Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 0.343 Render date: 2021-03-07T15:49:01.588Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Bringing Women on Board: The Social Policy Implications of Gender Diversity in Top Jobs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2019

HELEN KOWALEWSKA
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2ER, UK email: Helen.Kowalewska@spi.ox.ac.uk
Corresponding

Abstract

This paper argues that analyses of the gendered character of welfare states should be broadened to include women’s share of board and executive roles, as well as the affirmative-action policies (e.g. gender boardroom quotas) that help to overcome the gender stereotypes (e.g. women are ‘nice’, men are ‘assertive’) and opaque selection procedures at the root of this. Such indicators may seem beyond the remit of social policy analysis, which is concerned foremost with the analysis of ‘social risk’. However, drawing on evidence from across multiple disciplines, this paper argues that achieving a ‘critical mass’ of women in board and executive positions can bring women’s issues onto companies’ agendas and lead to the adoption of female-friendly practices, policies, and cultures at the firm level. Crucially, these practices, policies, and cultures can help to reduce the incidence of gendered social risks (employment/care conflicts, economic dependence on a partner) and sexual harassment among women at lower levels of the labour market. Thus, the paper highlights another dimension to the social-regulatory function of welfare states which has to date been overlooked, namely legislative requirements on companies to achieve gender diversity in their leadership structures.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bell, M., McLaughlin, M. and Sequeira, J. (2002a), Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling, Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1): 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. P., Quick, J. C. and Cycyota, C. S. (2002b), Assessment and Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Employees, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2): 160167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benish, A., Haber, H. and Eliahou, R. (2017), The Regulatory Welfare State in Pension Markets, Journal of Social Policy, 46(2): 313330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., Black, S.E., Jensen, S. and Lleras-Muney, A. (2019), Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labour Market Outcomes in Norway, Review of Economic Studies, 86(1): 191239.Google Scholar
Bitton, M.S., and Shaul, B.D. (2013), Perceptions and Attitudes to Sexual Harassment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10): 21362145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2003), Two Worlds of Pension Reform in Western Europe, Comparative Politics, 35(4): 399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2005), The Politics of the New Social Policies, Policy and Politics, 33(3): 431449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2013), The Origins of Active Social Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozhinov, V., Koch, C. and Schank, T. (2018), The Second Glass Ceiling: Women’s Role in Supervisory Boards of German Firms, Schmalenbach Business Review, 127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-018-0063-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brands, R.A. and Fernandez-Mateo, I. (2017), Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women’s Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles, Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(3): 405442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, L.D. (2002), Changing the Subject: Gender and Welfare Regime Studies, Social Politics, 9(2): 161186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, A.R. and Winter-Ebmer, R. (2010), Female-Led Firms and Gender Wage Policies, ILR Review, 64(1): 143163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalyst (2017), Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies, http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sp-500-companies [accessed 21.05.2017].Google Scholar
Cohen, P. and Huffman, M. (2007), Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap, American Sociological Review, 72(5): 681704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancaster, L. and Baird, M. (2016), Predictors of the Adoption of Work–Care Arrangements, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4): 456475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Dulk, L., Peters, P. and Poutsma, E. (2012), Variations in Adoption of Workplace Work–Family Arrangements in Europe, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(13): 27852808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derks, B., van Laar, C. and Ellemers, N. (2016), The Queen Bee Phenomenon, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3): 456469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhir, A. (2015), Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F., Kim, S. and Kalev, A. (2011), You Can’t Always Get What You Need: Organisational Determinants of Diversity Programmes, American Sociological Review, 76(3): 386411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, G.F. (2003), Breaking the Glass Ceiling: The Effects of Sex Ratios and Work-Life Programs on Female Leadership at the Top, Human Relations, 56(5): 541562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, S. (2016), Women Who Succeed: Strangers in Paradise?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J., Ashford, S., Lawrence, K. and Miner-Rubino, K. (2002), Red Light, Green Light: Making Sense of the Organisational Context for Issue Selling, Organisation Science, 13(4): 355369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. and Carli, L. (2007), Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership, Harvard Business Review, 85(9): 6271.Google ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. and Karau, S. (2002), Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders, Psychological Review, 109(3): 573598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellingsæter, A.L. (2013), Scandinavian Welfare States and Gender (De)Segregation, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 34(3): 501518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, R.A. (1996), Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States, Providence, R. I.: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Elvira, M.M. and Cohen, L.E. (2001), Location Matters: A Cross-Level Analysis of the Effects of Organisational Sex Composition on Turnover, The Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 591605.Google Scholar
Ely, R. (1995), The Power in Demography: Women’s Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work, The Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 589634.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009), The Incomplete Revolution, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
European Institute for Gender Equality (2019), Gender Statistics Database, http://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics [accessed 04.02.2019].Google Scholar
Fernandez-Mateo, I. and Fernandez, R.M. (2016), Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs, Management Science, 62(12): 36363655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flabbi, L., Macis, M., Moro, A. and Schivardi, F. (2016), Do Female Executives Make a Difference?, https://www.nber.org/papers/w22877 [accessed 04.12.2018].Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, T. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011), Cross-National Perspectives on Firm-Level Family Policies, in Clasen, J. (Ed.) Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, J.A., Leibbrandt, A. and List, J.A. (2015), Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers?, The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1): 122155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliarducci, S. and Paserman, D. (2015), The Effect of Female Leadership on Establishment and Employee Outcomes, in Polachek, S.W., Tatsiramos, K. and Zimmermann, K.F. (Eds.), Gender Convergence in the Labor Market, Bingley: Emerald, 343375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.-J. (1999), The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, E.H. (2005), Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences and Organisational Variation in the Hiring of Women, American Sociological Review, 70(4): 702728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güngör, G. and Biernat, M. (2009), Gender Bias or Motherhood Disadvantage?, Sex Roles, 60(3): 232246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakim, C. (2006), Women, Careers, and Work-Life Preferences, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 34(3): 279294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakim, C. (2016), The Sugar in His Tea: Sexuality, Patriarchy and Sexual Politics, Sociologica, 3(2016): 127.Google Scholar
Halldén, K., Säve-Söderbergh, J. and Rosén, Å. (2018), Gender of the Immediate Manager and Women’s Wages: The Importance of Managerial Position, Social Science Research, 72(2018): 115133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilman, M.E. (1983), Sex Bias in Work Settings: The Lack of Fit Model, Research in Organisational Behaviour, 5(1983): 269298.Google Scholar
Hernes, H. (1987), Welfare State and Woman Power, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, B. (2013), The Impact of Female Managers on the Gender Pay Gap, Economic Letters, 119(3): 348350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M. (2016), Does the Presence of Women in Management Impact Gender Inequality?, in Connerley, M.L. and Wu, J. (Eds.), Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women, Dordrecht: Springer, 175187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M., Cohen, P. and Pearlman, J. (2010), Engendering Change: Organisational Dynamics and Workplace Gender Desegregation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2): 255277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultin, M. and Szulkin, R. (1999), Wages and Unequal Access to Organisational Power: An Empirical Test of Gender Discrimination, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 453472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultin, M. and Szulkin, R. (2003), Mechanisms of Inequality: Unequal Access to Organisational Power and the Gender Wage Gap, European Sociological Review, 19(2): 143159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, H., Ely, R. and Kolb, D. (2013), Women Rising: The Unseen Barriers, Harvard Business Review, 91(9): 6166.Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation (2018), ILOstat Database, https://www.ilo.org/ilostat [accessed 30.01.2018].Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2015), The Fading Goal of Gender Equality, Social Politics, 22(4): 539560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977), Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kim, E. H., Maug, E. and Schneider, C. (2018), Labour Representation in Governance as an Insurance Mechanism, Review of Finance, 22(4): 12511289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A., Eagly, A., Mitchell, A. and Ristikari, T. (2011), Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine?, Psychological Bulletin, 137(4): 616642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konrad, A., Cannings, K. and Goldberg, C. B. (2010), Asymmetrical Demography Effects on Psychological Climate for Gender Diversity, Human Relations, 63(11): 16611685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, A., Kramer, V. and Erkut, S. (2008), Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards, Organisational Dynamics, 37(2): 145164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T. and Englund, S. (2013), Women’s Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations, Social Politics, 20(1): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewska, H. (2019), Bringing Women on Board? ‘Women-Friendly’ Welfare States and Gender Diversity in Top Jobs, paper presented at the Nordic Welfare Research Conference, Helsinki, 14–15 March.Google Scholar
Kurtulus, F. A. and Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2012), Do Female Top Managers Help Women to Advance?, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639(1): 173197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisering, L. (ed.) (2011), The New Regulatory State Regulating Pensions in Germany and the UK, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (1994), “She Has Other Duties”: Women, Citizenship and Social Security, in Baldwin, S. and Falkingham, J. (Eds.), Social Security and Social Change, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 3144.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (1997), Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, C.A. (1979), Sexual Harassment of Working Women, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, H. and Semyonov, M. (2005), Family Policies, Wage Structures, and Gender Gaps: Sources of Earnings Inequality in 20 Countries, American Sociological Review, 70(6): 949967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, H. and Semyonov, M. (2006), A Welfare State Paradox, American Journal of Sociology, 111(6): 19101949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maume, D. J. (2011), Meet the New Boss…Same as the Old Boss? Female Supervisors and Subordinate Career Prospects, Social Science Research, 40(1): 287298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C. and Blackstone, A. (2012), Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power, American Sociological Association, 77(4): 625647.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C. and Blackstone, A. (2017), The Economic and Career Effects of Sexual Harassment on Working Women, Gender and Society, 31(3): 333358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, K., Niessen-Ruenzi, A. and Ruenzi, S. (2018), The Impact of Role Models on Women’s Self-Selection in Competitive Environments, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Verein für Socialpolitik, Hamburg, 2–5 September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MSCI (2018), Women on Boards: Progress Report 2018, New York: MSCI.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J.S., Orloff, A.S. and Shaver, S. (1999), States, Markets, Families, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2017), The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (1993), Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship, American Sociological Review, 58(3): 303328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (2009a), Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda, Sociological Theory, 27(3): 317343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (2009b), Should Feminists Aim for Gender Symmetry?, in Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M.K. (Eds.), Gender Equality: Transforming Family Divisions of Labour, London: Verso, 129157.Google Scholar
Quinn, B.A. (2002), Sexual Harassment and Masculinity: The Power and Meaning of ‘Girl Watching’, Gender and Society, 16(3): 386402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C. and Hagen, I.M. (2019), The Perceived Influence of Employee Board Members on Decisions in Denmark and Norway, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, K.M., King, E.B., Adis, C., Gulick, L.M.V., Peddie, C. and Hargraves, R. (2012), Exploring the Asymmetrical Effects of Gender Tokenism on Supervisor-Subordinate Relationships, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1): E56E1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, M. and Fleckenstein, T. (2009), The Political Economy of Occupational Family Policies, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4): 741764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M. and Huse, M. (2017), Increasing the Number of Women on Boards: The Role of Actors and Processes, Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2): 289315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainback, K., Kleiner, S. and Skaggs, S. (2016), Women in Power: Undoing or Redoing the Gendered Organisation?, Gender and Society, 30(1): 109135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainback, K. and Kwon, S. (2012), Female Leaders, Organisational Power, and Sex Segregation, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639(1): 217235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C.M. and Aronson, J. (1995), Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutter, M. and Glätzle-Rützler, D. (2015), Gender Differences in the Willingness to Compete Emerge Early in Life and Persist, Management Science, 61(10): 23392354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, G. and Yang, L. (2015), Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure, Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teigen, M. (2012), ‘Gender Quotas on Corporate Boards’, in Engelstad, F. and Tiegen, M. (Eds.), Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas, Bingley: Emerald, 115146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., Holgersson, C. and Bendl, R. (2013), And Then There Are None: On the Exclusion of Women in Processes of Executive Search, Gender in Management, 28(1): 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A. and Huse, M. (2011), Women Directors on Corporate Boards, Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2): 299317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E.L. and Cohen, G.L. (2005), Constructed Criteria Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination, American Psychological Society, 16(6): 474480.Google ScholarPubMed
van Kersbergen, K. and Hemerijck, A. (2012), Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State, Journal of Social Policy, 41(3): 475492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitols, S. (2010), Board Level Employee Representation, Executive Remuneration and Firm Performance in Large European Companies, http://www.efesonline.org/database%20of%20employee%20ownership/Users/2010_ceo_pay_paper.pdf [accessed 28.02.2019].Google Scholar
West, A. and Nikolai, R. (2013), Welfare Regimes and Education Regimes, Journal of Social Policy, 42(3): 469493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiß, T. (2017), Paths Towards Family-Friendly Working Time Arrangements, Social Policy and Administration, 51(7): 14061430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiß, T. and Greve, B. (2019), A Comparison of the Interplay of Public and Occupational Work-Family Policies in Austria, Denmark, Italy and the United Kingdom, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Women and Equalities Committee (2018), Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmwomeq/725/725.pdf [accessed 03.05.2019].Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 250
Total number of PDF views: 338 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 31st October 2019 - 7th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Bringing Women on Board: The Social Policy Implications of Gender Diversity in Top Jobs
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Bringing Women on Board: The Social Policy Implications of Gender Diversity in Top Jobs
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Bringing Women on Board: The Social Policy Implications of Gender Diversity in Top Jobs
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *