Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T03:23:32.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Localizing Global Rules: Public Participation in Lawmaking in Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

John Gillespie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the pace of legal harmonization in developing East Asian states increases to comply with international trading treaties, a disjunction is forming between legislative expectations and everyday business practices. Evidence considered in this article suggests that Vietnam is no exception. State control over public discourse favors the interests of business elites, while small-scale entrepreneurs struggle to make their views known. Lawmakers exposed to this asymmetric discourse rarely adjust global legal rules to suit the transactional requirements of small-scale entrepreneurs. As a consequence, the largely imported commercial legislative framework is increasingly reflecting the interests of business elites. The article concludes that for the state to develop a more inclusive regulatory regime, it needs to relax its control over public deliberation and give small-scale entrepreneurs more opportunities to convey local precepts and practices to lawmakers.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , Summer 2008 , pp. 673 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach Quoc An, and Thi Van Anh. 2002. BTA's Impact on Vietnam's Current Legal System. Vietnam Law and Legal Forum 8 (91): 16–18.Google Scholar
Baxter, Hugh. 1998. Autopoiesis and the “Relative Autonomy” of Law. Cardozo Law Review 19:1987–2090.Google Scholar
Black, Julia. 2000. Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4): 597–614.Google Scholar
Black, Julia. 2002. Regulatory Conversations. Journal of Law and Society 29 (1): 163–96.Google Scholar
Boisot, Max. 1995. Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce, and Halliday, Terrence. 2006. Negotiating Globalization: Global Scripts and Intermediation in the Construction of Asian Insolvency Regimes. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (3): 521–84.Google Scholar
Chiba, Masaji. 1997. Japan. In Asian Legal Systems, ed. Tan, Pho-Ling, 82–123. Sydney: Buttersworth.Google Scholar
CIEM. 1998. Danh Gia Tong Ket: Luat Cong Ty va Kien Nghi Nhung Dinh Huong Sua Doi Chu Yeu [Review of the Current Company Law and Key Recommendations for Its Revision]. Hanoi: CIEM.Google Scholar
Dau Tu. 2006. Automobile Sales Plunge as High Taxes Bite. http://www.intellasia.com/news/english/articles/business/111140345.html (accessed April 1, 2007).Google Scholar
De Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2001. The Import and Export of Law and Legal Institutions: International Strategies in National Palace Wars. In Adapting Legal Cultures, ed. Nelken, David and Feest, Johannes, 241–53. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dinh Gia Trinh. 1961. May Y Kien Dong Gop Ve Van De Bao Ve Phap Che [Some Opinions on the Protection of Legality]. Tap San Tu Phap 3:20–24.Google Scholar
Dixon, C. 2004. State, Party, and Political Change in Viet Nam. In Rethinking Viet Nam, ed. McCargo, Duncan, 15–26. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Do, Sang, and Hanh, Dui. 1986. Ve De: Lam Xa Hoi Chu Nhgia bang Nha Nuoc [On the Use of the State to Realise Socialist Collective Mastery]. Hanoi: Nha Xuat Ban Phap Ly [Law Publishing House].Google Scholar
Duong Dang Hue. 2005. Unified Enterprise Bill and the Fulfilment of Investment Relation Development Commitments in the BTA. Vietnam Law and Legal Forum 11 (132): 2–6.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2000a. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2000b. Discursive Democracy vs. Liberal Constitutionalism. In Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association, ed. Saward, Michael, 78–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam. 2005. SOEs, Law and a Decade of Market-Orientated Socialist Development. In Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese Renewal and Chinese Reform, ed. Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip, 239–66. Canberra, Australia: Asia-Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Frankenburg, Gunther. 1985. Critical Comparisons: Re-Thinking Comparative Law. Harvard International Law Journal 26:411–56.Google Scholar
Gainsborough, Martin. 2002. Changing Political Economy of Vietnam: The Case of Ho Chi Minh City. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Gerber, David. 2004. Authority Heuristics. Chicago Kent Law Review 79 (3): 959–76.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2002. Transplanted Company Law: An Ideological and Cultural Analysis of Market-Entry in Vietnam. International Comparative Law Quarterly 51:641–72.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2006. Transplanting Commercial Law Reform: Developing a “Rule of Law” in Vietnam. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ellen. 1995. The Origins of Western Legal Tradition: From Thales to Tudors. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten. 2003. A Frame in the Fields: Policy Making and the Reinvention of Politics. In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, ed. Hajer, Maarten and Wagenaar, Hendrik, 88–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halpin, Andrew. 2001. Reasoning with Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Hannah, Joe. 2005. Civil-Society Actors and Action in Vietnam: Preliminary Empirical Results and Sketches from an Evolving Debate. In Towards Good Society: Civil Society Actors, The State, and The Business Class in Southeast Asia—Facilitators of or Impediments to a Strong, Democratic, and Fair Society?, ed. Heinrich Böll Foundation, 239–66. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Carolyn. 2005. Participatory Storylines and their Influence on Deliberative Forums. Policy Science 38:1–20.Google Scholar
Hoang Hai Van. 2004. Bo Tu Phap, UBND TPHCM de Nghi: Giu Nguyen Muc Thue Thu Nhap Doanh Nghiep 10% Cho Lien Doanh Phu My Hung [Ministry of Justice and Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee Propose that Corporate Income Tax Rate Remain at 10 Percent for Phu My Hung Joint Venture]. Thanh Nien, February 7, p 3.Google Scholar
Hy Van Luong. 1994. The Marxist State and Dialogic Re-Structuration of Culture in Rural Vietnam. In Indochina: Social and Cultural Change, ed. Elliott, D., Luong, H. V., Kiernan, B., and Mahoney, T., 79–117. Claremont, CA: Keck Center of International and Strategic Studies, Claremont McKenna College.Google Scholar
Industry Magazine. 2003. Hiep Hoi Doanh Nghiep Dien Tu Nhung Bai Hoc Kinh Nghiem [Lessons Experienced by the Electronic Enterprise Association]. Industry Magazine, May 25. http://irv.moi.gov.vn/News/PrintView.aspx?ID=13196 (accessed March 21, 2007).Google Scholar
Jensen, Erik. 2003. The Rule of Law and Judicial Reform: The Political Economy of Diverse Institutional Patterns and Reformers’ Responses. In Beyond Common Knowledge, ed. Jensen, Erik and Heller, Thomas, 345–63. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeong, Yeonsik 1997. The Rise of State Corporatism in Vietnam. Contemporary Southeast Asia 19 (2): 152–72.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2003. Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving In and Around the Socialist State. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2001. An Approach for Analyzing State-Society Relations in Vietnam. Sojourn 16 (2): 1–29.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koh, David. 2000. Wards of Hanoi and State-Society Relations in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. PhD diss., Department of Political and Social Change, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Le Cam. 2002. Cai Cach He Thong Toa An Trong Giai Doan Xay Dung Nha Nuoc Phap Quyen Viet Nam [Reform the Court System to Build Up a Law Based State in Vietnam]. Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap Phap 4:21–27.Google Scholar
Le Dang Doanh. 1999. Enterprise Law—A Must for Further Development of Multi-Sectorial Economy. Vietnam Law Legal Forum 56:11–13.Google Scholar
Le Minh Thong. 2003. Mot So Van De Phap Ly Cua Qua Trinh Toan Cau Hoa [Some Legal Issues on Globalisation] Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap 1:65–75.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. The Unity of the Legal System. In Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, ed. Teubner, Gunther, 12–25. London: Kluwers.Google Scholar
Marr, David. 1994. The Vietnam Communist Party and Civil Society. Unpublished paper, presented to the Vietnam Update Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, November 11.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard. 1997. The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms. Michigan Law Review 96 (2): 338–33.Google Scholar
McMillan, John, and Woodruff, Christopher. 2000. Private Order under Dysfunctional Public Order. Michigan Law Review 98:2421–58.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2005. Update of Major Activities Conducted by Various Projects. Biannual Conference and Legal Partnership Conference, Da Nang, Oct. 12.Google Scholar
Nguyen Chi Dung. 2006. “Van Dong Hanh Lang” Trong Hoat Dong Lap Phap Cac Nuoc va Xu Huong O Viet Nam [“Lobbying” in Global Lawmaking and the Trend in Vietnam]. Tap Chi Nghiem Cuu Lap Phap 9 (83): 51–57, 60.Google Scholar
Nguyen Cuu Viet. 1997. “Nhan Thuc Ve Nguyen Tac Tap Quyen va Vai Khia Canh” Trong Van De Ve Quan He Giua Lap Phap va Hanh Phap O Nuoc Ta Hien Nay [Some Perceptions of the Principles of “Unity of Power” and a Few Aspects of the Relationship Between the Legislative and Executive of Bodes of Vietnam Today]. Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 2:44, 47–49.Google Scholar
Nguyen Dang Dung. 2001. Phap Luat Khong Chi La Cong Cu Cua Nha Nuoc [Law Is Not Only the Instrument of the State]. Tap Chi Nghien Cuu Lap Phap 11:53–57.Google Scholar
Nguyen Hong. 2002. Policies Given Modest Thumbs up at Forum. Vietnam Investment Review May, 3–4.Google Scholar
Nguyen Ngoc Lam. 2007. Vai Tro Cua Hiep Hoi Doanh Nghiep Doi Voi Su Phat Trien Cua Doanh Nghiep va Doanh Nhan [Roles of the Enterprise Association Towards Development of Businesses and Businessmen]. To Chuc Nha Nuoc 1:30–31.Google Scholar
Norland, Irene, Ngoc, Tran, and Tuyen, Nguyen Dinh. 2003. Dealing with Donors: The Politics of Vietnam's Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy. Policy Paper 4, Institute of Development Studies. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Office of Government. 2003. Study Report to Improve the Quality of Laws and Ordinances Drafted by the Government to be Submitted to the NA and the NA Standing Committee, unpublished report. Working Delegation No. 804, Hanoi, December.Google Scholar
Oquendo, Angel R. 2002. Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2): 189–226.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2002. China's Long March towards Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pham Duy Nghia. 2000. Phap Luat Thuong Mai Viet Nam Truoc Thach Thuc Cua Qua Trinh Hoi Nhap Linh Te Quac Te [Commercial Law Faces the Challenges of International Economic Integration] Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 6:9–24.Google Scholar
Pham Duy Nghia. 2001. Mot So Anh Huong Truc Tiep Cua Qua Trinh Hoi Nhap Kinh Te Khu Vuc va The Gioi Doi Voi Phap Luat Viet Nam [Some Direct Influences of the World's and Regional Economic Integration into Vietnamese Law]. Tap Chi Nghien cuu Lap Phap 2:3–7.Google Scholar
Pham Duy Nghia. 2005. Confucianism and the Conception of the Law in Vietnam. In Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform, ed. Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip, 76–90. Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Pham Duy Nghia. 2006. Nguy Co Cua Chung Ta: Mot Nha Nuoc Thieu Nang Luc Phan Ung [Our Danger: A State of Limited Pensiveness]. Nha Nuoc va Phap Luat 6:3–5.Google Scholar
Pham Van Chuc. 2002. Dang Co Chang Mot Toan Cau Hoa Cho Moi Nguoi [Is There Now a Globalization for all People?]. Tap Chi Cong San 12:33–36.Google Scholar
Pham Van Dong. 1977. Strengthen the Party Leadership, Carry Out the State's Managerial Functions and Develop the People's Right to Ownership in Order to Successfully Fulfil the 1977 State Plan. Ho Chi Minh City Domestic Service, January 22, 4. Trans. FIBIS East Asia Daily Service (16), January 25, K9, K11-K13.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behavior. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Quinn, Brian. 2002. Legal Reform and Its Context in Vietnam. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 15 (2): 219–91.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Michael. 1999. Picking Positivism Apart: Stanley Fish on Epistemology and Law. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 8:401–48.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol. 1998. The “New” Law and Development Movement in the Post-Cold War Era: A Vietnam Case Study. Law & Society Review 32 (1): 93–135.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Shawn 2005. The Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy: Setting the Research Agenda. Acta Politica 40 (2): 212–24.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 2000. Universality and Truth. In Rorty and his Critics, ed. Brandom, Robert, 1–25. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sai Gon Giai Phong. 2004. Cloudy Reasoning in Phu My Hung Tax Row. Sai Gon Giai Phong, August 21, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News Services, Aug. 25, 14–15.Google Scholar
Salomon, Matthieu. 2007. Power and Representation at the Vietnamese National Assembly: The Scope and Limits of Political Doi Moi . In Vietnam's New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam, ed. Balme, Stephanie and Sidel, Mark, 198–216. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Santos, Alvaro. 2006. The World Bank's Uses of the “Rule of Law” Promise in Economic Development. In The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Apraisal, ed. Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro, 253–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 1993. Law Reform in Vietnam: The Complex Transition from Socialism and Soviet Models in Legal Scholarship and Timing. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 11:221–59.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 1997. Generational and Institutional Transition in the Vietnamese Communist Party. Asian Survey 37 (5): 481–506.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 2002. Analytical Models for Understanding Constitutions and Constitutional Dialogue in Socialist Transitional States: Re-Interpreting Constitutional Dialogue in Vietnam. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 6:42–89.Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jonathon. 2003. Business Associations and Policy-Making in Vietnam. In Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving In and Around the Socialist State, ed. Kerkvliet, Benedict, Heng, Russell, and Koh, David, 62–109. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Tan Duc. 1999. Bo Dieu 164 Cho Doanh Nhan Yen Tam Lam An [Revoke Article 164 to Make Businessman Feel Assured in Doing Their Business]. Thoi Bao Kinh Te Sai Gon [ Saigon Economic Times ], May 20, 10–11.Google Scholar
Taussig, Markus. 2005. Domestic Companies in Vietnam: Challenges for Development of Vietnam's Most Important SMEs. The William Davidson Institute, Policy Brief No 34. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunter. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunter. 1998. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences. Modern Law Review 61 (1): 11–32.Google Scholar
Thanh Nien. 2004a. Draft Competition Law Flawed: Professor. Thanh Nien, Nov. 9, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia New Service, Nov. 10, 7.Google Scholar
Thanh Nien. 2004b. Direct Democracy for Public Issues. Thanh Nien, Aug. 19, 3. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News, Nov. 21, 19.Google Scholar
Thanh Nien. 2007. US Investors Struggle. Thanh Nien, Mar. 11, 4. Trans. Development Vietnam, Intellasia News Service Mar. 13, 12.Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle. 1995. Mono-Organizational Socialism and the State. In Vietnam's Rural Transformation, ed. Kerkvliet, Benedict and Porter, David, 39–64. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tran Huu Huynh, and Dau Anh Tuan. n.d. Draft Report Business Associations. Hanoi: VCCI. (The report is on file with the author.)Google Scholar
UNDP. 1999. Completion of Viet Nam's Legal Framework for Economic Development. UNDP Discussion Paper No. 2. Hanoi: self-published.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun., ed. 1997. The Study of Discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process, 1–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Thong. 1999. Tong Ke Khai Nha Dat: Phan Dinh Chua Ro Quan Ly Hanh Chinh Cua Nha Nuoc [House and Land Declaration: Unclear Determination of State Administration]. Thoi Bao Kinh Te Sai Gon [Saigon Economic Times], July 29, 37.Google Scholar
VCCI. 1993. Strengthening the Organization and Activities of the Chamber of Commerce. Vietnam Investment Review August: 11.Google Scholar
VNS. 2007. Steel Producers Feeling Threatened by Chinese Imports. Viet Nam News, Mar. 12, 15.Google Scholar
Vo Kim Son. 2006. Nen Hanh Chinh Theo Huong “Dan Biet, Dan Ban, Dan Lam, Dan Kiem Tra” La Mot Nen Hanh Chinh Minh Bach, Cong Khaki, Mo Cua Void Dan [National Administrative Reform Influenced by the “People Know, Discuss, Do, and Supervise”]. To Chuc Nha Nuoc 7:17–18.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil. 2002. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review 65 (3): 317–59.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1992. The Civil Society Argument. In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, ed. Mouffe, Chantal, 89–107. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Watson, Allen. 1978. Comparative Law and Legal Change. Cambridge Law Journal 37:313–36.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and Interpretive Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Poststructuralism in Dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:389–412.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2005. Vietnam Development Report: Governance. Hanoi: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. n.d. EAP Sustainable Development on the Urban Fringe Vietnam Country Study. (unpublished report) First Stage Report, Hanoi: World Bank.Google Scholar