Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:35:30.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personalization and Institutional Constraints: Pinochet, the Military Junta, and the 1980 Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Robert Barros
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The standard account of military dictatorship in Chile (1973–1990) portrays the case as a personalist regime, and uses the dynamics associated with this type of regime to explain General Pinochet's control of the presidency, the enactment of the 1980 Constitution, and the longevity of military rule. Drawing on records of the decisionmaking process within the military junta, this article presents evidence for a different characterization of the dictatorship. It shows that Pinochet never attained the supremacy commonly attributed to him, that the commanders of the other branches of the armed forces retained significant powers, and that the 1980 Constitution was not enacted to project Pinochet's personal power. More generally, this study suggests that personal power is not a necessary condition for regime longevity; collective systems can also produce cohesion and stability.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Spring 2001 , pp. 5 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Actas de Sesiones de la Honorable Junta de Gobierno (AHJG) 199596. 63 Santiago: Departamento de Servicios Legislativos y Documentales, Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar
Actas de Sesiones de la Honorable Junta de Gobierno (AHJG) . 1974. Session 141, July 30: 9.Google Scholar
Actas de Sesiones de la Honorable Junta de Gobierno (AHJG) . 1975. Session 184, March 12: 3–8.Google Scholar
Actas de Sesiones de la Honorable Junta de Gobierno (AHJG) . 1976a. Session 280, September 3: 125–33.Google Scholar
Actas de Sesiones de la Honorable Junta de Gobierno (AHJG) . 1976b. Session 281, September 9: 22–28.Google Scholar
Alves, María, Helena, Moreira 1985. State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Craig L. 1997. Institutional Design, Military Rule, and Regime Transition in Argentina (1976–1983): an Extension of the Remmer. Bulletin of Latin American Research 16, 1: 327–50.Google Scholar
Arriagada Herrera, Genaro. 1985. La política militar de Pinochet. Santiago: n.p.Google Scholar
Barros, Robert. Forthcoming. Legality and Dictatorship in Pinochet's Chile: The Junta and Military Constitutionalism, 1973–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaustein, Albert P., Fortuna, Calvo Roth, and Robert, J. Luther 1980. Chile, 1973–1980. Constitutions of the Countries of the World ed. Blaustein, and Gilbert, H. Flanz. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Barahona Brito, Alexandra. 1997. Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1973. Associated-Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications. In Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future, ed. Alfred, Stepan. New Haven: Yale University Press. 142–76.Google Scholar
Carrasco Delgado, Sergio. 1981. Génesis de la constitución política de 1980. Revista de Derecho Público (Santiago) 29: 35–65.Google Scholar
Chehabi, H. E., and Juan, J. Linz, eds. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Pamela, and Arturo, Valenzuela. 1991. A Nation of Enemies: Chile Under Pinochet. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ensalaco, Mark. 1994. In with the New, out with the Old? the Democratising Impact of Constitutional Reform in Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies 26, 2: 409–29.Google Scholar
Fleischer, David V. 1983. Constitutional and Electoral Engineering in Brazil: A Double-edged Sword, 1964–1982. In Wahlen und Wahlpolitik in Lateinamerika, ed. Dieter, Nohlen. Heidelberg: Esprint.Google Scholar
Fontana, Andrés Miguel. 1987. Political Decision Making by a Military Corporation: Argentina, 1976–1983. Ph.D diss., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. 1969 1941. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1986. Political Processes in an Authoritarian Regime: The Dynamics of Institutionalization and Opposition. In Military Rule in Chile: Dictatorship and Oppositions, ed. Valenzuela, J. Samuel and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 144–83.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1995. Games of Intra-regime Conflict and the Breakdown of Authoritarianism. Paper presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. September.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta. September.Google Scholar
González, Mónica. 2000. Chile. La Conjura. Los mil y un días del golpe. Santiago: Ediciones B.Google Scholar
González, Encinar, José, Juan, Jorge, Miranda, Bolivar, Lamounier, and Dieter, Nohlen. 1992. El proceso constituyente. Deducciones de cuatro casos recientes: España, Portugal, Brasil y Chile. Revista de Estudios Políticos 76 (April–June: 7–27.Google Scholar
Gunther, Richard. 1980. Public Policy in a No-Party State: Spanish Planning and Budgeting in the Twilight of the Franquist Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guzmán, Jaime. n.d. Síntesis del resumen planteamientos altos mandos a la consulta D/L 527. D, Guzmán Papers. Fundación Jaime Guzmán, Santiago.Google Scholar
Heinberg, John Gilbert. 1932. Theories of Majority Rule. American Political Science Review 26, 3 (June): 452–69.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 1988. El ejército y la política en Chile de Pinochet. Su magnitud y alcances. Opciones 14: 89–136.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1975. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. In Handbook of Political Science, vol. III, ed. Fred, I. Greenstein and Nelson, W. Polsby. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. 175–411.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1992. La transición a la democracia en España en perspectiva comparada. In Transición política y consolidación democrática: España (1975–1986), ed. Ramón, Cotarelo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred, Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian. 1991. Misión Cumplida? Civil-Military Relations and the Chilean Political Transition. Latin American Politics and Society 33, 3 (Fall): 35–74.Google Scholar
Martínez-Lara, Javier. 1996. Building Democracy in Brazil: The Politics of Constitutional Change, 1985–95. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1977. Anoche en Chacarillas: S. E. indicó grandes lineas institucionales. July 10: 33, 37.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 1989. Public Choice II: A Revised of Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Franz. 1957. The Democratic and the Authoritarian State: Essays in Political and Legal Theory. ed. Herbert, Marcuse. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Polyarchies and the (Un)rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion. In The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, ed. Juan, E. Méndez, O'Donnell, , and Paulo, Sérgio Pinheiro. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 303–37.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1988. Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts. In Constitutionalism and Democracy, ed. Jon, Elster and Rune, Slagstad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1989. Military Rule in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
República de Chile. Secretaría de Legislación. 1974. Anteproyecto Estatuto de la Junta de Gobierno. In Decree-law 527, June 26. Decretos-leyes dictados por la honorable Junta de Gobierno, transcripciones y antecedentes. Santiago: Departamento de Servicios Legislativos y Documentales, Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Grez, Pablo. 1983. A dos años de la constitución. La Tercera (Santiago). March 13: 3.Google Scholar
Shain, Yossi, and Juan, J. Linz 1995. Between States: Interim Governments and Democratic Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1991. Discretion, Institutions, and the Problem of Government Commitment. In Social Theory for a Changing Society, ed. Pierre, Bourdieu and James, S. Coleman. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stammer, Otto. 1968. Dictatorship. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. David, Sils. New York: Macmillan 161–69.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1991. The Military in Power: The Consolidation of One-Man Rule. In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990, ed. Paul, W. Drake and Iván, Jaksić. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 21–72.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto. 1991. The Crisis of Legitimacy of Military Rule in the 1980s. In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, 1982–1990, ed. Paul, W. Drake and Iván, Jaksić. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 73–97.Google Scholar