 2009). See also Public Rights-of-Way Advisory Committee (PROWAAC) Subcommittee on Technical Assistance, Special Report: Accessible Public Right-of-Way Planning and Designing Alterations (July 2007), available at <http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/alterations/guide.pdf> (last visited January 29, 2009). When standards consistent with the final PROWAG guidelines are adopted by the Department of Justice, they will become the new minimum design standards under the ADA for both new construction and alterations of pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. 42 U.S.C. §12204(a) (1990).+(last+visited+January+29,+2009).+See+also+Public+Rights-of-Way+Advisory+Committee+(PROWAAC)+Subcommittee+on+Technical+Assistance,+Special+Report:+Accessible+Public+Right-of-Way+Planning+and+Designing+Alterations+(July+2007),+available+at++(last+visited+January+29,+2009).+When+standards+consistent+with+the+final+PROWAG+guidelines+are+adopted+by+the+Department+of+Justice,+they+will+become+the+new+minimum+design+standards+under+the+ADA+for+both+new+construction+and+alterations+of+pedestrian+facilities+in+the+public+right-of-way.+42+U.S.C.+§12204(a)+(1990).>Google Scholar
28 C.F.R. § 35.150 (d) (2008). The transition plan requires that any structural modifications to existing facilities intended to bring them into compliance should have been completed by January 26, 1995.Google Scholar
Department of Justice, ADA Best Practices Tool Kit for State and Local Governments, Chapter 6: Curb Ramps and Pedestrian Crossings, available at <http://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap6toolkit.htm> (last visited January 29, 2010).+(last+visited+January+29,+2010).>Google Scholar
The ADA mandates that a public entity employing fifty or more persons shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with its Title II requirements, including the investigation of complaints pursuant to a publicly available procedure. ADA Title II Technical Manual, II-8.5000 Designation of responsible employee and development of grievance procedures, available at <http://www.ada.gov/taman2.htm#II-8.3000> (last visited January 29, 2010). Other options include filing an administrative complaint with the Department of Justice, or directly with the Civil Rights Division, and filing a private lawsuit in federal court. Department of Justice ADA Enforcement, available at <http://www.ada.gov/enforce.htm> (last visited January 29, 2010).+(last+visited+January+29,+2010).+Other+options+include+filing+an+administrative+complaint+with+the+Department+of+Justice,+or+directly+with+the+Civil+Rights+Division,+and+filing+a+private+lawsuit+in+federal+court.+Department+of+Justice+ADA+Enforcement,+available+at++(last+visited+January+29,+2010).>Google Scholar
28 C.F.R. § 35.149 (d)(4) (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, J., “When a Woman in a Wheel-chair Was Struck and Killed by an SUV: Path of Resistance,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 10, 2005, at A1.Google Scholar
“Family Wins Verdict for Death of Woman Hit by Car,” Missouri Lawyers Weekly, January 14, 2008.Google Scholar
Patterson, Steve followed this story on the Urban Review STL Blog, “a look at public policy, urban planning and related politics in the St. Louis region,” available at <http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/> (last visited February 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Kezios, K., “Teaching Access through Advocacy: PROW Public Service Project” (April 23, 2009) (copy on file with author).Google Scholar
Kezios, K., “School of Law Students Advocate for People with Disabilities,” Saint Louis Brief (2009): 7.Google Scholar
Program, Profile of Harkins, Anne Marie, 2009 Women's Justice Awards, sponsored by Missouri Lawyers Weekly and the Saint Louis Daily Record (April 2009).Google Scholar
See Urban Review STL Blog, “a look at public policy, urban planning and related politics in the St. Louis region,” available at <http://www.urbanre-viewstl.com/> (last visited February 1, 2010). There is a specific entry for “accessibility” in the index.+(last+visited+February+1,+2010).+There+is+a+specific+entry+for+“accessibility”+in+the+index.>Google Scholar
“ADA Transition Plan: Do You Have One?,” panelist Elizabeth Pendo (speaking on legal requirements for accessible programs, activities and services under Title II of the ADA), sponsored by the American Institute of Architects, Saint Louis Chapter, and the City of Saint Louis Office on the Disabled, Oct. 20, 2009, Saint Louis, MO.Google Scholar
The accessibility evaluation project for public accommodations in Ruth Colker's casebook could be used to evaluate physician's offices. Colker, R., The Law of Disability Discrimination, 7th ed. (Newark: LexisNexis, 2009): 482501.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 12101(a)(3) (2000); see also Crossley, M., “Becoming Visible: The ADA's Impact on Health Care for Persons with Disabilities,” Alabama Law Review 52, no. 1 (2000): 5189, at 51 n.3 (collecting citations from legislative history).Google Scholar
See Pendo, E., Disability, “Equipment Barriers and Women's Health: Using the ADA to Provide Meaningful Access,” Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy 2, no. 1 (2008): 1556, at 29 n. 71 (collecting citations from regulations and technical assistance manuals).Google Scholar
29 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1) (1994).Google Scholar
29 U.S.C. § 794(b)(3)(A)(ii) (1994). Several courts have found that the receipt of Medicare or Medicaid funds constituted receipt of federal financial assistance within the meaning of the Rehabilitation Act. See, e.g., Henrietta D. v. Bloomberg, 331 F.3d 261, 272 (2d Cir. 2003) (noting lack of dispute on point under Rehabilitation Act and ADA).Google Scholar
See 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(F) (2000); 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a) (2000); 28 C.F.R. § 36 app. B at 696 (2008) (the office of a health care provider may be included even if it is located in a private home).Google Scholar
See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182(b)(2)(A), 12183(a) (2000).Google Scholar
Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health and Rehab. Ctr, 408 F. Supp. 2d 923 (E.D. Cal. 2004).Google Scholar
Anderson vs. Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare, 1 F. Supp 2d. 459, 459 (E.D. Pa. 1998).Google Scholar
Berg, P. E., “Ill/Legal: Interrogating the Meaning and Function of the Category of Disability Anti Discrimination Law,” Yale Law & Policy Review 18, no. 1 (1999): 152, at 4.Google Scholar
Scotch, R. K., “Models of Disability and the Americans with Disabilities Act,” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 21, no. 1 (2000): 213222, at 214.Google Scholar
National Council on Disability, “The Current State of Health Care for People with Disabilities” (September 30, 2009), available at <http://www.ncd.gov/> (last visited February 12, 2010).+(last+visited+February+12,+2010).>Google Scholar
Press Release, Barrier Free Health Care Initiative, Hospitals Join Disability Community to Launch Initiative to Improve Access and Care for People with Disabilities (June 26, 2009), available at <http://thebarrierfreehealthcareinitiative.org/> (last visited February 1, 2010).+(last+visited+February+1,+2010).>Google Scholar