Hostname: page-component-66d9dcfd78-khp5f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-10T02:36:56.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private Benefits? External Benefits? Outcomes of Private Schooling in 21st Century Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

FRANCIS GREEN ,
JAKE ANDERS ,
MORAG HENDERSON  and
GOLO HENSEKE
FRANCIS GREEN
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK email: francis.green@ucl.ac.uk
JAKE ANDERS
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK email: francis.green@ucl.ac.uk
MORAG HENDERSON
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK email: francis.green@ucl.ac.uk
GOLO HENSEKE
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK email: francis.green@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Policy discourse surrounding Britain’s unusually well-resourced private schools surrounds their charitable status and their relationship with low social mobility, but informative evidence is scarce. We present estimates of the extent to which private and external benefits at age 25 are associated with attendance at private school in England in the 21st century. We find a weekly wage premium of 17 percent, and a 12 percentage point lower chance of downward social mobility. By contrast, private schooling is not significantly associated with participation in local voluntary groups, unpaid voluntary work, or charitable giving and fundraising; this finding casts doubt on claims that private schools deliver ‘public benefit’ in this way.

Keywords

private schoolsocial mobilitycharityvolunteeringtrustwagesI20I22I24J30J62D62

Information

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 724 - 743
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adnett, N. and Davies, P. (2002), “Education as a positional good: Implications for market-based reforms of state schooling.” British Journal of Educational Studies 50(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, J. (2015) “Does socio-economic background affect pay growth among early entrants to high-status jobs?” NIESR Discussion Paper 453, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Ashley, L., Duberley, J., Sommerlad, H. and Scholarios, D. (2015), A qualitative evaluation of non-educational barriers to the elite professions. London: Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.Google Scholar
Barber, C., Mueller, C.T. and Ogata, S. (2013), “Volunteerism as purpose: examining the long-term predictors of continued community engagement.” Educational Psychology 33(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belfield, C. and Sibieta, L. (2016), Long-Run Trends in School Spending in England. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS Report R115.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R. and Van Reenen, J. (2015), “Does Management Matter in schools?” Economic Journal 125(584), 647–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, A. and Green, F. (2018), “Do private schools manage better?” National Institute Economic Review 243(February), R17–R26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonaro, W. (2006) Public–private differences in achievement among kindergarten students: Differences in learning opportunities and student outcomes, American Journal of Education, 113(1), 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clerkin, R. M., Paynter, S. R. and Taylor, J. K. (2009), “Public Service Motivation in Undergraduate Giving and Volunteering Decisions.” American Review of Public Administration 39(6), 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C. and Vignoles, A. (2014), Heterogeneity in graduate earnings by socio-economic background. IFS Working Paper(W14/30), 1–20. doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.2014.1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C., Gregg, P., Macmillan, L., Vignoles, A. and Wyness, G. (2016), “Higher education, career opportunities, and intergenerational inequality.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 32(4), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, L., Ferri, J. and Meghir, C. (2002), The effect of school quality on educational attainment and wages. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee, T. S. (2005), “The effects of catholic schooling on civic participation.” International Tax and Public Finance 12 (5), 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DESTATIS (2016) Finanzen der Schulen. Schulen in freier Trägerschaft und Schulen des Gesundheitswesens 2013. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Available at: www.destatis.de.Google Scholar
Dynarski, M. (2016), On negative effects of vouchers. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Elder, T. and Jepsen, C. (2014) Are Catholic primary schools more effective than public primary schools?, Journal of Urban Economics, 80, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, L. and Symons, J. (1999), Attainment in Secondary School. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 300–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksson, P., Oeckert, B. and Oosterbeek, H. (2013), ‘Long-Term Effects Of Class Size.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(1), 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. (2001), “Unobservable family effects and the apparent external benefits of education”, Economics of Education Review, 20, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, F. and Kynaston, D. (2019), Engines of Privilege: Britain’s Private School Problem. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Green, F., Henseke, G. and Vignoles, A. (2017), “Private Schooling and Labour Market Outcomes.” British Educational Research Journal 43(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, F., Machin, S., Murphy, R. and Zhu, Y. (2011), “The Changing Economic Advantage from Private Schools.” Economica 79, 658–679.Google Scholar
Green, F., Parsons, S., Sullivan, A. and Wiggins, R. (2018a), Dreaming Big: Self-Evaluations, Aspirations, High-Valued Social Networks and the Private School Earnings Premium the UK. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(3), 757–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, F., Anders, J., Henderson, M. and Henseke, G. (2018b), Who Chooses Private Schooling in Britain and Why? London: Centre for Research on Learning and Life Chances (LLAKES), Research Paper 62.Google Scholar
Halsey, A. H., Health, A. and Ridge, J. M. (1980), Origins and Destinations: family, class, and education in modern Britain. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A., Link, S. and Woessmann, L. (2013), Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, S. E. (2013), “Involuntary volunteering: The impact of mandated service in public schools.” Economics of Education Review 36, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henseke, G., Anders, J., Green, F. and Henderson, M. (2018), The income and wealth concentration of private school attendance in Britain. Workshop on Britain’s Private Schools in the 21st Century. London: UCL Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Hill, J. P. and den Dulk, K. R. (2013), “Religion, Volunteering, and Educational Setting: The Effect of Youth Schooling Type on Civic Engagement.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52(1), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, P. (2016), Leading People 2016. London: The Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C. and Persico, C. (2016), ‘The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: evidence from school finance reforms.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(1), 157–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, T., Musick, M. and Wilson, J. (1998), “Being volunteered? The impact of social participation and pro-social attitudes on volunteering.” Sociological Forum 13(3), 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, C. (2003) The effectiveness of Catholic primary schooling, Journal of Human Resources, 38 (4), 928–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerrim, J., Parker, P. D., Chmielewski, A. K. and Anders, J. (2016), “Private Schooling, Educational Transitions, and Early Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from Three Anglophone Countries.” European Sociological Review 32(2), 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubienski, C., Crane, C. and Lubienski, S. T. (2008) What do we know about school effectiveness? Academic gains in public and private schools, Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, L., Tyler, C. and Vignoles, A. (2015), Who Gets the Top Jobs? The Role of Family Background and Networks in Recent Graduates’ Access to High-status Professions. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacova, E. (2007), “Effect of single sex education on progress in GCSE.” Oxford Review of Education 33(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcenaro-Guierrez, O., Micklewright, J. and Vignole, A. (2014), Social mobility and the importance of networks: evidence for Britain. London: UCL Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, CLS Working Paper 2014/10.Google Scholar
Maxwell, C. and Aggleton, P. (2015), The historical construction of an elite education in England. Elite Education. International Perspectives. London: Routledge, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, A. (2015), Downward mobility, opportunity hoarding and the ‘glass floor’. London: Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, C., Thomas, S., Goldstein, H. and Knight, T. (1997), ‘1996 Study on Value Added for 16-18 Year Olds in England’, DfEE Research Study RS52. [Online] http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmm/migrated/documents/alevdfee.pdf Accessed on 6 July 2018.Google Scholar
OECD (2012), Public and Private Schools: How Management and Funding Relate to their Socio-economic Profile, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264175006-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, K., Ziersch, A. and Baum, F. (2008), “Who participates? Socioeconomic factors associated with women’s participation in voluntary groups.” Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, S., Green, F., Ploubidis, G. B., Sullivan, A. and Wiggins, R. D. (2017), The influence of private primary schooling on children’s learning: Evidence from three generations of children living in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 43(5), 823–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, M. (2015), The New Meritocracy: A History of UK Independent Schools, 1979–2015, London: Elliott and Thompson.Google Scholar
Perks, T. A. and Konecny, D. (2015), “The Enduring Influence of Parent’s Voluntary Involvement on Their Children’s Volunteering in Later Life.” Canadian Review of Sociology-Revue Canadienne De Sociologie, 52(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pianta, R. C. and Ansari, A. (2018), “Does Attendance in Private Schools Predict Student Outcomes at Age 15? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study.” Educational Researcher, 47(7), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, A., Friedman, S., Rahal, C. and Flemmen, M. (2017), “The Decline and Persistence of the Old Boy: Private Schools and Elite Recruitment 1897 to 2016.” American Sociological Review, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotolo, T. and Wilson, J. (2007), “The effects of children and employment status on the volunteer work of American women.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacerdote, B. (2011), ‘Peer Effects in c: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far?’ In E. Hanushek, A., Machin, S. and Woessmann, L. (Eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol 3, 249–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission. (2014), Elitist Britain? London: Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A. and Heath, A. (2003), Intakes and Examination Results at State and Private Schools in Walford, G. British Private Schools: Research on Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Green, F., Ploubidis, G. and Wiggins, R. (2017), “The path from social origins to top jobs: social reproduction via education”. British Journal of Sociology. 69(3), 776–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Green, F., Wiggins, R., Ploubidis, G. and Huynh, T. (2018a), “Educational attainment in the short and long term: was there an advantage to attending faith, private and selective schools for pupils in the 1980s?” Oxford Review of Education 44(6), 806–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Green, F., Wiggins, R. and Ploubidis, G. (2018b) ‘Elite universities, fields of study, and top salaries: which degree will make you rich?’, British Educational Research Journal 44(4), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, F. Y. (2008), “Socioeconomic disparities in voluntary organization involvement among older adults.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Sutton Trust (2015) Open Access: Democratising Entry to Independent Day Schools. https://www.suttontrust.com/research-paper/open-access-democratising-entry-independent-day-schools/Google Scholar
Warburton, J. and Smith, J. (2003), “Out of the generosity of your heart: Are we creating active citizens through compulsory volunteer programmes for young people in Australia?” Social Policy & Administration 37(7), 772–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitty, G., Power, S. and Edwards, T. (1998), The assisted places scheme: its impact and its role in privatization and marketization. Journal of Education Policy, 13(2), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, R., Green, F., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Wiborg, S. (2016), “Private Schools and the Provision of “Public Benefit”.” Journal of Social Policy 45(2), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (2000), “Volunteering.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W. (2017), “Does ‘compulsory volunteering’ affect subsequent behavior? Evidence from a natural experiment in Canada.” Education Economics 25(4), 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Green et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Green et al. supplementary material(File)
File 63.5 KB