Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-gvrqt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-02T11:56:37.126Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

The distribution of organic carbon in major components of forests located in five life zones of Venezuela

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Delaney
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61810.
S. Brown
United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 S. W. 35th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333. Direct all communication to this author
A. E. Lugo
International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, Call Box 25000, Río Piedras Puerto Rico 00928–2500.
A. Torres-Lezama
Instituto de Silvicultura, Universidad de Los Andes, Via Chorros de Milla, Merida, Venezuela.
N. Bello Quintero
Instituto de Silvicultura, Universidad de Los Andes, Via Chorros de Milla, Merida, Venezuela.


One of the major uncertainties concerning the role of tropical forests in the global carbon cycle is the lack of adequate data on the carbon content of all their components. The goal of this study was to contribute to filling this data gap by estimating the quantity of carbon in the biomass, soil and necromass for 23 long-term permanent forest plots in five life zones of Venezuela to determine how C was partitioned among these components across a range of environments. Aboveground biomass C ranged from 70 to 179 Mg ha−1 and soil C from 125 to 257 Mg ha−1, and they represented the two largest C components in all plots. The C in fine litter (2.4 to 5.2 Mg ha−1), dead wood (2.4 to 21.2 Mg ha−1) and roots (23.6 to 38.0 Mg ha−1) accounted for less than 13% of the total C. The total amount of C among life zones ranged from 302 to 488 Mg ha−1, and showed no clear trend with life zone. In three of the five life zones, more C was found in the dead (soil, litter, dead wood) than in the live (biomass) components (dead to live ratios of 1.3 to 2.3); the lowland moist and moist transition to dry life zones had dead to live ratios of less than one. Results from this research suggest that for most life zones, an amount equivalent to between 20 and 58% of the aboveground biomass is located in necromass and roots. These percentages coupled with reliable estimates of aboveground biomass from forest inventories enable a more complete estimation of the C content of tropical forests to be made.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Allison, L. E., Bollen, W. B. & Modie, C. D. 1965. Total carbon. Pp. 13461366 in Black, C. A. (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 Chemical and microbial properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Ingram, J. S. I. (eds). 1993. Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. (2nd edition). C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxford. 221 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, I. F., Martinelli, L. A., Thomas, W. W., Moreira, M. Z., Arruda, G., Ferreira, C. A. C. & Victoria, R. A. 1995. Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forest: an example from Rondonia, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 75:175189.Google Scholar
Brown, J. K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-19. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, U.S.A.22 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, S. 1997. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. Forestry Paper 134, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R. & Lugo, A. E. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science 35:881902.Google Scholar
Brown, S. & Lugo, A. E. 1992. Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Interciencia 17:818.Google Scholar
Brown, S. & Lugo, A. E. 1982. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica 14:161187.Google Scholar
Bultman, J. D. & Southwell, C. R. 1976. Natural resistance of tropical American woods to terrestrial wood-destroying organisms. Biotropica 8:7195.Google Scholar
Clark, D. B. & Clark, D. A. In press. Abundance, growth and mortality of very large trees in neotropical lowland rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management.Google Scholar
Delaney, M., Brown, S., Torres-Lezama, A. & Quintero, N. B. 1997. The quantity and turnover of dead wood in permanent forest plots in six life zones of Venezuela. Biotropica, in press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. S., & Uhlig, J. 1991. Refining estimates of carbon released from tropical land-use change. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:118131.Google Scholar
Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica. 206 pp.Google Scholar
Houghton, R. A. 1995. Land-use change and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 1:275287.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J. B., Uhl, C. & Cummings, D. L. 1988. Fire in the Venezuelan Amazon 1: Fuel biomass and fire chemistry in the evergreen rain forest of Venezuela. Oikos 53:167175.Google Scholar
Lugo, A. E. & Brown, S. 1992. Tropical forests as sinks of atmospheric carbon. Forest Ecology and Management 54:239255.Google Scholar
Martínez-Yrízar, A. 1995. Biomass distribution and primary productivity of tropical dry forests. Pp. 326345 in Bullock, S. H. B., Mooney, H. A. & Medina, E. (eds). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Post, W. M., Emanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J. & Stangenberger, A. G. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298:156159.Google Scholar
Rudmann, P. 1961. The causes of natural durability in timber. Part VII. The causes of decay resistance in teak (Tectona grandis). Holzforschung 15:151156.Google Scholar
Saldarriaga, J. G., West, D. C. & Thorp, M. L. 1986. Forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela. ORNL/TM-9712. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Sanford, R. L. Jr. & Cuevas, E. 1996. Root growth and rhizosphere interactions in tropical forests. Pp. 268300 in Mulkey, S. S., Chazdon, R. L. & Smith, A. P. (eds). Tropical forest plant physiology. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W. & Anderson, J. M. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK372 pp.Google Scholar
Tanner, E. V. 1980. Studies on the biomass and productivity in a series of montane rain forests of Jamaica. Journal of Ecology 68:573588.Google Scholar
Uhl, C., Buschbacher, R. & Serrao, E. A. S. 1988. Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia. I. Patterns of plant succession. Journal of Ecology 76:663681.Google Scholar
Uhl, C. & Kauffman, J. B. 1990. Deforestation, fire susceptibility, and potential tree responses to fire in the eastern Amazon. Ecology 71:437449.Google Scholar
Veillon, J. P. 1985. El crecimiento de algunos bosques naturales de Venezuela en relacíon con los parametros del medio ambiente. Revista Forestal Venezolano 29:5121.Google Scholar
Veillon, J. P. 1989. Los bosques naturales de Venezuela. Instituto de Silvicultura. Merida, Venezuela. 118 pp.Google Scholar
Woomer, P. L., Martin, A., Albrecht, A., Resck, D. V. S. & Scharpenseel, H. W. 1994. The importance and management of soil organic matter in the tropics. Pp. 4780 in Woomer, P. L. & Swift, M. J. (eds). The biological management of tropical soil fertility. John Wiley & Sons, UK.Google Scholar
Yoda, K. & Ktra, T. 1982. Accumulation of organic matter, carbon, nitrogen, and other nutrient elements in the soils of a lowland rainforest at Pasoh, Peninsular Malaysia. Japan Journal of Ecology 32:275291.Google Scholar