Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:52:06.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kleptoparasitism in the endemic gecko Phelsuma inexpectata: pollen theft from foraging honeybees on Réunion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2013

Johanna Clémencet ,
Cyril Aubert ,
Doriane Blottière  and
Mickaël Sanchez
Johanna Clémencet*
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bio-Agresseurs en Milieu Tropical, 15 avenue René Cassin, F-97715 Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
Cyril Aubert
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bio-Agresseurs en Milieu Tropical, 15 avenue René Cassin, F-97715 Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
Doriane Blottière
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bio-Agresseurs en Milieu Tropical, 15 avenue René Cassin, F-97715 Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
Mickaël Sanchez
Affiliation:
Nature Océan Indien, 6 Lotissement les Magnolias, Rivière des Roches, F-97470 Saint-Benoît, La Réunion, France
*
1Corresponding author. Email: johanna.clemencet@univ-reunion.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Interspecific kleptoparasitism (the stealing of already-procured items from other species) has received little attention in tropical reptiles. We report here the second case of kleptoparasitism in tropical lizards, and the first known case of pollen theft by a vertebrate species. Phelsuma inexpectata, a gekkonid lizard endemic to Réunion, was observed robbing pollen pellets from honeybees (Apis mellifera) foraging on Latania lontaroides flowers. Video-records were used to obtain reliable information on gecko-honeybee interactions occurring on L. lontaroides inflorescences. During the 19 observation periods (total duration 140 min) a total of 78 attempts were recorded, at least 40% were successful. Both males and females displayed kleptoparasitic behaviour. A high level of gecko kleptoparasitism occurred, with an average one-robbery attempt every 2 min. Behaviour of both the kleptoparasitic P. inexpectata and its host A. mellifera are described.

Keywords

Apis melliferaGekkonidaeIndian Oceankleptoparasite–host interactionLatania lontaroides
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 251 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ALAUX, C., DUCLOZ, F., CRAUSER, D. & LE CONTE, Y. 2010. Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biology Letters. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AUFFENBERG, W. 1981. The behavioral ecology of the Komodo monitor. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville. 406 pp.Google Scholar
BARNARD, C. J. 1984. The evolution of food-scrounging strategies within and between species. Pp. 95–126 in Barnard, C. J. (ed.). Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Croom-Helm, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOSSER, J., CADET, T., GUEHO, J. & MARAIS, W. 1984. Flore des Mascareignes: La Réunion, Maurice, Rodrigues. Volume 189: Palmiers. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Paris, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
BROCKMANN, J. & BARNARD, C. J. 1979. Kleptoparasitism in birds. Animal Behaviour 27:487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAMPOS, M. G. R., BOGDANOV, S., ALMEIDA-MURADIAN, L. B., SZCZESNA, T., MANCEBO, Y., FRIGERIO, C. & FERREIRA, F. 2008. Pollen composition and standardisation of analytical methods. Journal of Apicultural Research 47:154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARPES, S., BEGNINI, R., DE ALENCAR, S. & MASSON, M. 2007. Study of preparations of bee pollen extracts, antioxidant and antibacterial activity. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 31:1818–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRAIG, J. L. & STEWART, A. M. 1988. Reproductive biology of Phormium tenax: a honeyeater-pollinated species. New Zealand Journal of Botany 26:453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DESO, G., PROBST, J.-M., SANCHEZ, M. & INEICH, I. 2008. Phelsuma inexpectata Mertens, 1966 et Phelsuma borbonica Mertens, 1942 (Squamata: Gekkonidae): deux geckos potentiellement pollinisateurs de l’île de La Réunion. Bulletin de la Société Herpétologique de France 126:9–23.Google Scholar
FRANCK, P., GARNERY, L., LOISEAU, A., OLDROYD, B. P., HEPBURN, H. R., SOLIGNAC, M. & CORNUET, J. M. 2001. Genetic diversity of the honeybee in Africa: microsatellite and mitochondrial data. Heredity 86:420–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HODGES, D. 1974. The pollen loads of the Honey Bee. Bee Research Association, London. 150 pp.Google Scholar
IYENGAR, E. V. 2008. Kleptoparasitic interactions throughout the animal kingdom and a re-evaluation, based on participant mobility, of the conditions promoting the evolution of kleptoparasitism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93:745–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JEAN, R. P. 2005. Quantifying a rare event: pollen theft by honey bees from bumble bees and other bees (Apoidea: Apidae, Megachilidae) foraging at flowers. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 78:172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KERR, G. D., BULL, C. M. & MACKAY, D. 2004. Human disturbance and stride frequency in the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa): implications for behavioural studies. Journal of Herpetology 38:519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAVERGNE, C., DURET, C. & GIGORD, L. 2004. The last wild Red Latan population in the Mascarene archipelago. Plant Talk 36:32–33.Google Scholar
MAETA, Y., GOUKON, K., SUGIRA, N. & MIYANAGA, R. 1996. Host records of cleptoparasitic bees in Japan (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Japanese Journal of Entomology 64:830–842.Google Scholar
MCCONCHIE, T. & WILKINSON, F. A. 2004. Boa constrictor (Boa constrictor). Kleptoparasitism. Herpetological Review 35:272.Google Scholar
ROCHA, S., VENCES, M., GLAW, F., POSADA, C. & HARRIS, D. J. 2009. Multigene phylogeny of Malagasy day geckos of the genus Phelsuma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52:530–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ROCHA, S., RÖSLER, H., GEHRING, P.-S., GLAW, F., POSADA, D., HARRIS, D. J. & VENCES, M. 2010. Phylogenetic systematics of day geckos, genus Phelsuma, based on molecular and morphological data (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Zootaxa 2429:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SANCHEZ, M. & PROBST, J.-M. 2011. Distribution and conservation statue of an endemic threatened reptile to La Réunion, the Manapany day gecko, Phelsuma inexpectata Mertens, 1966. Cahiers Scientifiques de l'Océan Indien Occidental 2:13–28.Google Scholar
SANCHEZ, M., PROBST, J.-M. & DESO, G. 2009. Phelsuma inexpectata, Mertens, 1966 (Sauria: Gekkonidae) sur l’île de La Réunion: écologie, répartition et menaces. Bulletin de la Société Herpétologique de France 132:43–69.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER, F. 1989. Biométrie des abeilles à la Réunion. Thèse École Doctorale Vétérinaire, Maison Alfort. 91 pp.Google Scholar
WANGER, T. C., MOTZKE, I., FURRER, S., BROOK, B. W. & GRUBER, B. 2009. How to monitor elusive lizards: comparison of capture–recapture methods on giant day geckos (Gekkonidae, Phelsuma madagascariensis grandis) in the Masoala rainforest exhibit, Zurich Zoo. Ecological Research 24:345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clémencet Supplementary Material

Movie

Download Clémencet Supplementary Material(Video)
Video 27.9 MB