No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Princely prisons, state exhibitions, and Muslim industrial authority in colonial India
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2024
Abstract
This article analyses the prison industries and state industrial exhibitions of three Indian princely states in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, tracing how princely elites sought to develop distinct labouring and industrial cultures. Drawing on examples from three Muslim-led princely states, namely Rampur, Bhopal, and Hyderabad, the article argues that state elites distinguished their forms of cultural and religious authority from that of the British Raj by coercing and displaying new industrial practices. They aimed to cultivate an industrial modernity that could compete with colonial projects while also promoting what they characterised as Indian Muslim characteristics and courtly traditions for artisan labourers and their work. The article asks how princely elites worked to conscript their subjects—including marginalised subjects such as convict labourers—into visions of regional industrial authority. Princely visions of Muslim and courtly industrial futures in Rampur, Bhopal, and Hyderabad were rooted in the attempts of state administrators to fashion distinctive regional identities and assert authority in a context of circumscribed, quasi-colonial rulership. Industrial cultures associated with princely prisons and exhibitions ultimately exceeded the bounds of these projects, placing pressure on other state subjects to adopt new material practices and engage with state-defined regional craft traditions.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Asiatic Society
References
1 Bhagavan, M., ‘The rebel academy: modernity and the movement for a university in princely Baroda’, The Journal of Asian Studies 61.2 (2002), pp. 919–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Archambault, H., ‘Becoming Mughal in the nineteenth century: the case of the Bhopal princely state’, South Asia: The Journal of South Asian Studies 36.4 (2013), pp. 479–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Beverley, E., Hyderabad, British India, and the World: Muslim Networks and Minor Sovereignty, c. 1850–1950 (Cambridge, 2015), pp. 104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nair, J., Mysore Modern: Rethinking the Region under Princely Rule (Minneapolis, 2011), pp. 165–168Google Scholar.
3 Yang, A., ‘Disciplining “natives”: prisons and prisoners in early nineteenth century India’, South Asia 10.2 (1987), pp. 30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Mathur, S., India by Design (Berkeley, CA, 2007), pp. 49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Khan, R., Minority Pasts: Locality, Emotion, and Belonging in Princely Rampur (Delhi, 2022), p. 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Beverley, Hyderabad, pp. 223–226; and Cohen, B. B., ‘“The water flows under the bridge and we pass above it …” infrastructure, transport, and state power: the bridges of Hyderabad city, India c. sixteenth to twentieth centuries’, Journal of Transport History 44.1 (2022), pp. 36–38Google Scholar.
7 Lambert-Hurley, S., Muslim Women, Reform, and Princely Patronage: Nawab Sultan Jahan Begum of Bhopal (London, 2007), pp. 90–93, 144–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Jeffrey, R. (ed.), People, Princes, and Paramount Power: Society and Politics in Indian Princely States (Delhi, 1978), p. 11Google Scholar.
9 Datla, K., The Language of Secular Islam: Urdu nationalism and colonial India (Honolulu, 2013), pp. 40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 McLennan, R., The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941 (Cambridge, 2008), p. 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Ibid., p. 111. See also T. L. Leflouria, Chained in Silence: Black Women and Convict Labor in the New South (Chapel Hill, 2015), pp. 75–76.
12 C. Anderson, Convicts: A Global History (Cambridge, 2022), pp. 158–159; A. Yang, Empire of Convicts (Oakland, CA, 2021), pp. 161–163.
13 D. Arnold, ‘The colonial prison: power, knowledge and penology in nineteenth century India’, in Subaltern Studies VIII, (eds.) D. Arnold and D. Hardiman (Delhi, 1994), p. 176.
14 ‘Report on the results of artistic and industrial training in the Madras Presidency’, April 1873, no. 26, National Archives of India (NAI), Home: Education, p. 2.
15 Ibid., p. 2.
16 Arnold, ‘Colonial prison’, pp. 178–179.
17 A. McGowan, ‘Convict carpets: jails and the revival of historic carpet design in colonial India’, Journal of Asian Studies 72.2 (2013), p. 393.
18 R. Khan, ‘Local pasts: space, emotions, and identities in vernacular histories of princely Rampur’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 58.5 (2015), pp. 704–705.
19 L. Brennan, ‘A case of attempted segmental modernization: Rampur State, 1930–1939’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 23.3 (1981), p. 354.
20 On Awadhi Shiʿa models developed in Rampur more broadly, see J. Jones, Shiʿa Islam in Colonial India: Religion, Community, and Sectarianism (Cambridge, 2012), pp. 12, 250–251.
21 Ibn Ḥasan Khūrshīd, Taẕkirah-yi hunarmandān-i Rāmpūr (Rampur, 2001), pp. 14–18.
22 Muḥammad Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, Jild-i Duvum (Rampur, 1997), p. 346.
23 The Azad, Lucknow (20 November 1891), quoted in Selections from the Vernacular Newspapers Published in the Punjab, North-Western Provinces, Oudh, Central Provinces, and Berar (26 November 1891), p. 795.
24 Muhammad Ishak Khan, ‘Administration Report of the Rampur State for 1896–97’, British Library, India Office Records, p. 2.
25 Ibid., p. 26.
26 Khan, Minority Pasts, pp. 67, 85.
27 Ibid., p. 75; and Khan, Taẕkirah-yi hunarmandān, pp. 8–12.
28 H. Shakespear et al., Report of the Committee on Prison Discipline (Calcutta, 1838), pp. 51–55.
29 Ibid., p. 109.
30 ‘Administrative Report for Rampur State, June 1869’, Revenue Department for the Northwestern Provinces, BL, IOR, p. C, section 72.
31 Ripūrt-i intiẓāmiya riyāsat-i Rāmpūr 1890–91 (Rampur, 1891), p. 44.
32 Ibid., pp. 43–44.
33 Ibid., p. 43.
34 ‘Administrative Report for Rampur State, 1869’, no. 2.12.
35 On the entomology and application of the term akhlāq, see B. Ingram, Revival from Below: Revival from Below: The Deoband Movement and Global Islam (Oakland, CA, 2018), p. 119.
36 Khan, ‘Local pasts’, p. 702; see also Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, pp. 5–7.
37 Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, pp. 346–347.
38 ‘Rampur Administration Report’, December 1883, p. 3.
39 For an analysis of industrial masculinities, see H. Hamad, Industrial Sexuality: Gender, Urbanization, and Social Transformation in Egypt (Austin, TX, 2016), p. 45.
40 Khan, Minority Pasts, p. 70.
41 Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, pp. 207–208; and ‘Administrative Report for Rampur State 1872–73’, Revenue Department for the Northwestern Provinces (1873), BL, IOR, pp. 3–4.
42 ‘Administrative Report for Rampur State 1872–73’, pp. 3–4.
43 Khūrshīd, Taẕkirah-yi hunarmandān; see also Khan, ‘Local pasts’, p. 706.
44 Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, p. 207.
45 Rampur State Gazetteer 1905, p. 67.
46 Beverley, Hyderabad, p. 285.
47 B. N. Ramusack, Indian Princes and their States (New York, 2003), p. 26.
48 K. Leonard, ‘Banking firms in nineteenth-century Hyderabad politics’, Modern Asian Studies 15.2 (1981), pp. 181–183.
49 B. B. Cohen, Kingship and Colonialism in India's Deccan (New York, 2007), pp. 3–6, 107–109.
50 ‘Annual Financial Statement (1878–79)’, Finance Department: General, Hyderabad State, Telangana State Archives, p. 49.
51 Ibid., pp. 49–50.
52 Ibid., p. 48.
53 M. Rao and T. Rao, Bustān-i Āṣafiyah, jild-i charum (Hyderabad, 1931), p. 78.
54 Ibid., p. 76. On the Pathan community and its regulation in Hyderabad and Chanchalguda, see also Foreign Department: Internal A, ‘Measures to be taken for the prevention of Afghans, Rohillas, etc. from entering Hyderabad’, (1869), no 1-12, NAI, pp. 8–9.
55 Chiragh Ali, The Administration of Hyderabad (Deccan) Under Sir Salar Jung (Bombay, 1886), vol. 4, p. 354.
56 Report on the Administration of HEH the Nizam's Dominions 1331 Fasli (Hyderabad, 1922), p. 126.
57 E. L. Beverley, ‘Frontier as resource: law, crime, and sovereignty on the margins of empire’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 55.2 (2013), p. 247.
58 K. Leonard, ‘Reassessing indirect rule in Hyderabad: rule, ruler, or sons-in-law of the state?’, Modern Asian Studies 37.2 (2003), p. 375.
59 Ripūrt-i naẓm o nasq mumālik-i maḥrūsiyah sarkār-i Niẓāmul Mulk Āṣafjāh Bahādur, 1298–1303 faṣlī (Hyderabad, 1894), p. 268.
60 Ripūrt-i naẓm o nasq, 1303 f., pp. 285, 315–316.
61 Syed Hussain Bilgrami and C. Willmott, Historical and Descriptive Sketch of His Highness the Nizam's Dominions (Bombay, 1883), pp. 420, 433.
62 Ibid., p. 420.
63 Syed Mahdi Ali (ed.), Hyderabad Affairs (Bombay, 1883), vol. 4, p. 129.
64 C. E. Luard and Munshi Kudrat Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer (Calcutta, 1908), vol. 3, p. 35.
65 Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, pp. 3–4, 15.
66 B. Metcalf, ‘Islam and power in colonial India: the making and unmaking of a Muslim princess’, The American Historical Review 116.1 (2011), p. 12.
67 Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, p. 71.
68 Metcalf, ‘Islam and power’, p. 14.
69 Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, pp. 53, 72.
70 Ibid., p. 72; see also Sultan Jahan Begum, Hayat-i-Shahjehani: Life of Her Highness the Late Nawab Shahjehan Begum of Bhopal, (trans.) B. Ghosal (Bombay, 1926), p. 72.
71 Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, pp. 56–58.
72 M. J. Meade, Report of the Political Administration of the Territories within the Central Indian Agency, 1900–1901 (Calcutta, 1902), p. 9.
73 Sultan Jahan Begum, Hayat-i-Shahjehani, p. 72.
74 Luard, Bhopal State Gazetteer, p. 71.
75 Ibid., p. 101.
76 Sultan Jahan Begum, Hayat-i-Shahjehani, p. 85.
77 Ibid., p. 72.
78 Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, p. 178.
79 Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, p. 73.
80 V. Porter, ‘William De Morgan and the Islamic tiles of Leighton House’, Journal of the Decorative Arts Society 16 (1992), p. 76.
81 Ibid., pp. 76–77.
82 Āyīnah-yi Angrīzī Sadāgarī (London, 1894), p. 21.
83 Sulṭān Jahān Begum briefly noted and admired ceramic tile-work during her visit to Medina in 1904, pointing to another potential source for the elite embrace of ceramic tile-work in Bhopali residential architecture. See Nawab Sultan Jahan Begum, The Story of a Pilgrimage to the Hijaz (Calcutta, 1909).
84 W. Benjamin, ‘Paris, capital of the nineteenth century’, Perspecta 12 (1969), pp. 167–168.
85 Mathur, India by Design, p. 61.
86 J. Nair, ‘Mysore's Wembley? The Dasara Exhibition's imagined economies’, Modern Asian Studies 47.5 (2013), pp. 1550–1551.
87 Ibid., p. 3; see also Mir Yar Ali ‘Jan Sahib’, The Incomparable Festival, (trans.) Shad Naved, (ed.) Razak Khan (2021).
88 Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, p. 139.
89 Muḥammad Fayrūz Shāh, Rāmpūr kī namāyish: Taqrīb bīnaẓīr (Agra, 1894), p. 9.
90 On literary patronage at the Rampur exhibition, see Khan, ‘Local pasts’, p. 705, as well as Khan's introduction to Mir Yar Ali, Incomparable Festival, pp. 24–26.
91 Khan, ‘Introduction’, in Mir Yar Ali, Incomparable Festival, p. 9.
92 Shāh, Rāmpūr kī namāyish, p. 12.
93 Ripūrt-i intiẓāmiya riyāsat-i Rāmpūr, p. 91.
94 Ibid., p. 91
95 Shāh, Rāmpūr kī namāyish, p. 9.
96 Ibid., cover page.
97 Ibid., p. 14.
98 Ibid., p. 14.
99 Ibid., p. 14.
100 Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd, p. 139.
101 Aḥmad ‘Alī Khān, Nīl kī kāsht par lakchar (Moradabad, 1893), cover page.
102 Ibid., p. 24.
103 Shāh, Rāmpūr kī namāyish, p. 19.
104 G. Watt, Indian Art Exhibition, 1903, Delhi (Calcutta, 1903), p. 57.
105 Judicial and Public, ‘Working and Amendment of the Indian Arms Act, 1878’ (May 1882), File 1022 (British Library, India Office Records), pp. 2–4.
106 Syed Ali Bilgrami, ‘Iron industry in the territory of His Highness the Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan’, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute 56 (1899), p. 78
107 A. C. Campbell, Glimpses of the Nizam's Dominions: Being an Exhaustive Photographic History of the Hyderabad State, Deccan India (Bombay, 1989), pp. 172–173.
108 Watt, Indian Art Exhibition, p. 57.
109 Colonial and Indian Exhibition, 1886: Official Catalogue (London, 1886), p. 70.
110 Bilgrami, ‘Iron industry’, pp. 74–75.
111 Ibid., p. 75.
112 Report of the Nagpore Exhibition of Arts, Manufactures and Produce, December 1865 (Nagpore, 1866), p. 88.
113 Ibid., p. 89.
114 Datla, Language of Secular Islam, p. 12.
115 See ‘Discontinuance of the Bhopal Fair and holding of the Sehore Fair’, NAI, Bhopal Agency: Vernacular Record, No. 863, pp. 1-2.
116 ‘Administration Report of HH Shah Jehan Begum of Bhopal for 1872’, NAI, Foreign Department: Political A, No. 70, May 1873, p. 3.
117 ‘Correspondence relating to the Sehore Fair’, NAI, Bhopal Agency: Vernacular Record, No. 875, (1900), p. 3.
118 ‘Discontinuance of the Bhopal Fair’, pp. 1–2.
119 ‘Application from Bhopal Vakil for holding of an annual Fair in Jahangirabad Bhopal’, NAI: Bhopal Agency: Vernacular Record, No. 44 (1909), p. 2.
120 The annual Jahangirabad fair seems to have grown out of a smaller weekly fair held at the Jahangirabad parade grounds; see Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, p. 101.
121 Lambert-Hurley, Muslim Women, p. 46.
122 Luard, C. E. and Ali, K., Bhopal State Gazetteer (Calcutta, 1908), vol. 1, p. 50Google Scholar.
123 Sultan Jahan Begum, Hayat-i-Shahjehani, p. 83.
124 Ibid., p. 83.
125 See Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, pp. 71, 96.
126 The Bhopal Gazetteer of 1909 characterised the tiles as a ‘specialty’ unique to the jail; see Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, p. 73.
127 See Porter, ‘William De Morgan’, pp. 76–77; and Āyīnah-yi Angrīzī Sadāgarī.
128 Luard and Ali, Bhopal State Gazetteer, p. 73.
129 Examples include Sultan Jahan Begum, Hayat-i-Shahjehani; Najm ul-Ghanī Khān, Akhbār al-Ṣanādīd; Shāh, Rāmpūr kī namāyish; Chiragh Ali, Administration of Hyderabad.