Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:21:45.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of canopy species dominance on understorey light availability in low-elevation secondary forest stands in Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Randy P. Kabakoff  and
Robin L. Chazdon
Randy P. Kabakoff
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Robin L. Chazdon
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of canopy species dominance on understorey light availability in secondary forests was examined for Pentaclethra macroloba and Goethalsia meiantha, two common tree species with contrasting canopy architecture at La Selva Biological Station in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. In each of six 12- to 16-year-old successional stands dominated by one of these species, relative abundance and basal area of the focal species were determined within a 20 m × 50 m plot. Light availability at 1 m height was measured within each plot using a Licor-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer at 27 locations and by analysing hemispherical photographs taken at 10 locations. Across stands, mean LAI values were significantly negatively correlated with canopy openness. Understorey microsites beneath Pentaclethra had significantly higher light availability than microsites beneath Goethalsia. Across stands, however, light availability was not correlated with either total basal area or stem density of trees ≥10 cm DBH. These results indicate that basal area and stem density of trees in the upper levels of the forest canopy are poor predictors of light penetration to the understorey. One hypothesis suggested here is that dense subcanopy and understorey vegetation in tropical secondary forests can strongly influence understorey light levels. Alternatively, light transmittance characteristics of the upper forest canopy may be influenced by species-specific differences in canopy architecture or foliage density that vary independently from tree diameter and density.

Keywords

canopy/understorey interactionslight availabilityspecies compositiontropical secondary forests
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 779 - 788
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Brown, S. & Lugo, A. E. 1990. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canham, C. D., Finzi, A., Pacala, S. W. & Burbank, D. H. 1994. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazdon, R. L. & Field, C. B. 1987. Photographic estimation of photosynthetically active radiation - evaluation of a computerized technique. Oecologia 73:525–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chazdon, R. L. & Pearcy, R. W. 1991. The importance of sunflecks for forest understorey plants. BioScience 41:760–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazdon, R. L., Pearcy, R. W., Lee, D. W. & Fetcher, N. 1996. Photosynthetic responses of tropical forest plants to contrasting light environments. Pp. 5–55 in Mulkey, S. R., Chazdon, R. L. & Smith, A. P. (eds). Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. & Slatyer, R. O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111:1119–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetcher, N., Oberbauer, S. F. & Chazdon, R. L. 1994. Physiological ecology of plants. Pp. 128–141 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Finegan, B. & Sabogal, S. 1988. El desarrollo de sistemas de producción sostenible en bosques tropicales humedos de bajura: un estudio de caso en Costa Rica. El Chasquí 17:3–24.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1972. The ecological life history and population dynamics of Pentaclethra macroloba, a tropical wet forest dominant and Stryphnodendron excelsum, an occasional associate. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. & Hammel, B. E. 1994. Vegetation types and floristic patterns. Pp. 73–89 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Holdridge, L. R., Grenke, W. C., Hatheway, W. H., Liang, T. & Tosi, J. A. Jr. 1971. Forest environments in tropical life zones: a pilot study. Pergamon, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Horn, H. S. 1971. The adaptive geometry of trees. Monographs in Population Biology 3. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 144 pp.Google Scholar
Lanly, J. P. 1982. Tropical forest resources. FAO Forestry Paper 30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Lieberman, M., Hartshorn, G. & Peralta, R. 1985. Growth rates and age-size relationships of tropical wet forest trees in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Yánes, C. & Orozco-Segovia, A. 1984. Ecophysiology of seed germination in the tropical humid forests of the world: a review. Pp. 37–50 in Medina, E., Mooney, H. A. & Vázquez-Yánes, C. (eds). Physiological ecology of plants in the wet tropics. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, F. H. 1987. A time for secondary forests in tropical America. Pp. 189–198 in Giguera Colon, J. C., Wadsworth, F. H. & Branham, S. (eds). Management of the forests of tropical America: prospects and techniques. Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
Werner, P. 1984. La Reconstitution de'la Forêt Tropicale Humide au Costa Rica: Analyse de Croissance et Dynamique de la Végétation. PhD Dissertation, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar