Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.275 Render date: 2021-11-29T20:27:06.693Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Measuring retirement resource adequacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2008

PETER J. BRADY
Affiliation:
Investment Company Institute, 1401 H Street, NW, Washington DC, 20005, USA (e-mail: pbrady@ici.org)

Abstract

To maintain their standard of living during retirement, it is often assumed that individuals need to save enough to replace 75–80% of their final pay. This paper develops a replacement rate measure that better corresponds with a replacement of consumption by properly accounting for savings, taxes, and owner-occupied housing. Savings and investment behavior judged by standard analysis to be inadequate is shown to result in high real consumption during retirement relative to pre-retirement consumption. For example, the simulated savings and investment behavior of single individuals in this study results in retirement income of about 60% of final earnings, well below the typical adequacy threshold of 75–80%. However, this corresponds to replacing about 90% of pre-retirement consumption for renters and over 100% for homeowners who have paid off their mortgage.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, Susan, Bryan Farnen, D., and Schachet, Mike (2004) Affordable retirement: light at the end of the tunnel. Benefits Quarterly, 20(4): 714.Google ScholarPubMed
Aon Consulting/Georgia State University (2004) Replacement Ratio Study™: A Measurement Tool for Retirement Planning. Chicago, IL: Aon Consulting.Google Scholar
Arias, Elizabeth (2006) United States Life Tables, 2003. In National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 54, No. 14. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (2006) Updated Long-Term Projections for Social Security, June 2006. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/72xx/doc7289/06-14-LongTermProjections.pdfGoogle Scholar
Coronado, Julia, Maki, Dean, and Weitzer, Ben (2006) Retiring on the house? Cross-cohort differences in housing wealth. Pension Research Council Working Paper, No. 2006-25.Google Scholar
Engen, Eric M., Gale, William G., and Cori, Ucello (2004) Lifetime earnings, Social Security benefits, and the adequacy of retirement wealth accumulation. Boston College Center for Retirement Research Working Paper, No. 2004-10.Google Scholar
Harris, Amy Rehder and Simpson, Michael (2005) Winners and losers under various approaches to slowing Social Security benefit growth. National Tax Journal, 58(3): 523543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Sarah and VanDerhei, Jack (2005) The influence of automatic enrollment, catch-up, and IRA contributions on 401(k) accumulations at retirement. In ICI Perspective, Vol. 11, No. 2. Washington, DC: Investment Company Institute. http://www.ici.org/perspective/per11-02.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hurst, Erik (2007) Consumption in retirement: recent developments. Pension Research Council Working Paper, No. 2007-26.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Olivia S. and Moore, James F. (1998) Can americans afford to retire? New evidence on retirement saving adequacy. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65(3): 371400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Olivia S. and Phillips, John W. R. (2006) Social Security replacement rates for alternative earnings benchmarks. Pension Research Council Working Paper, No. 2006-6.Google Scholar
Moore, James F. and Mitchell, Olivia S. (1997) Projected wealth and savings adequacy in the health and retirement study. NBER Working Paper, No. 6240.Google Scholar
Munnell, Alicia H., Webb, Anthony, and Delorme, Luke (2006) A new national retirement risk index. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Issue Brief, No. 48.Google Scholar
Purcell, Patrick (2005) Progressive price indexing of Social Security benefits. Congressional Research Service , April 22, 2005.Google Scholar
Purcell, Patrick and Whitman, Debra B. (2007) Retirement savings: how much will workers have when they retire? Congressional Research Service , January 29, 2007.Google Scholar
Sabelhaus, John (1997) Public policy and saving in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(2): 253275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiber, Sylvester J. (2007) Beyond the golden age of retirement. Mimeo, Ninth Annual Conference of the Retirement Research Consortium, August 2007.Google Scholar
Scholz, John Karl, Seshadri, Anath, and Khitatrakun, Surachai (2006) Are americans saving ‘optimally’ for retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 114: 607643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, John Karl and Seshadri, Anath (2007) Children and household wealth. University of Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper, No. 2007-158.Google Scholar
Social Security Administration (2006) 2006 OASDI Trustees Report. Available at http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR06/trTOC.htmlGoogle Scholar
Statistics of Income (2005) Statistics of Income – 2003 Individual Income Tax Returns. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Allen and Lucas, Lori (2004) Shifting responsibility to workers: the future of retirement adequacy in the United States. Benefits Quarterly, Fourth Quarter.Google Scholar
United States, President's Commission on Pension Policy (1980) Interim Report of the President's Commission on Pension Policy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2007) Low defined contribution plan savings may pose challenges to retirement security, easpecially for many low-income workers. Report No. GAO-08-08, available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d088.pdfGoogle Scholar
Venti, Steven F. and Wise, David A. (1991) Aging and the income value of housing wealth. Journal of Public Economics, 44(3): 371398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venti, Steven F. and Wise, David A. (2002) Aging and housing equity. In Mitchell, Olivia S., Bodie, Zvi, Brett Hammond, P., and Zeldes, Stephen (eds) Innovations in Retirement Financing. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Venti, Steven F. and Wise, David A. (2004) Aging and housing equity: another look. In Wise, David A. (ed.) Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
24
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Measuring retirement resource adequacy
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Measuring retirement resource adequacy
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Measuring retirement resource adequacy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *