Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:37:54.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

There is no sharp transitivity on q6 when q is a type of Morley rank 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Ursula Gropp*
Affiliation:
Équipe de Logique Mathématique, Université Paris VII, 75005 Paris, France

Extract

In this paper we study transitive group actions.:G × XX, definable in an ω-stable theory, where G is a connected group and X a set of Morley rank 2, with respect to sharp transitivity on qα. Here q is the generic type of X (X is of degree 1 by Proposition (1)), for ordinals α > 0, qα is the αth power of q, i.e. (aβ)β < α, ⊨ qα iff (aβ)β < α is an independent sequence (in the sense of forking) of realizations of q, and G is defined to be sharply transitive on qα iff for all (aβ)β < α, (bβ)β < αqα there is one and only one gG with g.aβ = bβ for all β < α. The question studied here is: For which powers α of q are there group actions subject to the above conditions with G sharply transitive on qα?

In §1 we will see that for group actions satisfying the above conditions, G can be sharply transitive only on finite powers of q. Moreover, if G is sharply transitive on qn for some n ≥ 2, then the action of the stabilizer Ga on a certain subset Y of X satisfies the conditions above with Ga being sharply transitive on qm−1, where q′ is the generic type of Y (Proposition (8)). Thus, there would be a complete answer to the question if one could find some n < ω such that there is no group action as above with G sharply transitive on qn, but for n – 1 there is. In this paper we prove that such n exists and that it is either 5 or 6. More precisely, in §2 we prove that there is no group action satisfying the above conditions with G sharply transitive on q6. This is the main result of this paper. It is not known to the author whether the same also holds for q5 instead of q6. However, it does not hold for q4, as is seen in §3. There we give an example provided from projective geometry, for a group action satisfying the above conditions with G sharply transitive on q4; for G we choose PGL(3, K) and for X the projective plane over K, where K is some algebraically closed field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[Ber/Las]Berline, C. and Lascar, D., Superstable groups, Annals of Pure und Applied Logic, vol. 30 (1986), pp. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Hal]Hall, M. Jr., On a theorem of Jordan, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4 (1954), pp. 219226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Har]Hartshorne, R., Foundations of projective geometry, Benjamin, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[Lac]Lachlan, A., Singular properties of Morley rank, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 108 (1980), pp. 145157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Las]Lascar, D., Stability in model theory, Longman, Scientific & Technical, Harlow, and Wiley, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
[Mak]Makkai, M., A survey of basic stability theory, with particular emphasis on orthogonality and regular types, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 181238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Nes]Nesin, A., Solvable groups of finite Morley rank, Journal of Algebra, vol. 121 (1989), pp. 2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Pas]Passman, D., Permutation groups, Benjamin, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[Poi 1]Poizat, B., Cours de théorie des modèles, Nur al-Mantiq wal-Ma'rifah, Villeurbanne, 1985.Google Scholar
[Poi 2]Poizat, B., Groupes stables, Nur al-Mantiq wal-Ma'rifah, Villeurbanne, 1987.Google Scholar
[Rob]Robinson, D., A course in the theory of groups, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar