Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-mtzzk Total loading time: 0.293 Render date: 2022-06-27T01:51:33.694Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Weak definability in infinitary languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Saharon Shelah*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

We shall prove that if a model of cardinality κ can be expanded to a model of a sentence ψ of by adding a suitable predicate in more than κ ways, then, it has a submodel of power μ which can be expanded to a model of ψ in > μ ways provided that λ, κ, μ satisfy suitable conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baumgartner, J. E., Results and independence proofs in combinatorial set-theory, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1970.Google Scholar
[2]Baumgartner, J. E., On the cardinality of dense subsets of linear orderings. I, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 15 (1968), p. 935. Abstract #68T-E33.Google Scholar
[3]Beth, E. W., On Padoa's method in the theory of definitions, Indagationes Mathematicae, vol. 15 (1953), pp. 330339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Chang, C. C., Some new results in definability, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 70 (1964), pp. 808813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friedman, H., Back and forth, L(Q), L∞, ω(Q) and Beth theorem, mimeograph, Stanford University, 11 1971; Israel Journal of Mathematics (to appear).Google Scholar
[6]Keisler, H. J., Model theory for infinitary logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.Google Scholar
[7]Kueker, D., Definability, automorphisms and infinitary languages, the syntax and semantics of infinitary languages (Barwise, J., Editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972, pp. 152165.Google Scholar
[8]Kunen, K., Implicit definability and infinitary language, this Journal, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 446451.Google Scholar
[9]Makkai, M., A generalization of a theorem of E. W. Beth, Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 15 (1964), p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Malitz, J., Infinitary analogs of theorems from first order model theory, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 216228.Google Scholar
[11]Prikry, K., Changing measurable into accessible cardinals, Dissertationes Mathematicae Rozprawy Matematyczne, No. 68, Warsaw, 1970.Google Scholar
[12]Reyes, G. E., Local definability theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 95137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Shelah, S., Generalizations of saturativity, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 18 (1971), p. 258. Abstract #71T-E2.Google Scholar
[14]Shelah, S., The number of nonisomorphic models of an unstable first order theory, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 9 (1971), pp. 473487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Shelah, S., Notes in combinatorial set theory, Israel Journal of Mathematics (to appear).Google Scholar
[16]Shelah, S., Remark to “Local definability theory” of Reyes, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1971), pp. 441447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Shelah, S., Weak definability for infinitary languages, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 17 (1970), p. 834. Abstract #70T–E57.Google Scholar
[18]Silver, J. (to appear).Google Scholar
[19]Lopez-Escobar, E., An interpolation theory for denumerably long sentences, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 57 (1965), pp. 253272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Svenonius, L., A theorem on permutations in models, Theoria, vol. 25 (1959), pp. 173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Shelah, S., Stability, the f.c.p. and superstability, model-theoretic properties of formulas in first order theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 3 (1971), pp. 262271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Kueker, D. W., Generalized interpolation and definability, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 423468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Weak definability in infinitary languages
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Weak definability in infinitary languages
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Weak definability in infinitary languages
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *