Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-mb7zs Total loading time: 0.212 Render date: 2021-06-22T01:29:25.838Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Economic Vulnerability and Partisanship in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

Melina Altamirano
Affiliation:
Melina Altamirano is an assistant professor at the Center for International Studies, El Colegio de México.
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

A significant proportion of the population in Latin America depends on the informal economy and lacks adequate protection against a variety of economic risks. This article suggests that economic vulnerability affects the way individuals relate to political parties. Given the truncated structure of welfare states in the region, citizens in the informal sector receive lower levels of social security benefits and face higher economic uncertainty. This vulnerability makes it difficult for voters to establish strong programmatic linkages with political parties because partisan platforms and policies do not necessarily represent their interests and needs. Using cross-national microlevel data, this study shows that individuals living in informality are skeptical about state social policy efforts and exhibit weaker partisan attachments. The findings suggest that effective political representation of disadvantaged groups remains a challenge in Latin American democracies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© University of Miami 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Agarwala, Rina. 2013. Informal Labor, Formal Politics, and Dignified Discontent in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba Vega, Carlos. 2012. Local Politics and Globalization from Below: The Peddler Leaders of Mexico City’s Historic Center Streets. In Globalization from Below: The World’s Other Economy, ed. Mathews, Gordon, Ribeiro, Gustavo Lins, and Vega, Carlos Alba. Abingdon: Routledge. 203–20.Google Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel. 2010. Elections in Latin America, 2009–2011: A Comparative Analysis. Working Paper. Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher, and Just, Aida. 2012. Partisan Legitimacy Across Generations. Electoral Studies 31, 2: 306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Guachalla, Vania Ximena Velasco. 2018. Is the Informal Sector Politically Different? (Null) Answers from Latin America. World Development 102: 170–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Samuel, Jennings, Kent, Inglehart, Ronald, and Farah, Barbara. 1988. Party Identification and Party Closeness in Comparative Perspective. Political Behavior 10, 3: 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, Armando. 2009. Labour Markets and the (Hyphenated) Welfare Regime in Latin America. Economy and Society 38, 1: 87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kristina Flodman. 2004. The Informal Economy: Fact Finding Study. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
Benería, Lourdes, and Floro, María S.. 2006. Labour Market Informalization, Gender and Social Protection: Reflections on Poor Urban Households in Bolivia and Ecuador. In Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context: Uncovering the Gendered Structure of the Social, ed. Razavi, Shahra and Hassim, Shireen. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berens, Sarah. 2015a. Between Exclusion and Calculating Solidarity? Preferences for Private Versus Public Welfare Provision and the Size of the Informal Sector. Socio-Economic Review 13, 4: 651–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berens, Sarah. 2015b. Preferences on Redistribution in Fragmented Labor Markets in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Politics in Latin America 7, 3: 117–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertranou, Fabio. 2004. Protección social y mercado laboral en América Latina. South American Division Report. Santiago: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M. 2009. Social Protection and the Market in Latin America: The Transformation of Social Security Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M. 2015. Social Protection for the Poorest: The Adoption of Antipoverty Cash Transfer Programs in the Global South. Politics and Society 43, 4: 551–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2005. The New Iron Law of Argentine Politics? Partisanship, Clientelism, and Governability in Contemporary Argentina. In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, ed. Levitsky, Steven and Murillo. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 207–29.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1980. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnes, Matthew and Mares, Isabela. 2015. Explaining the “Return of the State” in Middle- Income Countries: Employment Vulnerability, Income, and Preferences for Social Protection in Latin America. Politics and Society 43, 4: 525–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecchini, Simone, and Madariaga, Aldo. 2011. Programas de transferencias condicionadas: balance de la experiencia reciente en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: United Nations, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).Google Scholar
Cecchini, Simone, and Martínez, Rodrigo. 2012. Inclusive Social Protection in Latin America: A Comprehensive, Rights-Based Approach. Santiago: CEPAL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel. 2009. Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Cramer, Brian D., and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2011. Views of Economic Inequality in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 44, 9: 1206–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, John. 1998. Informal Politics: Street Vendors and the State in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crossa Niell, Verónica. 2018. Luchando por un espacio en la ciudad de México: comerciantes ambulantes y el espacio público urbano. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott, and Norrander, Barbara. 2009. The Gender Gap in Latin America: Contextual and Individual Influences on Gender and Political Participation. British Journal of Political Science 39, 1: 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry J., Linz, Juan, and Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1999. Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Dion, Michelle. 2010. Workers and Welfare: Comparative Institutional Change in Twentieth- Century Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1989. Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics 22, 1: 2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Whitefield, Stephen. 1993. Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe. British Journal of Political Science 23, 4: 521–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha, and Garay, Candelaria. 2017. Redistribution Under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking. Comparative Political Studies 50, 14: 18711906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E.. 1983. The Dynamics of Party Identification. American Political Science Review 77, 4: 957–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparini, Leonardo. 2004. América Latina: estudio de la protección social y el empleo sobre la base de encuestas de hogares. In Protección social y mercado laboral, ed. Bertranou, Fabio. Santiago: Oficina Internacional del Trabajo.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2005. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, and Lee, Taeku. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party: Race, Immigration, and the Failure (of Political Parties) To Engage the Electorate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2018. Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Politics in Truncated Welfare States. World Politics 70, 4: 555–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha, and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2017. Easy and Hard Redistribution: The Political Economy of Welfare States in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics 15, 4: 9881006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Soren. 2003. Are Political Parties Necessary? Electoral Studies 22, 2: 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., Kernell, Georgia, and Leoni, Eduardo L.. 2005. Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments Across Democracies. Political Analysis 13, 4: 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Calla. 2017. Disobedient Markets: Street Vendors, Enforcement, and State Intervention in Collective Action. Comparative Political Studies 50, 11: 1524–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2018. Making the Newest Citizens: Achieving Universal Birth Registration in Contemporary Brazil. Journal of Development Studies 54, 3: 397412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussmanns, Ralf. 2003. Defining and Measuring Informal Employment. Geneva: Bureau of Statistics, International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). 2009. A Moving Target: Universal Access to Healthcare Services in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: IADB.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO). 2015. Transition to the Formal Economy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Geneva: International Training Centre, ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO). 2017. Definition of the Informal Economy. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/employment-promotion/informal-economy/lang—en/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven, eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk, Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2010. One Illness Away: Why People Become Poor and How They Escape Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, Matthew L., and Smith, Amy Erica. 2015. Incorporating Marginal Citizens and Voters: The Conditional Electoral Effects of Targeted Social Assistance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 48, 7: 854–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Nagler, Jonathan. 1992. Individual and Systemic Influences On Turnout: Who Votes? 1984. Journal of Politics 54, 3: 718–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Santiago. 2018. Under-Rewarded Efforts: The Elusive Quest for Prosperity in Mexico. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2013. Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science 57, 1: 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2014. Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. World Politics 66, 4: 561602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2015. Partisanship in Latin America. In The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, ed. Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, Matthew M., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 226–45.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. Electoral Volatility in Brazil. Party Politics 4, 4: 523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, Juliana. 2008. Welfare Regimes in Latin America: Capturing Constellations of Markets, Families, and Policies. Latin American Politics and Society 50, 2: 67100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, Juliana, and Sánchez-Ancochea, Diego. 2014. The Double Challenge of Market and Social Incorporation: Progress and Bottlenecks in Latin America. Development Policy Review 32, 3: 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89, 5: 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1976. The Cross-National Use of Party Identification as a Stimulus to Political Inquiry. In Party Identification and Beyond, ed. Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis. London: Wiley. 2132.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana. 2011. Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana, and Meléndez, Carlos. 2016. Parties Under Stress: Using a Linkage Decay Framework to Analyze the Chilean Party System. Journal of Politics in Latin America 8, 3: 2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Jana, and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2017. Social Patterns of Inequality, Partisan Competition, and Latin American Support for Redistribution. Journal of Politics 79, 1: 193209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara, and Pribble, Jennifer. 2017. Social Policies and Center-Right Governments in Argentina and Chile. Latin American Politics and Society 59, 3: 7297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, Janice, 2010. Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Guillermo, Maloney, William F., Arias, Omar S., Fajnzylber, Pablo, Mason, Andrew D., and Saavedra-Chanduvi, Jaime. 2007. Informality: Exit and Exclusion. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattoni, Simona. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Haller, William. 2010 (2005). The Informal Economy. In Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd ed., ed. Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 403–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. Social inequalities Without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era. Studies in Comparative International Development 36, 4: 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2005. Are Workers in the Developing World Winners or Losers in the Current Era of Globalization? Studies in Comparative International Development 40, 3: 2964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 2: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, David, Burton, Jonathan, and Kneeshaw, Jack. 2002. Identifying the True Party Identifiers: A Question Wording Experiment. Party Politics 8, 2: 193205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2007. The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Matthew M. 2016. Informal Sector Work and Evaluations of the Incumbent: The Electoral Effect of Vulnerability on Economic Voting. Latin American Politics and Society 58, 2: 4973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singerman, Diane. 1996. Avenues of Participation: Family, Politics, and Networks in Urban Quarters of Cairo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2005. The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 49, 2: 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2010. Do the Poor Count? Democratic Institutions and Accountability in a Context of Poverty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, James R. 2003. Party Identification in Britain: Does Length of Time in the Electorate Affect Strength of Partisanship? British Journal of Political Science 33, 2: 332–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on. 1987. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (WEF). 2006. Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Economic Vulnerability and Partisanship in Latin America
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Economic Vulnerability and Partisanship in Latin America
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Economic Vulnerability and Partisanship in Latin America
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *