No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Marketing Alternatives for Northeastern Dairy Beef and Feeder Calves
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Extract
Raising livestock has always been a difficult and arduous occupation. The financial risks are substantial and the long-term returns in many instances are merely adequate, at best. When the cattle are raised in fringe producing areas, such as much of the Northeast, the complexities are magnified. Producers must use additional managerial expertise to offset partially their cost disadvantage compared to feeders operating in more grain-rich areas.
- Type
- Symposia
- Information
- Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1982 , pp. 111 - 120
- Copyright
- Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
The author would like to thank Karin Rasmussin for allowing him to use information from her recently completed surveys of New York feeders and major area packers. The Animal Products Group of AMS, USDA, under the direction of Dr. Webb provided detailed information on regional packers. This research was supported by a Federal-State Cooperative grant awarded to the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets by AMS, USDA.
References
Andrews, R. A., Yunker, G., Darulis, J. P. and Frick, G. F. “Marketing Agricultural Products in New Hampshire: The Structure of the Livestock Marketing System.: Univ. New Hamp., Ag. Exp. St., Res. Rpt. 39, August, 1974.Google Scholar
Davis, D. “TELCOT From Commercialization to Industry Wide Implementation.” In Sport-leader, T. L. (Ed.), proceedings: National Symposium on Electronic Marketing of Agricultural Commodities. Texas Ag. Exp. St., MP-1463, 1980.Google Scholar
Federal-State Livestock Market News Service, New York State Dept. Ag. and Markets, various dates.Google Scholar
Haas, J. T. “Veal Calf Pooling.” USDA, Farmer Cooperative Service, Mkt. Res. Rpt. 615, August, 1963.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. D. “An Economic Evaluation of Alternative Marketing Methods for Fed Cattle.” Univ. Nebraska, Ag. Exp. St., SB520, June, 1972.Google Scholar
Lesser, W. “Marketing Fat Cattle and Feeder Calves in New York.” Cornell Univ. Dept. Ag. Econ., A.E. Res. 80–34, December, 1980.Google Scholar
Lesser, W. “Marketing Freezer Beef in New York State.” Cornell Univ., Dept. Ag. Econ., A.E. Res. 79–12, May, 1979.Google Scholar
Marion, D. R. “Livestock Marketing in New York State, 1953; Part III: Livestock Dealer Operations.” Cornell Univ. Dept. Ag. Econ., A.E. 1022, Feb., 1956.Google Scholar
Marion, B. W. and Arthur, H. B. Dynamic Factors in Vertical Commodity Systems: A Case Study of the Broiler System, Ohio Ag. Res. and Dev. Center, RB1065, November, 1973.Google Scholar
Miller, K. S. and Raikes, R. “A Risk Processing Analysis of Cattle Procurement by Beef Packers.” NC-117, WP-16, May, 1978.Google Scholar
New York Crop Reporting Service, “New York Crop and Livestock Report.” Albany, New York, No. 6–81, April, 1981.Google Scholar
Stinson, R. L., Allen, P. G. and Christensen, R. L. The Economic Feasibility of Constructing Additional Livestock Slaughter Facilities in Massachusetts, Mass. Ag. Exp. St., RB660, December, 1978.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. C. and Candler, W. “A Normative Analysis of the Value of Quality, Regularity and Volume in Hog Marketing.” Indiana Ag. Exp. St., Bull. SB12, August, 1973.Google Scholar
Tomek, W. G. “Price Behavior on a Declining Terminal Market.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 62 (1980): 434–44.Google Scholar