Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:47:59.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community structure of pre-dispersal seed predatory insects on eleven Shorea (Dipterocarpaceae) species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2009

Tetsuro Hosaka ,
Takakazu Yumoto ,
Hiroaki Kojima ,
Furumi Komai  and
Nur Supardi Md. Noor
Tetsuro Hosaka
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Takakazu Yumoto
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan
Hiroaki Kojima
Affiliation:
Tokyo University of Agriculture, Kanagawa 243-0034, Japan
Furumi Komai
Affiliation:
Osaka University of Arts, Osaka 585-8555, Japan
Nur Supardi Md. Noor
Affiliation:
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor 52109, Malaysia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The Dipterocarpaceae in South-East Asia are known for their strict mast fruiting. During fruiting, pre-dispersal seed predation by insects contributes to mortality of dipterocarp seeds. We documented the community structure of insect seed predators on 11 Shorea species in Peninsular Malaysia. Fruits were sampled sequentially throughout seed development, and 2144 and 1655 individuals of seed predator weevils and moths were collected in two mast-fruiting events. Four weevils: Nanophyes shoreae, nanophyid sp. 1, Alcidodes dipterocarpi and Alcidodes humeralis, and one moth Andrioplecta shoreae were abundant in seeds of the Shorea species. The proportion of N. shoreae to the total predators became larger in the latter fruiting event than the former while that of Alcidodes spp. became smaller. The predator species composition changed during seed development; nanophyid spp. emerged from immature fruits while Alcidodes spp. emerged from mature fruits. Andrioplecta shoreae emerged from both immature and mature fruits. The level of host specificity measured by Kullback–Leibler distance was low for most predator species in both events. Predator species composition of many Shorea was similar to each other due to the dominance of N. shoreae though it might gradually differ with the phylogenetic distance between hosts. In conclusion, predator species composition of Shorea varied during seed development within a host rather than among hosts. Intermittent synchronized fruiting by congeneric Shorea trees would be advantageous to avoid pre-dispersal insect seed predators, and contribute to their reproduction.

Keywords

AlcidodesAndrioplectadipterocarpgeneral floweringmastingNanophyidaepre-dispersal seed predationpredator satiation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 625 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

APPANAH, S. 1985. General flowering in the climax rain forests of South-east Asia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:225–240.Google Scholar
ASHTON, P. S. 2004. Dipterocarpaceae. Pp. 63–388 in Soepadmo, E., Saw, L. G. & Chung, R. C. K. (eds). Tree flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, and Sarawak Forestry Department.Google Scholar
ASHTON, P. S., GIVNISH, T. J. & APPANAH, S. 1988. Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. American Naturalist 132:44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLÜTHGEN, N., MENZEL, F. & BLÜTHGEN, N. 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology 6:9.Google Scholar
BREARLEY, F. Q., PROCTOR, J., SURIANTANANAGY, L. NAGY, L., DALRYMPLE, G. & VOYSEY, B. C. 2007. Reproductive phenology over a 10-year period in a lowland evergreen rain forest of central Borneo. Journal of Ecology 95:828–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURGESS, P. F. 1972. Studies on regeneration of the hill forests of the Malay peninsula: the phenology of dipterocarps. Malayan Forester 38:105–123.Google Scholar
CHEY, V. K. 2002. Dipterocarp seed predators. Malaysian Naturalist 55:46–49.Google Scholar
CHAN, H. T. 1977. Reproductive ecology of some Malaysian dipterocarps. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
CURRAN, L. M., CANIAGO, I., PAOLI, G. D., ASTIANTI, D., KUNSNETI, M., LEIGHTON, M., NIRARITA, C. E. & HAERUMAN, H. 1999. Impact of El Niño and Logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286:2184–2188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CURRAN, L. M. & LEIGHTON, M. 2000. Vertebrate responses to spatiotemporal variation in seed production of mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecological Monographs 70:101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CURRAN, L. M. & WEBB, C. O. 2000. Experimental tests of the spatiotemporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecological Monographs 70:129–148.Google Scholar
DALJEET-SINGH, K. 1974. Seeds pests of some dipterocarps. The Malayan Forester 37:24–36.Google Scholar
DONALDSON, J. S. 1993. Mast-seeding in the cycad genus Encephalartos: a test of the predator satiation hypothesis. Oecologia 94:262–271.Google Scholar
FUKUMOTO, H. & KAJIMURA, H. 2001. Guild structures of seed insects in relation to acorn development in two oak species. Ecological Research 16:145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HANSKI, I. 1988. Four kinds of extra long diapause in insects: a review of theory and observations. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25:37–53.Google Scholar
HOSAKA, T., ARITA, Y. & KIRTON, L. G. 2007. Seed predation on the dipterocarp Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae) by the clearwing moth Synanthedon nautica (Lepidoptera, Sesiidae) in Peninsular Malaysia. Transaction of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 58:165–171.Google Scholar
IGARASHI, Y., & KAMATA, N. 1997. Insect predation and seasonal seedfall of the Japanese beech, Fagus crenata Blume, in northern Japan. Journal of Applied Entomology 121:65–69.Google Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:465–492.Google Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1974. Tropical black water rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae. Biotropica 6:69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1980. Specificity of seed-attacking beetles in a Costa Rican deciduous forest. Journal of Ecology 68:929–952.Google Scholar
KAMIYA, K., HARADA, K., TACHIDA, H. & ASHTON, P. S. 2005. Phylogeny of PgiC gene in Shorea and its closely related genera (Dipterocarpaceae), the dominant trees in Southeast Asian tropical rain forests. American Journal of Botany 92:775–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KELLY, D. 1994. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Tree 9:465–470.Google Scholar
KELLY, D., HARRISON, A. L., LEE, W. G., PAYTON, I. J., WILSON, P. R. & SCHAUBER, E. M. 2000. Predator satiation and extreme mast seeding in 11 species of Chionochloa (Poaceae). Oikos 90:477–488.Google Scholar
KOCHUMMEN, K. M. 1997. Tree flora of Pasoh. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 462 pp.Google Scholar
KOKUBO, A. 1987. Preliminary study on mortality factors of seeds of Dipterocarpaceae. Tropical Forestry 8:21–25 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
LEWIS, O. T. & GRIPENBERG, S. 2008. Insect seed predators and environmental change. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1593–1599.Google Scholar
LYAL, C. H. C. & CURRAN, L. M. 2000. Seed-feeding beetles of the weevil tribe Mecysolobini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae) developing in seeds of trees in the Dipterocarpaceae. Journal of Natural History 34:1743–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LYAL, C. H. C. & CURRAN, L. M. 2003. More than black and white: a new genus of nanophyine seed predators of Dipterocarpaceae and review of Meregallia Alonso-Zarazaga (Coleoptera: Curculionidea: Nanophyidae). Journal of Natural History 37:57–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAETO, K. & OZAKI, K. 2003. Prolonged diapause of specialist seed-feeders makes predator satiation unstable in masting of Quercus crispula. Oecologia 137:392–398.Google Scholar
MARZALINA, M., JAYANTHI, N. & ANGK., C. K., C. 2003. Flowering predictions based on 20 years of phenological observations of Neobalanocarpus heimii (King) Ashton. Pp. 215–213 in Okuda, T., Manokaran, N., Matsumoto, Y., Niiyama, K., Thomas, S. C. & Ashton, P. S. (eds). Pasoh: Ecology of a lowland rain forest in Southeast Asia. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
MAYCOCK, C. R., THEWLIS, R. N., GHAZOUL, J., NILUS, R. & BURSLEM, D. F. R. P. 2005. Reproduction of dipterocarps during low intensity masting events in a Bornean rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:635–646.Google Scholar
MCKONE, M. J., KELLY, D., HARRISON, A. L., SULLIVAN, J. J. & CONE, A. J. 2001. Biology of insects that feed in the inflorescences of Chionochloa (Poaceae) in New Zealand and their relevance to mast seeding. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 28:89–101.Google Scholar
MEDWAY, Lord 1972. Phenology of a tropical rain forest in Malaya. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 4:117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOMOSE, K., NAGAMITSU, T. & INOUE, T. 1996. The reproductive ecology of an emergent dipterocarp in a lowland rain forest in Sarawak. Plant Species Biology 11:189–198.Google Scholar
NAKAGAWA, M., ITIOKA, M., MOMOSE, K., YUMOTO, T., KOMAI, F., MORIMOTO, K., JORDAL, B. H., KATO, M., KALIANG, H., HAMID, A. A., INOUE, T., & NAKASHIZUKA, T. 2003. Resource use of insect seed predators during general flowering and seeding events in a Bornean dipterocarp rain forest. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93:455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAKAGAWA, M., TAKEUCHI, Y., TANAKA, K. & NAKASHIZUKA, T. 2005. Pre-dispersal seed predation by insects vs. vertebrates in six dipterocarp species in Sarawak, Malaysia. Biotropica 37:389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAITO, Y. 2008. Reproductive ecology and early demography of two dipterocarp species in a lowland tropical rainforest of peninsular Malaysia. Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University, Japan.Google Scholar
NG, F. S. P. 1977. Gregarious flowering of dipterocarps in Kepong, 1976. Malaysian Forester 40:126–137.Google Scholar
NUMATA, S., KACHI, N., OKUDA, T. & MANOKARAN, M. 1999. Chemical defences of fruits and mast-fruiting of dipterocarps. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NUMATA, S., YASUDA, M., OKUDA, T., KACHI, N. & NOOR, N. S. M. D. 2003. Temporal and spatial patterns of mass flowerings on the Malay Peninsula. American Journal of Botany 90:1025–1031.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, G. S., ACKERY, P. R., KITCHING, I. J., BECALLONI, G. W. & HERNÁNDEZ, M. 2001. Host plants of the moth and butterfly caterpillars of the Oriental region. The Natural History Museum, London & Southdene, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
SAKAI, S. 2002. General flowering in lowland mixed dipterocarp forests of South-east Asia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75:233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAKAI, S., MOMOSE, K., YUMOTO, T., NAGAMITSU, T., NAGAMASU, H., HAMID, A. A. & NAKASHIZUKA, T. 1999. Plant reproductive phenology over four years including an episode of general flowering in a lowland dipterocarp forest, Sarawak. American Journal of Botany 1999:1414–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAKAI, S., HARRISON, R. D., MOMOSE, K., KURAJI, K., NAGAMASU, H., YASUNARI, T., CHONG, L. & NAKASHIZUKA, T. 2006. Irregular droughts trigger mass flowering in aseasonal tropical forests in Asia. American Journal of Botany 93:1134–1139.Google Scholar
SILVERTOWN, J. W. 1980. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 14:235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEPHENSON, A. G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUN, I. F., CHEN, Y. Y., HUBBELL, S. P., WRIGHT, S. J. & NOOR, N. S. M. D. 2007. Seed predation during general flowering events of varying magnitude in a Malaysian rain forest. Journal of Ecology 95:818–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SYMINGTON, C. F. 2004. Forester's manual of dipterocarps. (Second edition). Forest Research Institute Malaysia and Malaysian Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur. 519 pp.Google Scholar
TOY, R. J. 1988. The pre-dispersal insect fruit-predators of Dipterocarpaceae in Malaysian rain forest. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
TOY, R. J. 1991. Interspecific flowering patterns in the Dipterocarpaceae in West Malaysia: implications for predator satiation. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN SCHAIK, C. P., TERBORGH, J. W. & WRIGHT, S. J. 1993. The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:353–377.Google Scholar
VANDER WALL, S. B., FORGET, P.-M., LAMBERT, J. E. & HULME, P. E. 2005. Seed fate pathways: filling the gap between parent and offspring. Pp. 1–8 in Forget, P.-M., Lambert, J. E., Hulme, P. E. & Vander Wall, S. B. (eds). Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, G. B. & ICKES, K. 2002. Mast fruiting and ENSO cycles – does the cue betray a cause? Oikos 97:459–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YASUDA, M., MATSUMOTO, J., OSADA, N., ICHIKAWA, S., KACHI, N., TANI, M., OKUDA, T., FURUKAWA, A., RAHIM NIK, A. & MANOKARAN, N. 1999. The mechanism of general flowering in Dipterocarpaceae in the Malay Peninsula. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar