Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-7jw6s Total loading time: 0.245 Render date: 2022-12-02T19:57:38.219Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Impact of health plan reforms in Washington on employment decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2019

Norma B. Coe*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania and NBER, Philadelphia, PA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: nbcoe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

Abstract

The State of Washington, as part of a State Innovation Model (SIM) grant, is changing the payment model within state employee health insurance plans. The system is moving away from traditional fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based payment, through insurance design (the creation of accountable care network insurance products) and bundled payment strategies. New plans were rolled out January 2016 (enrollment occurred in late 2015), with the stated goal of getting 80% of state employees covered by plans that contain value-based purchasing within the next 5 years. The goal of payment reform is to improve member experience, member health, and cut costs. However, changing health insurance during employment can directly and indirectly change labor market outcomes. Decreasing costs of insurance could lead people to remain in the state-employment sector longer. However, it could also influence retirement timing, through changing the relative costs of insurance and through improving health.

This paper examines who switches to value-based insurance, where the insurance explicitly decreases premiums without changing out-of-pocket costs. We find that the peak age for switching insurance plans is 35–45, even among the subsample of individuals who would not need to change their usual sources of care. Second, we look at the labor market activity – both leaving the state-employee sector and retiring from state-employment – and find that younger workers with value-based insurance plans are less likely to leave state employment. Further, we find evidence of value-based insurance, available at a reduced cost to both employees and retirees, leads to a shifting downward in the distribution of retirement age. While these findings support the existence of both the price and income effects, the effect sizes are rather small.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blau, DM and Gilleskie, DB (2006) Health insurance and retirement of married couples. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 935953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, DM and Gilleskie, DB (2008) The role of retiree health insurance in the employment behavior of older men. International Economic Review 49, 475514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, MA and Lahey, JN (2010) Health insurance and the labor supply decisions of older workers: evidence from a US Department of Veterans Affairs expansion. Journal of Public Economics 94, 467478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2014) State Innovation Models Initiative Round Two [accessed on June 30, 2018]. Available at https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2014-Fact-sheets-items/2014-12-16.html.Google Scholar
Choudhry, NK, Fischer, MA, Avorn, J, Schneeweiss, S, Solomon, DH, Berman, C, Jan, S, Liu, J, Lii, J, Brookhart, MA, Mahoney, JJ and Shrank, WH (2010) At Pitney Bowes, value-based insurance design cut copayments and increased drug adherence. Health Affairs (Millwood) 29, 19952001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choudhry, NK, Avorn, J, Glynn, RJ, Antman, EM, Schneeweiss, S, Toscano, M, Reisman, L, Fernandes, J, Spettell, C, Lee, JL, Levin, R, Brennan, T and Shrank, WH (2011) Full coverage for preventive medications after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Medicine 365, 20882089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cid, C, Ellis, RP, Vargas, V, Wasem, J and Prieto, L (2016) Global risk-adjusted payment models. In Scheffler, RM (ed.), World Scientific Handbook of Global Health Economics and Public Policy, vol. 1. New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1142/9200.Google Scholar
Fisher, ES, Shortell, SM, Kreindler, SA, Van Citters, AD and Larson, BK (2012) A framework for evaluating the formation, implementation, and performance of accountable care organizations. Health Affairs 31, 23682378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, MD (2014) Retiree health insurance for public school employees: does it affect retirement? Journal of Health Economics 38, 8898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fronstin, P and Roebuck, MC. Health Plan Switching: A Case Study—Implications for Private- and Public-Health-Insurance Exchanges and Increased Health Plan Choice, EBRI Issue Brief, no. 432, (Employee Benefit Research Institute, March 23, 2017). https://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_432_PlnSwtch.23Mar17.pdf.Google Scholar
Gibson, TB, Mahoney, J, Ranghell, K, Cherney, BJ and McElwee, N (2011) Value-based insurance plus disease management increased medication use and produced savings. Health Affairs (Millwood) 30, 100108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, J and Madrian, BC (2001) Health insurance, labor supply, and job mobility: A critical review of the literature, presented at the Research Agenda Setting Conference, University of Michigan, July 8–10, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Care Authority (2015) PEBB Enrollment Report for January 2015 Coverage. https://www.staging.hca.wa.gov/assets/pebb/carrier_012015.pdf. Accessed 7/31/2018.Google Scholar
Health Care Authority (2016 a) How UMP Plus Compares to UMP Classic. www.hca.wa.gov/ump. Accessed 7/31/2018.Google Scholar
Health Care Authority (2016 b) What's Changing for UMP in 2016? https://www.hca.wa.gov/search/site/UMP%2520enrollment accessed 7/31/2018.Google Scholar
Health Care Authority (2018) Public Employees Benefits Board Retreat. https://www.hca.wa.gov/assets/pebb/pebb-meeting-briefing-book-180131.pdf accessed 9/24/2018.Google Scholar
Johnson, RW, Davidoff, AJ and Perese, K (2003) Health insurance costs and early retirement decisions. ILR Review 56, 716729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, BG, Spivack, BS, Stearns, SC, Song, PH and O'Brien, EC (2017) Impact of accountable care organizations on utilization, care, and outcomes: a systematic review. Medical Care Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558717745916.Google ScholarPubMed
Madrian, BC (2005) The U.S. health care system and labor markets. Conference Series; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 50, 137163.Google Scholar
McClellan, M, Udayakumar, K, Thoumi, A, Gonzalez-Smith, J, Kadakia, K, Kurek, N, Abdulmalik, M and Darzi, AW (2017) Improving care and lowering costs: evidence and lessons from a global analysis of accountable care reforms. Health Affairs 36, 19201927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newhouse, JP, Price, M, Huang, J, McWilliams, JM and Hsu, J (2012) Steps to Reduce Favorable Risk Selection in Medicare Advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges. Health Affairs 12, 26182628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyce, S, Schieber, SJ, Shoven, JB, Slavov, SN and Wise, DA (2013) Does retiree health insurance encourage early retirement? Journal of Public Economics 104, 4051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajkumar, R, Conway, PH and Tavenner, M (2014) CMS — engaging multiple payers in payment reform. JAMA 311, 19671968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogowski, J and Karoly, L (2000) Health insurance and retirement behavior: evidence from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Health Economics 19, 529539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2014) The role of retiree health insurance in the early retirement of public sector employees. Journal of Health Economics 38, 99108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrank, W (2013) The center for medicare and medicaid innovation's blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Affairs 32, 807812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wertz, D, Hou, L, DeVries, A, Dupclay, L, McGowan, F, Malinowski, B, et al. (2012) Clinical and economic outcomes of the Cincinnati Pharmacy Coaching Program for diabetes and hypertension. Managed Care (Langhorne, PA) 21, 4454.Google ScholarPubMed
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Impact of health plan reforms in Washington on employment decisions
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Impact of health plan reforms in Washington on employment decisions
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Impact of health plan reforms in Washington on employment decisions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *