Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T01:32:09.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Filtering on Sea and Air Operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Extract

Estimation methods and filtering techniques are nowadays an integral part of any computer-based navigation system. The purpose of these techniques is to provide an estimate of required variables which is sufficiently accurate for real-time command and control purposes. Repeatability, which is important for so many applications, is deemed to be a by-product of the estimation process. For this requirement it is not strictly necessary for the process to be accurate, it is sufficient if it is only consistent; these are closely linked but one does not imply the other. The modern approach is to minimize the variance of the noisy observations or the sum of the squares of the residuals, and the methods available for doing this are increasingly refined. The impression given in the literature (and it is extensive) is that data processing can somehow compensate for the shortcomings of the basic sensors with respect to the operation being considered. Within certain limits this is true, but the real reason for the sudden surge of Kalman filtering for real-time on-line applications was the relative simplicity of the computational process. In a way, Kalman filtering has done for estimation theory what the Fast Fourier Transform has done for spectral analysis.

The concept is simple enough to state. It consists of combining two independent estimates of a variable to form a weighted mean. One of these estimates is a forecast and the other is the current measurement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

For example, ‘Derivation of Kalman filtering equations from elementary statistical principles’ by Barnham, P. M. and Humphries, D. E.RAF Tech. Note.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. E. (1951). The theory of position finding. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, June.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W. (1965). Is the Gaussian distribution normal? This Journal 18, 65. A. F. Crossley (1966). On the frequency distribution of large errors. This Journal, 19, 33. E. W. Anderson and D. M. Ellis (1971). Error distributions in navigation. This Journal, 24,429. O. D. Anderson (1976). On error distributions in navigation. This Journal, 29, 69.Google Scholar
See, for example, Sorenson, H. W.Comparison of Kalman, Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Estimation Techniques. NATO AGARDograph no. 139, chapter 6.Google Scholar
A good overview of the numerical techniques involved is given in Computational Techniques in Kalman Filtering, by Schmidt, S. F.. NATO AGARDograph no. 139, chapter 3.Google Scholar
See, for example, A Comparative Assessment of Selected Filtering Techniques, by Pearson, M. G., (Flight Navigation Preliminary Report, 1976).Google Scholar
Pearson, M. G., op. cit.Google Scholar
Communicated to the author by Woods, A. R. of Racal-Decca Survey Ltd.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. E., op. cit. p. 192.Google Scholar