Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:37:47.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Problems of Brunei Chronology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Robert Nicholl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Owing to the absence of dates in historical manuscripts and on monuments, Brunei chronology has been based upon traditional dates of uncertain origin. The object of this article is to take such events in Brunei as can be chronicled in external sources and to compare these foreign dates with those traditionally accepted.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 1989 , pp. 175 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Professor Brown, Donald, Brunei: The Structure and History of a Bornean Malay Sultanate (Brunei, 1970), pp. 134–40.Google Scholar Hereinafter referred to as “Brown, Brunei”.

2 MacBryan, G.T.M., “Two Brunei Charms”, ed. Tom Harrisson, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (JMBRAS) 20, Pt. 2 (1947): 48–49Google Scholar; Malaysian Historical Sources, ed. Tregonning, K.G. (Singapore, 1962), p. 106.Google Scholar

3 Hereinafter referred to as “Low”.

4 Ibid., pp. 1–8.

5 Ibid., p. 11 (1).

6 Ibid., p. 54 (5).

7 Ibid., p. 12 (3).

8 Ibid., p. 13 (5).

9 Ibid., p. 57 (10 & 11).

10 Ibid., p. 64 (23).

11 Ibid., p. 71 (33).

12 MS.A., p. 12 (3); MS.B., p. 51(1) Note 2.

13 MS.A., p. 11 (1); MS.B., p. 51 (1).

14 Ibid., p. 82 (54).

15 Sharifuddin, Dato P.M. and Hj. Abd. Latif Hj. Ibrahim, B.M.J. 3, No. 2 (1974): 253–64.Google Scholar

16 Low, pp. 32–35.

17 MS.A., pp. 11–12 (1–4).

18 The contents of her version are summarized by Brown, Donald E. in “Brunei through the Sha'er and the Silsilah”, Solidarity 99 (1984): 10–15.Google Scholar

19 Brown, Brunei, pp. 134–36, also his “Hyranyagarbha — The Hindu Cosmic Egg and the Brunei Royal Line”, Brunei Museum Journal (B.M.J.) 4, No. 4 (1980): 30–37.Google Scholar

20 Personal communication from Dr. Martin Baier.

21 For a summary of his achievements see MS.A., p. 49 (71–72); MS.B., pp. 54–55 (7–8); Mow, pp. 9–10; Pehin Orang Kaya Amar Di-Raja Doctor Haji Muhammad Jamil Al-Sufri, “The Story of Bendahara Sakam”, B.M.J. 3, No. 3 (1975): 109–115.Google Scholar

22 Blair, H.M. and Robertson, J.A., “Accounts of Expeditions”, The Philippine Islands, 1493–1803, Vol. 4 (Cleveland, Ohio, 1893 and Quezon City, 1973), p. 166.Google Scholar

23 Carroll, J.S., “Francisco de Sande's Invasion of Brunei in 1578; An Anonymous Account”, B.M.J. 6, No. 2 (1986): 62.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., p. 63.

25 Ibid., p. 62, note 95.

26 Ibid., p. 66.

27 Ibid., p. 66.

28 Rev. Jacobs, H., Documenta Malucensia, Vol. 2 (Roma, 1980), p. 33, note 12.Google Scholar

29 H.E.I.C.MS. Borneo Factory Records, p. 495.

30 Where spelling in the Family Tree differs from that of Dr. Sweeney, the former is followed here.

31 MS.B., p. 51 (1).

32 Ibid., p. 70 (32).

33 MS.A., p. 11 (1).

34 E.g. Bisayah: B. Sandin, “The Bisayahs of Limbang”, Sarawak Museum Journal (S.M.J.) 19, Nos. 38–39 (July-December 1971): 406; Melanau: Lawrence, A.E., “First Brunei Conquests on the Sarawak Coast”, S.M.J. 1, No. 1 (1911): 120–24.Google Scholar

35 Negarakertagama, in Pigeaud, T.G. Th., Java in the Fourteenth Century (The Hague, 1960), Vol. 3, p. 16 & Vol. 4, p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Brown, Mrs Carrie, “An Early Account of Brunei by Sung Lien”, B.M.J. 2, No. 4 (1972): 220Google Scholar; Groenveldt, W.P., Historical Notes on Indonesia and Malaya Compiled from Chinese Sources (Jakarta, 1960), pp. 110–11.Google Scholar Hereinafter referred to as “Groenveldt, Notes”.

37 Le Höja et le Sayyid Husain de l'Histoire des Mings, Tung Pao, Vol. 38, Pts. 2–3 (1948), p. 268 note 347.Google Scholar

38 ”Sometimes even good Homer nods.”

39 The P'o character in proper names, such as Buddha, can express the sound bu, so that P'o-ni would be a Chinese phonetic expression of Bu[r]ni, cf. Julien, S., Méthode pour déchifrer et transcrire les noms snascrits dans les livres chinois, No. 1415 (Paris, 1861), p. 172.Google Scholar

40 Hirth, F. and Rockhill, W.W., Chau ju-kua: His Work on Chinese and Arab Trade in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries Entitled: Chu-fan-chi (St. Petersburg, 1911 & Taipeh, 1967), pp. 155–58 & 193.Google Scholar

41 Groenveldt, Notes, p. 108.

42 de Sá, A.B., Documentaçāo para a História das Missōes de Padroado Portuguêse do Oriente (Lisboa, 1954), Vol. 1, p. 68Google Scholar; Cartas de Afonso de Albuquerque (Lisboa, 1884), Vol. 3, p. 91Google Scholar; Brown, D., “Four Brief Notes on Brunei History”, B.M.J. 2, No. 3 (1971): 174–75Google Scholar; Nicholl, R., European Sources for the History of the Sultanate of Brunei in the Sixteenth Century (Brunei, 1975), p. 4.Google Scholar The latter hereinafter referred to as “Nicholl, Sources”.

43 Trs. A. Cortesāo (London, 1944), Vol. 1, p. 132.

44 The names of the royal party are given on the memorial stele at the tomb of Maharaja Kama; they are given by Brown, Mrs Carrie, “Two Ming Texts Concerning King Ma-na-je-chia-na of P'o-ni”, B.M.J. 3, No. 2, (1974): 224.Google Scholar They are all easily reconstituted into Sanskrit titles still used in Brunei, and given in Brown, Brunei, pp. 185–225.

45 Groenveldt, Notes, p. 112.

46 Coloured photographs of the statuary at the tomb are in B.M.J. 5, No. 4 (1984): 35–45.Google Scholar

47 Professor Mazahéri, Ali, La Route de la Soie (Paris, 1983), pp. 40–44.Google Scholar

48 ”The Introduction of Islam into Campa”, JMBRAS 58, Pt. 1 (1985): 1–28.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., p. 7.

50 E.g. Groenveldt, Notes, p. 109.

51 MS.A., p. 31 (37).

52 Awg. Matassam Hj. Jibah, “Notes on Tombstones Recently Found in Brunei”, B.M.J. 5, No. 2 (1982): 19.Google Scholar

53 MS.A., p. 11 (2).

54 MS.B., p. 53 (5).

55 Ibid., p. 54 (5).

56 Low, p. 24.

57 MS.B., pp. 52–53 (2–5); Low, p. 6. This is the Italian spelling of Kinabatangan and Kinabalu, cf. Nicholl, R., “The Sixteenth Century Cartography of Borneo”, B.M.J. 3, No. 4 (1976): 114–15.Google Scholar It is unnecessary to labour the point. Ki-na is a Kadazan prefix for a toponym, and has nothing to do with China, cf. Evans, I., Among Primitive People in Borneo (London, 1922), pp. 277–79.Google Scholar

58 Groenveldt, Notes, pp. 114–15.

59 E.g. Carroll, J.S., “Berunai in the Boxer Codex”, JMBRAS 55, Pt. 2 (1982): 4.Google Scholar

60 Groenveldt, Notes, p. 102.

61 For cessation of tribute-bearing missions to the Imperial Court from Sulu in 1424, cf. Groenveldt, Notes, pp. 103–105. This would mark the end of independence for Sulu.

62 Skelton, R.A., Magellan's Voyage (London, 1973), p. 108.Google Scholar This is a translation of the Beineke-Yale Codex.

63 Ibid., p. 107.

64 Low, pp. 24–25.

65 MS.A., p. 11 (1).

66 MS.B., p. 54(5).

67 Supra note 28.

68 For an examination of Sulu folklore on the subject, cf. Professor Majul, César Adib, Muslims in the Philippines (Quezon City, 1973), Ch. 1 passim.Google Scholar

69 Hikayat Hang Tuah, ed. Ahmad, Kassim (Kuala Lumpur, 1968), p. 378.Google Scholar

70 Combés-Retana, , História de las islas de Mindanao, Jolo, y sus Adyacentes (Madrid, 1887), column 44Google Scholar; Blair and Robertson, The Natives of the Southern Islands, Vol. 40, p. 130.

71 Blair and Robertson, Relation of 1627–1628, Vol. 22, pp. 207–210.

72 Photograph in Majul, op. cit., opposite p. 180.

73 Nicholl, Sources, pp. 22–23.

74 Ibid., p. 21.

75 MS.A., p. 12 (2).

76 MS.B., p. 54(6).

77 Infra note 95.

78 Low, p. 3 note (6), and p. 24 note.

79 Ibid., p. 24.

80 MS.A., p. 12 (2).

81 MS.B., p. 54(6).

82 Hunt, J., “Particulars Relating to Sulu”, in Moor, J.M., Notices of the Indian Archipelago (London, 1837 & 1968), Appendix p. 32.Google Scholar

83 Low, p. 34.

84 Wada, Sei, The Philippine Islands as known to the Chinese before the Ming Period, Memoir of the Research Department of the Tōyō Bunko, No. 4 (Tokyo, 1929), p. 150.Google Scholar

85 Carroll, J.S., “Aganduru Móriz Account of the Magellan Expedition at Brunei”, B.M.J. 6, No. 1 (1985): 59.Google Scholar

86 Skelton, op. cit., p. 107.

87 Groenveldt, Notes, p. 105.

88 Supra note 69.

89 Nicholl, R., “The Letter of Brás Baiāo, B.M.J. 5, No. 3 (1983): 54.Google Scholar

90 Dalrymple, A., Journal of the Indian Archipelago, No. 3 (1849): 564.Google Scholar

91 Blair and Robertson, Vol. 4, p. 197; Nicholl, Sources, p. 55.

92 Ibid., pp. 55 & 197.

93 Blair and Robertson, Vol. 4, p. 152; Nicholl, Sources, p. 37.

94 Carroll, J.S., “Berunai in the Boxer Codex”, JMBRAS 55, Pt. 2 (1982): 1.Google Scholar

95 Ibid., p. 16.

96 As in note 94, p. 5; MS.A., p. 12 (2); MS.B., p. 56 (8); Low, pp. 11 & 26.

97 Low, p. 26.

98 MS.A., p. 12 (2); MS.B., p. 56 (8).

99 Nicholl, Sources, pp. 82–87.

100 Blair and Robertson, Morga's Sucesos, Vol. 15, pp. 193–96; Stanley, J.E.J., The Philippine Islands at the Close of the Sixteenth Century (London, 1868), pp. 140–49.Google Scholar

101 Nicholl, Sources, p. 84.

102 de Erédia, Emanuel Godhino, “Description of Malacca, Meridional India and Cathay”, trs. J.V. Mills, JMBRAS 8, Pt. 1 (1930): 245.Google Scholar

103 Linehan, W., “A History of Pahang”, JMBRAS 14, Pt. 2 (1936): 32 note 3.Google Scholar

104 MS.A., p. 20 (16); MS.B., p. 56 (9).

105 MS.A., p. 13 (4–5) & p. 20 (16).

106 ”Valentyn's Borneo”, trs. Mrs Dovey, B.M.J. 4, No. 2 (1978): 85Google Scholar; van Dijk, L.C., “Dutch Relations with Borneo in the Seventeenth Century”, B.M.J. 5, No. 3 (1983): 64–67.Google Scholar

107 MS.A., p. 21 (18); MS.B., p. 56 (9).

108 Blair and Robertson, Vol. 4, p. 219.

109 Majul, op. cit., p. 16 note 10.

110 Blair and Robertson, Vol. 15, p. 132; Stanley, op. cit., p. 88.

111 van Dijk, L.C., “Relations of the Dutch East India Company with Borneo [Brunei], the Sulu Archipelago, Mindanao, etc.”, B.M.J. 5, No. 4 (1984): 10.Google Scholar Hereinafter referred to as “Van Dijk, Brunei”.

112 Low, p. 8.

113 MS.A., p. 13 (5).

114 B.M.J. 5, No. 3 (1983): 64.Google Scholar

115 Ibid., p. 68.

116 MS.A., p. 20(16).

117 MS.A., p. 12 (3); MS.B., p. 56 (10).

118 Low, p. 27.

119 Low, p. 27; A. Dalrymple, Oriental Repertory Vol. 1 (London, 1791), p. 577.

120 Blair and Robertson, Conquest of Mindanao, Vol. 29, p. 300.

121 Van Dijk, Brunei, p. 28.

122 Low, p. 13 note 2.

123 The distressing circumstances of the murder are related in MS.B., p. 58 (12) and Low, pp. 12–13.

124 The 14 Rabiul Akhir fell on hari Isnein four times during the seventeenth century: A.H. 1014 (A.D. 1605); A.H. 1046 (A.D. 1636); A.H. 1078 (A.D. 1667); A.H. 1110 (A.D. 1698).

125 Van Dijk, Brunei, pp. 27–28.

126 MS.B., p. 60(15).

127 Low, p. 14.

128 MS.A., p. 12(3).

129 Dato P.M. Sharifuddin & Hj. Abd. Latif, op. cit., p. 254; Low, p. 34.

130 MS.A., p. 13 (5); p. 21 (18).

131 MS.A., p. 14 (7).

132 MS.B., p. 57 (10).

133 Ibid., cf. Dr. Sweeney's note 3 on this.

134 MS.B., p. 64 (23); Low, p. 17.

135 MS.B., p. 71 (33).

136 Van Dijk, Brunei, p. 30.

137 Ibid., p. 30.

138 MS.A., p. 50 (72); Low, p. 11.

139 Low, p. 17 note.

140 MS.B., pp. 67–68 (27–29); Low, pp. 20–21.

141 Van Dijk, Brunei, p. 31.

142 Nicholl, R., “Relations between Brunei and Manila”, B.M.J. 4, No. 1 (1977): 154–55.Google Scholar Hereinafter referred to as “Nicholl, Relations”.

143 Low, p. 29.

144 Nicholl, Relations, p. 133.

145 Ibid., p. 144, which reproduces a photograph of the actual passage.

146 Ibid., pp. 162 & 171.

147 Ibid., pp. 159–62 & 166–67.

148 BIair and Robertson, Augustinians in the Philippines, Vol. 42, p. 184; Nicholl, Relations, p. 171.

149 Nicholl, Relations, pp. 161–62.

150 Ibid., p. 156.

151 Ibid., p. 173.

152 The present writer, when editing these texts in 1976, suggested (p. 150) that the Sultan here described might be Sultan Muhyidden, but this now appears wholly inadmissable.

153 MS.A., p. 12 (3).

154 MS.B., p. 69 (30).

155 Dato P.M. Sharifuddin and Hj. Abd. Latif, op. cit., p. 255; Low, p. 35.

156 Low, p. 29.

157 Ibid.

158 The date on the tomb is no longer legible.

159 MS.A., p. 12(3).

160 As for note 155; Low, p. 35.

161 H.E.I.C. MS. Borneo Factory Records, p. 495.

162 Nicholl, Relations, p. 176.

163 Cf. note 59.

164 “Brunei Rediscovered”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 14, No. 1 (March 1983): 32–33.

165 Carroll, op. cit., p. 4.

166 Groenveldt, op. cit., p. 113.

167 Ibid., pp. 113–14.

168 Carroll, op. cit., p. 5.

169 Ibid., p. 2.

170 Ibid., p. 16.

171 Op. cit., p. 2.

172 Op. cit., p. 1 note 2.

173 Op. cit., p. 139.

174 Op. cit., p. 138.

175 “Early Portuguese and Spanish Contacts with Borneo”, International Association of Historians of Asia, Taipei Conference 1962, Transactions, pp. 485–526.

176 Op. cit., p. 138.

177 B.M.J. 4, No. 3 (1977): 31.