Skip to main content Accessibility help

Gubernatorial use of executive orders: unilateral action and policy adoption

  • Mitchell Dylan Sellers (a1)


I examine gubernatorial use of executive orders, and assess how executive action influences statute adoption. I argue that strong governors use executive orders to pursue policy objectives when they perceive legislation as unlikely to pass. Multilevel Event History Analysis of executive orders and the adoption of statutes that protect the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community from 1975 to 2013 reveals that partisan control of government and intrastate factors influence both forms of policy adoption. My findings support the strategic model that argues that executives turn to executive orders when confronting unfavourable legislative conditions, and that governors issue protections more when entering office. Legislatures respond to partisan control of the legislature and social characteristics. Further, states that have pro-LGBT executive orders in place are more likely to adopt similar statutes. My results suggest that stronger governors are more likely to issue executive orders, but it is states with weaker governors that are more likely to adopt legislation.



Hide All
Arizona Memory Project (2014) Arizona Executive Orders, (accessed 14 October 2014).
Barclay, S. and Fisher, S. (2003) The States and the Differing Impetus for Divergent Paths on Same-Sex Marriage, 1990-2001. Policy Studies Journal 31: 331352.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1990) State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review 84(2): 395415.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1999) Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In Sabatier P. A. and Weible C. M. (eds.), Theories of the Policy Process. Berry and Berry- Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 307360.
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C. and Hanson, R. L. (1998) Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93. American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327348.
Boehmke, F. J. (2009) Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies With Multiple Components. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9(2): 229252.
Bolton, A. and Thrower, S. (2015) Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism. American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 649663.
Brewer, P. R. (2007) Value War: Public Opinion and the Politics of Gay Rights. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Burke, J. P. (1992) The Institutional Presidency. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Council of State Governments (2014) The Book of States 2014. Council of State Governments (accessed 10 October 2014).
Deering, C. J. and Maltzman, F. (1999) The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power. Political Research Quarterly 52(4): 767783.
Ferguson, M. R. and Bowling, C. J. (2008) Executive Orders and Administrative Control. Public Administration Review 68(suppl. 1): S20S28.
Fine, J. A. and Warber, A. L. (2012) Circumventing Adversity: Executive Orders and Divided Government. Presidential Studies Quarterly 42(2): 256274.
Godwin, M. L. and Schroedel, J. R. (2000) Policy Diffusion and Strategies for Promoting Policy Change: Evidence from California Local Gun Control Ordinances. Policy Studies Journal 28(4): 760776.
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2000) Lesbian and Gay Politics in the States: Interest Groups, Electoral Politics, and Public Policy. In Rimmerman C., Wald K. and Wilcox C. (eds.), The Politics of Gay Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 290346.
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001) Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1): 526.
Hicks, W. D., McKee, S. C., Sellers, M. D. and Smith, D. A. (2015) A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States. Political Research Quarterly 68(1): 1833.
Howell, W. G. (2003) Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Howell, W. G. (2005) Unilateral Powers: A Brief Overview. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35(3): 417439.
Human Rights Campaign (2014) Home page. (accessed 12 November 2014).
Karch, A. (2007) Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion Among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Klarner, C. (2012) Data sets. (accessed 22 December 2012).
Kousser, T. and Phillips, J. H. (2012) The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krause, G. A. and Cohen, D. B. (1997) Presidential Use of Executive Orders, 1953-1994. American Politics Research 25(4): 458481.
Lax, J. R. and Phillips, J. H. (2009) Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness. American Political Science Review 103(3): 367386.
Mayer, K. R. (1999) Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Journal of Politics 61(2): 445466.
Mayer, K. R. (2009) Going Alone: The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action. In Edwards G. C. III and Howell W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook and the American Presidency. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 427454.
Mayer, K. R. and Price, K. (2002) Unilateral Presidential Powers: Significant Executive Orders, 1949-99. Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): 367386.
Mills, M. (2011) Introducing Survival and Event History Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Mooney, C. Z. and Lee, M. H. (1995) Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform. American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 599627.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (2013) Home Page, (accessed 6 November 2013).
Oklahoma Secretary of State (2014) Executive Orders, (accessed 8 November 2014).
Partin, R. W. (2001) Campaign Intensity and Voter Information: A Look at Gubernatorial Contests. American Politics Research 29(2): 115140.
Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondal, A. (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
Sellers, M. D. (2014a) Executive Expansion of Transgender Rights: Electoral Incentives to Issue or Revoke Executive Orders. In Taylor J. K. and Haider-Markel D. P. (eds.), Transgender Rights and Politics: Groups, Issue Framing, and Policy Adoption. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 189207.
Sellers, M. D. (2014b) Discrimination and the Transgender Population: Analysis of the Functionality of Local Government Policies That Protect Gender Identity. Administration & Society 46: 7086.
Sharp, E. B. (2005) Morality Politics in American Cities. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Shipan, C. R. and Volden, C. (2008) The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840857.
Soule, S. A. and Earl, J. (2001) The Enactment of State-Level Hate Crime Law in the United States: Intrastate and Interstate Factors. Sociological Perspectives 44(3): 281305.
Spill, R. L., Licari, M. J. and Ray, L. (2001) Taking on Tobacco: Policy Entrepreneurship and the Tobacco Litigation. Political Research Quarterly 54(3): 605622.
Taylor, J. K., Lewis, D. C., Jacobsmeier, M. L. and DiSarro, B. (2012) Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion Gay and Transgender-Inclusive Laws Against Discrimination. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12(1): 7598.
Transgender Law Center (2010) Litigation: Case law, (accessed 18 May 2014).
Walker, J. L. (1969) The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States. American Political Science Review 63(3): 880899.
Wigton, R. C. (1996) Recent Presidential Experience with Executive Orders. Presidential Studies Quarterly 26(2): 473484.
Wilcox, C. and Robinson, C. (2010) Onward Christian Soldiers?: The Religious Right in American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed