Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:45:16.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Correlates of Party System Demise and Populist Resurgence in Venezuela

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Considering its strong, highly institutionalized two-party system, Venezuela was surely one of the least likely countries in Latin America to experience a party system breakdown and populist resurgence. That traditional party system nevertheless was founded on a mixture of corporatist and clientelist linkages to social actors that were unable to withstand the secular decline of the oil economy and several aborted attempts at market liberalization. Successive administrations led by the dominant parties failed to reverse the economic slide, with devastating consequences for the party system as a whole. The party system ultimately rested on insecure structural foundations; and when its social moorings crumbled in the 1990s, the populist movement of Hugo Chávez emerged to fill the political void. This populist resurgence both capitalized on and accelerated the institutional decomposition of the old order.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Angel Eduardo. 1996. La crísis de hegemonía de los partidos políticos venezolanos. In El sistema político venezolano: crísis y transformaciones, ed. Alvarez, Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela. 154.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter, Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benton, Allyson Lucinda. 1997. Patronage Games: the Effects of Economic Reform on Internal Party Politics and Party System Stability in Latin America. Paper presented at the 1997 meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, Dc, August 131.Google Scholar
Bolívar, Ligia, and Magaly, Pérez Campos 1996. El sistema de derechos humanos en la constitución de 1961 y propuestas de reforma. In El sistema político venezolano: crísis y transformaciones, ed. Angel, Eduardo Alvarez Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina. 1999. Loyalty Dilemmas and Market Reform: Party-Union Alliances under Stress in Mexico, Spain, and Venezuela. World Politics 52, 1 (October): 134.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1994. Politics: A Key for the Long Term in South America. In Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform, ed. William, C. Smith, Carlos, H. Acuña, and Eduardo, A. Gamarra. New Brunswick: Transaction. 155.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conniff, Michael L. ed. 1982. Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies 2, 2 (July): 171.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2000. Presidents, Ruling Parties, and Party Rules: a Theory on the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America. Comparative Politics 32, 2 (January): 149.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, and David, Denver eds. 1985. Electoral Change in Western Democracies: Patterns and Sources of Electoral Volatility. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian. 2000. Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Interest Groups. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, Scott, C. Flanagan, and Paul, Allen Beck eds. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles L., and Kenneth, M. Coleman. 1989. Political Control of Organized Labor in a Semi-Consociational Democracy: The Case of Venezuela. In Labor Autonomy and the State in Latin America, ed. Edward, C. Epstein. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Sebastian, Edwards eds. 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1982. Conclusion Requiem for Populism? In Conniff 1982 145.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1991. Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2000. Country Profile 2000: Venezuela. London: Economist.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1995. El sindicalismo en Venezuela en el contexto democrático (1958–1994). Caracas: Fondo Editorial Tropykas.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization.. 1997. 1997 Labour Overview: Latin America and the Caribbean. Lima: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization.. 1998. 1998 Labour Overview: Latin America and the Caribbean. Lima: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1987. Petroleum and Political Pacts: the Transition to Democracy in Venezuela. Latin American Research Review 22, 1: 194.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R. 1977. Corporatism, Clientelism, and Partisan Conflict: A Study of Seven Latin American Countries. In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, ed. James, Malloy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 148.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, Miriam. 1998. Venezuela en los noventa: las crísis de la democracia. Caracas: Ediciones IESA.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1998. Crisis, Party Adaptation, and Regime Stability in Argentina: the Case of Peronism, 1989–1995. Party Politics 4, 4: 170.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2001. Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: the Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. World Politics 54 (October): 156.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend J., and Carlos, H. Waisman. eds. 1996. Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein, Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, ed. Lipset, and Rokkan, New York: Free Press. 164.Google Scholar
López-Maya, Margarita. 1997. The Rise of Causa R in Venezuela. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas, A. Chalmers, Carlos, M. Vilas, Katherine, Hite, Scott, B. Martin, Kerianne, Piester, and Monique, Segarra. New York: Oxford University Press. 143.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P., and Timothy, R. Scully. eds. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Johan, P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Márquez, Gustavo, and Carmen, Pagés 1998. Ties That Bind: Employment Protection and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America. Working Paper 373. Washington, Dc: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Myers, David J. 1998. Venezuela's Political Party System: Defining Events, Reactions, and the Diluting of Structural Cleavages. Party Politics 4, 4: 1521.Google Scholar
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penfold Becerra, Michael. 2000. El colapso del sistema de partidos en Venezuela: explicación de una muerte anunciada. Paper presented at the 22d meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, March 118.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1997. Theoretical Decay and Theoretical Development: the Resurgence of Institutional Analysis. World Politics 50 (October): 161.Google Scholar
República, Venezuela 1995. Venezuela ante la cumbre mundial sobre desarrollo social Caracas.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: the Peruvian Case. World Politics 48 (October): 1116.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era. Studies in Comparative International Development 36, 4 (Winter): 133.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Erik, Wibbels. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3 (September): 190.Google Scholar
Romero, Aníbal. 1997. Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Titanic: the Agony of Democracy in Venezuela. Latin American Research Review 32, 1: 136.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John, M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1994. La crísis social de América Latina: una perspectiva neoestructuralista. In Pobreza y modelos de desarrollo en América Latina, Washington, DC: Economic Development Institute.Google Scholar
United Nations. Comisión Económico y Político para América Latina (CEPAL).. 1999. Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Neoliberalism and Neopopulism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Fall): 131.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. The Political Fate of Market Reform in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe. International Studies Quarterly 42: 645–74.Google Scholar
Wilkie, James W., Eduardo, Alemán, and José, Guadalupe Ortega eds. 1999. Statistical Abstract of Latin America, Vol. 35. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.Google Scholar
Williamson, John ed. 1990. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar