Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Montaño-Centellas, Flavia A. and Garitano-Zavala, Álvaro 2015. Andean bird responses to human disturbances along an elevational gradient. Acta Oecologica, Vol. 65-66, p. 51.


    Paluh, Daniel J. Kenison, Erin K. and Saporito, Ralph A. 2015. Frog or Fruit? The Importance of Color and Shape to Bird Predators in Clay Model Experiments. Copeia, Vol. 103, Issue. 1, p. 58.


    Silveira, Fernando A. O. Fernandes, G. Wilson and Lemos-Filho, José P. 2013. Seed and Seedling Ecophysiology of Neotropical Melastomataceae: Implications for Conservation and Restoration of Savannas and Rainforests1. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 99, Issue. 1, p. 82.


    Boyle, W. A. Norris, D. R. and Guglielmo, C. G. 2010. Storms drive altitudinal migration in a tropical bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 277, Issue. 1693, p. 2511.


    ×

Effects of forest age on fruit composition and removal in tropical bird-dispersed understorey trees

  • Heather A. Lumpkin (a1) and W. Alice Boyle (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409006208
  • Published online: 01 September 2009
Abstract
Abstract:

Little is known about how land-use changes affect interspecific interactions such as fruit–frugivore mutualisms. Forest age could affect both fruit sugar concentrations via differences in light availability or disperser abundance, and fruit removal rates via differences in bird and plant community composition. We examined how these two factors are affected by forest age in a Costa Rican rain forest. We compared seven young-secondary forest species, seven old-growth forest species, and Miconia nervosa growing in both forests. We measured sugar concentrations in fruits and manipulated the location of paired fruiting branches, measuring subsequent fruit removal. Sugar concentration means were on average 2.1 percentage points higher in young-secondary forest species than in old-growth forest species, but did not differ among Miconia nervosa fruits from the two forests. Fruit removal rates were higher in young-secondary forest for 86% of young-secondary forest species, 71% of old-growth forest species, and on average for both young-secondary and old-growth forest Miconia nervosa individuals. Higher sugar concentrations in young-secondary forest plants could reflect stronger competition for dispersers, while experimental fruit removal results suggests the opposite patterns of competition; fruits are more likely to be removed by dispersers in young-secondary forest independent of fruit nutrient concentration.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1Corresponding author. Current address: Department of Zoology, Birge Hall, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email: hlumpkin@wisc.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. G. BLAKE & B. A. LOISELLE 1992. Fruits in the diets of neotropical migrant birds in Costa Rica. Biotropica 24:200210.

J. G. BLAKE & B. A. LOISELLE 2001. Bird assemblages in second-growth and old-growth forests, Costa Rica: perspectives from mist nets and point counts. Auk 118:304326.

T. A. CARLO 2005. Interspecific neighbors change seed dispersal pattern of an avian-dispersed plant. Ecology 86:24402449.

R. L. CHAZDON 2003. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 6:5171.

R. L. CHAZDON & N. FETCHER 1984. Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland tropical rain forest in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 72:553564.

R. L. CHAZDON , S. CAREAGA , C. WEBB & O. VARGAS 2003. Community and phylogenetic structure of reproductive traits of woody species in wet tropical forests. Ecological Monographs 73:331348.

J. A. ELZINGA , A. ATLAN , A. BIERE , L. GIGORD , A. E. WEIS & G. BERNASCONI 2007. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interaction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:432439.

D. N. FERNANDES & R. L. SANFORD 1995. Effects of recent land-use practices on soil nutrients and succession under tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 9:915922.

H. F. HOWE & M. N MIRITI . 2000. No question: seed dispersal matters. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 15:34436.

P. JORDANO 1995. Fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant–animal interactions. American Naturalist 145:163191.

D. J. LEVEY 1987a. Seed size and fruit-handling techniques of avian frugivores. American Naturalist 129:471485.

D. J. LEVEY 1988a. Spatial and temporal variation in Costa Rican fruit and fruit-eating bird abundance. Ecological Monographs 58:251269.

D. J. LEVEY 1988b. Tropical wet forest treefall gaps and distributions of understory birds and plants. Ecology 69:10761089.

B. A. LOISELLE & J. G. BLAKE 1999. Dispersal of melastome seeds by fruit-eating birds of tropical forest understory. Ecology 80:330336.

C. MARTÍNEZ-GARZA & H. F. HOWE 2003. Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:423429.

R. A. MONTGOMERY & R. L. CHAZDON 2001. Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in tropical wet forests. Ecology 82:27072718.

A. ÖDEEN & O. HÅSTAD 2003. Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:855861.

B. POULIN , S. J. WRIGHT , G. LEFEBVRE & O. CALDERON 1999. Interspecific synchrony and asynchrony in the fruiting phenologies of congeneric bird-dispersed plants in Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:213227.

C. RESTREPO , N. GOMEZ & S. HEREDIA 1999. Anthropogenic edges, treefall gaps, and fruit–frugivore interactions in a neotropical montane forest. Ecology 80:668685.

K SANFORD & N. S. CLAYTON 2008. Motivation and memory in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) foraging behaviour. Animal Cognition 11:189198.

H. M. SCHAEFER , V. SCHAEFER & D. J LEVEY . 2004. How plant–animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:577584.

R WATSON , C. J. WRIGHT , T. MCBURNEY , A. J. TAYLOR & R. S. T. LINFORTH 2002. Influence of harvest date and light integral on the development of strawberry flavour compounds. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:21212129.

N. T. WHEELWRIGHT & G. H ORIANS . 1982. Seed dispersal by animals: contrasts with pollen dispersal, problems with terminology, constraints on coevolution. American Naturalist 119:402413.

J. M. WUNDERLE , M. R. WILLIG & L. M. PINTO-HENRIQUES 2005. Avian distribution in treefall gaps and understory of terra firme forest in the lowland Amazon. Ibis 147:109129.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: