Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Lawmaking in American Legislatures: an empirical investigation

  • Joshua D. Clinton (a1) and Mark D. Richardson (a2)
Abstract

Given pervasive gridlock at the national level, state legislatures are increasingly the place where notable policy change occurs. Investigating such change is difficult because it is often hard to characterise policy change and use observable data to evaluate theoretical predictions; it is subsequently unclear whether law-making explanations focusing on the US Congress also apply to state legislatures. We use several measures of state policy outcomes to examine lawmaking in state legislatures across nearly two decades, and we argue for using simulation studies to connect theoretical predictions to empirical specifications and help interpret the theoretical relevance of estimated correlations. Doing so reveals that the observed law-making outcomes we study are most consistent with law-making models emphasising the importance of the chamber median and the powers of the governor rather than those that focus on the preferences of the majority party.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aldrich, J. H. (1995) Why Parties? The Origins and Transformation of Political Parties. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, J. H. and Rohde, D. W. (1997) The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics. Political Science Quarterly 112(4): 541567.
Aldrich, J. H. and Rohde, D. W. (2000) The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee. The Journal of Politics 62(1): 133.
Anzia, S. F. (2011) Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups. The Journal of Politics 73(2): 412427.
Anzia, S. F. and Jackman, M. C. (2013) Legislative Organization and the Second Face of Power: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures. The Journal of Politics 75(1): 210224.
Battista, J., Peress, M. and Richman, J. (2014) Policy Representation in the State Legislatures. University of Rochester Working Paper, Rochester, New York, USA.
Battista, J. C. and Richman, J. (2011) Party Pressure in the U.S. State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36: 397422.
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1990) State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. The American Political Science Review 84(2): 395415.
Binder, S. (1999) The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947--1996. American Political Science Review 93: 519533.
Black, D. (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowen, D. and Greene, Z. (2016) Legislative Professionalism Component Scores, V1.1, http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27595 (accessed 17 August 2017).
Bowen, D. C. and Greene, Z. (2014) Should we Measure Professionalism With an Index? A Note on Theory and Practice in State Legislative Professionalism Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 14(3): 277296.
Brady, D. W. and Volden, C. (1998) Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cameron, C. M. (2000) Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Canes-Wrone, B. (2006) Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Caughey, D. and Warshaw, C. (2015a) Dynamic Representation in the American States, 1960--2012. Technical Report, MIT Working Paper, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Caughey, D. and Warshaw, C. (2015b) The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936--2014. American Journal of Political Science 60: 899913.
Chiou, F.-Y. and Rothenberg, L. S. (2003) When Pivotal Politics Meets Partisan Politics. American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 503522.
Chiou, F.-Y. and Rothenberg, L. S. (2009) A Unified Theory of U.S. Lawmaking: Preferences, Institutions, and Party Discipline. Journal of Politics 71(4): 12571272.
Clinton, J. D. (2007) Lawmaking and Roll Calls. Journal of Politics 69(2): 457469.
Clinton, J. D. (2012) Congress, Lawmaking, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 1971--2000. American Journal of Political Science 56: 355372.
Clinton, J. D. (2017) Coding the Ideological Direction and Content of Policies. Annual Review of Political Science 20: 433450.
Clinton, J. D., Jackman, S. and Rivers, D. (2004) The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Voting: A Unified Approach. American Political Science Review 98: 355370.
Coleman, J. J. (1999) Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness. American Political Science Review 93: 821835.
Cox, G. W. and McCubbins, M. D. (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Diermeier, D. and Krehbiel, K. (2003) Institutionalism as a Methodology. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(2): 123144.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C. and McIver, J. P. (1993) Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finnigan, K., Adelman, N., Anderson, L., Cotton, L., Donnelly, M. B. and Price, T. (2004) Evaluation of the Public Charter Schools Program: Final Report. Technical Report, U.S. Department of Education, http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/choice/pcsp-final/finalreport.pdf (accessed 29 December 2013).
Florsheim, L. (2014) Here’s Proof That the Anti-Abortion Movement is Winning. The New Republic. 30 July, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118897/pro-life-movement-winning-abortion-battle-arizona-mississippi (accessed 5 August 2015).
Gamm, G. and Kousser, T. (2010) Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures. American Political Science Review 104(1): 151170.
Hamm, K. and Squire, P. (2005) 101 Chambers, State Legislatures, and the Future of Legislative Studies. Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press.
Howell, W. G. (2003) Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Jenkins, J. and Gailmard, S. (2010) Negative Agenda Control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of Majority Party Power. Journal of Politics 69: 698700.
Jenkins, S. (2008) Party Influence on Roll Call Voting: A View from the States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8: 239262.
Kernell, S. (2007) Going Public, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Kousser, T. and Phillips, J. H. (2009) The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krehbiel, K. (1998) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Krehbiel, K. and Rivers, D. (1988) The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage. American Journal of Political Science 32: 11511174.
Lapinski, J. (2008) Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877--1994. American Journal of Political Science 52: 235251.
Lax, J. and Phillips, J. (2012) The Democratic Deficit in the States. American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 148166.
Lee, F. (2016) Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, D. E. (2008) The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Mayhew, D. R. (2005) Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946--2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. (1998) Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms. The Journal of Politics 60(1): 126148.
Moe, T. M. (2006) Political Control and the Power of the Agent. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22(1): 129.
Moe, T. M. and Howell, W. G. (1999) The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 15(1): 132179.
Peress, M. (2013) Estimating Proposal and Status Quo Locations Using Voting and Censorship Data. The Journal of Politics 75(3): 613631.
Poole, K. T. and Rosenthal, H. (1997) Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rau, A. B. (2013) Timeline: Abortion Laws in Arizona. The Arizona Republic. 21 May 21, http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130226arizona-abortion-law-timeline.html (accessed 5 August 2015).
Reilly, M. (2009) States Limiting Legislative Debate. Technical Report No. 2009-R-0249, Connecticut General Assembly Research Report, http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/rpt/2009-R-0249.htm (accessed 18 May 2015).
Reiss, P. C. and Wolak, F. A. (2007) Structural Econometric Modelling: Rationales and Examples from Industrial Organization in J. J. Heckman and E. E. Leamer (eds) Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 6A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Oxford, UK, 4280–4415.
Richman, J. (2011) Parties, Pivots, and Policy: The Status Quo Test. American Political Science Review 105(1): 151165.
Rogers, S. (2016) National Forces in State Legislative Elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667(1): 207225.
Rogers, S. (2017) Electoral Accountability of State Legislative Roll-Calls and Ideological Representation. American Political Science Review 111: 555571.
Rohde, D. W. (1991) Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978) Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice 33(4): 2743.
Shipan, C. R. and Volden, C. (2006) Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Anti-Smoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States. American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 825843.
Shober, A. F., Manna, P. and Witte, J. F. (2006) Flexibility Meets Accountability: State Charter School Laws and their Influence on the Formation of Charter Schools in the United States. Policy Studies Journal 34(4): 563587.
Shor, B. and McCarty, N. (2011) The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures. American Political Science Review 105(3): 530551.
Shor, B. and McCarty, N. (2014) July 2014 Update: Aggregate Data for Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures. Harvard Dataverse, V1, http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26799 (accessed 11 May 2014).
Smith, S. S. (2007) Party Influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Squire, P. (2007) Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 211227.
Squire, P. (2012) The Evolution of American Legislatures: Colonies, Territories, and States, 1619--2009. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
State of New Hampshire Charter School Program Review (2007) Technical Report, New Hampshire Department of Education, https://www.education.nh.gov/instruction/school_improve/charter/documents/program_review.pdf (accessed 8 June 2015).
Treier, S. (2010) Where Does the President Stand? Measuring Presidential Ideology. Political Analysis 18(1): 124136.
Volden, C. (2006) States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294312.
Wawro, G. J. and Schickler, E. (2004) Where’s the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-Cloture Senate. American Journal of Political Science 48: 758774.
Wawro, G. J. and Schickler, E. (2006) Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wiseman, A. E. and Wright, J. R. (2008) The Legislative Median and Partisan Policy. Journal of Theoretical Politics 20(1): 529.
Woon, J. and Cook, I. P. (2015) Competing Gridlock Models and Status Quo Policies. Political Analysis 23(3): 385399.
Wright, G. C., Erikson, R. S. and McIver, J. P. (1987) Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States. American Journal of Political Science 31(4): 9801001.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Clinton and Richardson supplementary material 1
Clinton and Richardson supplementary material

 PDF (227 KB)
227 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 559 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2018 - 24th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.