Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. Dennett and the Changing Face of Free Speech

Abstract

It was the policy of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) during the 1920s to contest only those obscenity regulations that were “relied upon to punish persons for their political views.” So stated a 1928 ACLU bulletin, reiterating a position to which the organization had adhered since its formation in 1920. For the majority of the ACLU's executive board, “political views” encompassed the struggle for control of the government and the economy, but not of the body. The early ACLU was not interested in defending avant-garde culture, let alone sexual autonomy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
weinrib@uchicago.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Leigh Ann Wheeler , “Rescuing Sex from Prudery and Prurience: American Women's Use of Sex Education as an Antidote to Obscenity, 1925–1932,” Journal of Women's History 12 (2000): 173–96 (describing opposition by Reverend William Sheafe Chase)

Martha Minow , “We, the Family: Constitutional Rights and American Families,” Journal of American History 74 (1987): 959–83

John M. Craig , “‘The Sex Side of Life’: The Obscenity Trials of Mary Ware Dennett,” Frontiers 15 (1995): 145–66

Constance M. Chen , The Sex Side of Life: The Story of Mary Ware Dennett (New York: New Press, 1996)

David E. Bernstein , Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform [University of Chicago Press, 2011])

Geoffrey R. Stone , “The Origins of the Bad Tendency Test: Free Speech in Wartime,” Supreme Court Review (2002): 411–53

Gerald Gunther , “Learned Hand and the Origins of the Modern First Amendment Doctrine: Some Fragments of History,” Stanford Law Review 27 (1975): 719–73

Christopher Capozzola , Uncle Sam Wants You: World War I and the Making of the Modern American Citizen (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)

Vincent Blasi , “Holmes and the Marketplace of Ideas,” Supreme Court Review (2004): 146, 6–13

Laura Weinrib , “From Public Interest to Private Rights: Free Speech, Liberal Individualism, and the Making of Modern Tort Law,” Law & Social Inquiry 34 (2009): 187223

Emily Zackin , “Popular Constitutionalism's Hard When You're Not Very Popular: Why the ACLU Turned to Courts,” Law and Society Review 42 (2008): 367–95

Michael Kent Curtis , Free Speech, “The People's Darling Privilege”: Struggles for Freedom of Expression in American History (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000)

Kristin Luker , “Sex, Social Hygiene and the Double-Edged Sword of Social Reform,” Theory and Society 27 (1998): 601–34

Felix Frankfurter , “The Business of the Supreme Court at October Term, 1929,” Harvard Law Review 44 (1930): 140, 19, n. 22

Paul Vanderham , James Joyce and Censorship: The Trials of Ulysses (Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 1998)

Carmelo Medina Casado , “Legal Prudery: The Case of Ulysses,” Journal of Modern Literature 26 (2002): 9098

Recent Cases: Obscenity, Test of Obscene Literature,” Harvard Law Review 48 (1935): 519–20

Leo M. Alpert , “Judicial Censorship of Obscene Literature,” Harvard Law Review 52 (1938): 4076

Hazel C. Benjamin , “Lobbying for Birth Control,” Public Opinion Quarterly 2 (1938): 4860

Nadine Strossen , “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?” Duke Law Journal (1990): 484573

Robert W. Gordon , “Critical Legal Histories,” Stanford Law Review 36 (1984): 57125

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×