Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-5fx6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:25:46.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intervention by Outsiders: A Strategic Management Perspective on Government Industrial Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Romano Dyerson  and
Frank Mueller
Romano Dyerson
Affiliation:
Centre for Business Strategy, London Business School
Frank Mueller
Affiliation:
Strategic Management, Aston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the debate throughout the eighties has concluded, the efforts of governments to intervene at the firm level has largely been disappointing. Using two examples drawn from the British experience, Rover and Inmos, this paper offers an analysis as to why the Government has encountered difficulties when it has sought to intervene in a strategic fashion. Essentially, public policy makers lack adequate mechanisms to intervene effectively in technology-based companies. Locked out of the knowledge base of the firm, inappropriate financial control is imposed which reinforces the ‘outsider’ status of the Government. Having addressed the limitations of strategic intervention, the paper, drawing on the comparative experience of other countries, then goes on to address how this policy boundary might be pushed back in the long term.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 69 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altshuler, A. et al. (1985) The Future of the Automobile London: Unwin Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Anon (1990) Technical Note: The New Rover K Series Engine', International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. II, 2, pp. 208–216.Google Scholar
Aston, B. (1991) ‘The Key to Running a High-Tech Business: Relational Teams’, Business Strategy Review, No. 3, Autumn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydalot, P. and Keeble, D., eds. (1988) High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience, Routledge.Google Scholar
Bertodo, R. G. (1988) ‘Evolution of an engineering organization’, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 3, 6, pp. 693–710.Google Scholar
Bertodo, R. G. (1990) ‘The Strategic Alliance: Automotive Paradigm for the 1990s’, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 5, 4, pp. 375–388.Google Scholar
Berry, B. H. (1990) ‘Aluminium Cast in Starring Role’, Iron Age, Vol. 6, 8, August.Google Scholar
Bianchi, P. and Bellini, N. (1991) ‘Public Policies for Local Networks of Innovators’, Research Policy, Vol. 20, 5, pp. 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Light, C. D. and Gazda, G. M. (1987) ‘Attitudes Towards European, Japanese and US Cars’, European Journal of Marketing (UK), Vol. 21, 5, pp. 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983) ‘A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behaviour, Corporate Context and the Concept of Corporate Strategy’, Academy of Management Review, pp. 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. and Sayles, L. R. (1986) Inside Corporate Innovation. Strategy, Structure, and Managerial Skills, Free Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. and Mowery, D. (1984) ‘Firm Heterogeneity and R&D: An Agenda for Research’, in: Bozeman, B. (ed), Strategic Importance of Industrial R&D.Google Scholar
De Mayer, A. (1986) ‘Large European Manufacturers and the Management of R&D’, R&D Management, April, vol. 16, 2, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
Dore, R. (1986) Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy 1970–80, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. (1984) Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1985) ‘The Changed World Economy’, in Wortzel, H. V. and Wortzel, L. H., eds., Strategic Management of Multinational Corporations: The Essentials, John Wiley, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Dyerson, R. and Roper, M. (1991) ‘When Expertise Becomes Know-How: The Management of IT Projects in Financial Services’, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 2, 2, Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwardes, M. (1983) Back from the Brink: An Apocalyptic Experience. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Goold, M. and Campbell, A. (1987) Strategy and Styles: The Role of the Centre in Managing Diversified Companies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Globerman, S. (1980) ‘Markets, Hierarchies and Innovation’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 14, 4, pp. 977–998.Google Scholar
Harbridge House (1983) Corporate Strategies of the Automotive Manufacturers, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1989) After Thatcher. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Horwitch, M. and Prahalad, C. K. (1987) ‘Managing Technological Innovation: Three Ideal Modes’, in: Roberts, E. B., ed., Generating Technological Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1985) ‘Managing the New Product Development Process: How Japanese Companies Learn and Unlearn’, in: Clark, K., Hayes, R. and Loveny, C., eds., Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma: The Uneasy Alliance, Harvard Business School Press, Ch.8.Google Scholar
Jones, D. T. (1989) ‘Corporate strategy and technology in the world automobile industry’, in: Dodgson, M., ed., Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy, p. 13.Google Scholar
McLean, M. and Rowland, T. (1985) The Inmos Saga. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Maidique, M. A. and Hayes, R. H. (1987) ‘The Art of High-Technology Management’, in: Roberts, E. B., ed., Generating Technological Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1989) ‘Nurturing Those Ideas’, Business Week, Issue 3110, 16 June 1989, pp. 106–118.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. (1992) ‘The US National Innovation System: Origins and Prospects for Change’, Research Policy, Vol. 21, 2, April, pp. 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, F. (1991) ‘The Engine of Change in Employee Relations’, Personnel Management, July 1991.Google Scholar
Mueller, F. and Roper, M. (1991) ‘Technological Innovation and Commercial Success: The Development of the K-Series Engine at Rover’, Technology Project Papers, No. 15, London Business School.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pavitt, K. (1986) ‘Technology, Innovation and Strategic Management’, in: McGee, J. and Thomas, H., Strategic Management Research.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. P. (1988) Restructuring the Automobile Industry: A Study of Firms and States in Modern Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, R. B. (1989) ‘The Quiet Path to Technological Preeminence’, Scientific American, Vol. 261, 4, pp. 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. (1988) ‘What We've Learned: Managing Invention and Innovation’, Research Technology Management, January/February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, R. (1974) ‘SAPPHO Updated. Project SAPPHO, Phase 2’, Research Policy, Vol. 3, 3, pp. 258–291.Google Scholar
Rothwell, R. and Gardiner, J. P. (1988) ‘Re-Innovation and Robust Designs: Producer and User Benefits’, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 3, 3, Spring, pp. 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1988) ‘An Assessment of Government Innovation Policy’, in: Roessner, J. D., ed., Government Innovation Policy: Design, Implementation, Evaluation. London: Macmillan, pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. (1984) ‘Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm’, in: Lamb, R., Competitive Strategic Management.Google Scholar
Select Committee (1979) Second special report on Science and Technology (Sub-committee on technological innovation) 1978–79: Developments in small passenger car engine technology, House of Commons, HMSO.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M. (1989) ‘Corporate Strategies and Collaboration: The Case of ESPIRIT and European Electronics’, in: Dodgson, M., ed., Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy, Longman.Google Scholar
Shonfield, A. (1984) In Defense of the Mixed Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, D. K. (1981) ‘The Case for Government Support of R and D and Innovation’, in: Carter, C., ed., Industrial Policy and Innovation, Heinemann, pp. 116–128.Google Scholar
Teece, D. (1987) ‘Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy’, in: Teece, D., ed., The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Ballinger.Google Scholar
Watkins, T. A. (1991) ‘A Model of R&D Consortia as Public Policy’, Research Policy, Vol. 20, 2, pp. 87–107.Google Scholar
Whipp, R. (1991) ‘Crisis and Continuity: Innovation in the British Automobile Industry 1896–1986’, in: Mathias, R. and Davis, A., eds., Innovation and Technology in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whittaker, D. H. (1990) Managing Innovation. A Study of British and Japanese Factories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. (1988) Industrial Policy and the Motor Industry, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Williams, J. and Haslam, C. (1987) The Breakdown of Austin Rover. A Case Study in the Failure of Business Strategy and Industrial Policy, Berg.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Willman, P. and Winch, G. (1985) Innovation and Management Control: Labour Relations at BL Cars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar