Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:37:55.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Judicial Performance in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joseph L. Staats ,
Shaun Bowler  and
Jonathan T. Hiskey
Joseph L. Staats
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science at Texas Tech University
Shaun Bowler
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Jonathan T. Hiskey
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An increasing number of development scholars and policymakers are recognizing the importance of Latin American judicial reforms in shaping the ultimate outcome of the region's “dual transition.” We can hardly begin to assess the conditions in which judicial systems are likely to improve, however, unless we have a means to measure judicial performance systematically across countries. This article offers just such a comprehensive cross-national measure of judicial performance for Latin America. Drawing from a survey of Latin American legal scholars and practitioners from 17 countries in the region, it seeks to establish a more valid, and therefore more useful, assessment of the performance of Latin American judiciaries than existing measures, in order to advance efforts to understand the causes and consequences of effective judicial reforms in the region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , Winter 2005 , pp. 77 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agüero, Felipe, and Jeff, Stark, eds. 1998. Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Becker, David G. 1999. Latin America: beyond “Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy 10, 2: 138–51.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth. 1990. Political Democracy and Measurement Traps. Studies in Comparative International Development 25: 7–24.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, and Beatrice, Weder. 1999. Investment and Institutional Uncertainty: A Comparative Study of Different Uncertainty Measures. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, Gregory, Kisunko, and Beatrice, Weder. 1997. Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector. Background Report carried out for World Development Report 1997. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Buscaglia, Edgardo, and Pilar, Domingo. 1997. Impediments to Judicial Reform in Latin America. Mexico City: Centro de Investigatión y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
Carmines, E. G., and Zeller, R. A.. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez, Rebecca Bill. 2003. The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: a Tale of Two Provinces. Comparative Politics 35: 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems. Party Politics 4: 547–68.Google Scholar
Dakolias, María. 1996. The Judicial Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: Elements of Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakolias, María. 1999. Court Performance Around the World: A Comparative Perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degregori, Carlos Iván. 1998. Ethnicity and Democratic Governability in Latin America: Reflections from Two Central Andean Countries. in Agüero and Stark 1998. 203–34.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry J. 1999. Developing Democracy Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Djankov, Simeon, et al. 2001. Legal Structure and Judicial Efficiency: The Lex Mundi Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2003. Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico's 1994 Judicial Reform: an Empowered Court. Journal of Latin American Studies 35: 777–99.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen. 1993. The Right Degree of Independence. In Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary, ed. Irwin, P. Stotzky. Boulder: Westview Press. 55–72.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2003. Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Frühling, Hugo. 1998. Judicial Reform and Democratization in Latin America. in Agüero and Stark 1998. 237–62.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, Caldeira, and Vanessa, A. Baird. 1998. On the Legitimacy of National High Courts. American Political Science Review 92: 348–58.Google Scholar
Gwartney, James D. and Robert, Lawson. Economic Freedom of the World: 2004 Annual Report. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1998. Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990s: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline? in Agüero and Stark 1998. 99–143.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2000. Degrees of Democracy. World Politics 52: 484–519.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy. American Political Science Review 96: 291–303.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J. 2002. The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 355–89.Google Scholar
Holston, James, and Teresa, P. R. Caldeira. 1998. Democracy, Law, and Violence: Disjunctions of Brazilian Citizenship. in Agüero and Stark 1998. 263–96.Google Scholar
Huber, John, and Ronald, Ingelhart. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Placement in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1: 73–112.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. Dilemmas of Democratization. Comparative Politics 23: 1–21.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, and Andrew, H. W. Stone. 2002 World Business Environment Survey. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart, Kraay, and Pablo, Zoido-Lobatón. 1999. Governance Matters. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart, Kraay, and Pablo, Zoido-Lobatón. 2002. Governance Matters II. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen, and Philip, Keefer. 1995. Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207–27.Google Scholar
Lagos, Marta. 2001. How People View Democracy: between Stability and Crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 12: 137–45.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Ben, Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levine, Ross. 1998. The Legal Environment, Banks, and Long-Run Economic Growth. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30: 596–613.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred, C. Stepan. 1996. Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy 7: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Marysa, and Susan, C. Bourque. 1998. Fault Lines of Democratic Governance: a Gender Perspective. in Agüero and Stark 1998. 175–202.Google Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, Juan, Méndez, and Paulo Sérgio, Pinheiro, eds. 1999. The (Un) Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Prillaman, William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ray, Leonard. 1999. Measuring Party Positions on European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. European Journal of Political Research 36: 283–306.Google Scholar
Ray, Leonard, and Hanne Marthe, Narud. 2000. Measuring the Issue Positions of Norwegian Parties: Results from an Expert Survey. Party Politics 6: 225–39.Google Scholar
Ruthig, Nora. 2002. Customer Relations Specialist, International Country Risk Guide (Icrg). the Prs Group, East Syracuse, Ny. Author telephone interview. May 16.Google Scholar
Saez Garcia, Felipe. 1998. The Nature of Judicial Reform in Latin America and Some Strategic Considerations. American University International Law Review 13: 1267–1325.Google Scholar
Salas, Luis, and José, Ma. Rico. 1993. Administration of Justice in Latin America: A Primer on the Criminal Justice System. San José, Costa Rica: Center for the Administration of Justice.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 1995. Democratic Consolidations: Some Broad Comparisons and Sweeping Arguments. Latin American Research Review 30: 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoultz, Lars. 1981. U.S. Policy and Human Rights Violations in Latin America: a Comparative Analysis of Foreign Aid Distributions. Comparative Politics 13: 149–70.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Robert M., Geoffrey, Shepherd, and DeCelso Marcos, Souza. 1994. Judicial Systems and Economic Performance. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34: 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. 1995. Legal Framework for Development: World Bank's Role in Legal and Judicial Reform. In Judicial Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Proceedings of a World Bank Conference, ed. Malcolm, Rowat, Waleed, H. Malik, and María, Dakolias. Washington, DC: World Bank. 13–15.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2003. When the Devil Turns: the Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review. Journal of Legal Studies 32: 59–90.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto. 1998. Democratization in Latin America: a Citizen Responsibility. in Agüero and Stark 1998. 145–74.Google Scholar
Weder, Beatrice. 1995. Legal Systems and Economic Performance: The Empirical Evidence. In Judicial Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Proceedings of a World Bank Conference, ed. Malcolm, Rowat, Waleed, H. Malik, and María, Dakolias. Washington, DC: World Bank. 21–26.Google Scholar