Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:02:51.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Craniometric Patterning within Ancient Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ann H. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Campus Box 8107, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8107 (annjoss@ncsu.edu)
Douglas H. Ubelaker
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH, MRC 112, Washington, DC 20013-7012
Sonia Guillén
Affiliation:
Centra Mallqui, The Bioanthropology Foundation Peru

Abstract

Numerous studies have used the Howells Peruvian sample from the province of Yauyos as the morphological representative for South America. Although Peru has a rich history of investigations of human skeletal remains, biological distance studies based on craniometrics are limited to nonexistent. This study examines the morphological variation found in Peru using the Howells sample and three additional coastal (Makatampu and Ancón) and highland (Cajamarca) samples. The between-group variation and the degree of among-group differentiation were tested using a canonical discriminant analysis and Mahalanobis D², respectively. All groups are significantly different from the Yauyos sample and results indicate a closer morphological affinity between coastal groups and the two highland groups.

Resumen

Resumen

Numerosos estudios han utilizado la muestra peruana de Howells de la provincia de Yauyos como el representante morfológico para Sudamérica. Aunque Perú tiene una historia rica de investigaciones de restos óseos humanos, los estudios de variación biológica basados en las medidas craniométricas son limitados. Este estudio examina la variación morfológica encontrada en el Perú usando la muestra de Howells y tres muestras adicionales de la costa (Makatampu y Ancón) y la sierra (Cajamarca) peruana. Los materiales empleados en este trabajo están depositados en el Museo Nacional de Arqueología, Antropología e Historia de la ciudad de Lima. La variación morfométrica y el grado de diferenciación biológica fueron probados usando un análisis multivariado de los valores D² de Mahalanobis como distancias morfométricas entre pares de muestras. Todos los grupos son perceptiblemente diferentes de la muestra de Yauyos y los resultados indican una afinidad morfológica más cercana entre los grupos costeros y el grupo serrano y demuestra que la muestra original de Howells no refleja adecuadamente la variación morfométrica peruana.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ackerman, Rebecca R., and Cheverud, James 2004 Detecting Genetic Drift versus Selection in Human Evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:1794617951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz 1912a Migrations of Asiatic Races and Cultures to North America. Scientific Monthly 28:110117 Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1912b The History of American Race. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 21:117183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez, Luis G. 1968 Cráneos Humanos Precedentes del Valle de Lima: Makat-tampu. Tesis para Bachiller de Ciencias Antropológicas. Universidad Nacional de San Cristobal de Huamanga. Ayacucho.Google Scholar
Cocilovo, José A., and Rothhammer, Francisco 1990 Paleopopulation Biology of the Southern Andes-Craniofacial Chronological and Geographical Differentiation. Homo 41:1631. Methodological Approaches for the Solution to Ethnohistorical Problems: Bioassay of Kinship in Prehistoric Populations of Arica, Chile. Homo 47:177–190.Google Scholar
Cocilovo, José A., and Rothhammer, Francisco 1999 Morphological Microevolution and Extinction of Kinship in Prehistoric Human Settlements from the Azapata Valley, Chile. Revista Chilena Historia Natural 72:213218.Google Scholar
Darroch, John N., and Mosimann, James E. 1985 Canonical and Principal Components of Shape. Bio-metrika 72:241252.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Manuela 1996 Study of the Face Structure of Highland And Lowland Populations in Prehispanic South America. Colloquium Antropologicum 20:95110.Google Scholar
Ericksen, Mary F. 1962 Undeformed Pre-Columbian Crania from the North Sierra Of Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 20:209222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frieß, Martin, and Baylac, Michel 2003 Exploring Artificial Cranial Deformation Using Elliptic Fourier Analysis of Procrustes Aligned Outlines. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 122:1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-José, Rolando, Ramírez-Rozzi, Fernando, Sardi, María, Martínez-Abadias, Neus, Hernández, Miquel, and Pucciarelli, Héctor M. 2005 Functional-Cranial Approach to the Influence of Economic Strategy on Skull Morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128:757771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, William W. 1973 Cranial Variation in Man. A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kaulicke, Peter 1997 Contextos Funerarios de Ancon. Esbozo de una Síntesis Analítica. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial. Lima.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael 1990 The Rate of Morphological Evolution in Mammals from the Standpoint of the Neutral Expectation. American Naturalist 136:727741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCurdy, George G. 1923 Human Skeletal Remains from the Highlands of Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 6:217329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore-Jansen, Peer, and Jantz, Richard L. 1994 Data Collection Procedures for Forensic Skeletal Material. Report Investigation no. 48. The University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Morton, Samuel G. 1839 Crania Americana J.B. Lippincott and Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Mosimann, James E., and James, Frances C. 1979 New Statistical Methods for Allometry with Application Florida Red- Winged Blackbirds. Evolution 33:444459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neves, Walter, A., Hubbe, Mark, Okumura, Maria Mercedes M., González-José, Rolando, Figuti, Levy, Eggers, Sabine, and De Blasis, Paulo Antonio Dantas 2005 A New Early Holocene Human Skeleton from Brazil: Implications for the Settlement of the New World. Journal of Human Evolution 48:403414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, Marshall T. 1943 A Metric Study of Undeformed Crania from Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology N.S. 1:2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ousley, Stephen D., and Jantz, Richard L. 1998 Forensic Data Bank: Documenting Skeletal Trends in the United States. In Forensic Osteology. Advances in the Identification of Human Rremains, edited by Kathleen J. Reichs, pp. 441–458. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, LTD, Springfield.Google Scholar
Pucciareli, Héctor M., Neves, Walter A., Gonzélez-José, Rolando, Sardi, Marina L., Rozzi, Fernando Ramírez, Struck, Adelaida, and Bonilla, Mary Y. 2006 East-West Cranial Differentiation in Pre-Columbian Human Populations of South America. Homo: 57:133150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relethford, John H. 1994 Craniometric Variation among Modern Human Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 95:5362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Relethford, John H., and Harpending, Henry C. 1994 Craniometric Variation, Genetic Theory, and Modern Human Origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 95:249270 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseman, Charles C. 2004 Detecting Interregionally Diversifying Natural Selection on Modern Human Cranial Form by Using Matched Molecular and Morphometric Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:1282412829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseman, Charles C., and Weaver, Timothy D. 2004 Multivariate Apportionment of Global Human Craniometric Diversity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 125:257263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, Ann H., Ubelaker, Douglas H., and Falsetti, Anthony B. 2002a Craniometric Variation in the Americas. Human Biology 74:807818.Google ScholarPubMed
Ross, Ann H., Ubelaker, Douglas H., and Falsetti, Anthony B. 2002b Ethnohistorical Relationships on the Iberian Peninsula. Anthropologic XL. 1:5157.Google Scholar
Ross, Ann H. 2004 Regional Isolation in the Balkan Region: An Analysis of Craniofacial Variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 124:7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothhammer, Francisco, Cocilovo, José A., Quevedo, Silvia, and Llop, Elena 1982 Microevolution in Prehistoric Andean Populations-Chronologic Craniometric Variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 58:391396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothhammer, Francisco, Quevedo, Silvia, Cocilovo, José A., and Llop, Elena 1984 Microevolution in Prehistoric Andean Populations-Chronologic Nonmetrical Cranial Variation in Northern Chile. American Jouranl of Physical Anthropology 65:157162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothhammer, Francisco, and Silva, Claudio 1989 Peopling of Andean South America. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78:403410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupert, Jim L., and Hochachka, Peter W. 2001 The Evidence for Hereditary Factors Contributing to High Altitude Adaptation in Andean Natives: A Review. High Altitude Medicine & Biology 2:235256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sardi, Marina L., Rozzi, Fernando Ramérez, González-José, Rolando, and Pucciarelli, Héctor M. 2005 South Amerindian Craniofacial Morphology: Diversity and Implications for Amerindian Evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128:747756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS [computer program] 2001 System for Windows Version 8, Computer Program Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schafer, Joe 1999 [Computer Program] NORM: Multiple Imputation Of Incomplete Multivariate Data under a Normal Model, version 2.Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas D. 1943 Skeletal Remains from Paracas, Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1:4763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1981 The Ayalan Cemetery. A Late Integration Period Burial Site on the South Coast of Ecuador. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1987 Dental Alteration in Prehistoric Ecuador A New Example from Jama- coaque. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 77:7680.Google Scholar
Varela, Hugo H., and Cocilovo, José A. 1999 Evaluation of the Environmental Component of the Phenotypic Variance in Prehistoric Populations. Homo 50:4653.Google Scholar
Varela, Hugo H., and Cocilovo, José A. 2000 Structure of the Prehistoric Population of San Pedro de Atacama. Current Anthropology 41:125132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela, Hugo H., and Cocilovo, José A. 2002 Genetic Drift and Gene Flow in a Prehistoric Population of the Azapa Valley and Coast, Chile. American Journal Physical Anthropology 118:259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verano, John 1997a Advances in the Paleopathology of Andean South-America. Journal of World Prehistory 11:237268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verano, John 1997b Human Skeletal, Remains from Tomb 1, Sipan(Lambayeque River Valley, Peru); and Their Social Implications. Antiquity 71:670682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verano, John 2001a War and Death in the Moche World; Osteological Evidence and Visual Discourse. Studies in the History of Art 63:110125.Google Scholar
Verano, John 2001b Mummified Trophy Heads from Peru: Diagnostic Features and Medicolegal Significance. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48:525530.Google Scholar
Verano, John, Uceda, Santiago, Chapdelaine, Claude, Tello, Ricardo, Paredes, María Isabel, and Pimentel, Víctor 1999 Modified Human Skulls from the Urban Sector of the Pyramids of Moche, Northern Peru. Latin American Antiquity 10:5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Karen J. 2005 Body Proportions in Ancient Andeans from High and Low Altitudes. American Journal Physical Anthropology 128:569586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed