Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T15:15:44.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civilians and the Military in Latin America: The Absence of Incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Thomas C. Bruneau
Thomas C. Bruneau*
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School tbruneau@nps.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that civil-military relations should be conceptualized not only in terms of democratic civilian control but also for effectiveness in implementing a spectrum of roles and missions. It also argues that achieving effectiveness requires institutional development as a necessary but not sufficient condition. Currently in Latin America, the focus in civil-military relations remains exclusively on civilian control. While there is a growing awareness of the need for analysis beyond asserting control over the armed forces, so far nobody has proposed or adopted a broader analytical framework. This article proposes such a framework, and employs it to analyze differences among four major South American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia. The explanation for the differences identified by use of the framework is found in the incentives of civilian elites in Chile and Colombia, who have recognized serious threats to national security and defense.

Type
Policy Issues
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , Winter 2013 , pp. 143 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agüero, Felipe. 1995. Soldiers, Civilians, and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe. 2009. The New “Double Challenge”: Democratic Control and Efficacy of Military, Police, and Intelligence. In Stepan 2009. 59–74.Google Scholar
Argentina, Ministry of Defense. 2010. 2010 Libro blanco de la defensa. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Brazil, Ministry of Defense. 2008. National Strategy of Defense (END). Brásilia: Ministry of Defense.Google Scholar
Brazil, Ministry of Defense. Pró-Defesa. https://www.defesa.gov.br/index.php/programas-e-projetos/programa-pro-defesa.html Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., and Trinkunas, Harold A.. 2008. International Democracy Promotion and Its Impact on Civil-Military Relations. In Global Politics of Defense Reform, ed. Bruneau, and Trinkunas, . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 3–20.Google Scholar
Bruneau, and Trinkunas, 2011. Patriots for Profit: Contractors and the Military in U.S. National Security. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., and Goetze, Richard. 2006. Ministries of Defense and Democratic Control. In Who Guards the Guardians and How: Democratic Civil-Military Relations, ed. Bruneau, and Tollefson, Scott. Austin: University of Texas Press. 71–100.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., and Cristiana Matei, Florina, eds. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Civil-Military Relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chile. Camara de Diputados. 2012. Website. www.lasegunda.com/Noticias/Economia/2012/06/754904/Camara-de-Diputados-aprueba-con-voto-unanime-nuevo-finan-ciamiento-para-las-FFAA Google Scholar
Cope, Jay. 2002. Strategic Forum. INSS, Washington, DC: National Defense University.Google Scholar
Correio Brasiliense (Brasília). 2002. March 9.Google Scholar
Cottey, Andrew, Edmunds, Timothy, and Forster, Anthony. 2002. The Second Generation Problematic: Rethinking Democracy and Civil-Military Relations. Armed Forces and Society 29, 1: 31–56.Google Scholar
Diamint, Rut. 2010. The Hidden Appeal of Defence. In RESDAL 2010. 66–68.Google Scholar
Edmunds, Timothy. 2006. What Are Armed Forces for? the Changing Nature of Military Roles in Europe. International Affairs 82, 6: 1059–75.Google Scholar
Flisfisch, Angel, and Robledo, Marcos. 2012. Gobernabilidad democrátia de la defensa en Chile: un indice para el periodo 1990–2010. Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
Frederick, Sabrina, Dra. 2009. Subsecretary for Education, Ministry of Defense. Author interview. Buenos Aires, April 23.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary, C. Taylor, R.. 1966. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44: 936–57.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice. 2008. The Hague: International Court of Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php. Accessed November 5, 2013.Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro. 2011. Informe 2011. Santiago: Latinobarómetro.Google Scholar
Montenegro, Germán. 2010. Argentine vice Minister of Defense, 2006–2010. Author interview. Buenos Aires, April 15.Google Scholar
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). 1994. Osce Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. December. http://www.osce.org/fsc/41355. Accessed November 5, 2013.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 2005. Political Management of the Military in Latin America. Military Review 85, 1:19–31.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 2009. Defense Organization and Civil-Military Relations in Latin America. Armed Forces and Society 35, 3 (April): 562–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, and Trinkunas, Harold. 2007. Attention Deficits: Why Politicians Neglect Defense Policy in Latin America. Latin America Research Review 42, 3: 76–100.Google Scholar
Przeworksi, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radseck, Michael. 2005. From Casa Militar to an Instrument of Political Control: a Functional Analysis of the Defense Ministries in Argentina and Chile. Defense and Security Analysis 21, 2 (June): 179–99.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Marta Lucía. 2003 Minister of Defense, Colombia. Author interview. Bogotá, April 5.Google Scholar
Red de Seguridad y Defensa de América Latina. (RESDAL). 2010. A Comparative Atlas of Defence in Latin America and the Caribbean. Buenos Aires: RESDAL.Google Scholar
Rial, Juan. 2010. The Ministries of Defence and the Political Power. In RESDAL 2010. 48–50.Google Scholar
Serafino, Nina M., 2001 Colombia: Conditions and U.S. Policy Options. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Serra, Narcís. 2009. Beyond Threats to Democracy from the Armed Forces, Police, and Intelligence: the Spanish Case. In Stepan 2009. 75–85.Google Scholar
Serra, Narcís. 2010. The Military Transition: Democratic Reform of the Armed Forces. Trans. Bush, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, ed. 2009. Democracies in Danger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 2012. http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database. Accessed June 13, 2012.Google Scholar