Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:12:40.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Two-Gap Analysis of Foreign Aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1975

Mitsuo Ezaki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The objective of this paper is to clarify the welfare implications of the two-gap analysis of foreign aid concentrating on the model developed by Chenery and Strout (1966) and to provide related numerical examples for four Southeast Asian countries (Republic of Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines) where the real series in national income statistics are available.

The two gaps are of course the investment-saving gap (IS gap) and the importexport gap (ME gap), both of which are in the ex ante sense and must be consistent with the target growth rate of output.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 6 , Special Issue 2: Essays by Japanese Scholars in the Center for Southeast Asian Studies at Kyoto University , September 1975 , pp. 151 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, I. and Chenery, H., “Foreign Aid and Economic Development: The Case of Greece,” Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1966, 48, 1–19.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and Kurz, M., Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy, Baltimore, 1970.Google Scholar
Asanuma, S., Kokusai Kaihatsu Enjo (International Development Aid), Tokyo, 1974.Google Scholar
Balassa, B., “The Capital Needs of the Developing Countries,” Kyklos, 1964, 17, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, H. and Bruno, M., “Development Alternatives in an Open Economy: The Case of Israel,” Economic Journal, March 1962, 77, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, H. and MacEwan, A., “Optimal Patterns of Growth and Aid: The Case of Pakistan,” in Adelman, I. and Thorbecke, E. (eds.), The Theory and Design of Economic Development, Baltimore, 1966.Google Scholar
Chenery, H. and Strout, A., “Foreign Assistance and Economic Development,” American Economic Review, September 1966, 56, 679–733.Google Scholar
Fei, J. C. H. and Paauw, D. S., “Foreign Assistance and Self-Help: A Reappraisal of Development Finance,” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1965, 47, 215–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuchi, T., “The One Gap Approach versus the Two Gap Approach,” Developing Economies, December 1970, 8, 3–15.Google Scholar
Lai, Deepak, “The Foreign-Exchange Bottleneck Revisited: A Geometric Note,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, July 1972, 20, 722–730.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R., “Foreign Exchange Constraints in Economic Development and Efficient Aid Allocation,” Economic Journal, June 1964, 74, 308–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, R. F., The Economics of Foreign Aid, Chicago, 1968.Google Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, P., “International Aid for Underdeveloped Countries,” Review of Economics and Statistics, May 1961, 43, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations, Yearbook of National Accounts Statistics, 1970 and 1971 issues, New York, 1972 and 1973.Google Scholar
Vanek, J., Estimating Foreign Resource Needs for Economic Development: Theory, Method and a Case Study of Colombia, New York, 1967.Google Scholar