No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transitioning Guerrillas: An Analysis of the Internal Cohesion of the Former FARC in Their Transit from War to Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2023
Abstract
The emergence of ex-rebels’ political parties after peace accords creates a vehicle for political reintegration, which in turn has positive effects on peace and democracy consolidation after war. However, many of these parties tend to break apart and disappear, elevating the risk of renewed cycles of political violence. In times of war, cohesion plays a pivotal role in maintaining the bonds among members of armed organizations. It empowers them to perform effectively even in the face of challenging conditions and continues to be a critical factor during postconflict transitions. By means of a quantitative analysis of former FARC guerrillas in Colombia, now part of a newly founded legal political party, we test whether ideology, organizational dynamics, or individual perceptions and motivations help to explain their levels of cohesion. Our results show that even if all dimensions add up to the observed cohesion levels, perceptions of internal democracy, and inclusion, are the most relevant. We argue that assistance to former rebels in their organizational reengineering efforts after war will help to reduce the risk of the negative effects of rebel party collapse.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © Universidad del Rosario, 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
Aalen, Lovise. 2019. The Revolutionary Democracy of Ethiopia: A Wartime Ideology Both Shaping and Shaped by Peacetime Policy Needs. Government and Opposition 55, 4: 653–68. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.54.Google Scholar
Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. 2016. National Government of Colombia–FARC-EP, November 24. https://www.peaceagreements.org/wview/1845.Google Scholar
Ahronson, Arni, and Cameron, James E.. 2007. The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample. Military Psychology 19, 1: 9–25. DOI: 10.1080/08995600701323277.Google Scholar
Albarracín, Juan, Corredor-Garcia, Juan, Milanese, Juan Pablo, Valencia, Inge H., and Wolff, Jonas. 2023. Pathways of Post-Conflict Violence in Colombia. Small Wars & Insurgencies 34, 1: 138–64. DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2022.2114244.Google Scholar
Alfieri, Valeria. 2016. Political Parties and Citizen Political Involvement in Post-Conflict Burundi: Between Democratic Claims and Authoritarian Tendencies. Civil Wars 18, 2: 234–53. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205566.Google Scholar
Allison, Michael E. 2006. The Transition from Armed Opposition to Electoral Opposition in Central America. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 4: 137–62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00368.x.Google Scholar
Allison, Michael E. 2016. The Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unit: The Long Collapse. Democratization 23, 6: 1042–58. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1159557.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316421925.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana, Fergusson, Leopoldo, Natalia Garbiras-Diaz, Garcia, Juana, Hiller, Tatiana, Polo, Lewis, and Weintraub, Michael. 2020. Actitudes de exintegrantes de las FARC-EP frente a la reincorporación. School of Government Working Papers 75. Bogotá: Los Andes University.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana, Kasfir, Nelson, and Mamipilly, Zachariah, eds. 2015. Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316182468.Google Scholar
Berdal, Mats, and Ucko, David H., eds. 2009. Reintegrating Armed Groups after Conflict: Politics, Violence and Transition. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203876497.Google Scholar
Berti, Benedetta. 2011. Armed Groups as Political Parties and Their Role in Electoral Politics: The Case of Hizballah. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34, 12: 942–62. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2011.621115.Google Scholar
Berti, Benedetta. 2019. Rebel Groups between Adaptation and Ideological Continuity: The Impact of Sustained Political Participation. Government and Opposition 54, 3: 513–35. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.44.Google Scholar
Berti, Benedetta, and Beatriz Gutiérrez. 2016. Rebel-to-Political and Back? Hamas as a Security Provider in Gaza between Rebellion, Politics and Governance. Democratization 23, 6: 1059–76. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1170008.Google Scholar
Blattman, Christopher. 2009. From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review 103, 2: 231–47. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055409090212.Google Scholar
Bliese, Paul D., and Halverson, Ronald R.. 1996. Individual and Nomothetic Models of Job Stress: An Examination of Work Hours, Cohesion, and Well-Being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 13: 1171–89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb02291.x.Google Scholar
Burihabwa, Ntagahoraho Z., and Curtis, Devon E. A.. 2019. The Limits of Resistance Ideologies? The CNDD-FDD and the Legacies of Governance in Burundi. Government and Opposition 54, 3: 559–83. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2019.2
Google Scholar
Carless, Sally A., and de Paola, Caroline. 2000. The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams. Small Group Research 31, 1: 71–88. DOI: 10.1177/104649640003100104.Google Scholar
Carron, Albert V., and Brawley, Lawrence R.. 2000. Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research 31, 1: 89–106. DOI: 10.1177/104649640003100105.Google Scholar
Carron, Albert V., and Brawley, Lawrence R.. 2012. Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research 43, 6: 726–43. DOI: 10.1177/1046496412468072.Google Scholar
Casey-Campbell, Milly, and Martens, Martin L.. 2009. Sticking It All Together: A Critical Assessment of the Group Cohesion-Performance Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 11, 2: 223–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers 56, 4: 563–95. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpf064.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher, Huang, Reyko, and Sawyer, Katherine M.. 2021. Voting for Militants: Rebel Elections in Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 65, 1: 81–107. DOI: 10.1177/0022002720937750.Google Scholar
Curtis, Devon E. A., and Sindre, Gyda M.. 2019. Transforming State Visions: Ideology and Ideas in Armed Groups Turned Political Parties—Introduction to Special Issue. Government and Opposition 54, 3: 387–414. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.51.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2016. Between Adaptation and Breakdown: Conceptualizing Party Survival. Comparative Politics 49, 1: 125–45. DOI: 10.5129/001041516819582919.Google Scholar
de Zeeuw, Jeroen, ed. 2007. From Soldiers to Politicians: Transforming Rebel Movements after Civil War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. DOI: 10.1515/9781626373495.Google Scholar
Dion, Kenneth L. 2000. Group Cohesion: From “Field of Forces” to Multidimensional Construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4, 1: 7–26. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7.Google Scholar
Dudouet, Véronique. 2012. Intra-Party Dynamics and the Political Transformation of Non-State Armed Groups. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 6, 1: 96–108. DOI: 10.4119/ijcv-2932.Google Scholar
Dyce, Jamie A., and Cornell, Jeff. 1996. Factorial Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among Musicians. Journal of Social Psychology 136, 2: 263–64. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714003.Google Scholar
Evans, Charles R., and Dion, Kenneth L.. 1991. Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research 22, 2: 175–86. DOI: 10.1177/1046496491222002.Google Scholar
Fergusson, Leopoldo, Natalia Garbiras-Díaz, Juana Garcia, Suescún, Cecilia, and Weintraub, Michael. 2022. ¿Cómo va la implementación del Acuerdo Final? Evidencia de una encuesta remota con exintegrantes de las Farc-EP. CEDE Working Paper 39. Bogotá: University of the Andes. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4263079.Google Scholar
Friedkin, Noah E. 2004. Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology 30, 1: 409–25. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625.Google Scholar
Gluecker, Andreas, Correa-Chica, Andrea, and López-López, Wilson. 2022. The FARC in Colombia: Collective Reintegration and Social Identity Transformation. Political Psychology 43, 2: 359–74. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12765.Google Scholar
Griffith, James. 2008. Institutional Motives for Serving in the U.S. Army National Guard: Implications for Recruitment, Retention, and Readiness. Armed Forces & Society 34, 2: 230–58. DOI: 10.1177/0095327x06293864.Google Scholar
Gully, Stanley M., Devine, Dennis J., and Whitney, David J.. 1995. A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence. Small Group Research 26, 4: 497–520. DOI: 10.1177/1046496495264003.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2014. Ideology in Civil War: Instrumental Adoption and Beyond. Journal of Peace Research 51, 2: 213–26. DOI: 10.1177/0022343313514073.Google Scholar
Hansen, Stig Jarle. 2018. Unity under Allah? Cohesion Mechanisms in Jihadist Organizations in Africa. Armed Forces & Society 44, 4: 587–605. DOI: 10.1177/0095327x17740086.Google Scholar
Heidar, Knut. 2006. Party Membership and Participation. In Handbook of Party Politics, eds. Richard, S. Katz and William, J. Crotty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 301–15. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608047.n26.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Daniel, and Smilde, David, eds. 2010. Bottom Up or Top Down? Participation and Clientelism in Venezuela’s Bolivarian Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hensell, Stephan, and Gerdes, Felix. 2017. Exit from War: The Transformation of Rebels into Post-War Power Elites. Security Dialogue 48, 2: 168–84. DOI: 10.1177/0967010616677713.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and Terry, Deborah J.. 2000. Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. Academy of Management Review 25, 1: 121–40. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791606.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2008. Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science 52, 2: 436–55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00322.x.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2016. Introduction to the Special Issue “From Bullets to Ballots: The Transformation of Rebel Groups into Political Parties.” Democratization 23, 6: 969–71. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1189905.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John, and Batta, Ana. 2011. Swords into Plowshares: The Organizational Transformation of Rebel Groups into Political Parties. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44, 4: 369–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.004.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John, and Marshall, Michael. 2015. Candidate Recruitment and Former Rebel Parties. Party Politics 21, 4: 591–602. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813487125.Google Scholar
Iturbide, Luis María, Elosua, Paula, and Yanes, Félix. 2010. Medida de la cohesión en equipos deportivos. Adaptación al español del Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Psicothema 22, 3: 482–88.Google Scholar
Jarstad, Anna K., and Sisk, Timothy D., eds. 2008. From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511755859.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., and Adam Kocher, Matthew. 2007. How “Free” Is Free Riding in Civil Wars? Violence, Insurgency, and the Collective Action Problem. World Politics 59, 2: 177–216. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2007.0023.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver. 2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316671887.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver, and Nussio, Enzo. 2018. Explaining Recidivism of Ex-Combatants in Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62, 1: 64–93. DOI: 10.1177/0022002716644326.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William J., eds. 2006. Handbook of Party Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608047.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 2007. The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed Forces. A Response to Guy Siebold. Armed Forces & Society 33, 4: 638–45. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X07301445.Google Scholar
Laengle, Sigifredo, Loyola, Gino, and Tobón-Orozco, David. 2020. Bargaining under Polarization: The Case of the Colombian Armed Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 57, 4: 551–63. DOI: 10.1177/0022343319892675.Google Scholar
Langfred, Claus W. 2000. The Paradox of Self-Management: Individual and Group Autonomy in Work Groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 5: 563–85. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5%3C563::aid-job31%3E3.0.co;2-h.Google Scholar
Leana, Carrie R. 1985. A Partial Test of Janis’ Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making. Journal of Management 11, 1: 5–18. DOI: 10.1177/014920638501100102.Google Scholar
Lindsley, Dana H., Brass, Daniel J., and Thomas, James B.. 1995. Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Review 20, 3: 645–78. DOI: 10.2307/258790.Google Scholar
Liu, Shelley X. 2022. Control, Coercion, and Cooptation. How Rebels Govern after Winning Civil War. World Politics 74, 1: 37–76. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887121000174.Google Scholar
Lyons, Terrence. 2005. Demilitarizing Politics: Elections on the Uncertain Road to Peace. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. DOI: 10.1515/9781588269676.Google Scholar
Lyons, Terrence. 2016a. From Victorious Rebels to Strong Authoritarian Parties: Prospects for Post-War Democratization. Democratization, 23, 6: 1026–41. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1168404.Google Scholar
Lyons, Terrence. 2016b. The Importance of Winning: Victorious Insurgent Groups and Authoritarian Politics. Comparative Politics 48, 2: 167–84. DOI: 10.5129/001041516817037745.Google Scholar
Maley, William. 2018. Transition in Afghanistan. Hope, Despair and the Limits of Statebuilding. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315143071.Google Scholar
Manning, Carrie. 2007. Party-Building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique. Democratization 14, 2: 253–72. DOI: 10.1080/13510340701245777.Google Scholar
Manning, Carrie, and Smith, Ian. 2016. Political Party Formation by Former Armed Opposition Groups after Civil War. Democratization 23, 6: 972–89. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1159556.Google Scholar
Manning, Carrie, and Smith, Ian. 2019. Electoral Performance by Post-Rebel Parties. Government and Opposition 54, 3: 415–53. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.34.Google Scholar
Marshall, Michael Christopher, and Ishiyama, John. 2016. Does Political Inclusion of Rebel Parties Promote Peace after Civil Conflict? Democratization 23, 6: 1009–25. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1192606.Google Scholar
McCoun, Robert J., Kier, Elizabeth, and Belkin, Aaron. 2006. Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat? An Old Question with an Old Answer. Armed Forces & Society 32, 4: 646–54. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X05279181.Google Scholar
McCoun, Robert J., and Hix, William H.. 2010. Unit Cohesion and Military Performance. In Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy: An Update of RAND’s 1993 Study, eds. Bernard D. Rostker, Susan Hosek, and John D. Winkler. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. 137–65. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1056.html.Google Scholar
McFee, Erin, and Rettberg, Angelika, eds. 2019. Excombatientes y acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP en Colombia. Balance de la etapa temprana. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. DOI: 10.30778/2019.39.Google Scholar
Mitton, Kieran. 2008. Engaging Disengagement: The Political Reintegration of Sierra Leone’s Revolutionary United Front. Conflict, Security & Development 8, 2: 193–222. DOI: 10.1080/14678800802095377.Google Scholar
Mitton, Kieran. 2009. Engaging with Disengagement: The Political Integration of Sierra Leone’s Revolutionary Front. In Reintegrating Armed Groups after Conflict: Politics, Violence and Transition, eds. Mats Berdal and David H. Ucko. London: Routledge. 172–98.Google Scholar
Moon, Bruce E. 2009. Long Time Coming: Prospects for Democracy in Iraq. International Security 33: 4: 115–48. DOI: 10.1162/isec.2009.33.4.115.Google Scholar
Mudrack, Peter E. 1989. Defining Group Cohesiveness: A Legacy of Confusion? Small Group Behavior 20, 1: 37–49. DOI: 10.1177/104649648902000103.Google Scholar
Mullen, Brian, and Copper, Carolyn. 1994. The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration. Psychological Bulletin 115: 210–27. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210.Google Scholar
Muriaas, Ragnhild L., Rakner, Lise, and Aagedal Skage, Ingvild. 2016. Political Capital of Ruling Parties after Regime Change: Contrasting Successful Insurgencies to Peaceful Pro-Democracy Movements. Civil Wars 18, 2: 175–91. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205563.Google Scholar
National University. 2017. Caracterización de comunidad FARC-EP. Resultados generales. Censo socioeconómico UN-CNR 2017. Bogotá: National University of Colombia.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Desirée, and Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi. 2011. Revisiting an Elusive Concept: A Review of the Debate on Spoilers in Peace Processes. International Studies Review 13, 4: 606–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01080.x.Google Scholar
Nussio, Enzo, and Ugarriza, Juan E.. 2021. Why Rebels Stop Fighting: Organizational Decline and Desertion in Colombia’s Insurgency. International Security 45, 4: 167–203. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00406.Google Scholar
Nussio, Enzo, and Camilo Quishpe, Rafael. 2019. La fuerza centrífuga del posconflicto: las FARC-EP entre la unidad y la desintegración. In Excombatientes y acuerdo de paz con las FARC-EP en Colombia, eds. Erin McFee and Angelika Rettberg. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. 163–81. DOI: 10.30778/2019.46.Google Scholar
Oliver, Laurel W., Joan Harman, Elizabeth Hoover, Hayes, Stephanie M., and Pandhi, Nancy A.. 1999. A Quantitative Integration of the Military Cohesion Literature. Military Psychology 11, 1: 57–83. DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1101_4.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Charles A., and Caldwell, David F.. 1985. The Impact of Normative Social Influence and Cohesiveness on Task Perceptions and Attitudes: A Social Information Processing Approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology 58, 3: 193–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00195.x.Google Scholar
Ozer, Emily J., Best, Suzanne R., Lipsey, Tami L., and Weiss, Daniel S.. 2003. Predictors of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Symptoms in Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 129, 1: 52–73. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo, and Trinidad, Mario. 1990. Modelos de partido: Organización y poder en los partidos políticos. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Pearce, Justin. 2020. From Rebellion to Opposition: UNITA’s Social Engagement in Post-War Angola. Government and Opposition 55, 3: 474–89. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.36.Google Scholar
Pepitone, Albert, and Kleiner, Robert. 1957. The Effects of Threat and Frustration on Group Cohesiveness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54, 2: 192–99. DOI: 10.1037/h0049040.Google Scholar
Piper, William E., Myriam Marrache, Renee Lacroix, Richardsen, Astrid M., and Jones, Barry D.. 1983. Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups. Human Relations 36, 2: 93–108. DOI: 10.1177/001872678303600201.Google Scholar
Rettberg, Angelika, and Moreno Martínez, Daniela. 2023. Rastreando la transición de guerrilla a partido político en Colombia: ¿Cómo va el partido Comunes? Estudios Políticos (Medellín) 66: 230–54. DOI: 10.17533/udea.espo.n66a10.Google Scholar
Ruiz Rodríguez, Leticia M. 2006. Coherencia partidista: la estructuración interna de los partidos políticos en América Latina. Revista Española de Ciencia Política 14: 87–114.Google Scholar
Rufyikiri, Gervais. 2017. The Post-Wartime Trajectory of CNDD-FDD Party in Burundi: A Facade Transformation of Rebel Movement to Political Party. Civil Wars 19, 2: 220–48. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2017.1381819.Google Scholar
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim. 2003. African Political Parties: Evolution, Institutionalisation and Governance. London: Pluto Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt18fs78h.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661862.001.0001.Google Scholar
Schubiger, Livia Isabella, and Zelina, Matthew. 2017. Ideology in Armed Groups. PS: Political Science and Politics 50, 4: 948–52. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096517001056.Google Scholar
Siebold, Guy L. 2007. The Essence of Military Group Cohesion. Armed Forces and Society 33, 2: 286–95. DOI: 10.1177/0095327x06294173.Google Scholar
Sindre, Gyda Marås. 2016a. In Whose Interests? Former Rebel Parties and Ex-Combatant Interest Group Mobilisation in Aceh and East Timor. Civil Wars 18, 2: 192–213. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205564.Google Scholar
Sindre, Gyda Marås. 2016b. Internal Party Democracy in Former Rebel Parties. Party Politics 22, 4: 501–11. DOI: 10.1177/1354068814550436.Google Scholar
Sindre, Gyda Marås, and Söderström, Johanna. 2016. Understanding Armed Groups and Party Politics. Civil Wars 18, 2: 109–17. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205559.Google Scholar
Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi. 2008. When Rebels Change Their Stripes: Armed Insurgents in Post-War Politics. In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, eds. Anna, K. Jarstad and Timothy, D. Sisk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 134–56. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511755859.006.Google Scholar
Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi. 2021. The Legacy of a Revolution that Never Happened: The Post-War Politics of Former Rebel Party RUFP in Sierra Leone. Government and Opposition 56, 2: 245–59. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2019.23.Google Scholar
Söderberg Kovacs, Mimmi, and Hatz, Sophia. 2016. Rebel-to-Party Transformations in Civil War Peace Processes 1975–2011. Democratization 23, 6: 990–1008. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1159558.Google Scholar
Söderström, Johanna. 2011. Politics of Affection: Ex-Combatants, Political Engagement and Reintegration Programs in Liberia. PhD diss. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Söderström, Johanna. 2013. The Concept of Political Reintegration in Current Peace Research. Department of Government Working Paper 2013:5. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Söderström, Johanna. 2015. Peacebuilding and Ex-Combatants: Political Reintegration in Liberia. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315762807.Google Scholar
Söderström, Johanna. 2016. The Resilient, the Remobilized and the Removed: Party Mobilization among Former M19 Combatants. Civil Wars 18, 2: 214–33. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205565.Google Scholar
Sprenkels, Ralph. 2019. Ambivalent Moderation: The FMLN’s Ideological Accommodation to Post-War Politics in El Salvador. Government and Opposition 54, 3: 536–58. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.37.Google Scholar
Stokes, Joseph, Fuehrer, Ann, and Childs, Laurence. 1983. Group Members’ Self-Disclosures: Relation to Perceived Cohesion. Small Group Behavior 14, 1: 63–76. DOI: 10.1177/104649648301400105.Google Scholar
Sundberg, Ralph, and Ruffa, Chiara. 2021. Measurements for the Institutional Cohesion Dimension of the Standard Model of Military Group Cohesion. Military Psychology 33, 2: 92–103. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1897491.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R., and Strassberg, Donald S.. 1986. The Effects of Sex Composition on Cohesiveness and Interpersonal Learning in Short-Term Personal Growth Groups. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 23, 2: 267–73. DOI: 10.1037/h0085608.Google Scholar
Themnér, Anders. 2011. Violence in Post-Conflict Societies: Remarginalization, Remobilizers and Relationships. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203814598.Google Scholar
Thomson, Andrew. 2020. The Credible Commitment Problem and Multiple Armed Groups: FARC Perceptions of Insecurity during Disarmament in the Colombian Peace Process. Conflict, Security & Development 20, 4: 497–517. DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2020.1794139.Google Scholar
Tuncel, Ozlem, and Manning, Carrie. 2022. Building Democracy after War? Post-Rebel Electoral Parties and the Construction of Stable Party Systems. Party Politics 29, 6: 1039–50. DOI: 10.1177/13540688221124877.Google Scholar
Ugarriza, Juan E. 2009. Ideologies and Conflict in the Post-Cold War. International Journal of Conflict Management 20, 1: 82–104. DOI: 10.1108/10444060910931620.Google Scholar
Ugarriza, Juan E., Cotrina, Andrés, and Sequera, Natalia. 2013. ¿Qué se negocia en los procesos de paz? Agendas y factores de éxito 1989–2012. Análisis Político 26, 77: 153–73.Google Scholar
Ugarriza, Juan E., and Nussio, Enzo. 2017. The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation: An Experimental Approach. Political Psychology 38, 1: 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12324.Google Scholar
Ugarriza, Juan E., and Craig, Matthew J.. 2013. The Relevance of Ideology to Contemporary Armed Conflicts: A Quantitative Analysis of Former Combatants in Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57, 3: 445–77. DOI: 10.1177/0022002712446131.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2014. OG 4.30: Reintegration. In UN Operational Guide to the Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards. Geneva: UN Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Resource Centre. 157–181. https://www.unddr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Operational-Guide-to-the-IDDRS-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Verweijen, Judith. 2018. Soldiers without an Army? Patronage Networks and Cohesion in the Armed Forces of the DR Congo. Armed Forces & Society 44, 4: 626–46. DOI: 10.1177/0095327x17740096.Google Scholar
von Einsiedel, Sebastian, Malone, David M., and Pradhan, Suman. 2012. Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139021869.Google Scholar
Wiegink, Nikkie. 2013. The Forgotten Sons of the State: The Social and Political Positions of Former Government Soldiers in Post-War Mozambique. Colombia Internacional 77: 43–72. DOI: 10.7440/colombiaint77.2013.03.Google Scholar
Wilson, Alice. 2020. Ambiguities of Radicalism after Insurgents Become Rulers: Conflicting Pressures on Revolutionary State Power in Western Sahara’s Liberation Movement. Government and Opposition 55, 4: 617–33. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.50.Google Scholar
Wittig, Katrin. 2016. Politics in the Shadow of the Gun: Revisiting the Literature on “Rebel-to-Party Transformations” through the Case of Burundi. Civil Wars 18, 2: 137–59. DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2016.1205561.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth J. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808685.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, Stephen J., and Lowe, Charles A.. 1988. Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology 128, 4: 547–58.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, Stephen J. 1991. Nonequivalent Associations between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology 131, 3: 387–399. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1991.9713865.Google Scholar
Ugarriza et al. supplementary material
Ugarriza et al. supplementary material
File
55.5 KB